Comment Replies (2)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
It's about time all these were removed IMO. If anyone wants to subscribe to this oragnisation after all this, you deserve all that you get, which judging by the one reliable review about this site, isn't a lot.
|
03-10-09 07:26am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
badandy400 (0)
|
That is not true either. We tend to ignore or question the extreme low scoring reviews when reasoning is not given in reasonable amounts. No site is perfect and no two people are the same, so of course there will be differences. However, most of us can agree on roughly how good a site is. If I give a site an 85, there is likely going to be someone else who gives it an 83 or 87 based on something they liked or disliked that I am impartial to. We usually stay in the same area though, and everyone who is trusted gives valid reasons and explains why those reasons are important to them.
I checked out the link you provided. Image this, a T-girl getting nice compliments from other T-girls and T-girl wannabes. That is about as useful as asking a chain smoker what they feel about raising the taxes on cigarettes. Of course the opinions will be biased! I believe you will have come up with a better argument than that.
I enjoy many sites, but do not give them 100's and at times not even in the 90's. This may be because they are lacking elsewhere. It looks as if the site we are discussing updates only weekly. The site I gave a 100 to updates five times per day! Perfection does not keep us waiting.
Had you come on here and given 85-90, I do not think anyone would have thought much of it. But 100's right out of signing up just do not float well. Particularly when Khan has already told us that there have been issues with people creating multiple accounts to artificially boost the site.
|
03-10-09 09:12am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
