| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
tangub (0)
|
Totally not interested.
|
04-18-11 02:34am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
pat362 (0)
|
This is a tough one to choose because we probably all have a slightly different idea of what makes a BBW. I'd say that by todays standard most average women are considered closer to big than thin.
I guess I'd say that it really depends on the model.
|
04-18-11 05:58am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
Jay G (Disabled)
|
I find as I get older, I like more and more different types of women. When I was young only a small number of very pretty very thin women appealed to me. Now I find myself really liking many different types, including many very pretty (but much bigger) women who would not have appealed to me a decade or two ago.
|
04-18-11 07:12am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
t9chome (0)
|
Closer to the bone, the sweeter the meat! Not emaciated, tho.
|
04-18-11 07:14am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
messmer (Disabled)
|
I like BBWs, depending on the model. I never used to but I think it is a subconscious reaction against all those airbrushed, slim, tight, tanned little beauties one finds on most sites. I am bored with them, as well as too old for them. I'm not Hef!
|
04-18-11 10:09am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Thomas20 (0)
|
What Jay G said.
|
04-18-11 10:11am
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Capn (0)
|
I like curvy, but not obese.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-18-11 10:25am
Reply To Message
|
8
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
Porn is all about fantasy for me. My preference is for young (18-25), thin and small-breasted. When it comes to paying for porn memberships I'll stick with my main interests.
|
04-18-11 01:26pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Interesting what Jay G said. I grew up in a community where "meat on the bone" was quite the norm, and a good marbled covering of fat wasn't at all uncommon either. The skinnie minnies were in short supply, though a few of them were around and some of them were lovely indeed. But I was also into the girls who could "Shake That Fat" (cue Jo Jo Gunne song).
These days, I like the thinner ones more, but as t9chome said, not emaciated. I'd say the limit is Rina at Skokoff and MetModels. I think she's a ballerina. I, however, think of her as a "ball-lay-reemah."
Anyway, about that question: No. I'd never thin my wallet for a fat girl site.
|
04-18-11 04:04pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
BadMrFrosty (0)
|
Agree with the Capn, curves are great, rolls of fat are not. Being a fan of massive tits its quite hard to avoid ladies on the larger side but I do have my limits.
|
04-19-11 01:57am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
dracken (0)
|
It's definitely nice to get some variation from what you see on every other site, I love curves. But very obese is just never a turn on for me, they look so unhealthy. Somewhere in between emaciated and obese is great.
|
04-19-11 12:34pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
slategrey (0)
|
lots of interesting comments for this one...
t9chome & Capn took word right out of my mouth, couldn't say it any better
|
04-19-11 03:06pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
elonlybuster (0)
|
REPLY TO #1 - tangub :
agreed. Not my cup of tea
|
04-19-11 07:35pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
No thanks. Plumpers can be ok but usually even they look better the slimmer they are.
|
04-20-11 01:16am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
yote78 (0)
|
I naked girls of all shapes and sizes and BBWs are really no different. Having said that, I don't like to see nasty rolls of fat and flab.
BBWs are not always fat. If they're well proportioned I generally like them, although they would not be anywhere near the top of my list of preferred body types.
|
04-29-11 06:31pm
Reply To Message
|
