Comment Replies (4)
|
Replies to the user comment above. |
| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
rearadmiral (0)
|
Too little, too late really seems to sum it up. Playboy is a brand with a lot of recognition and like so many older studios and brands (I'm looking at you, Hustler) they seemed to miss the boat with the internet. I haven't looked at the Playboy site in a while, but the last time I did look I wasn't compelled to join. If Playboy wanted to do it right they could have a huge success on the internet.
It speaks volumes that most of the active PU members are of an age where Playboy means something and no one has posted a review.
I suspect I'll stop in and check out their tour pages.
|
11-05-11 09:00am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
Capn (0)
|
Too little too late indeed!
All I see in the tour area is hype & razzamatazz.
You can get access to a free gallery if you give them your email address so they can spam you!!!!
Whoop de doop!
Cap'n :oE
|
11-05-11 09:48am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
slutty (0)
|
Is it even any different? Seems as though you still might have to pay extra for the .tv site. All it looks like is a revamped front page, who knows what it looks like inside.
|
11-05-11 09:23pm
Reply To Message
|
4
|
elephant (0)
|
They would and could I agree do so much more and rake it in if done right, they have the name and the quality of women to work with. Look at other successful sites and see how they are doing it, they always give so little away on the tour pages, it boring pointless trailers with showing nothing, fair enough it's never going to be hardcore here but at least get a little more daring and show more lesbian stuff, that would bring me in, show updates and proper trailers for each update, newsletters with showing stuff, its creates interest, if you give away nothing and show so little to the viewer to what they actually will get in the membership area people lose interest fast.
|
11-06-11 02:35am
Reply To Message
|
| *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. |
|
