Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Geeky, nerdy, librarian, teacher-type porn.
- Very large site with 556 scenes on it.
- Good download speeds (80% of my max)
- Nearly 500 models.
- Bills through Epoch.
- Remastered updates are bringing life to some of their oldest and best scenes.
Cons:
- The new updates stopped in 2017 but they have released remastered scenes since then.
- They don’t do the best job of meeting the niche.
- The downside of being a site that’s been around a long time. The oldest scenes are far below the newer scenes in technical quality.
Bottom Line:
I think this is one of the most common niches in porn. They do switch it up some. It’s not always an older male teacher with a younger female student. They have some older female teachers with younger guys. There are some scenes that are supposed to be two bookworks/nerds and they could both be older or they both could be younger. The part that doesn’t change much is the scenes are filmed in a classroom setting.
As much as I like the remasters they can make a porn collector like me get over-excited like seeing a “new” update from Gracie Glam, then realizing it’s a remastered version of her 2005 scene. I thought, “She hasn’t aged a bit”.
The production values on this site could be higher than they are. Nearly every scene features sex on the teacher’s desk. They at least do have multiple classroom sets so it doesn’t look like every scene is filmed in the same classroom. The stories in the scenes are mostly the same. Student does something bad, stays after class, the teacher spanks her then bends her across his desk. I do think there is a positive to this site. The outfits. The attitudes. The women usually have on something like a schoolgirl outfit and their attitudes vary between bratty to more horny than the teacher. It’s a lot like the site Innocent High except the women on this site don’t wear the same outfit like they do on Innocent High.
They have 556 scenes with all scenes between 2014-2017 having a 4K download option along with 1080p and 720p. The pictures could be better quality and some don’t even have a zip download option. It’s an older site but in this day and age of cookie-cutter porn, it’s sometimes better to go back and find good old scenes, especially when they’re remastered to 1080p or 720p quality.
For this genre, it’s a good site and I think most fans of the genre would be happy with it. There are some big name models on here too. One of the new remasters is the Alexis Texas scene and Amia Miley has a very good scene on this site. The remasters are a selling point to me since they are remastering their best and most popular scenes first. Good site on an even better network.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-PU discount $9.95 first month (recurs at $24.95/mo).
-The female porn star's name is given for each video.
-The posting date is given for each video.
-The galleries are low quality screen caps, not photoshopped or glamorized. So you can see what the models look like without makeup or fancy costumes. A dose of reality TV. If you like your sex raw.
-All videos have a clip option where you can download parts of the entire video.
-There is a rating system for the videos. But many videos have a high rating, which is suspect. Why give a video a rating of 8 or 8.5, when the model has below-average looks, and the video is like a porn flick from the 1970s when you got a visual of crude sex?
Cons:
-Pre-checked cross-sale on join page.
-Not all videos have a streaming option. The earliest videos have to be downloaded and then watched on your PC.
-There is no zip file for the earliest galleries.
-But the earliest galleries are low quality screencaps, so who would want to save them anyway?
-Early videos only have a WMV or MPEG file option to download. No higher quality definition to download.
-Female porn stars have below-average attractiveness.
-Even when you have a model who is naturally pretty, there is no effort made to make her look attractive.
Jassie (AKA Jassie James) is a naturally pretty, young-looking girl--but in her scene at Naughty America she does not appear to be attractive.
This is a girl who has 24 galleries at MetArt, under the name of Jassie A, as well as galleries at ddgirls and digitaldesire.
-Download speeds varies. I get between 1 to 4 MB/sec, which is below average for my connection.
-Quality of the older videos is poor.
Bottom Line:
Site theme: naughty schoolgirls having sex.
Site statistics: 514 videos + matching galleries.
I much prefer the models at Teen Mega World, Diesel network, X-Art, or almost any other hardcore or heartcore site, because the models at other sites are much more attractive. Even the models at Rocco Siffredi and the Devils Film network (which includes Peter North, Rocco Siffredi, Silvia Saint and Silverstone DVD) are presented more attractively, even though the sex is often raw and crude.
I don't know why, I just think that Naughty Bookworms is bottom of the barrel sex. But that's a personal observation. Many other people think the videos at Naughty Books are just fine.
Giving the site a score of 78. Because it has a hugh amount of content. For a low introductory price.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Great Quality 1080p, 720p, and lower quality (in case you're still on dial up)
- multiple uploads a week (across the network there is about one a day)
- zip downloads for pix (over 100 per set)
- archived live shows 9in this genre). I think this is the best part of the site- with regular guys calling the action the girls are dirtier and more fun.
