After taking a break from We Are Hairy, I rejoined to find that the download problems that lead me to quit the site are no longer an issue. I can download videos and pictures at normal download rates.
I'm very glad as this is one of my favorite sites.
I've been having very erratic download speeds, from 100% to down to 1% and then back repeatedly, for days now. I contacted Customer Support and they said they were unable to replicate the problem, and it must be a problem on my end. I cleared my cache and it's no better. I'm getting 100% DL speeds on other sites, so I'm thinking it's an issue at WAH and not me.
What's the deal with their movies? They are like exact copies
Ok so I spent some time going through the previews on this site today, and there are some hot models! But let me tell you what I experienced as I watched the previews for quite a few movies of a few different models. A model could have 4-7 solo masturbation videos, and they are LITERALLY the EXACT same as far as position changes, way of masturbation etc. It's like the photographer has absolutely zero concept of variety. Not only that, but a lot of models even do it the exact same way, it's like here's the formula, do this. Jesus spice things up a bit. Let's look at a few examples, or please, be my guest and look for yourselves. Just a couple models but there are tons more examples like this:
1. Baby Boom - EVERY scene 2 fingers underneath leg and 2 fingers in doggie to the side, in the same way every scene.
2. Tanita - EVERY scene 2 fingers underneath leg, or just in front, and 2 fingers in doggie to the side.
etc etc etc.
Guys, you can have the models use more than 2 fingers, or do things differently from scene to scene. Please. If you're going to have 5+ masturbation movies of a model, that's great, but what's the point if they are all copies of each other?
Just tried to join this site again. I renew at least once every couple of years. The best porn site says the site cost is $24.95 if you join through best porn BUT I found that the cost is actually $34.95.
TOO HIGH!!!!
I am happy to report that the previews of the videos and full picture sets are back! This is one site that keeps drawing me back to it, even though lately I have only been peeking, but judging by the updates things are getting better for my taste. I notice quite a few sets where the model actually wears panties and bra and some even start fully clothed. Might be time to re-join soon, as long as the webmaster doesn't decide to start including b/g material. :-)
One thing I used to like about this site was that you could look at a whole set (at least the thumbs) of pictures, or a short video preview, and make up your mind, based on the teasers, if you wanted to join or not. It's gone. All you get now is a quick trip to the sign-up page. Really too bad because it was those previews of whole sets (and glimpses of a video) that made the site different and classy.
On the 25th of November I wrote: "Going from glory to glory" because, as compared to another hairy site, this one appeared to have gone back to being moderate when it came to the publication of "hairy legs" sets.
So, here I am, just about to re-subscribe because I really like the new models, but to make sure I don't waste another subscription on a site I get nothing out of any more I do a quick search under hairy legs (my pet peeve) and get 17 updates since Jan. 2, 2013!! SEVENTEEN hairy legs sets/videos in 16 days.
This sort of puts an end to the standard exhortation by web masters that "if you don't like hairy legs you can always look at something else," because 17 updates in half a month is more than just the occasional nuisance that I can choose to ignore, it is a sizable chunk of the updates. This is insane.
From now on "shaved" is in as far as I am concerned .. with a sad farewell to two of my favorite hairy sites .. and one of my favorite web masters ... who, no doubt, does what is best for the bottom line but is no longer able to please a moderate "hairy bush" lover like me.
The usual disclaimer: My discontent is in no way a reflection on the value of the site itself. The material is still top quality, the rate of updates is still excellent .. if you love hairy legs go for it. You can't lose, unless Basil's search engine was off!
This is written with more than a tinge of sadness because their main competition, as well as this site, were staples in my diet for years and it is like losing old friends. But times and tastes change, so what can you do?
Ageism is so rampant in porno land that it takes courage to publish a model over forty. Three cheers for "We Are Hairy" and Tiffany T!
This new model will no doubt cause some negative comments from the younger crowd but her presence on this fine site is enough to make me subscribe once again. And if you think I am exaggerating just go to VB (if you are a subscriber) and see the storms of protest if they dare to publish a GILF video!
We Are Hairy will be featuring their first hardcore set ever tomorrow, Sunday, April 15. Looks as if they will continue this policy according to the webmaster, so it's not a one-time thing.
