Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
uge collection of over 35 gigs.
Most of the models are extremely attractive.
The models are all amateurs some of who continue on to make a name for themselves. Like Gianna Michaels.
There are multiple pictures of the same pose so if one picture is blurry the other will cover it.
There is a model directory set up an alphabetic form.
Photos go up to 2000x1333 in size
Photo collections are set up in zip files
Cons:
I ran into download problems and had to resolve it by switching back and forth between two browsers.
Some of the older material had problems with picture quality like blurriness and redeye. There would be pictures where the models eyes were cut off. Some of the pictures it seemed that the photographer was just as big of amateur as a model.
Bottom Line:
It was a good amateur site and it was only $15 a month. The pros greatly outweighed the cons.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# most models(18-23) are genuine amateurs; first timers flown into LA from all parts of the country
#pretty girls- I did not see very many models that I would pass
# nice shoots; provocative poses; girl next door; amateur quality; pretty girls-
I respect their model quality- poses; none have a stripper look to them- girl next door.
1303 x 2000 rez pics ( sets shot in 2009)
1063 x 1600 pic size; 2008 shoots.
884 models; 1048 vids; 249,995 pics
some models set pic count up to 200 per set.
videos: masterbation, interview; backstage, audition tapes- get to know models; lesbian; boy
girl hardcore all have links that seperates them out- dont have to got to fill in the box search page
recent 06'-09' vids 797 X1200 size; good quality. ##windows media or quicktime
#photoshoots start with sofcore- with plenty of nakedness towards the end
# behind the scenes photoshoots
#ccbill processor- reliable cancels and join
Cons:
# great looking models are spoiled by poor resolutions for any shoot shot between 2001- 2004. 2005 set sizes are bare minimum
acceptable size. Sets any older than 2005 and get tinier and tinier.
797 x1200 pics rez shot in 2006
546 x 683 pics sets shot in 2001 (who wants to see sets this small?)- 2001 sets should should
be scrapped- save the space
800 x 1067 sets shot in 2002.
711 x 1056; 711 x 1091 rez pics for set shot in 2005
# updates are inconsistent; and pic count inconsistent.
#vids are broken down into clips; and aren't offered in various sizes.
# they should resize or drop the sets from 2001-2004 and then reduce the membership price to 24.95. #29.95 is a bit too high. Though I'd pay that if they upgrade 2001- 2004. But may be better to drop it and then charge $24.95 for a smaller site.
# some models portfolios are three updates or less- though most are four or more with about three photosets to one vid ratio
Bottom Line:
I was a complete man slut this month and joined a new site to look at pretty girls. It was a long time since I tried a new site. Matts Models was one site that I was looking at for a while. i saw some great reviews on it- which is why I gave it a shot.
This site is for those who like pics; amateur models, lesbian vids; masterbation vids. The models are mostly students from all over the country who are flown in to LA for a few days. Some are genuine first timers- others can be found on other sites. Some have never done this before- others are not.
Most vids are shot in an apartment setting which give it an amateur look.
The pic quality is good- not great; the same goes for the vids.and I liked both the pics and vids. The pics primarily should satisfy pic lovers.
The problem with trying new sites is that you don't know what you are getting. The reviews don't always help either.
They did deliver on the models; beautiful models; provocative poses; with good resolution.
a lot of the models are from all over the country- and are flown in to LA for the shoots.
but this site is the best dating back to 2006 with 2005 being the last real year for acceptable quality. Any older than that- there are still beautiful models; but the size starts getting too small.
I would say- from 2006 on, Matts Models is a pretty decent site. The photosets are not
watch4beauty quality. I am a pic lover and they satisfied me.
This sites videos are fair to good quality and comes in 797 x 1200 size on screen; full screen mode is available.
Some random videos come through in a larger; hi rez size larger than 797 x 1200.
Photo quality 2006 to present is 8/10
model quality is 8/10- they said amateurs and most are
vid quality 7/10
updates 6/10
So, again, Matts Models is a good site 2006 to present.. Anything older than 2005 starts to get pretty sub standard.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some new faces.
Cons:
Bad lighting. Average or mediocre video quality.
Inconsistent and rare updating.
Hidden bandwidth limit...was shut off with no warning for 24 hours. No notice of bandwith limits.
Horribly small jpegs. Some real small videos (even 10megs or less)
Bottom Line:
Probably worth 14.95 because of different non-pro models but boring presentation. Overall, I would skip it and pay xtra for a better sight. Teen Dreams is only 17.95 and has a lot more. However, it is nice to hear a conversation in English once in a while.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
This is one of my favorite sights.
