| Msg # |
User |
Message |
Date |
1
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
I have a hard time trying to tell the age of a model, in general. And there are some models that, for years, look far younger than their actual age.
But I have deleted vids and pics where I thought the model did look too young. Not recently. But when I had a newsgroup subscription, you could download lots of material, and who knew where most of it came from, and there was very little way of knowing who some of the models were.
With pay porn sites, at least you have the assurance that they are checking on the age of the models for you.
|
04-25-13 12:13am
Reply To Message
|
2
|
RustyJ (Suspended)
|
Yes. But not because I was worried about her really being underage but because I don't like too young looks. Teddy bears, lollipops and striped socks also tend to turn me off being too in-your-face teeny.
|
04-25-13 05:17am
Reply To Message
|
3
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
From one of the very early MET ART newsletters.
|
04-25-13 07:08am
Reply To Message
|
4
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
Going back over the METART archives this shoot was done by Peter Dominic for the June 14, 2003 issue and made the cover. One model's name is Claire and the other unnamed. Here is the intro to this 20 photo layout.
"Peter Dominic, the photographer of these lovely girls, has been working with Claire for over a year now. During one of his photo sessions with her, Claire brought along her friend, who said she was curious about what Claire had told her was a really fun and kind of exciting new activity.
Upon seeing Claire pose naked for a while, her friend started to feel shy and nervous. Peter could tell she was getting uncomfortable, so he asked if she’d like to join in. Hesitant at first, she soon fell victim to his charms and Claire’s assurance that it was all just in fun.
Now we can see the fruits of her decision. This incredibly cute and innocent teen is finally out in the open for all to see. Come in and give her the encouragement she deserves."
This cover can be viewed on thenude.eu - brown hair, hand supporting elbow with other hand on side of cheek.
I mean, what do you think?
|
04-25-13 08:36am
Reply To Message
|
5
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #4 - jberryl69 :
As a major softcore site, I'm sure Met-art tries to follow the age guidelines for most of the world's countries. That only makes business-sense.
After Grigori Galitsin had legal problems in Russia, all of Galitsin's photosets at Met-art were deleted, whether the models were of legal age or not.
Galitsin used to be one of the first, and main, photographers at Met-art.
|
04-25-13 09:26am
Reply To Message
|
6
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #5 - lk2fireone :
All I know is that when I looked at the photos several years ago, it made me feel a wee uncomfortable. But that is not to say I know they or one of them, was under 18. I will say this though have researching it today, there is no other web presence I can find of the original model (Claire) nor Her Best Friend (which is was the title of the spread) other than references to this shoot. I would imagine that you can still find this spread in MetArt if one were curious enough to look. I know we have members who belong to MetArt so they could go look at the Met Mag from that date.
|
04-25-13 02:32pm
Reply To Message
|
7
|
Capn (0)
|
Not a fan of an overly young look.
I don't like any of the 'schoolgirl' related paraphanalia either.
Cap'n. :0/
|
04-25-13 02:55pm
Reply To Message
|
8
|
lk2fireone (0)
|
REPLY TO #6 - jberryl69 :
I am currently a member of Met-art.
I don't know whether the photo set you are referring to is still at Metart, or whether it was deleted.
If you do a search for a model named Claire at Metart, the search returns "There is no model named Claire."
Possibly she is listed under another name.
If you look at the photo sets of the photographer named "Peter Dominic", it does show there are 7 sets by him, but none of those sets have a posting date of June 14, 2003, and none of the sets have the title "Her Best Friend".
Trying to search for photo sets in the archives section (2004 and earlier) is not as simple as checking sets posted from 2005 and later.
My guess is that this set was probably at the site at one time, but was subsequently deleted, for one reason or another.
|
04-25-13 03:13pm
Reply To Message
|
9
|
Cybertoad (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - RustyJ :
I agree with Rusty on this !
|
04-25-13 04:13pm
Reply To Message
|
10
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
I actually don't mind the "schoolgirl" schtick per se. It's kind of a fun role play idea when the model is clearly a mature 20-something. Or 30-something. It's like, "Let's pretend we're back in school, and it's time for back in school."
