Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Review A review of the site and any replies from other users.

Porn Pros Network (0)

Newbie 82* lk2fireone (0) 11-01-16  02:10am                TRUST USER?   YES (1), NO (0) Status: Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review). Pros: -Primary billing agent is Epoch. A major plus, because Epoch means you can easily cancel your membership, and offers help if you have a billing problem with the site. -Nice assortment of teen, hardcore sites. You get access to 22 sites (listed in the "Bottom Line" section of this review). -Many of the models are late teens, early twenties. Mainly white, mostly attractive. -Professionally shot videos: OK or good camera work, lighting, sound control, etc. But poor editing. -Long time before site timeout. -Allows download managers. I use Down Them All, a free, easy to use download manager. -Good download speeds. I get around 3-5 MB/sec. My max download speed is 6.25 MB/sec. -Can stream videos in high definition or standard definition. Cons: -Pre-checked cross sale on join page. Warning: I unchecked the pre-checked cross-sale on the join page when I subscribed, but found that I was charged for the cross sale anyway. I had to contact the biller to reverse the charge. The biller was Epoch, who allowed me to cancel the "fraudulent" sale, since I told them I had unchecked the cross-sale. -$69.95 one-time charge to upgrade your membership to access all the sites in the network (as long as you keep your original membership open). -You have to click through/decline the $69.95 upgrade page to enter your paid membership sites each time you log in to the site. Which is irritating. -Only one definition (1080p) is offered for downloading many videos. Which is surprising. I've seen very few sites that offer such a limited choice to download a video. -Even though the downloaded video is listed as 1080p, when you download the video, and check its specs, you find: frame width: 852 frame height: 480. Based on those specs, I would assume Bottom Line: CONS (CONTINUED): the video is not 1080p, but 480p. Since I am viewing the video on a 14" laptop (that's a few years old), the videos are nice and crisp images. But if you were watching the videos on a large-screen monitor, you might be disappointed with the quality since these are 480p videos. -There's not a lot of buildup or plot to the videos: they are basically hardcore sex. There might be some kissing before the bj and fucking, but it's minimal. Most videos are just basically hardcore sex. A little plot would add to the videos. Even though a lot of the videos feature attractive models, the sex can get repetitious. If I were new to porn, just looking at these naked, attractive models having sex would be a real turn-on. But I'm not new. Sites like Blacked and Tushy offer high quality models and a glamcore style of shooting that makes the videos much more appealing than the straight hardcore videos at Porn Pros. -The editing is very abrupt: there are missing jumps in the action where the girl is naked by herself, then a guy is eating her pussy, then he is fucking her, and the action is jerky because they delete the intervening motions. The action is not continuous, but disconnected, which is poor editing. BOTTOM LINE You get access to 22 sites with your basic membership. The number of updates is current as of 2016-10-30: 18yearsold-480 Updates 40ozbounce-119 Updates Amateurviolations-34 Updates Cockcompetition-40 Updates Crueltyparty-64 Updates Cumdisgrace-34 Updates Cumshotsurprise-107 Updates Deepthroatlove-290 Updates Disgraced18-115 Updates Eurohumpers-21 Updates Flexiblepositions-27 Updates Freaksofboobs-61 Updates Freaksofcock-183 Updates Jurassiccock-80 Updates Lolcumshots-4 Updates Massagecreep-202 Updates Milfhumiliation-83 Updates Pimpparade-33 Updates Realexgirlfriends-568 Updates Shadypi-93 Updates Squirtdisgrace-15 Updates Teenbff-234 Updates The porn pros network is basically a collection of teen sites. The network is mainly hardcore videos. You also get a matching photoset for most videos. The matching photosets are quality screencaps of the video shoot. The software program used to make the screencaps from the video does an excellent job--far better than the screencaps that used to accompany hardcore videos from years ago. Since many of the models are really attractive, many of the photosets are worth collecting. This is not categorized as a photo network, but the quality of the screencaps is impressive. This is a large network: you get access to over 3,000 videos. For $17.95/month with a PU discount, you get your money's worth. Many of the models are attractive young women. Engaged in hardcore sex. If the videos had some plot to give the sex more meaning, it would increase the value of the network. Even though sites like Blacked and Tushy and X Art have less content, I enjoy the videos at those sites more, because those sites make an effort to: -select the most outstanding attractive models -present the models in the most visually attractive way (with excellent camera-work, outstanding lighting, make-up, etc.) -base the sex on some plot to make the video more erotic than just hardcore sex. I'm giving the network a score of 83. That is very subjective. If you are new to porn, the videos would have more of an impact on you, and you would rate the network higher. But in the last few years, I've joined a number of paysites, and have seen so many attractive young models, that I want videos that have more plot or variety than straight hardcore sex. An element of eroticism. Sites like Blacked, Tushy or X-Art are high quality glamcore sites. But you can find gonzo sites that can have an element of eroticism, or strong visual appeal. If you watch the videos at Rocco Siffredi, which is mainly gonzo hardcore sex, some of those videos have a potent effect because the sex seems real. Those videos do not have the ultra-refined camera-work and lighting and colors compared to Blacked, Tushy or X-Art, but some of the Rocco Siffredi videos can be very hot in spite of the lower quality, because the action/plot is so strong. I also give Teen Mega World a higher rating, another teen hardcore network, because many of their videos appeal to me. CONTINUED IN THE REPLY SECTION: Reply To Review Review in Favorites!