- Hot girls who ever your favorite is odds are she's shot for NA. If you like up and comers they shoot plenty of them too.
- Mobile version of site (see my review of that too)
- newsletter/twitter account often sends out specials where you can save 50% or more off a membership
- over 30 sites included (some dead sites)
- some softer ("girlfriend friendly") shoots (although most pop shots are facials)
Cons:
- I keep getting an error message saying my account is inactive and I have to reset it. It only takes a minute or two but it's getting really annoying to have to do this over and over again.
- cross sells, every time I have to go through the above process I have to decline memberships to other sites, again this is really annoying when I have to do this several times a week (sometime multiple times in the same day.
- repetitive scenario can get a little tired.
Bottom Line:
My biggest knock on NA is they discontinued the live shows which I was a huge fan of. The other down side is with every site in the network focused on a different fantasy it gets very repetitive very quickly.
That said the deals (a lot of time you can grab a membership for between $10 and $15) and the great quality and talent means I usually re-up every couple of months. The preview section is rather generous and gives you a good idea of the content (there's no surprised once you've joined.
There is now a NA Live section where you can see amateurs being naughty, but it seems like everyone I'm interested in is an additional charge. :(
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Bill through CCBill
-Part of Kickass network of 16 websites.
-Easy to link with other sites in the network.
-Can search site and network by name and small photo.
-Supports download managers.
-No DRM or download restrictions. Not a single broken link or download problem.
-All exclusive material shot for the site.
Cons:
-Only 20 videos.
-Oldest videos 320x240 and boring gonzo style. Anyone can put glasses on a pornstar.
-Only 5 zipdownloadable photo sets.
-Updates have no dates.
-No update schedule posted.
-WMV and IPod are the only download options. No clips, but there is streaming.
Bottom Line:
This site shocked me. I was not expecting much and found my self pleasantly surprised. It actually has potential to be a great site. On the negative side, of the 20 videos, 13 are obviously a few years old and the quality reflects that at 320x240. These are just old fashioned pointless gonzo like on so many other sites, but the girls wear glasses. THE SITE HAS DRAMATICALLY CHANGED. It has 7 newer updates that are really good. The video quality has improved to 640x480, 1588 kbps. The most important thing is that they are fun and very creative. The new videos have great looking girls and the stories are a lot of fun, as well as very funny. I can honestly say that the new videos have a personality, something rare in the world of cookie cutter, gonzo porn. The girls play characters such as a computer hacker or a poetry student. In each video there is a guy who wants to get in her pants and asks the site to find her weakness. As the story unfolds and the characters interact, the girls fall for the guy who has something the girls want, such as passwords, or other advice or secrets and she is the sexual aggressor. There is some fun stuff here. Since the beginning of April there have been two updates, but the site is no help with dates overall. If they continue to add such interesting, as well as quality videos, this may yet be a site with ratings in the 90's. As of today, I see potential, but also a site with only a handful of superior videos. They also need better video quality. Watch this site grow, as it may be great in six months. This may be hard to do. When you look at the preview pages, they make no mention of the plots and storylines.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Niche site for eyeglass fetish features very attractive pornstars
- All scenes are downloadable in one part
- No DRM
- TBP Discount
- Access to Kick Ass Pass network (10+ sites)
- Fast downloads (around 1.5MB/sec)
Cons:
- Only 13 scenes
- All videos are only low quality (320x240) wmv
- Only 4 photosets
- Models in the photosets do not have a video and none of the video models have photosets: frustrating
- Glasses are obviously fake as they are the same few sets of frames in all of the movies
Bottom Line:
As a glasses wearing man, I have always found girls with glasses to be really cute. This site helps to spread my vision by putting fake or prop glasses on some very attractive porn starlets. These scenes are exclusively shot by Kick Ass Pictures for its "Specs Appeal" DVD series and are reposted online.
Having said that, this site suffers from a few issues: first, it is way too small. I know that the Specs Appeal video series lasted for more than 13 scenes, so I am waiting for more of those scenes to become available. Second, all of the scenes currently available are only 320x240 and are almost unwatchable at full-screen size. Third, I know that this theme must be more difficult to cast, but it would be nice if the girls wore different glasses in the scenes. I'm sure that the studio could afford to buy a bunch of faux fashion frames and let the actresses wear different pairs rather than recycle the same few sets every time.
