British Doggers (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Maybe 11 videos and 78 photo sets of various quality (mostly really bad stuff, videos are around 320x240 and images are around 768px × 1,024px)
- They have zipped images and some hardcore action, some stripping, all outdoors
- The site came bundled in a network deal so I guess I didn't technically spend money on this particular site.
- Navigation worked okayish most of the time and the whole using the site experience was adequate (downloads worked, I didn't get kicked out suddenly and the links worked) |
| Cons: |
- Very few videos and few images. To make things worse the quality of most images and all videos is very poor. The scenes have inadequate lighting and for the most part mediocre camera work.
- No diverse options when downloading size or quality wise. In fact, overall the site looks like it was made 10-15 years ago and never updated the technical side
- Some sets look recycled from the '70 some look like they belong on a different network (I swear I saw a bangbus set on here) I don't think there is anything remarkable or interesting about the content, it seems all non -exclusive image sets from diverse places and poor quality clips.
- Nothing British about the models, no apparent rhyme or reason to the scenes. No modes page or way to easily browse the scenes.
- They have adds for other sites in the members section
- While they do daily updates it looks like they simply recycle content, the newer content looks just as bad as the old, with no foreseeable improvement. |
| Bottom Line: |
I don't know what you're interested in but this site doesn't have it, trust me you're probably better off with a Google image search. I have seen preview pages for some sites that were way more impressive than the members section of this site. Why? Well let's take a quick tour
The video section is a joke, 11 scenes at 320x 240 resolution with very, very generic porn action. Even more interesting the oldest video is from august this year and the most recent is from September, combined with the fact that all scenes look like they were filmed before digital cameras were invented it's pretty obvious they are recycling content.
The photo section is a bit better, we have around 80 sets with anywhere between 20 to 100 images each. Some look like behind the scene photos (the girl smiles next to a guy with a flaccid penis) some look like screengrabs from a hardcore movie and the rest look like old discolored photos you might find in your dad's collection.
The action in the scene is all over the place, there are some scenes where the girls don't even take their clothes off, some DP, some stripping outdoors, some dildo... overall a hodgepodge that doesn't make any sense. You have anything here from Hillary Scott deepthroating a dude to stuff that would maybe be at home on Met-art if they decided to give up on good quality, HD photos.
So the content is poor, the quality of the images and video is bad,the website navigates like an amateur project put together by someone with minimal HTML knowledge. There is no way to find specific categories of action or particular models, to get to the scenes you have to click the images, but not the texts, although they are links as well. Oh and don't even bother with streaming the videos, of navigating the images with their image browser that is also a joke and will break on you.
Overall there is nothing here that redeems the site. I got it as a special deal when I joined a network and was just impressed at the poor quality. If I had paid to be here I would demand my money back, it's simply a poor site. Maybe the sites they offer as bonus are better (I didn't check those out so maybe those are awesome and worth it... but I doubt it.) |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