- real amateur looking girls
- real clothes stripping
- I love the anti-glam attitude
- the little stories about the girls are fun
- nice emphasis on butt shots
- I am a big fan of the laying down flat on the belly pose and he has 4 or 5 of these in each shoot
- good variety and quality of girls - blondes, latinas, skinny, a little chubby, TANLINES!!, asian, etc.
Cons:
- Some complaints about photography may be justified. - red eye etc.
- videos are lame - but I don't do video
-
Bottom Line:
I like the amateur feel of this sight and the huge amount of photos. Also, he poses the models very well. Maybe its just me, but I get nothing from the big glam sights like Met or Hegre but this sight is very stimulating - you can actually visualize yourself talking (okay negotiating) to these girls instead of the ice princesses on the other sights.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ Well designed navigation with multiple content indexes
+ Roughly 1000 models
+ Very amateur spin, alot of unknown models
+ Many models who are now famous, but were just starting out when photographed
+ Interview "audition" videos are genuine and interesting, you get to hear what these girls are thinking about getting into the industry, Matt is respectful and not irritating
+ Matt seems to be very open to being contacted (although I never tried)
+ Good TBP price of $14.95
+ Bonus join of "Ownmymouth.com" for $4.95 for three days, really hot POV content
+ Matt likes to drink beer, play guitar, and photograph nude chicks! That's two things I have in common with him, and one I wish I did.
+ This was a top site in its day
Cons:
- Most content is very dated, low quality
- Alot of "unattractive" models
- Not many new updates, Matt appears to be losing interest in his site
- Too many photos in sets (typically 150 or more), alot of repeat photos, takes a long time to make progress
Bottom Line:
If I ever owned a website, and was just starting out, I probably wouldn't do half as good a job as Matt has. Finding the models, photographing them, administering the website, etc., is alot of work. Matt has certainly done an exceptional job for someone that started out almost 10 years ago, and in its heyday this must have been THE place to go for amateur and up-and-coming content.
Unfortunately by today's standards, the site's age really shows compared to other sites. Most photos are low resolution, and the newer higher res ones are poorly photographed (blurry, bad lighting, etc.)
A key reason I joined was to get some early content of many of my favorites: Destiny St. Claire, Sarah Blake, Peaches, Jaime Lynn, Jassie, Jana Cova, ... Unfortunately most of this content is low quality, and I was a bit disappointed. Some photos appear to have been originally shot with a digital cam many years ago, that gives an idea of the quality, but at the same time, adds to the "home-grown" nature of the site.
Not to be rude, but alot of the models are downright ugly, admittedly that's just my personal taste. If I was photographing nude models from a newspaper ad I'd probably shoot anyone that was willing! I'd recommend taking the tour and carefully perusing the model index. The actual site is just like the tour, except you have full access to the galleries and videos.
Bottom line: An interesting history lesson for collectors. Take the tour and judge this book by its cover.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Good amount of content
Easy to download, batch downloading
Great download speed. 40 MBit/s
Files named nicely
Nearly 3000 Zip sets
Close to 1000 videos
Newer videos look nice
$15 price is not bad
Cons:
Very unprofessional
Picture on the small side, except for the newest
Site is a pain to get around
Mostly couch scenes
Download managers are not fully suported
Bottom Line:
The price for this site makes it would a look. It is possible to download the zips in a batch download for you picture lovers. This makes download all 3000 zips pretty easy. The speeds are not bad either, I saw 40 MBit/s.
Be careful with download managers. They work to download the content once it is in queue, but if you use the manager to scan the site you will be locked out for browsing too many pages too quickly. This is not a huge issue though because they reset the lockout list every 15 minutes.
The videos vary on size and bit rate, but the newer half at least is 640x480 and around 1000 KBit/s. There are some that are half that, but those are older and that is usually to be expected.
The newest photo set, March 23, as about 100 photos in it and they are 1600x1067. They look nice, but of course the older ones are smaller 683x512.
A good portion of the videos are "audition" videos, then some masturbation videos. There is not a lot of G/G and some B/G, but not much. Some of the videos make you open separate browsers even when clicking the download link, and there are other things that make the site navigation a little of a pain.
They also claim to be the first to shoot Amy Reid, I am a big fan of her! :)
If you are bored on day and want a site that does not cost an arm and a leg, and do not mind less than perfect content then this site would be recommended. But if you want top rate photos and well planned scenes then you should look elsewhere
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Tons of content, upwards of 3,000 picture sets and 1,000 videos
- Many known pornstars before they were stars, many amateurs that I wish went on to a career in porn as well.