That being said, I've said, to myself, "Whoa. No, no," when I've seen a model who, while being of legal age, looked as though she could be in the 7th grade.
|
04-25-13 05:12pm
Reply To Message
|
11
|
RagingBuddhist (Disabled)
|
I have enough years behind me that a good number of the 20-somethings look too young to me. If a model looks really young, enough to make me question her legal status, I just check the 2257 declaration and I'm good with it. But that thought doesn't really cross my mind with major studios and websites.
|
04-25-13 06:00pm
Reply To Message
|
12
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #8 - lk2fireone :
I lost patience with looking through the site for it but I will revisit it again. If it is anywhere then it will be found in the tab label "archive" which takes you to older issues of Met Art.
One of the reasons I lost patience is that after I tab a couple of pages, the next one would take me to a black blank page and I would have to leave and come back. Because the archive has some 15 pages with ... after about page five I couldn't get to the middle of the pages. But like I said I will try to do it again.
|
04-26-13 07:50am
Reply To Message
|
13
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #10 - Drooler :
You mean like Tanner Mayes?
|
04-26-13 07:51am
Reply To Message
|
14
|
graymane (Suspended)
|
I like'm looking young.
Note the emphasis is on "looking" .....not by any sense of the word does that actually mean under the age of 18.
Most girls of legal age (but appear quite younger) are my guess as being valuable finds and sorely sought after by the industry. I've subbed on a couple of these nubie's earlier openings where, later, their popularity shot through the roof.
Icing on the cake for sites that have these prepubescent gems enjoy the luxury of their young star carrying the whole show .... thus having to deal with more hired hands.
|
04-26-13 09:15am
Reply To Message
|
15
|
tangub (0)
|
As long as I know it's a trusted site I wouldn't be particularly bothered if they look young.
|
04-26-13 10:51am
Reply To Message
|
16
|
pat362 (0)
|
I've never passed on a model solely based on how young she looks because that's not one of the main parameters that I use when searching for a model. I'm suspect the term "Too person so that makes it hard to agree on what constitute looking too young.
Maybe what I think is too young is significantly different than others. I still rmember watching Tracy Lords movies when they were still legal and there is no way that I would have believe that she was 15 at the time and yet she was indeed 15 in her first film.
|
04-26-13 03:57pm
Reply To Message
|
17
|
marcdc1 (0)
|
I'm more of a MILF fan so i don't encounter this issue much
|
04-26-13 04:53pm
Reply To Message
|
18
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #13 - jberryl69 :
I don't think she looks as though she's in the seventh grade, though from what I've read, sometimes she acts like it. ;)
|
04-26-13 05:26pm
Reply To Message
|
19
|
Buckhead (0)
|
I tend to move on from the ones who look too young. Once I feel the need to re-check the 2257, it kinda ruins it for me.
|
04-26-13 06:57pm
Reply To Message
|
20
|
KET924aab (0)
|
I haven't really seen any that would make me seriously question their legality. I do pass over models that are dressed in such a way or posed on sets that are designed to make them look under age (stuffed animals, etc). Early 20s is my preferred age for models--I think that is the peak of a woman's physical beauty.
|
04-26-13 09:25pm
Reply To Message
|
21
|
slutty (0)
|
I'm also with RustyJ on this one, try hard to look young makes me feel kind of creepy.
|
04-26-13 11:24pm
Reply To Message
|
22
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #18 - Drooler :
haha.. point taken though my comment was more her body type sans the tats.
|
04-27-13 06:00am
Reply To Message
|
23
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #2 - RustyJ :
Yeah Rusty, "teeny" tends to be a genre that doesn't do much for me either but under aged and not acting teeny (at least you know it's an act) makes me squirm. Of course, the deer in the headlights does not just stop when you turn 18 so sometimes it's like regardless of age, they seem under aged.
|
04-27-13 06:04am
Reply To Message
|
24
|
Drooler (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #22 - jberryl69 :
Ohh, yes, that's right. Her itty-bitty titties remind me of a neighbor girl when she was about 12 or so. Her younger brother, never one too terribly concerned with socially appropriate behavior, suddenly lifted her shirt in front of me one day.
But I like Tanner. I've watched her do all kinds of naughty things. And she's damned cute.
|
04-27-13 08:26am
Reply To Message
|
25
|
jberryl69 (Disabled)
|
REPLY TO #24 - Drooler :
Well I too like Tanner, like her scene in Face Fucking, Inc. She does that kind of stuff well.
|
04-27-13 03:06pm
Reply To Message
|
