Was a member approx. 1 month prior to this review.
Pros:
PU/TBP discount
Nearly 20 years worth of updates online.
Site still updating with a new photo set nearly every day and a new video at least weekly.
Nearly 2000 models with over 10,000 photo sets and over 1000 videos.
Photo sets with downloadable zips in 4 sizes 800px, 1200px, 2500px & 5500px.
Latest videos come with 4 download options 1920, 1040, 720 & 480.
No download limits encountered and no issues using download manager.
Cancellation was easy enough with immediate email confirmation.
Cons:
Watch out for the pre-checked cross sales, you could end up with $80 of charges for unwanted subscriptions if you miss it.
Biggest con for me was the incomplete and shambolic model index, will explain more in bottom line.
I found the videos boring but maybe that's just me, I'm only really interested in the photos.
There's no real description or preview of the videos so you don't really have much idea of the content before you watch or download it.
No file sizes listed for videos or photo zips.
You could probably count the number of Black or Asian models on one hand.
Minimal model info.
Bottom Line:
I signed up for Femjoy early December after spotting a Cyber Monday deal on PU/TBP at $5 for the first month, an offer I found too good to refuse. I did have reservations about signing up though as I really don't like the Trust Charge billing company they use and the way they add 20% to the join price allegedly for VAT, not to mention the pre-checked cross sales. Happy to report that no problem with unauthorised charges though and cancellation was relatively straightforward. With the threat of a recurring billing of $36 I was only ever going to stay for 1 month.
The earliest updates on Femjoy date from June 2004 so you have almost 20 years of updates to see here. It's a nude art photography based site similar to MetArt with photo sets outnumbering videos by ten to one. There's almost 2000 models and they are almost all attractive to drop dead gorgeous. The content is nearly all solo with the odd two or three girl sets here and there. You get some brief biographical info of the models such as hair and eye colour, height, weight and breast size. They don't however say where they are from, I'm guessing mostly white Eastern Europeans. There's also something weird going on with the given ages of the models. You can look at a model who might look in her 20s then look at her bio and her age is given as 42. I'm guessing they put the model's age when she first appears on the site then it rises year by year to give her current day age.
The site is easy enough to find your way around, the main headings being home, models, photos and videos. My preferred way to browse a site is via the model index working my way through from A to Z. It was only after going through the models beginning with M it suddenly occurred to me that I hadn't seen Matty, a model I had noticed on the home page due to a recent update, so I checked again and she definitely did not appear in the model index. I then started looking through the photos pages and by the time I had reached page 50 dating back to 2018 I had come across more than 300 more models that do not appear in the model index. This seems to be a major oversight on the part of the site owners not ensuring that models who have debuted on the site in the last few years are added to the model index. You can also sort the model index, photos and videos by most recent and rating although I think sorting by rating is pretty useless as every photo set and video is rated 5/5 and every model apart from 2 on the last page are rated 5/5. There are also several dozen models in the model index who have zero photo sets or videos, I'm assuming these are models who retired and asked to have their content removed. Surely you should also remove them from the model index?
The photo sets are the main strength of Femjoy, they clearly use some of the best photographers in the business. I particularly enjoyed the many photo sets shot in stunning outdoors settings. Thankfully they now produce the photo sets in a decent mid size 2500px option which they haven't always done until recent years and the main reason I had never joined until now. The file sizes of the 2500px zips are mostly nice and compact coming in at between 30 to 100MB although for some reason the updates in the last few months are more like 300 MB. The zip file names include model name, photographer name and set name. Unfortunately they don't include the date so the photo sets won't sit in chronological order in your folder as they do at MetArt. There was no index of photographers that I could find although if you are viewing a photo set you can click on the photographers name and you'll be taken to a page with all their other sets.
I'm not that interested in videos and tend to find them boring on these types of sites. The first one I watched was of a beautiful Asian babe with an infectious smile named Kloyali. She's walking around on a beach in a bikini, removes the bikini and then rolling around naked on the sand and in the sea, you barely get a glimpse of pussy. It's very tame. Not all videos are like that though, I watched one of Caprice masturbating and then one of Anna N called Maid for Pleasure where she's dressed as a French Maid and masturbating with a dildo so there is some more explicit stuff but I'm not sure how much of that you will find. I guess it depends on the model and what she feels comfortable doing.