- Though quality on picture sets does vary, all sets are available in zips
- Exclusive content
- New site design from when I was a member a few months ago, download speeds have increased for me.
- Great TBP price of $14.95
Cons:
- Video quality could be improved, but I like this site for the exclusive pictures moreso than the videos.
- Picture quality could be better, but it is advertised as amateur site, so it isn't that bad.
- Not a lot of hardcore
- Older sets have a quality dropoff from new sets
Bottom Line:
Matt's Models reminds me a lot of the ATK sites. If you're here just for the videos, you probably won't like it as much. One of my favorite parts of the site is the "before they were stars" content. My original reason for joining was to get some really great older content of Eva Angelina, pre-implants, with glasses too. Just a few other recognizable models are Erica Campbell, Shay Laren and a personal favorite Addisson Rose.
Looking through the more amateur models that have yet to go pro, or for that matter, may never go pro, adds value to the site since some of these girls haven't been seen before. Cassandra Colegra is another favorite here, she has her own site now, but isn't as well known as most pro models.
Picture quality can throw you off some. I've downloaded different sets from different years and overall, I would call the resolution average just above average for the entire site. The newer sets are better, as expected. The videos I have downloaded are around 500 on the high end of the resolution scale, downloadable in full scenes, which is a plus over the aforementioned ATK sites.
Overall, this isn't a site that I would tell a new porn customer to check out. I get a lot out of this site, because they have plenty of material from some of my favorites, but it still isn't a site to introduce someone to online porn with. On the other hand, if you've never tried Matt's, I would give it a recommendation, especially with the $14.95 price. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of models
Models are wholesome, no tattoed pierced skanks
Relatively inexpensive
Cons:
Few of the models are model-quality
poor photography
most of the videos are poor quality
Bottom Line:
The first thing here is that the name of the website implies that "Matt" is a photographer, but clearly he's not. Not only the models are amateurs, but so is the photographer. Red-eye in most of the photos, many of the photos aren't scaled properly. And the sequences aren't interesting. You'd think after photographing so many girls he'd develop some sort of style.
Some of the sets look like they've been decorated from a dumpster; he's got to be making some money from this, so the poor photographer excuse shouldn't apply here. If you're a horny guy in your 20s you'll probably love this site, but there aren't enough girls on here that I'd be dying to see naked.
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Good quality pics (other older ones aren't so great, but recent ones are very good)
- Amateurs
Cons:
- Too many pics in shoots (100 pics; 150 for fuck scene is long enough)
- Pics too big for screen
- Mat has got into that DREAFUL HABIT of getting the girls to show sheir pussies at about pics 5 - thereby completely ruining the sense of erotic.
- Too many shaved pussies (as usual)
- If I see one more girl in that stupid pose of her finger in her mouth, I'll SMASH MY COMPUTER!
- Very few hardcore scenes
- Colours ugly (red & dark grey)
- Poor navigation
- Pages take too long to come up
Bottom Line:
An over-rated site, with lots of attractive girls, but not much of real value.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+ It's MOSTLY amateurs
+ Higher res video is a welcome addition
+ Decent amount of content
Cons:
- Yeah, the navigation's bad - especially for such a well-known site
- Server won't allow you to resume a broken download
- Thumbnails/pictures and video links not loading at times - have to refresh page, somtimes more than once
- Some videos download to 0 file size the first (sometimes second and third) time
Bottom Line:
With the debate here about what's what, I had to see for myself.
Trying to use a download manager, clicking on a "Save" button sends the file into a continuous download loop - it gets to 100%, then starts over. It also doesn't have the same file name as it does when downloading through your browser - it uses what I would guess are file ID numbers, with no file extension. I also found out through the download manager that you can't use an accelerator and that their server doesn't allow for resumption of broken downloads.
So, given the poor navigation, the server issues, the problems getting pages to load correctly and the inability to use my download manager, I'd have to say I'm disappointed. That's what led me to give Matt's a way lower score than I ever thought I would for an amateur site.
Current Member for over 6 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of models
tons of content
updated daily
Forums where you can chat with matt
Lots of first timers
Cons:
Not a lot of hardcore
old quality as you go back in dates
and in honor of liking girls mattsmodels is in need of more girl/girl
Bottom Line:
I would reccomend and do recomend this site to all my friends matt shoots some real hot girls . I see lots of models that go threw site end up on other sites and I say to myself I seen that chick on matts first . And that gentlemen is what i like to see the fresh nervous scared girls . Its natural and hot !
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
The models on matt's are where its at... he knows whats up with the real deal. I am sick of the fake same old girls. Always fresh content keeps me coming back.
