| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
badandy400 (0)
|
Well, one things worth mention is that the site you recommend is a $50 per month site. That price is absolutely absurd considering the content. $50 for 1.5 MBit video of something that is not truly unique will not sit well with most of us. Many of use have been feeling it when we pay $30 for a site!
I understand the download limit, and split site issues though. Those are two of my largest NO-NOs for websites.
A review of the site would be nice, but TBP may not jump on that simply because the cost makes it a site that the majority is less likely to join and they need to focus on sites that are most likely to help people.
On that note. Why not simply write a review yourself. You already know the ups and downs of both sites so why suggest that someone else spends their time and money when you already have.
|
10-25-08 08:07pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
You say: "By now TBP has been notified about the existense of 'g-queen' and hopefully we shall see a review of it within a reasonable time. "
I haven't seen any "notification" from you about the site. Only it's mention here. In future, if you want a site listed, please email the URL to "support [at] pornusers [dot] com"
In the meantime, I've passed this one to the TBP Editors.
|
10-26-08 05:26am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
lurifax (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - Khan :
An email was sent to the admin. @ TBP before my comments were posted.
|
10-26-08 11:06am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lurifax (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
Firstly I want to apologize for not having noticed before that ‘www2.g-queen.com’ has a daily download limit of 1.5GB (the last item on F.A.Q.), which makes the site less interesting: No information is given about the video clips sizes, which makes one doubt if it is possible to download the lot (presently 121 of them) within a month.
That apart, (I quote “…something that is not truly unique…”) maybe you would be generous enough to let me know where else one may find a plentitude of Shaved Japanese girls?
I have seen enough amateurish drivel (“reviews”) to let myself into that business. It is, in my opinion, better left to the professionals. Besides – they are paid for it.
|
10-26-08 06:07pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - lurifax :
If you look at the logo for this site is states "porn reviews by the people." Point being that it is by the people and not by professionals. Of course there will be some lame reviews and some others who take more pride in it and do a much better job.
As for where to find shaved Japanese girls, I really could not say because it is not something I have gone after. The point being that shaved girls is not an unusual niche American, European, Oriental or otherwise. Getting a Japanese shaved girl would be no more difficult to get an American shaved girl and does not warrant such costs.
A recent posting was about Ass Smoothies. That is unique, I have not seen that done in many places. It does not command $50 even though if that is something you truly wanted you would have to pay that.
I honestly do not know how many shaved Japanese sites are out there, but it is certainly more than the amount that feature ass smoothies.
I might suggest looking for this niche from sites that actually are Japanese. It would look a little strange and perhaps be strange to read if translation does not work correctly, but I am sure you can find many sites that way.
I just do not feel that this site has the niche cornered to the point that it can charge whatever it wants.
|
10-26-08 06:22pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #3 - lurifax :
As an aside ...
The site has now been added. You may enter your remarks at
https://www.pornusers.com/review/gqueen/
|
10-27-08 06:19am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
lurifax (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Khan :
Thanks, it is a start...but did you got the price right?
|
10-27-08 06:42pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #7 - lurifax :
The editors list the price based on what they find when they visit the site. I show they currently list the site as:
Monthly: $29.95 (recurring)
Multi-Mo: $54.95 (3 months, non-recurring)
|
10-28-08 04:39am
Reply To Message
|
9
|
lurifax (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Khan :
There has been a mix-up.
The prices given by the editors are the prices for 'lbfm' - not 'g-queen'!
The correct prices are on page http://www2.g-queen.com/eng/join.html
|
10-28-08 07:53am
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Khan (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #9 - lurifax :
That was my bad ... I grabbed the price from the LBFM listing rather than the one they entered for g-queen.
But, as it happens, there was a typo... $39 recurring at $44 when it should have been $49 recurring at $44
So, while I made the mistake in which prices I posted, your prompt did let us catch the typo. Thanks
I'm told the price is correct now.
|
10-28-08 08:29am
Reply To Message
|
