Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
Have to admit, this is as close as I've seen to a blatant website advertisement here in a while. Let's see, a member over 6 months ago, no site facts or specifics, and your "cons" section make it sound like there's hardcore boy/girl content on this site when there's not. I'd go on but I'm not going to waste my time.
|
02-23-09 06:31pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
badandy400 (0)
|
While I will agree it is a good site, it certainly is not the Holy Grail as you make it seem. Any why is concern about HIV a con for the site? I do not wish HIV on anyone, but it would hardly hurt me if the somehow it were transmitted between a few of the girls, and it certainly has nothing to do with the content of the site.
Basically what it comes down to is this review is advertisement for the site. Although I am not sure why? The site has decent reviews and scores here. I would not think they would need to resort to this sort of spamming. Perhaps this person receives some sort of referral bonus for new members, but if someone where to join through PU than PU would get that kick back?
Anyway, not a trustworthy review. The site worth joining, but a reader must be the judge of that based off of other reviews.
|
02-23-09 10:41pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Whizz (Unverified)
|
REPLY TO #2 - badandy400 :
I am not trying to advertise the site, I have no affiliation with the site. This is a subjective opinion - but how could it be any other? I am sure you will not be disappointed to hear that I will keep my opinions to myself in future.
In hindsight, I should have scored it 95, and added the following cons:-
Navigation needs improving.
Site looks dated and probably needs a re-vamp.
If you don't like this particular genre of pornography then you will probably not like the site.
|
02-24-09 02:06am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Whizz :
There is no need for hindsight, just go back and change what you feel needs to be changed.
|
02-24-09 11:16am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Whizz :
I agree with Badandy, if you go back and make some changes we'll cut you some slack being this is your first review.
|
02-24-09 12:05pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Goldfish (0)
|
I'll come to Whizz's defense and say if any site has ever come close to a 100% score, Sapphic Erotica is one of them.
I've been a member several times. In later visits I was sorry to say the quality of the girls and the sex portrayed in the movies has degraded a bit. Conversely, other sites have stepped up and delivered some quality content that either matches or has surpassed SE.
The site as a whole though is still solid and has an impressive catalog of movies. Adding the search engine and the HD movies has also improved the site.
|
02-24-09 07:10pm
Reply To Message
|