In conclusion an an excellent site with beautiful models and amazing photography, highly recommended if you have the time and patience to go through it and find all the models that are missing from the model index, thankfully 10 days off work for Christmas meant I had the time. I was tempted to knock points off for the shambolic organisation of the model index but in the end just based my score on the quality of the content.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge Archive
Almost Perfect Website
Very Beautiful Girls
High Quality Photos and Videos
Search by Photographer
Cons:
Only softcore
Only solo girls
More of a photo site than a video site
Bottom Line:
Femjoy is a site I joined a couple of months ago. They have a huge archive of photos and videos going back to 2005. I found the website so much better than most of the sites I visited or joined. You can easily navigate to where you want to go. Even though the main sections are simple as Home, Photos, Videos, and Models; the website offers a rich experience of enjoying the site.
Femjoy girls are very very beautiful for sure. You will definitely love them. Their photos are very high quality and very enjoyable. As a photo lover, I was surprised to have not met this site before this year. Their videos are good also, but mostly taken when the photo shoots are made. I would classify Femjoy as photo site than a video site. You can download photos, and videos in any quality you want. I have not met big problems watching the videos, but I also cannot say that the site is faster than average.
Femjoy only offers solo girls with very light softcore photos and videos. If you are looking for more, you should try other sites. The thing about the site is that you know what you will get, and you know you will get the best of it with high quality. Even though the website is a good design, the site is simple; but it doesn’t stop you from finding what you want to find in their archive.
Who would like this site? Definitely the ones, who like to see high quality photos of very beautiful women. That is what Femjoy is for me. I first joined for a month, but after that I made a one-year subscription. Currently, a month subscription (first month) is $10 and a year subscription is $90. If you are not sure, you can do as I did, and join for a month and if the site pleases you, you can go for a year subscription; but if you love photos and photo sets, it is a site to be joined for a year with their huge archive.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Large site that leans heavily to the photography side, but has a good collection of videos too.
Currently has 1,622 models
9,036 photo sets and 755 videos.
The videos are better than I expected them to be, while there's no full masturbation, there is light masturbation and full views of the models bodies.
Averages a photo update each day and a video update once per week.
Cons:
Music in videos takes away the moaning -- if there is any moaning.
Site layout seems to have been changed. There is a button to go back to the old website style. The new or current style isn't real good to use with Edge Beta browser as the streaming player's function buttons are covered by the videographer's name and you click it when trying to fast forward, taking you to the videographer's page and stopping your video.
Bottom Line:
I decided to review Joymii and Femjoy at the same time as I got the sites confused, having a Adult Time account makes it more confusing since both are on Adult Time now in very limited sample sizes. I joined both Femjoy and Joymii as standalone sites not with Adult Time access.
I'm not a big picture collector, but this is my second time on Femjoy and I really like their photos. Their biggest size is 6000x4000 or vice versa and they are incredibly crisp photos for that large resolution.
The models are your regular European teen models, you do see some variety in body shapes and sizes, but in general, these are slim or slender models and they are nearly all very pretty. The videos are better than most artsy sites and they do show full pussy spreads and buttholes. You even get some rubbing, light touching and that helps keep this site's content out of the too softcore grouping.
There is nothing close to a balance of videos and photos as the photos near 10,000 sets while the videos haven't even reached 1,000. All are downloadable and there's no limits from as far as I can tell.
It's a good site, I like it better than Joymii which I believe is probably ran by the same company and if not they are very similar. I prefer these solo scenes when on the softer side of porn.
The video options are 1080p, 720p, 540p, 360p, 270p. Their content dates all the way back to 2005. There are some models here with tattoos, but they are minimal and don't distract.
I do think if you are interested in this site it should be more for the photos than videos, even though I recommend streaming a few of the videos. I think they could be seen as fetish videos with the pretty women naked, touching themselves lightly, their natural arousal and positioning causing their pussies to open, but then again, I could see just about anyone saying the videos are too softcore.
A few site layout issues aside, it's a very good site overall and should make any photo collector happy. The photo sets are often more explicit than the videos.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great model interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not at all shy
Improved site layout and navigation
Token based login (remembers you)
4 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 6000x4000 pixels
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation much better but still a little quirky
Videos are a sometimes bit snoozy
Bottom Line:
This is my third review of this site in about 6 years, and I'm happy to say that, with an improved layout, better file size options and less inhibited models, it is better than ever.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best.