Review Replies (9) Replies to the user review above. Msg # User Message Date 1 lk2fireone (0) CONTINUED REVIEW: In spite of the large amount of content, and the large number of attractive models, my main negatives are: -Being charged for a pre-checked trial subscription, when I unchecked the trial subscription, meaning I said no. -The jerky editing, which destroys the flow of the videos. -The lack of heat of the videos. These are fine-looking girls, having hardcore sex, but it doesn't hold my interest, or passion. 11-01-16  02:18am Reply To Message 2 elephant (0) Really good review mate, I've been recently there too, I just didn't get why they think not speaking much or at all in some vids is the way to go, it just lacks something I felt, you are right seemed very repetitive and no need to edit them so much, lave the undressing parts and sexual positions changing in. 11-04-16  03:34am Reply To Message 3 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #2 - elephant : I just read your recent review of the same network, and it's surprising how well my review agrees with what you wrote. Years ago, I got a negative trust vote (my only negative trust vote) because the person, Anonymous, wrote: "Reviews are too much like other members and english prof. would most likely think that you copied some material just makes your reviews a little questionable for me." But this is the first time that I know of that the negative trust vote comment might seem real: It surprises me how we both agree on many points in our different reviews of this network. You mention that Blacked, Tushy and Vixen are producing great porn. In several of my last reviews, I've mentioned that Blacked, Tushy, (sometimes Vixen), and X-Art are producing great glamcore porn. Are you sure we aren't related? Or sharing the same telepathic thoughts? LOL. I do appreciate your reply. Years ago, reviews seemed to get replies more often. It lets the writer know that someone is reading the reviews. Which is useful positive confirmation. 11-04-16  07:06am Reply To Message 4 elephant (0) REPLY TO #3 - lk2fireone : Yeah I agree we've do have similar tastes, after all the years I've been into porn my tastes have switched a little and some things like solo vids I used to hate I can appreciate these day. I still am no fan of solo masturbation though, never quite sure why but it does nothing for me lol. I do have a varied taste though and love beautiful wow girls blacked and tushy stuff but then I also like really old fashioned stuff too, my best porn I feel is around 10 years ago when Sasha Rose, Benta, Zanna, Yuki were in their prime, there was some great Euro sites around producing some really hot porn, sadly few euro stars I see these days, not to equal the beauties that used to enter porn. I'm more into American and Aussie girls these days. So yeah porn in my eyes comes out with gems but no site seems to be what it was 5 or 10 years ago. I also like reality porn lots were not much direction is happening but filmed well still. Yeah you are correct, not much commenting going on these days on reviews, its a shame. 11-04-16  10:04am Reply To Message 5 rearadmiral (0) Very thorough review. Thanks for posting it. It's disappointing that Jurassic Cock no longer updates as it was among the best old/young sites on the 'net when it was active. I know it isn't a niche that most people are interested in but old/young sites that feature top U.S. talent are few and far between. 11-06-16  06:15am Reply To Message 6 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #5 - rearadmiral : Teen Mega World has an Old-n-Young site. That hasn't updated since October 2015. But it has about 85 videos. I'm sure you've been a member of TMW (a lot of the PU members probably have). If you skipped the Old-n-Young site at TMW, it's probably worth a visit. Or if you've forgotten the videos you watched. (As I get older, I watch a lot of videos I've seen before, almost as if it's for the first time). PU discount is $14.95 to join through Old-n-Young. Or you can join through TMW PU discount for the same price. Both memberships give access to all the TMW network sites. I don't know why, but a lot of the TMW models really appeal to me. They are not made up to appear their best, and in many of the scenes the clothes and sets are cheap, but the girls are young and physically attractive and can give a hot performance. The TMW models are Russian. 11-06-16  09:22am Reply To Message 7 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #6 - lk2fireone : You're right... I have been a member there. It's a great site too but I like to follow specific models and Russian models change their names so often they don't make that easy. I guess I'll just have to be happy with the flood of old/young videos studios are putting out as stepdaughter /stepfather. 11-07-16  03:47pm Reply To Message 8 lk2fireone (0) REPLY TO #7 - rearadmiral : There are many sites that give alternate names for porn models. One of my favorites is: www.indexxx.com It's free, and easy to use. You can search by the model's name. You can also search, under the "Website list" hot link, for the models that appear at a specific website. (That is helpful for model names that are used by many different models.) You can also build a listing of your favorite porn models, if you register for a free account. (I've registered, and have never gotten a bunch of spam from indexxx.com, that I know of. But I do get a bunch of spam from porn sites.) If you want to track a model, indexxx.com will list most of the web sites she appears at. As well as her name at each web site. Which can be very useful. Separately, "incest" porn seems to be very popular. By "incest", I mean step- brother, sister, father, etc. So you can get your fix of old-young from those videos. 11-07-16  04:02pm Reply To Message 9 rearadmiral (0) REPLY TO #8 - lk2fireone : Thanks for the link. I have a couple of index sites bookmarked but I was looking for one that tracked by website. I guess I'm stuck in the Dark Ages with IAFD, though, to be fair, they are listing websites now. 11-07-16  04:42pm Reply To Message *Message rows highlighted in light orange are replies to replies. Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.02 seconds.