Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Visit Party Hardcore

Party Hardcore (0)

Newbie
65*
mbaya (0) 03-27-16  07:40am
Rookie Badge  Talk Back  Comments  Pollster  Top Monthly User  Hardcore Badge  Trusted User  Male Profile TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0)
Status: Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros: -PU discounted price
-The videos are 1920x1080 7132 kbps mp4
-Good number of videos with 427 presently available
-Updates every seven days
-The photos are zipdownloadable 4000x2667
-There is a photoset for every video
Cons: -There has been a change in policy as to what sites are available from the network. You get the site you joined and the rest are available on a pay per view basis.
-The members area has lots of advertising. Even the page for support has advertising.
-There is a popup upon log in to ask if you want to upgrade.
-Off color disco type lighting that makes the models orange or some other distracting color. Weird.
-Distracting, nonstop techno disco type music that is too loud and distracting.
-Camera work that does not make for an erotic experience. It focuses on the background and often misses the best action.
Bottom Line: This site has videos that were originally on DVD’s. These DVD’s are offered in a separate section listing them as 720 in quality. I downloaded only one and it was 640x360. Unfortunately this was not the only thing disappointing about the site.

The preview of the site made no mention of the network Tainster, which I had previously been a member of. I found the content to be disappointing and a waste of time and money. Upon logging in for the first time, I was surprised to see a popup advertising a live cam site.

My membership did not include access to the other network sites. The only mention of this fact was on the members support page, and nowhere on the preview. I paid about $20 for a single site and could have gotten a network membership at half the price, with the PU discount. This is not cricket as the saying goes.

Individual videos could be accessed on a pay per view basis though. The members support page has advertising.

The members’ section is badly cluttered with advertising for other sites as well as upgrades and pay per view. Nowhere does it say how much an upgrade would cost, just a link to customer service.

All of this was a turnoff, but at least I should be able to say that the content was worth it. Well, it wasn’t.

Many of the videos were filmed in colored lighting, giving the models off color oversaturated tinges. For example, orange is a nice color, but it is also distracting in a porn video. The music was bad techno disco music. In most scenes it was just too loud and yet another distraction.

The cameraman has a knack for missing the erotic. Ten to fifteen minutes of following a male stripper around is not all that interesting. He should have focused on one of the other male strippers who were getting blow jobs or were feeling up one of the women. He consistently was filming the wrong action. There is always this one really attractive woman having sex, but the cameraman is trying to get all 12 in the video. When the action was captured on film, it was not for long enough to really work. A few seconds or even a minute and onto something else. My recommendation for the cameraman is to take your meds before work so you can focus properly. The videos look like what a person with ADD might produce. A better job of editing would also help. The scenes are about 20 to 30 minutes and taken from a much longer original. Poor editing starts off many downloads without any buildup or tease. We all love to go right to the sex from the first second, right?

What attracted me to the site was that it is CFNM (Clothed female naked male) with a party theme. As far as I know there is only one other, Dancing Bear. That one is far superior in every way and is a much better choice if you like this kind of material.

Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (3)

Replies to the user review above.

Msg # User Message Date

1

lk2fireone (0) Bottom line:
Would you recommend this site to your enemies?

Just kidding.
An excellent review. Sorry you wasted your money, but at least you wrote a review warning us not to waste ours.

03-27-16  07:54am

Reply To Message

2

mbaya (Disabled) REPLY TO #1 - lk2fireone :

There is not much good to say about this site. Oh well, c'est la vie.
03-27-16  07:55am

Reply To Message

3

elephant (0) Yeah I remember joining this site a few years ago with high hopes cause they seemed to have beautiful girls and I love an orgy scene but I didn't find them all too great and found them more frustrating than anything, too many girls full clothed and often the ones I wanted to see in the action. I don't think I watched too many of my downloads, don't remember any standing out. shame as it has huge potential.
03-27-16  09:48am

Reply To Message

*Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies.

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.01 seconds.