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on the number of sets, but it is now up to about 5000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last 4 years. The pre-2010 sets tend to be a little more "Naked girl in the woods" but for the past several years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in many different poses...standing, reclining, come-hithering, you name it. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Photographer interaction with the model is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward, ugly or uncomfortable anywhere. The photographers here are simply the best in the industry. They start with beautiful women and turn them into breathtaking goddesses. Stefan Soell, for example, manages to regularly find and photograph some of humanity's finest examples of the female form in some of the most beatiful settings on earth. And the other photographers are just as good, providing you with uncluttered, nicely focused, obstruction- free, mostly prop-free views of beautiful, confident, 100% natural women.
Just a reminder that this is relatively soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and a few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want harder core in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views from every angle of great looking models. In the past few years, the sets have become somewhat more explicit. That is a huge change from prior years and adds another level to the awesomeness of these models.
The videos usually follow the pattern of a similar photo shoot. They are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. There are a few close-ups, etc., but there is usually no masturbation. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (480p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
The photo sets typically have about 80-120 images in them and the images can be downloaded individually or in zip files of the whole set. Image sizes in the recent zips range from a now-puny 800 pixels across to a decent poster sized 6000 pixels across. To get the really big images, you have to download the zip file.
Femjoy updated their site layout a couple of years ago and overall it is a huge improvement. Very large set thumbnails include the model name, the set name, the photographer name, the set date and the number of images in the set. The main pages are an uncluttered design with weekly videos on the right, favoriate models toward the bottom and a couple of other sites referenced at the very bottom. There are also pages for just photo sets and pages for just videos. On those pages, you can navigate easily to any month of any year all the way back to 2004. Nicely done. No aggresive partner marketing in your face like so many other sites. There is a search function for models and photographers, a set card for each model and photographer, and a scoring system of 1-5 stars for both the model and the photographer.
The ONLY thing I still have not gotten used to is the in-set navigation. It is much better than before, but there are no options for opening an image in a new window and th eback button doesn't really work. Everything here opens in the original window and if you try to open an image in a new window, some functionality, like image size selection or next/previous is lost. Click on a set and you get nice large thumbnails of all of the images in the set on one page. HUGE PLUS. There is a large X in the upper right hand corner that will get you back to the page you came from. Same with the images. The first time you select an image, you get the smallest size until you chose a different size, then the site remembers that size but only for the current set. And the X in the upper right corner will take you back to the previous page, but it takes you to the TOP of the previous page rather then where you were. A little inconvenient if you are looking at images at the bottom of a set or a set thumbnail at the bottom of a page.
OK, I'm out of room....
Bottom line? If you are into medium-soft core and like young, showy, confident, OMG beautiful young women, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content and good pricing. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months. I will have a subscription here until either the site or I are no longer around.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the most beautiful women you will find anywhere on planet Earth
Daily updates, with about 9 to 11 total updates each week. Almost every week, one of the updates is a video.
Extremely high quality production values.
Some of the models have A LOT of content – Ariel has 73 photo sets and 40 videos, Lorena G has 78 photo sets and 27 videos. Rena has been appearing very frequently recently – she now has 26 photo sets and 1 video.
HTTPS is used (TLS 1.2)
12 years’ worth of content, and a lot of the older stuff is stellar
Cons:
Still a number of technical quirks / glitches. They don’t interfere with the main task you are here for – looking at pictures/videos and downloading the same. But they make searching, tagging, favoriting, etc. a lot less useful than they should be.
Very little striptease action here – in most sets, the model is completely nude throughout.
Tech support is a joke.
Bottom Line:
Back in the day, Femjoy and Met Art were very close competitors, and I tended to prefer Femjoy. Then at some point Met Art really stepped up their game while Femjoy seemed a little stagnant. The models on Femjoy were always quite attractive, but not spectacular. In the past year or two, this seems to have changed – there are a number of models on Femjoy that are stunningly beautiful, and I have not seen many of these models on other sites.
And when I say stunningly beautiful, I mean I am actually stunned. Several times a month there will be a photoset where I just stop and stare at the cover photo before clicking into the photo set. My jaw will quite literally drop on some of these. That doesn’t happen very often on most other sites.
