| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I remember you had a similar request about a different site. I voted for that one. Did that site ever get a review from TBP?
I'll second the motion this time, as well.
|
01-21-10 03:52am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
To submit a nomination for a new review, you have to enter the "secret words", to ensure that this is done by a real person, instead of a computer-automated program. I see more and more of that at different sites. It indicates a lack of trust. Are there really that many people spamming PU/TBP that it makes sense to require the "secret words" program?
Some of the programs make it difficult for a human to read the secret words, because the letters/numbers are distorted so much.
|
01-21-10 04:05am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Denner (0)
|
Oh, yes - it's about time to get an TBP-review of Janas own site - she's something else!
Was so lucky and got those three blowjob/handjob-videos downloaded...
Still looking forward to a real hc/bg video/photoset of Jana - and maybe more.
|
01-21-10 06:59am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Rick (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #2 - lk2fireone :
Trust me, we're not a fan of the captcha verification either... but it seems to be the most reliable when we need it.
For nominations, we tried it for a few weeks without the captcha and got a ton of spam in the nominations comments. This isn't an area where we monitor closely, so it was necessary to put it back.
BTW, the words are tough to make out sometimes. Some may know already, but even though there's 2 words, you only have to type 1 of the two words in the field to verify successfully.
p.s. Thanks for the nominations, we'll get this one reviewed soon.
|
01-21-10 08:23am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - Rick :
Rick, thanks for the explanation on capcha and the tip on using it.
This was only my second nomimation for a site review. I've been a member of PU for over 1 year now, so I figure I'm not included in the spam group.
Could you give me a reason or explanation why spammers would enter nominations or comments? It seems totally senseless to me. Or is it some kind of grafitti-type thing, where spammers just spam everything in sight as an exercise in power/artistic freedom/spite/who-the-hell-knows?
|
01-21-10 08:48am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Rick (Suspended)
|
REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :
Spammers go after backlinks for SEO benefit (google) plus the minor benefit of the few eyeballs that hit those pages. I don't know the technical nature behind it, but once they flag an open posting form, it can get ugly.
BTW, eventually we will have a log-in engine at TBP and of course registered users won't ever have to be inconvenienced with it. This will take time though. :(
|
01-21-10 09:00am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Capn (0)
|
Whilst I do not have favourites as such, this lady is always very easy on the eye & always a pleasure to see.
A review of her personal site would be most welcome.
Cap'n. :0)
|
01-21-10 09:18am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :
Thanks, man! And that other site was Showcase Eufrat, which, judging from the feedback, ought to be called "Showcase Crap Site."
|
01-21-10 01:19pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #3 - Denner :
Thanks, buddy!
|
01-21-10 01:20pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
You probably already have a quorum, but sure, Jana's active, seems quite committed to this site - to the point that she divested herself of a do-nothing webmaster a few months ago - and I'd be very interested in seeing a review.
I don't see enough reviews of solo-girl sites at TBP and I'm probably more a fan of those types of sites than most here at PU.
|
01-21-10 05:40pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #10 - PinkPanther :
That's an interesting tidbit about the do-nothing webmaster. (There are plenty of them around.) How did you come across this info? I'm curious.
Seems sometimes that anyone who can say "HTML" in the right order can get a job with people who have no idea what fun they're in for.
|
01-21-10 06:01pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
PinkPanther (0)
|
REPLY TO #11 - Drooler :
It wasn't any secret info or anything. Jana was really pissed about the fact that there were hardly any updates for quite a while and she knew that she had turned in a lot of material that wasn't getting posted to the site. Apparently the guy figured he could do nothing and claim that he was helping her out by parsing material out very slowly over time. As a former member of her site, I was receiving her update e-mails promoting upcoming cam shows, her new DVD's, auctions, little diary bits and for a couple of months she was just going off on this guy and how pissed she was. I guess she had a contract with him and had to negotiate a settlement with him and then was gleefully writing about how now she would be able to do all the updates that she wanted, etc.
She's also doing a lot more boy/girl action on the site - mainly bj's. It was interesting because guys that had worked on the site for a while - and a number of long-term members - were urging her in her forum to stop doing any boy-girl action - instead she started doing more - lol.
I like Jana - she's a cool woman.
|
01-21-10 11:27pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
anyonebutme (0)
|
If you really like Jana, jump on in! Otherwise give it a pass.
Don't expect 4000px imagesets and 1080p videos, but what they do give, if you're a big fan of Jana the site is great.
|
01-22-10 11:04am
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I see that the new review is coming out now in less than a week. Thanks to all!
|
03-07-10 01:35pm
Reply To Message
|
