| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
badandy400 (0)
|
Mbaya. Check out the numbers he lists for how he rates each site. He actually lists Lietuva Girls as having better quality. Nudesportvideos seems to gain some ground back by updating more and being more unique.
If the sites are not all that similar then why the fuss? Maybe I am missing something here. We all tend to review sites little differently base on what the site is. I guess I just do not see your point yet, please fill us in with your thinking on this topic?
|
04-30-09 10:05pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - badandy400 :
Lietuvagirls has videos that simply are not worth watching. The quantity of videos that are worth keeping is miniscule. The photos are just barely ok. Nudesportvideos is a site with a lot more quantity of videos that are of much higher quality. On originality alone it is a significantly better site. The hotness factor of the two cannot be compared. No way could I ever rate the two sites with nearly identical scores. Anyone is free to disagree with me or my ratings, but one site I rate as 90 and the other as generously 70. My major gripe is that NSV was not rated at least an 80 after praising it in his review. I probably would have said nothing if he had not, or had found fault with it. If you like a site, give it an appropriate score.
|
05-01-09 01:13am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
badandy400 (0)
|
REPLY TO #2 - mbaya :
I see what you are saying. Where the reviews done at a similar time? Also worth noting is that one is a full review and the other is an express review. I do not know if that makes any difference though.
I am interested to here a response from Spencer. But then again, this is why we are given a site for our reviews and they have a site for theirs.
|
05-01-09 02:01pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
mbaya (Disabled)
|
The dates are 4/1/9 and 4/25/9. Before I joined PU I felt the professional reviwers on TBP were more to be trusted than the amateurs on PU. The longer I am on PU, the more I realize how wrong I was.
|
05-02-09 12:18am
Reply To Message
|