The new design of the site (implemented in January 2017) is a huge improvement over the older Femjoy, but it still has many quirks and other issues. (If you prefer the older layout, that is still available at old.femjoy.com). The new version has been up long enough that these quirks should be fixed by now, so it seems likely that there will be slow or no progress on fixing the issues.
For example, if you go to the Models page, there are filter buttons across the top of the page for Sort By, Bra Size, Hair Color, Ethnicity, or Shaved. However, if you click on these buttons in Firefox or IE 11, nothing happens. If you do it in Chrome, The Sort By allows you to choose Recent, Views, or Rating, but the other buttons don’t do anything.
You can save Favorites for Photo Sets, Videos, or individual pictures, but not for Models. You can save as many Photo Sets as you want as Favorites, but your Favorites page will only display 20 of them – there’s no next page to see the other ones.
If you want to change your password, you have to do it through the billing site (ccBill in my case) rather than on the site itself.
Tech support is a joke. If you post a request for help via the FAQ/Support Page, you get no response. (I tried several times). If you try to “send feedback”, the page just hangs and never sends your feedback in. Luckily my requests were fairly minor, but it would be nice to actually have at least a response, even if it’s not possible to fix the issue. But when you make it impossible for complaints to ever reach you, you also make it impossible to improve the site. If they are assuming that the lack of complaints reaching their ears indicates all is well, then I guess ignorance really is bliss.
At least the speed is good for browsing, streaming and downloading. Picture and video quality is uniformly excellent.
Monthly memberships go for $29.95, with a PU discount to $149.5 for the first month. Annual memberships are $119.50.
There are 8151 photo galleries, 632 videos, and 577 models appearing on the site. The oldest content dates back to 2005.
If you like looking at outrageously gorgeous women who have no clothes on, this is the site for you. Based on the quality of the photos and the models, this should be ranked as one of the top sites in the world. Unfortunately the annoying technical stuff knocks several points off the score.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
1-2 sets a day and 1 video a week
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation still not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Bottom Line:
I noticed my review of this site expired and there are no current reviews, so I'm updating my old review. Very little has changed since 2014 except the number of sets has gone up a lot.
Femjoy is one of a few sites that I have an annual membership to. This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open and the site seems to e getting a little more explicit than it was in the early days. No problem with that!
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 4000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful views of great looking models.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
So..what's not to like? Well...there are STILL a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best.
First, the navigation is still a little off. There are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. You have to click "back to gallery" or pageback to return to the gallery page. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving because you will inevitably close an image and end up exiting the set. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I was told they were working on this in 2014. Apparently, they lied.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, showy, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months!
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Some of the best European models
Wonderful sets and lighting
Top notch photography
Great interaction
2 sets a day
Models generally are not shy
Good site layout
3 image file/zip file sizes for each set.
Images up to 5500 x 3700 pixels(a 6 foot poster)
Excellent value for the money
Cons:
Navigation not up to par with the best sites
Videos are a bit snoozy
Image/zip file sizes are odd/archaic
Site is not quite as reliable as some others.
Bottom Line:
I've been a member of this site 5 or 6 times over the years and keep forgetting to write a review. It keeps drawing me back.
Here's the good and bad (absolutely no ugly).
This is a site with photography that ranks up there with the best in this genre...perhaps THE best. The photo sets and models themselves are generally spectacular. In fact, there are a few exclusive models here that are the absolute pinnacle of beautiful female form. Translation: They have perfect, perfect bodies, pretty faces and bright eyes. The models are 18 to mid-20s, fit, clean, totally natural, mostly clean shaven and just drop-dead gorgeous. Very few piercings and next to no tattoos. The more recent models are very open. I've never used this word in a review before. Delicious.
Lets talk about content:
The site has been around since 2004. I can't get a good read on sets, but it is at least 3000 or so, plus about a video or two a week for at least the last few years. Of course the older sets tend to be a little more "observing a naked girl in the woods" but for the past few years, the shooting formula has been damn near perfect. Great mix of full body and close-ups in various poses. Sets and outdoor locations are great. Interaction is great. Lighting is consistently terrific. Posing is great. Nothing awkward or uncomfortable anywhere.
The videos are sometimes of the photo shoots and sometimes shot separately on the same set. The girls start naked or disrobe and are usually undressed by the halfway point. Any close-ups, etc are reserved for the last few minutes of the video and there is rarely any masturbation. These are not bad videos, but they are not terribly exciting unless you really want to see how a particular model moves. They come in multiple sizes and formats from standard definition (272p) to 1080p. Older ones are in 720p.