I had signed up for this site last week along with juggmaster but didn't spend a whole lot of time browsing around. Have been busy and just got around to checking out in detail today. Looks pretty decent. As I am a fan of the natural look, it is quite appealing. The only thing I see negative so far is that the photographs, although well-composed, aren't always the sharpest images when viewed at Super-High Res. The detail is there, it's just that the focus can sometimes be soft. Then again, as an amateur photgrapher myself, I know how viewing images at high res can bring out the slightest imperfections. Other than that, it looks very well done and many of the images will certainly make nice additions to my erotic art collection. Haven't toyed with videos as I am not much of a video person. Will get around to checking them out after a while so I can write a review with all my thoughts.
I really don't get how this We Are Hairy outscores ATK Hairy. In terms of layout they are about equal navigation/search-wise. Both have massive content, and some of it dates back at least a few years so they both have issues of not everything being HD. Really, when you get right down to it, it all comes down to content. And that's why I don't see why We Are Hairy is scoring higher than ATK.
WAH has some decent models, but even their best is almost average for ATK. My primary complaint about WAH is that it is almost 99% softcore, solo modeling. No action to really speak of. Even the masturbation videos they have are, well, boring.
As far as a hirsute fetish site goes, WAH is okay, they are certainly worth a look if you just want solo models doing little else than posing. However, if you want a littel range in your hairy porn, then I would certainly look at ATK Hairy because they actually have everything from "X" to "XXX."
Obviously, it's been a while since my review, so here are a few updates.
On the plus side:
The number of models has increased nicely (250+), along with it, the addition of different age and body type models. There are also a few ethnics now appearing on the site.
Picture viewing preference can now be set globally.
Custom zip files for pictures in 3 resolutions.
On the negative side:
I have to agree with a lot of the comments that have been left on here and on the site - weird camera angles, focus and lighting issues are far too common in a lot of the picture sets. Two recurring themes that bother me personally are the models pulling on their pubic hair throughout the set and similarly having to touch themselves or keep their hands near their crotch.
With the video, I've seen a considerable amount of scenes where the camera is constantly moving, almost in (for lack of a better phrase) an amateur-with-their-first-camera fashion.
I'm still an amateur fan and definitely old school - I like my women natural and I still like the site. Fortunately, Basil is one of the most attentive webmasters I've encountered and I have no doubt that anything that can be done to appeal to more people will be taken care of.
Natural lighting?
Does this website do a lot of photo editing that causes the models to have unnatural colors or causes the pics to look unnatural.
How are the poses? Are there a bunch of useless poses without having that good shot you're waiting for or missing some of those basic poses.
They should at least have these basic poses:
1)(full body nude shot with good clarity/detail) standing or lying down
2)(boob shot) from the waist up to include the cute face of the model
3) (vagina shot) model laying down on back with legs spread, but also with her face in view without being out-of-focus. Kind of like a missionary pose.
A quick tour revealed that WAH has been doing four updates a day since August! Very impressive. It does my heart good to see that this site is prospering and ever improving (despite my rather "frightened" comment a while ago.) I really was scared that "scary" hairy would take over, but don't see much of a sign of that happening. Thanks, Basil, for sticking with a good formula. Now, please give me more models in lingerie! :-)
... because I like the webmaster and his enthusiasm too much but I would ask all those who read my review to take off at least 10 points if they are not into a "hair" fetish.
Nine updates this month alone feature models with hairy legs! Mind you, this still leaves 51 fairly straight updates, but the site is starting to look way too earthy for me to feel comfortable seeing it listed at a whopping 99 under my name.
Therefore to all ye who may be tempted to subscribe: if you are into body hair in general, including anal, pits, arms, legs, this site will still rate very highly with you given all its good points. The quality, the lay-out, the search engine, the updates, the friendly and helpful webmaster are all still there.
If, on the other hand, you like clean looking girls who have remained traditional by keeping their pubic hair but who shave their legs (as everyone except for hippies and women in rural Transylvania did for as long as I can remember,) then an 89 would be a more realistic rating for you these days.
This is still a pretty good score for a pretty good site, I think! And with a bit of sifting you'll still get a lot of good stuff. I just don't like to see my 99 connected with hairy legs! Ever! :-)
You've been taken over by a different breed. I sincerely wish you luck, after all lovers of hairy legs, pits, bellies, cracks, have to have a site too but there has never been a time in my lengthy life time where I have met anyone who was turned on by extreme hairiness .. except now and that's why the reference to a different breed.
