| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
badandy400 (0)
|
"Not real HD in 1920x1080"
How many sites have resolutions that high yet? I am a huge fan of high resolution and I can tell you there are not that many, at least that offer good material. Besides, is it necessary for the videos to be 1080? They need to look good, bot be big. Videos at 480 can look fabulous, while the same video at 1440 might look worse actually. It is all about what they with what they have. Just like a cheap digital camera with 8 MP, it will look no better than the other model by the same maker that is 3 MP because it uses the same CCD but they just crammed more pixels on it.
But in your defense, this site does need to do a bit of work to the video quality. Good looking HD would be a great addition and would certainly get my credit cards attention.
|
12-10-08 04:56pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
arangon (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
well I've been a member at FTVGirls, 18closeup, givemepink, asstraffic and these sites all have amazing high def clips in 1080 with bitrates as high as 8000Kb/s. But what was my biggest problem was that Nubiles' videos were so... unsurprising
|
12-10-08 05:05pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Nubiles Captain (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - arangon :
Send me your username and I will be more than happy to give you a refund.
|
12-10-08 06:37pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
For me it is all about the babe quality with Nubiles.net. They seemed to have put some attention to the "engagement" level of the models, because the first time I joined, I found a fair amount of material where the models looked bored or pained - models that other sites got great material from. I haven't found that to be the case since. I rejoined when Jessie's stuff was being posted a few weeks ago - I'm a big fan of Jessie at facedownassupuniversity.com and I really liked her material at Nubiles.net - there was one schoolgirl vid that was awesome. I like their stuff pretty well. It's not the highest quality on the net. They get their stuff from a variety of sources. But they always have new girls coming. They give multiple updates every day. It's a well-done site with good navigation and search functions and so long as the babes are hot, it's quite a nice site to see girls that you're not going to see absolutely everywhere, though if you see girls everywhere else, it's fun to see that they've got early material here, frequently.
|
12-10-08 07:30pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
ace of aces (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Nubiles Captain :
this is a good word. always happy to see that webmasters are interested in the oppinion of members. good job!
|
12-11-08 10:30am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Nubiles Captain (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
badandy400,
I think the quality of video is a great debate to have. Our HD WMVs come out of the camera at 1440 x 1080 in size and we skrink it down to 1280 x 720 (16:9 format)and encode them at 3500 kb/s. Other sites are shooting at 1440 x 1080 then they BLOW Up the size to 1920 x 1080, its not a true 1920 x 1080, its blown up to that size but at least thats 16:9 and not 4:3.
Now as an example this guy is saying FTV girls. If you look at his sample page he has a 8000kb/s sample wmv to download. I tested it out. The footage is 1440 x 1080 what the camera shoots but he doesn't change the size down to 1280 x 720 screen or up to 1920. So he is relying on the video player to resize it. In my windows media player resizes to fit my screen. But in my other video players this sample is squished because he encoded it at 4:3 resolution size.
Now as example if you look at our hd wmv sample of a recent girl, say Candice. You will see the quality is actually much better then this FTV sample. Less artifacting, less blurryness. Compare them side by side. Candice vs. his 8000kbs sample on his tour.
We can look at blowing it up to 1920 x 1080, not sure it will look any better. Most cameras are not shooting at this level, we have a few that do but not enough to be universal. We can increase the bitrate higher but why is our 3500kb/s less artifacting then FTVs 8000 kb/s and then the files will be extremely HUGE. Maybe its just a issue of lighting and camera operator and camera model. We have many photographers so tons of levels of quality where FTV is consistent as its one guy.
Most porn producers are using Sony FX1s or the Canon Equivalent. Those shoot at 1440 x 1080. We have a few Sony EX1 which shoot at 1920x1080 footage. I think technology needs to improve some, however I am going to look into testing some new codecs and experiments.
|
12-12-08 02:01pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - Nubiles Captain :
When did you guys start posting videos at 720? I do not recall of hand seeing any that high, but it has been a while since I looked through my Nubiles video collection.
Thank you for the reply and information. Informed customers are happy customers. We do not like unpleasant surprises.
I do not agree with artificially increasing bit rate or resolution without some hardcore processing first. If it is 8 MBit it better look look a hell of a lot better than a 3 or 4 Mbit video. Everyone here knows I do not mind large files, what's another terabyte or so, but if I can have a 500 MB file that looks just as good or even better than a GB file I am definitely all for it. That is more bang for my buck and yours.
I would not focus on making that stats of the videos seem more impressive on the tour pages. Rather, make the videos look absolutely stunning and they will speak for themselves!
|
12-12-08 05:38pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Nubiles Captain (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #7 - badandy400 :
Badandy,
We have been doing the 1280 x 720 videos for about 2 years now. We work with 30-40 different photographers so it has taken awhile to get them all HD cameras. Almost all new content is now offered in this form. If you check our tour and the recent girls profiles, Candice, Isabella example you can download the HD WMVs samples. I would be interested in your opinion of the quality of these.
|
12-12-08 06:19pm
Reply To Message
|
