Party Hardcore (0)
|
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-PU discounted price
-The videos are 1920x1080 7132 kbps mp4
-Good number of videos with 427 presently available
-Updates every seven days
-The photos are zipdownloadable 4000x2667
-There is a photoset for every video |
| Cons: |
-There has been a change in policy as to what sites are available from the network. You get the site you joined and the rest are available on a pay per view basis.
-The members area has lots of advertising. Even the page for support has advertising.
-There is a popup upon log in to ask if you want to upgrade.
-Off color disco type lighting that makes the models orange or some other distracting color. Weird.
-Distracting, nonstop techno disco type music that is too loud and distracting.
-Camera work that does not make for an erotic experience. It focuses on the background and often misses the best action. |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has videos that were originally on DVD’s. These DVD’s are offered in a separate section listing them as 720 in quality. I downloaded only one and it was 640x360. Unfortunately this was not the only thing disappointing about the site.
The preview of the site made no mention of the network Tainster, which I had previously been a member of. I found the content to be disappointing and a waste of time and money. Upon logging in for the first time, I was surprised to see a popup advertising a live cam site.
My membership did not include access to the other network sites. The only mention of this fact was on the members support page, and nowhere on the preview. I paid about $20 for a single site and could have gotten a network membership at half the price, with the PU discount. This is not cricket as the saying goes.
Individual videos could be accessed on a pay per view basis though. The members support page has advertising.
The members’ section is badly cluttered with advertising for other sites as well as upgrades and pay per view. Nowhere does it say how much an upgrade would cost, just a link to customer service.
All of this was a turnoff, but at least I should be able to say that the content was worth it. Well, it wasn’t.
Many of the videos were filmed in colored lighting, giving the models off color oversaturated tinges. For example, orange is a nice color, but it is also distracting in a porn video. The music was bad techno disco music. In most scenes it was just too loud and yet another distraction.
The cameraman has a knack for missing the erotic. Ten to fifteen minutes of following a male stripper around is not all that interesting. He should have focused on one of the other male strippers who were getting blow jobs or were feeling up one of the women. He consistently was filming the wrong action. There is always this one really attractive woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. When the action was captured on film, it was not for long enough to really work. A few seconds or even a minute and onto something else. My recommendation for the cameraman is to take your meds before work so you can focus properly. The videos look like what a person with ADD might produce. A better job of editing would also help. The scenes are about 20 to 30 minutes and taken from a much longer original. Poor editing starts off many downloads without any buildup or tease. We all love to go right to the sex from the first second, right?
What attracted me to the site was that it is CFNM (Clothed female naked male) with a party theme. As far as I know there is only one other, Dancing Bear. That one is far superior in every way and is a much better choice if you like this kind of material. |
Reply To Review Review in Favorites!
|