Cons:
The nav is my only complaint, could be a bit better.
Bottom Line:
I don't know whats up with the initial review, but it doesn't add up. I would just stick with following what regular users have to say.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Lots of content
- Young models
- Cheap membership
Cons:
- Hard to navigate the site
- Only 4-5 thumbnails per page. You have to click forever to get to the good stuff.
- Not too many movies
- Models use the same poses as the last model
Bottom Line:
I just don't understand all the hype over this site. If you are looking for a truly amateur site from the girls to the website layout, this is the site for you.
Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
Tons of models. Easy site navigation. Has a forum to talk with him directly. Has some good videos (I never look at pictures). Constantly updating.
Cons:
video needs a ton of work for itself. Too much movement, bad angles ect. As explained to matt in his forum. Camera people dont make the best video people.
Bottom Line:
I have recommended others to his site...specifically to see the chantell video....it sets itself apart from the rest. Although again the video work could have been better. He got everything into the shot.
The internet is bogged down with female solo videos of models just going through the motions. Web masters claiming they have more then whats really offered.
I noticed here recently that he was getting more involved with the solo performances. That doesnt make it solo and have my own term for it....one mans jollies. Keeping things natural as possible and actually as simple as possible is what the internet needs. Hes almost there.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
- newest LA girls
- easy navigation
- RSS by god lol
- nice variety of pics
Cons:
- not enough hardcore
- older content low rez
Bottom Line:
i'm a fan of Hollywood porn (all that crap coming out of california). i like the trashy glamour of it. kinda like the mainstream hollywood crowd but more tits.
this site shows all those fresh little newbies flooding into LA. true to life, the girls here are nervous and it shows in the videos. no polishing or makeup, just raw amateur sets.
Matt's site is cheap as hell and easy to use. it lacks more hardcore, but i guess newbies don't wanna fuck right away lol
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
-Volume
-Reputation (questionable)
Cons:
-The web site is a mess and a bother to get around. It's a perfect example of what not to do.
-So many of the photos look like scans from magazines. The quality is poor, the color is uncontrolled, the clarity doesn't exist, just half-assed.
-If you want amateur, start with AbbyWinters, but don't go here.
Bottom Line:
You can find these models elsewhere and can actually see them clearly in these places, but not with Matt's Models. This is perhaps the most over-rated site on the net. Quality is poor and the site is hard to get around. I checked out this site years ago and it's just as bad as it was before. Save your money. Go elsewhere.
Was a member approx. 5 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-Most of the models are very good looking.
-Over 700 models
-Large photo sets: approximately 100+ photos.
-Many behind the scenes and audition videos.
-Some compelling hardcore videos.
-Inexpensive: $14.95
Cons:
-Many of the advertised amateurs are no longer amateurs.
-Most of the photos are only medium sized (711 x 1069).
-Not very many hardcore shoots/videos.
-The photo shoots are often low-budget (e.g., not lit very well). But, this can have its appeal as well.
Bottom Line:
It’s actually very odd to describe Matt’s Models as an amateur site. This is because, many of the models are immediately recognizable as girls who have gone on to have great careers as nude models or pornstars. Do you recognize the names Courtney Simpson, Cytherea, Erica (Rose) Campbell, Jelena Jensen, Jesse Capelli, and Lela Star? If so, then gimme-five fellow porn fan! I can’t vouch for whether Matt was in fact the first to photograph these girls or not. But, either way the site has appeal as a source of early shoots for these ladies as well as many others. Personally, the photo sets of Adel Sharpe (Miller), and her mesmerizing hardcore b/g video were worth the cost of admission. In the end, I wouldn’t recommend this site as an amateur site. Rather I’d recommend it to people who like the low-fi look of amateur production, but also want to see gorgeous women normally found on professional sites.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
-never seen before models
-good looking site
Cons:
-lacking videos
-pic viewing is horrible
-bad site navigation
Bottom Line:
i was quite dissapointed with this site. the videos are short and medium quality. most of the vids are audition vids which i loved but there was barely and lesbians, some boy/girl and solo. the pics were very annoying to view since it loaded in the same window, not a new page
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Matt is amazing. He has pics and vids of hundreds of girls. How do i get a job like this! I want to be Matt. Matt you rule!
Cons:
What Cons? This is the life! How many asses do you have to stare at Matt to find the perfect one! Seriosly there is not much wrong with his site...except i would like to see more videos and less pics. That would be one thing. More girls doing blowjobs and getting fucked.
Bottom Line:
Bottom line...you want to see some of the hottest chicks out there...Matt's fucking got them. I don't know who this guy is but he's my new hero!
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
