| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
badandy400 (0)
|
You are dead on with respects to the site's navigation and look. 10 year old kids do better than this site with their Myspace pages! They need to wake up and realize that this will not cut it and it does not do justice to the good content they produce.
|
12-11-08 04:24pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mr smut (0)
|
Hi Jeffrey,
are you sure that there's at least one girl with cup size C featured on ALS Scan? I think that B is the maximum because they have ALS Angels for the busty models :-)
Pissing is in fact a big niche. I started a poll on All Over 30 for the most favourite fetish and peeing is #1 even with those that love mature girls!
As for the number of pics per set it's not 100% correct for the new shoots. I'd say that around 200 is a normal number but there's a lot of sets having +300 pics and even some with more than 400 pics for one series.
Thanks for your thoughts on ALS Scan.
Cheers,
Eddie
|
12-11-08 10:00pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
Whoa! 10-year-olds do better?
Yes! That makes the point. I agree that the navigation at ALS needs improvement, though it used to be worse! At least now you can go to the other parts of the site from within galleries and vids, at least from the newer ones. And they have update archives that go back longer than 1.5 months, which used to be the case.
One thing they should do is just put all of a model's gallery links on the model's page. There, they can indicate whether it's redone stuff or not.
Another thing is the page widths. I happen to like 1024x768, but their gallery thumbs always extend past the right side of the screen, even the most recent stuff.
ALS has always had a problem in making their site too complicated to navigate. It was really much worse than it is now, but they ought to think about taking the next step.
|
12-12-08 01:54am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Jeffrey99 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mr smut :
You might be right, anything above a B might be on ALS Angels. If they'd just merge both sites into one, then it'd probably be alot better. Seems they are just trying to milk people out of money.
|
12-12-08 06:57am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
mr smut (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Jeffrey99 :
I wouldn't say so because both sites are running for many years now and Alex surely has a lot of expenses. Anyhow this was a thought I also had this morning after I've read your review ... why not merge both sites together or give at least long term members like me the chance to get the second site for a few bucks more. I'd be happy to spent some extra $ to be a member of ALS Angels too :-)
|
12-12-08 09:37am
Reply To Message
|
