Review Replies (11)
|
Replies to the user review above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Good review. Your description sounds just like it is one of those sites that has that certain look. So many of those teen sites have that look. You would think it would be relatively easy to make attractive girls look attractive, but somehow they manage to do just the opposite.
|
08-01-10 07:39pm
Reply To Message
|
2
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - Tree Rodent :
Thanks for the kind words. This site (and you get many other sites in the network with a membership) has some really attractive teen girls. The videos are all hardcore. But they leave me cold. I wish it was otherwise, because there are some lovely girls, but they are not attractive in the videos, and in the pictures they are even less attractive. That is me. I know there are PU members who find these videos hot, but I find them boring: hardcore fuck and suck, without any erotic or arousing quality. A real shame, considering some of the girls are really attractive.
|
08-01-10 07:59pm
Reply To Message
|
3
|
slutty (0)
|
Good review,
Did you ever get access to 18firstsex.com as a bonus, I got an email from these guys a while ago saying it was a new bonus site, but I guess my membership expired before I could get access. Just curious if you did, and if it is any good.
|
08-01-10 11:55pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - slutty :
As you know, there are a number of different sites in the network. And they slice and dice the sites that you get access to, depending on which site you join through, and when you join.
I joined through teenmegaworld a few weeks ago.
I do not have access to 18firstsex.com.
I was hoping to get access to fuckstudies as part of my membership, because I saw some clips from that site that seemed nice. But I did not get access to fuckstudies either.
I've been a member of the network before. But it will a good while before I rejoin, after this membership runs out.
Sorry I can't give you any information on either of those sites (fuckstudies or 18firstsex).
I mentioned elsewhere that it's irritating that you don't know exactly which sites you will get access to before you join. They really should give you access to all the sites in the network. The way it currently works is a little stupid and irritating, because you always want what you don't get (if you know the sites that are available). Just human nature. :)
|
08-02-10 01:20am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #3 - slutty :
Oops. I just realized that I became interested in fuckstudies because I read your review on the site. So I guess I don't need to tell you about that site. Lol. :)
|
08-02-10 01:43am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
slutty (0)
|
REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :
So you didn't even get access to fuckstudies when you joined this site? That is weird because I got access to teenstarsonly when I joined fuckstudies... Definitely a bit of a confusing network - I am pretty sure they give you fewer bonus sites if you join with the discount.
|
08-02-10 11:10am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - slutty :
You do get a one less bonus site when you join with the PU/TBP discount. But I did not think it was worth the extra $10.00 to join without the discount.
Joining with the bonus thru teenmegaworld I got:
$19.95/30 days membership
17 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
Checking the join page, non-bonus teenmegaworld, it states:
$29.95/30 days membership
18 "exclusive" sites
16 non-exclusive sites
And like I said, it is difficult to tell exactly what sites you get access to before you sign up. Once your membership is activated, and you enter one of the sites, you can then tell which sites you have access to.
So I was a little disappointed to find I did not get access to fuckstudies. I joined through the teenmegaworld site. Possibly, if I had joined through the teenstarsonly site, I might have gotten access to fuckstudies. Their bonus system is a mystery, and even the webmaster apparently has to check with somebody to be able to know exactly which sites you get access to with each site membership. And that is probably not taking into account the reduction in sites from the PU/TBP membership discount.
So is it worth it to email the webmaster asking for the specific information? When there are so many combinations?
Why can't they just make it easy on the customer, and give all the sites with any membership? Would it really cost them anything, after considering the added good will on the part of the customers, who won't be angry or disappointed because their membership did not include some network site they wanted as part of the membership?
Apparently, they give access to most of the sites in the network with any subscription. So why not give access to all the sites?
Maybe, in the back of their minds, they are considering a bonus loyalty program, where they will add a few more sites to your membership if you stay a member longer than 1 or 2 months. But I don't think they actually have that program in place at this time.
|
08-02-10 12:17pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
Check out the Denner review for Teen Mega World, which is over a year old so doesn't have the latest sites on it, but it does go a good way to explaining how complicated it all is. I'm confused. Don't know why these sites don't just have 2 or 3 sites instead of 25 small ones all with the same look and content, or at least similar look and content.
|
08-02-10 03:36pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #8 - Tree Rodent :
My theory is that by splitting the contents into 30+ sites, it makes the contents appear much bigger than if the contents were split into 1 or 2 or 3 sites. So it's basically a marketing decision, I think. Also, with the contents spread into many small sites, they can offer access to the sites through each separate site, and through a group offer which is through teenmegaworld, which is not a single site but a mixture of most of the separate sites in the network. Somebody might be drawn/interested in a solo teen site, a boy-girl site, an old-young site, etc. etc. And they could offer a loyalty program that includes more sites in the membership the more months a person stays a member.
So it's basically a marketing strategy, I think.
But the site layout and design for each site is basically the same, from the sites I've seen, as far as navigation and having a video with an accompaning photoset, and the different options for downloading are the same from site to site.
I was a member of teenmegaworld before, and Denner's review is accurate. The navigation has not improved at all: it's very basic, and the search is very poor as well. I agree with Denner's review, except my score is much lower, because my taste in videos is different, and I have a slow ISP download speed (about 160 Kb/s), which makes downloading a single video take about 2 hours (in high quality), and I can't play the videos in flash mode, because my ISP speed isn't fast enough (the flash video stutters and stops, instead of playing). I mentioned the cons in my review, which is why I gave the site a lower score than Denner, who gave it a 90.
If you are into gonzo teen sex, then the network has a lot to offer. I personally want something with a "prettier", more glamorous look, where the models are attractive (they do have attractive young girls, but they are not shown to advantage), and there is more than just a meat factory fuck-suck sex. I would like some tenderness, or some slight story behind the sex to give it some meaning, or where the girls are really excited and enjoying the sex. The girls and the guys could be shovelling snow or mud for all the excitement and heat and enjoyment they are showing in many of the sex clips. I mean, the guys look like the sex is a chore, like they are working for a paycheck, instead of actually enjoying sex with some really cute girls.
|
08-02-10 05:20pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Tree Rodent (0)
|
REPLY TO #9 - lk2fireone :
Yes I totally agree with you reasoning behind why they do it. For me there comes a point where I just get sick of it and join a different site because I want an easy time with an easy customer friendly site. I don't mind 3-6 different sites but some of these places take it too far.
Good review that I think tells everyone what sort of content to expect.
|
08-02-10 06:34pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
slutty (0)
|
REPLY TO #7 - lk2fireone :
It is definitely a frustrating network setup, my guess is they think by holding back a few of the sites they will get people to join those on a seperate occasion. The last time I joined the "network" I looked at all their sites to see which was offering the best collection of sites. Sort of stupid, I agree.
|
08-02-10 08:07pm
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
