Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
We need to subpoena the PU business records to make sure these perps are legally in the United States. If not in the United States legally (or they are residing in some pinko country outside of the Red-White-and-Blue borders, we need to round them up in a secret kidnapping attack (authorized by the highest powers of the land), throw them into some foreign jail where they do not have constitutional rights, and waterboard them into confessing whatever crimes they may have committed. Right on for the American way of life, which protects its citizens against immorality. Americans for America, is what I always say, whenever I am asked if I am a patriotic son of a gun.
|
09-17-09 12:14am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Fine by me, as long as they wear tight-fitting, colorful body suits with capes.
|
09-17-09 01:30am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Capn (0)
|
Is this for real?
Which country's Government is doing this?
|
09-17-09 12:51pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
Oh sure, I always preferred the "Lion King" to all the filth one finds on the Internet these days .. if one looks hard enough!
|
09-17-09 01:08pm
Reply To Message
|
5
|
Capn (0)
|
Lion King! That has nude animals in it!!! :00
Cap'n ;0)
|
09-17-09 01:17pm
Reply To Message
|
6
|
turboshaft (0)
|
"Definitely not"! I just wish it weren't true. :(
To me, real obscenity is like the bullshit I saw in my local paper yesterday: a blurb about a freshman (and he's only 28) U.S. congressman posing in a $1700 suit for GQ. Disgusting. Every month thousands of Americans are still losing their jobs, and their part of the "best health care system in the world" along with it, and this asshole has the gall to prance around for a fashion magazine. But hey, it's not like congress has been getting much done anyway.
|
09-17-09 01:31pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Capn (0)
|
It sounds like your Government has some weird priorities! :0/
|
09-17-09 01:43pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
turboshaft (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - Capn :
Well, unless you live here (the U.S.) you probably don't know the half of it. In fact, even if you do live hear you still probably don't know the half of it -- ignorance really can be bliss!
|
09-17-09 01:48pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Wittyguy (0)
|
I had to vote "yes" just because I didn't think anyone else would (apparently someone else came in with a pity vote besides me).
|
09-17-09 02:28pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
dracken (0)
|
Sigh...some laws are beyond my powers of understanding.
|
09-17-09 02:31pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
The thing's 4 years old. Started in 2005 under the Bush Administration.
Hey, wonders never cease, do they?
I wonder if they were dispatched to New Orleans in the aftermath of Katrina. I mean, that was about the most obscene spectacle of THAT year.
|
09-17-09 02:52pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #11 - Drooler :
You speak right out of my heart, Drooler! There are worse obscenities in this world than the so-called "obscenities" our representatives are forever trying to get rid of. Unnecessary wars are obscene, starving children are obscene, abused wives are an obscenity, people losing their homes because of ill health are an obscenity.
Going after vices (drugs, alcohol, prostitution, sexual material etc.) that have existed in one form or the other since the beginning of time, vices that will never be eradicated as long as humanity exists, for some reason seems a lot more popular with politicians than actually helping someone get out of socially deplorable conditions.
Reading that last paragraph of mine, I think there should be a law against convoluted sentences! But I'm too lazy to rephrase it, so I hope you can make sense of it. :-)
|
09-17-09 03:15pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - Capn :
I know, Capn. I put my hand over my wife's eyes every time one of those naked critters appeared. Ladies should be spared sights like that.
|
09-17-09 03:17pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Capn (0)
|
REPLY TO #13 - messmer :
That is exactly the gentlemanly behaviour I would have expected.
A very considerate action! :0)
|
09-17-09 03:20pm
Reply To Message
|
15
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #12 - messmer :
Here, here! And your sentence checked out OK by me.
|
09-17-09 04:07pm
Reply To Message
|
16
|
pat362 (0)
|
I'm all for preventing children from accessing porn but this is not what these people are doing. If you truly want to go agains't people attacking the morale fiber of America then target all those tablid magazines. They do far more damage to the Youth of America than any porn film. I'm quite curious to know how much money has been spent up until now.
|
09-17-09 05:13pm
Reply To Message
|
17
|
james4096 (Suspended)
|
Sometimes I think I'd welcome a bunch of law enforcement types kicking down my door and taking away my porn. That's about the only thing that could stop my porn addiction.
|
09-18-09 03:38am
Reply To Message
|
18
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
Yes, I am definitely happy to help foot the bill to let the government intrude into peoples' personal lives.
|
09-25-09 09:55am
Reply To Message
|