The site owner of ATK Natural and Hairy tried to tell me that people having my taste were still being catered to and he/she "proved" it by stating that only 38% of recent updates catered to the extreme crowd. ONLY 38%??
This love of hair everywhere on the body is something brand new to me and does not fit my ideal of feminine beauty. So, off to "shaved!"
I hope lovers of "extreme" hair see this comment as well because it can't hurt to get new subscribers who like the niche, and I am certainly not out to undermine an otherwise fine site or to dispute their users' taste ..!
"We Are Hairy" are certainly not as prejudiced in favor of extreme hair as is ATK N&H at the moment but judging by their recent updates they are getting there.
Thank Heavens I got used to the shaved look in the meantime, otherwise I'd really be stuck for anything to subscribe to.
I am sincerely sad about the recent developments but also sincerely glad that room has been made for the fetishists in the hairy category to look at and enjoy what they like best. Still wishing the best to this site and its webmaster, I remain,
After having seen that the honourable Messmer gave this site a 99 I couldn't resist and had to join it immediately. Now there's a lot of new content waiting for me to explore some of it is already downloaded and I was able to watch some of the movies they offer. This is a dream for those not afraid of hairy pussy. I did find some models also appearing on AllOver30.com and I'm quite happy with the mixture of mature and younger hairy ladies/girls.
Guess I'll have to write a review soon. The best model so far is 41 year old Carmen who knows exactly how to tease :-).
I was just going to upgrade my review to 99 but discovered I could no longer edit it so I'm taking the lazy man's way out by saying I promised this site a 99 once its content increased and it has. I don't think I'll have reason to rue the decision to give a site my highest mark ever because:
Content has increased considerably!
There are now three updates a day (2 Picture sets, 1 Video)!
Quality and erotic value of the picture sets and videos are far superior to that of its present competitors!
Webmaster is still as attentive and personally involved as he was at the beginning!
May this site escape the ravages of the present economic downturn, it deserves nothing but success!
You may have noticed I didn't mention lingerie. I am saving my 100 for the site that features the most sets featuring erotic undies percentage wise. Haven't checked out all the updates of this site yet so, who knows, I might do the unthinkable yet and give a site the perfect score! :-)
I like this site and really want to see it succeed, especially with so few quality hairy sites out there. But more and more, it's starting to feel just like ATK Hairy. Most of the models are the same ones that appeared on ATK a month or so before, and there isn't much turn-around. The same old faces keep reappearing. Also, although the image size is bigger than ATK, the fine detail in pictures just doesn't come anywhere close to what you'd see on Met-art or a few other high-quality sites. This might be down to poor photography, but at 3000 pixels, you should be counting pores on the skin, yet many sets on WAH just look soft in close-up.
The poses are also getting to be quite boring. Every set is much the same, with corny lingerie up to the last page.
As I said, I want this site to succeed and be good, but it's getting too repetitive and the image quality isn't among the top sites. I'll see how it looks in the future.
I hate to sound like a shill for this site but I love the way they make it easy for potential subscribers to make up their minds by making it possible to look at complete picture sets in their tour to see what they are all about. I just took a look at a couple of their latest updates (in reduced format, of course) and am about to re-subscribe because I actually found some sets containing sufficient lingerie to keep me happy.
As you know I gave them a high score in a review and I still think it was well deserved because they pay such attention to details that are so important to their potential clients.
Been a member for a few weeks, found everything to be fine. Just what I expected from the site after reading reviews and looking through the samples. Have been a member of the "other" hairy site a few times - all OK with wearehairy so far...
Except, I've had a few login issues recently. As in the Members link doesn't respond, keeps timing out...
Any other wearehairy users having similar issues (late October 2010)?
I've mailed support, so will wait and see what the response is like...
I just wanted to let everyone know that the good people at We Are Hairy hooked us up with special discount prices. They included a monthly, 2 month & 3 month discount options. This site scored well and if you have been on the fence about checking it out, now is a good time :)
I won't change my score for the site because I still think they're good at what they do, and the site is still relatively new, but video fans might be somewhat disappointed here. It's two updates a day, but an average of every fifth or sixth one (sometimes more) is a video, some of which are non-nude interviews.
Looks like this will be my next join. The navigation looks like it'll be easy to get around the site. The video quality of the flash video previews alone look good enough to make me think this'll be a winner. A review will be forthcoming, of course.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
