Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Backroom Casting Couch (0)

Newbie 80* dracken (0) 08-16-10  11:10pm                TRUST USER?   YES (0), NO (0) Status: Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review). Pros: - about 130 videos and a new one every Tuesday evening. Unfortunately the videos are all different sizes, quality and can either be mpg or wmv, some of them only one or the other. - some seriously hot girls. Look through the tour to see some very cute girls, and if you look on the porn tubes you can usually find one or two previews to his videos (only the highlights, for the good stuff you have to join) - the scenes seem very unscripted, it's just a dude with a camera and a girl. Which means that sometime he runs around setting stuff up or he chats with the girl while she lubes herself, if you like that kind of real, pierre woodman-like stuff that you'll love this site. If you prefer perfect light, professional zoom-ins and generally more mainstream stuff, this might put you off. On the other hand seeing a girl hold a camera and then seeing how it shakes as she cums (and either they are incredible actors or they really cum) makes this site very unique. Cons: - Download speeds can be slow at times. I got anywhere from 50kb to 900, no clue why or how. - Whole site is very amateur-ish, just like the content. There is one video were he even says he accidentally forgot to turn on one camera so we just get one angle. I thought it was funny, but other people might feel cheated out. -Some girls only do solo (only one or two, but still a tag system would have been nice) Unfortunately the site has no search and the descriptions are not always very clear. I remember for one girl he says he can't believe she does anal, well she doesn't :) -Some girls are not first time on video. Nicole Ray and Chastity are both professional models and I bet a few more of the girls are too, kinda shame really since the amateurs are so much cutter. There is one read head soccer mom who tries anal and her scene is incredibility hot. - No photos, really a shame. - No bonus sites. I understand a year or two back the site came in a package, no more Bottom Line: This site has two very big bonuses going for it. Hot amateur girls. Many of the models are truly shy and a bit uncomfortable and it shows, also the guy is not a huge douche like other porn models. I think I mentioned this before but he closely resembles Pierre Woodman, he is there to convince these girls to have sex on camera, but he won't abuse them more than they want to be abused and that makes the whole video a lot more enjoyable. Going back to that hot read-head soccer mom I mentioned before, she tries anal and is clearly uncomfortable and he immediately stops the scene instead of pushing it. The whole moment along with the look on her face lets you know this is real, unscripted sex, but with much better camera work than a truly amateur scene. Oh and there is also the twitter, which the guy uses to posts future interviews and ask for feedback, very nice usage of the web 2.0 media. Unfortunately, here is where the good things stop and I have to mention the very plain site design, the lack of bonus features, the lack of a decent search button and the fact that we don't get photo-sets. For the same price I pay here I can get a Nubiles or Little Mutt subscription and get three times the content. It's true those sites don't have the interviews and the whole "real" setting, but then again you can join woodmanX and get similar content and a lot more of it (then again woodman is more expensive and not all scenes are in English). So, the bottom line? I love the site, but I can see how many people wouldn't feel the same way. It lacks in features and if you don't LOVE the pov, interview, reality kinda videos these will leave you feeling a bit cheated. I for one will download a bunch of the videos and probably join back in a year or so for the updates, in the mean time I am following the twitter feed and will enjoy that incredibly hot read-head (did I mention here already ? I feel like I did :). Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (12) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 slutty (0) Good review, totally agree on most of your points. I never had any problems with download speeds as long as I used a manager, the in-browser speeds were always really slow for me. Decent site, but they should really include their other site as a package deal. 08-16-10  11:38pm Reply To Message 2 bjajlt362 (0) Great Review. Like I've said before I'm not sure I get the twitter thing, but some of the girls on this site are hotties. I've seen a couple of the videos from this site and I'm seriously considering joining. My only issue is since I'm a POV porn fan he seems to cut away from that a whole lot, if only he made it so you could choose your camera angle I'd be a happy porn viewer. 08-17-10  01:30am Reply To Message 3 SteveO (0) Thank you for this review. I think I might check this site out and I will have to keep an eye out for that soccer mom! 08-17-10  07:57am Reply To Message 4 pat362 (0) How many of the girls do anal on the site? It's really unclear. I checked and this is from the same guys that do exploitedcollegegirls That other site is alos very much POV and amateurish in look. 08-17-10  02:43pm Reply To Message 5 slutty (0) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 : There really isn't that much anal that I recall on this site. I imagine it is very similar to exploitedcollegegirls, although I have never been a member there. Did a quick survey of the 24 scenes I still have on this computer, and the only one I saw with any anal is the scene dracken spoke of in his review. A lot of the scenes progress in more or less the same fashion - inteview, gets girl to strip, BJ, doggy on desk or couch, missionary, finish, a little chit chat, the end. If anal is what you desire, I'd look elsewhere. 08-17-10  08:56pm Reply To Message 6 Capn (0) I quite like the interview & strip videos. As you said though..... A shame there are no photos too. :0( Cap'n :0/ 08-18-10  11:54am Reply To Message 7 pat362 (0) REPLY TO #5 - slutty : The amount of anal is a make or break deal for me. I noticed that quite a few of the girls that appear on this site also appear on exploitedcollegegirls.com. I can't tell if it's the same guy since he's never in any of the shot except for his d..k, but I suspect it's him. The POV angles in exploited were a big drawback because he often shot from an unusual angle and you saw the performer from the side. Not too mention that he talks all the time. You're having sex with a gorgeous girl. Shot the F..k Up. 08-18-10  06:23pm Reply To Message 8 slutty (0) REPLY TO #7 - pat362 : I would assume the same guy, and he does it with two camera's - one on a tripod, one POV (either the guy or the girl holds it), the camerwork is by no means excellent, but it isn't super poor either. Like I said if anal is your thing, I'd join a different site, I assume based on my sample that the amount of anal on this site is not very significant - and it is not a large site to begin with. 08-18-10  10:38pm Reply To Message 9 John1 (0) Now the videos, are they full scenes only or are they also divided into smaller clips for download? Thank you for the excellent review! 08-28-10  09:40am Reply To Message 10 dracken (0) REPLY TO #9 - John1 : It's all full scene, no smaller clips. Also someone asked about anal scenes and there aren't that many, maybe 10 or so. It's hard to tell, because you have to download everything and watch the whole scene, before you know. 08-30-10  09:06pm Reply To Message 11 dracken (0) REPLY TO #4 - pat362 : To be honest not that many girls do it and quite a few are just quick tries where the girl gets "pumped" once or twice and wants to change to something else. Since there is no search function you have to view each scene yourself to figure things out and sometimes the description is misleading (I partially joined becuase I wanted to see Chastity doing anal, she doesn't although the description hints at that) I'd say there are maybe 10-15 anal scenes? maybe...but they are worth the watching if you like amateur porn. The guy usually films the girl's face as he penetrates her and that is something you don't find very often. You basically get a blend of anal penetration shot and face shot, instead of a focus on the but hole. 09-06-10  10:15pm Reply To Message 12 pat362 (0) REPLY TO #11 - dracken : Thanks draken. 10 or 15 scenes isn't too bad. You wouldn't happen to have the names of some that do anal? I'd hate to find out that they are the same girls that did anal of his other site exploited college girls. 09-07-10  06:24pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2025 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.01 seconds.