| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
otoh (0)
|
Depends on the definition of tour. I'm very wary of - and don't think I've joined - any sites that don't let you see at least thumbnails of all sets/videos available. On the sites with just a few pages of tour, you have no idea of knowing how much content there is - other than, of course, their claims of being the largest on the net etc...
|
04-05-13 12:50am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
gaypornolover (0)
|
I picked "know they don't tell all". Most sites I've joined the content is accurately reflected by the previews, but you have to be careful.
It's often more the technical things which are debatable - the definition of "HD", for example.
Of course, restrictions like slow downloads, no download managers etc. are rarely mentioned.
I think the most outright dishonesty concerns things like frequency of updates, which often isn't as much as claimed, or the definition of "new" content, which can actually just be rotated old content.
Sometimes the previews showing highlights can be accompanied by text which suggests there's rather more to the video than there actually is.
Certainly the tour is important but I use it in conjunction with reviews wherever possible and take what it says with a pinch of salt!
That's why sites like this are so important - you get the view of an ordinary porn user who has actually got past the advertised, handed over their hard-earned and can tell you the whole unvarnished truth!
|
04-05-13 12:56am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I like to read the reviews at PU to get a sense of whether the site might be worthwhile joining.
But I also like a site to have a useful public tour pages, where they show the site models, and hopefully give some preview shots of the photography and videos the site features.
The preview pages at some sites are just about worthless. No model listings, no information on the site contents, other than saying they have gorgeous models and the most exciting videos.
|
04-05-13 04:47am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
Many sites either leave out information or do not tell you some areas are not included. I like to call it the old bait and switch. Most sites are open about it, but some are afraid the hook won't hold so make you think something is there included when it was not. Or the include other sites that have not been updates since Clinton was President. But make them seem a great part of the site. Any site that is worth its weight does not need tricks and pre-checked or misleading ads .
|
04-05-13 08:22am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
tangub (0)
|
It depends on the site, those sites that give a full preview showing every model and photo set or video available I tend to trust, those 2 page tours that give nothing away I tend not to trust and more likely to depend on reviews.
|
04-05-13 10:12am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
Capn (0)
|
Agree with, tangub.
That sums it up nicely.
Cap'n. :0)
|
04-05-13 02:27pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
pat362 (0)
|
I think that they're usually quite accurate but that doesn't mean that accuracy equals quality. I find that if a site has a poor preview section then the there's a good chance the site will also be poor or worse. In the same way that site who is open about it's content is likely to be good or better.
|
04-05-13 06:10pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
Lack of info is a basic problem. A site should let you see what it's got. TorridArt is a good example of a site that does, as are MetArt and Hegre-Art. You can browse the content as a visitor and they tell you the specs on video and photo sizes and video formats available. AND they mention that they got this stuff in zip archives.
Sites that fall sort of such features in their tours are hard to trust. One wonders if they're hiding something or not.
|
04-05-13 07:10pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
KET924aab (0)
|
A few websites have good tours, but many don't. That's why I luv this site!
|
04-05-13 08:57pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
In reviews I turst! Usually tours are crap and misleading without showing any real content. Some sites like Kink.com, 21Sextury and EvilAngel have taken the right path and you see exactly what is available without paying first.
|
04-06-13 02:47am
Reply To Message
|
11
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
One of the reasons I tend to stick to the same few sites over and over again is because I don't trust tours. I know I'm not the only one it's happened to, but I've been burned by trusting a site to tell me what they're all about. If I do want to venture outside my "trusted few", I look here first to see if anybody's got anything to say about a site.
|
04-06-13 03:56am
Reply To Message
|
12
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
There's such a variety in reviews that it's hard to answer; like RustyJ said, some do it well others not so much. I think another site that does a good job with previews in manojob and naughtyamerica.com
I'm not looking for them to give away the farm - just want to know if what you have is what I want
|
04-06-13 02:39pm
Reply To Message
|
13
|
Ambition (0)
|
Even if the tour seems trustable, I always check reviews. Even sites that offered the possibility to preview every model and every scene have tricked me with hidden download limits or optional scenes not included in the monthly fee or in earlier years: DRM.
|
04-15-13 05:36pm
Reply To Message
|
14
|
Homegirl (Disabled)
|
Tours are generally accurate, but should not be your only information source.
|
05-30-20 04:43am
Reply To Message
|