While I didn't take any points off for the 3rd complaint, the small collection size and the less-than-stellar video quality do count against the site's score. At this time, I can only recommend this site as part of the Kick Ass Pass network. On its own, this site is a poor value. However, combined with the rest of the network, it is a nice component.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- 183 shoots, lots of content
-Good variety of models,only cytherea appears more then once
-Hardcore porn with threesome b/b/g, and g/g/b,anal
-Pic sets after 11-10-2005 can be downloaded in zip files in high resolution
-Download videos in normal, high, dvd, mpeg, apple, ipod as of 04-23-2007
-Consistent updates, anywhere from 3 days to 2 weeks: usually once a week since late 2003
-Get the naughty America vip pass membership which includes 9 other similar sites(lots of content)
Cons:
-Older pictures are not downloadable
-Basic design: just picture of model with her name under it on one huge page
-Most the girls suck at acting, and you can tell they memorized a script
- about 98% of cumshots are facials
-Most of the content is porn stars, I prefer amateur
-Plots get old after about 10 videos: same thing student looking for extra credit , change grades
-Most of the girls do not orgasm and fake moan, no passion whatsoever
Bottom Line:
-The videos are fairly long about 32 minutes
-The dvd videos are very clear, however are like 350,000 mb
- Corny minute and 24 second naughty america promo clip before some videos
-The wardrobe is good, and the girls look very
school girlish
-Older videos only offered in wmv and mpeg and are of less then average quality
-Every single girl where glasses, strange huh?
As I said most the girls are pornstars, but there are still many older shoots that are amateurs in which I never saw before, and those videos are more erotic and more believable.
-Whats weird is that these girls are around 18 25 and they would be in college, yet the classroom is set up like an elementary school classroom.
- 11-04-2004 is the first time they started dating there content
-Pornstars use there name such as brandy taylor, penny flame, kinzie kenner (no exclusive names)
sidenotes: Danni Woodward is the first porn star to be on this site and Randy spears appears as the teacher in most of the earlier videos
-Im just rating this site 81 and not lower for the simple fact there is a lot of content, and the newer videos are dvd quality, so if you want you can burn some porn movies to a dvd, and they will actually look good on your tv. But why I didnt grade it higher mostly is because the older videos really are poor quality, and the acting sucks. But if your into the whole schoolgirl thing, it really isnt that bad of a site, and its worth the join
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-You get over 150 videos going back to 2004 (some go further back, but aren't dated) with numerous quality options for downloading
-Each video includes a set of pictures with the most recent ones being very high quality with the ability to download as zip files
-The girls are mostly in the 18-22 year old range and over the last year or so are "glamour" in nature, but lovers of nerdy girls will enjoy the older sets which are much more amateur
-Full network access to Naughty America's 10 sites
Cons:
-Videos over the last year or so allow downloads of over 2000kbps, but before that it varies greatly with some of the older ones being around 512 at the very best
-The newer picture sets offer multiple quality settings and are real digital shots, but going further back you will often find low-res vidcaps instead
-The scenarios get very old very fast: Teacher gives student a bad grade. Tells her if she wants a better one, she better "do" him. Student is mad but takes all her clothes off anyway
Bottom Line:
This is the second site I have reviewed on the Naughty America network and one I've eyed for awhile. It really is a tale of two sites that began with an amateur focus as "Bookworm Bitches" and slowly progressed to more of a glam site called "Naughty Bookworms". While the change does make it appeal to two different niches, I don't think the change has been one for the better.
The number of videos offered is impressive with clips going back several years. The quality of the videos has vastly improved during that time and vidcaps have become high quality digital photos. The newer vids can be downloaded at half a dozen quality settings along with zip downloads for the pic sets. However, as you go further back those options quickly disappear.
When the site began it used amateur girls and of the nerdy persuasion. I am very fond of that niche and as such was very pleased with the older content even though the quality lacks in comparison. I also enjoy the newer content with all the bells and whistles, but I couldn't help noticing that besides the classroom setting, there is very little that makes this site distinctive from any of the others offered by Naughty America.
So, if you like glam with a teacher-student scenario you will love this site. However, if you are looking for any level of creativity you definitely will not. I do like both sides of the site, but the original one was more unique and something we need more of, not less. Frankly, I wish they'd change it back.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