Just a reminder that this is soft core. There is no guy/girl sex, no toys, no insertions, etc., with maybe a little bit of masturbation and few girl/girl sets just touching and leaning. (If you want that in this format, go over to Joymii.) At Femjoy, you just get beautiful unobstructed view.
So..what's not to like? Well...I know the webmasters are working on improvements, but there are a few things that keep me from rating this site right up there with the best. I know they will be reading this so forgive me if I direct some of my points to them.
First, the navigation is a little off. there are a few too many clicks to get where you want to be and not enough new-window options. When you click on a set from the home or updates page, a new window opens for that set and then all actions happen in that window. Click to see images, and a limited number of images appear in a gallery. Click on "show all" (nice pun, I guess) and all of the images appear. What, are we still in dial-up times? Just show me ALL the images when I ask to see ALL images, please. This doesn't sound like much, I know, but it is a little odd to navigate through. ..Then there is selecting a picture. When you click on an image from a gallery, it opens up in the same window that the gallery of images was in. Click back and you are taken back to the top of the gallery page regardless of where the image was that you clicked on. This may also seem like a little thing but when looking through many images, it is unnerving. What SHOULD happen is that each set should open a window/tab and each image within that set should open a window/tab. Or better yet, the whole thing should be user selectable like several of the other top-tier websites are. To their credit, the navigation options once looking at an image are pretty good (larger image, next, previous and back to gallery).
And my last little nitpick is with the file sizes. There are three image size choices: "Quickview Edition" images are 800k wide. "Collectors Edition" images are 1200k wide and "Poster-Size Edition" images are 4500-5500k wide. Wait, what? (Insert captain Piccard meme here) Who the fuck looks at 800k images anymore? Even iPhones are 960 pixels wide/tall! My smallest computer screen is 1900 pixels wide. So the two smallest images sizes are waaaay too small to fill my computer screen and the only other option involves 5500 pixel, 2 meg images and a zip file that is a third of a gig! There is just something seriously outdated with this thinking. I appreciate the larger images, but they are a little too large to be loaded and kept exclusively. What is needed is a 1200, a 2000 and a max resolution (4500+) image size. I have been told they are working on fixing this and will happily report when it is fixed.
Bottom line? If you are into soft core and like young, OMG beautiful girls, don't hesitate. Just join this site. This is one of the few sites that I would recommend for an annual membership because of the terrific soft core content. There is enough here to keep you entertained for months.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Overall solid photography and production values and a clean but simple layout.
- Attractive, youthful, slender models, mostly euro with some porn star cross overs.
- Good download speeds, with a nice variance of photo file sizes.
- Apps are offered for IPhone and Android.
- All material is exclusive.
- Large Model Data base.
Cons:
- The search engine for models consists of A to Z or models name making it time consuming to searh the site in an efficient way.
-Some of their better models are shot in a very softcore way. Little use of lingere and too many straight birthday suits in some sets.
- Mild decline in the quality of recent models.
- Watch for upsell when joining, CCBill was slow to respond to issues.
Bottom Line:
FEMJOY is an art nude site which caters to those who like young, generally pretty and natural women. It is softcore, so no insertions other than an occasional finger tip nor toy play and all of the material is exclusive. The current price for the site is 19.95 recurring which is a bargain if this type of site interests you and especially if you've never been a member.
You have several photo formats which is nice and all pictures within the last four years are high resolution. The zip files offered are small, standard (my preference) and large and the download speeds were above average for me.
I personally ran into to no download limits but I do not have a mass downloader. Still, I was able to pop out up to 20 plus gallery downloads per session with no trouble.
FEMJOY uses what I call mildly deceptive advertising where they want you to see the more and not the less. They claim up to 3 updates daily and up to 2 new videos per week. Well, I saw that happen just once in both categories. FEMJOY has a wide selection of models, up to 750. There has been a ton of brunettes and not enough blonde's in recent months and in my humble opinion, they haven't had those knock out main stay models since the last time I joined.
To clarify, I waited a solid two plus years between memberships and it took that long for me to justify joining again from simply following their updates and models.
The videos offer what is more or less a flash player and formats for windows are 640 x 360 or 1280 x 720. The smaller files were adequate for my tastes. They offer the same exact sizes for Quicktime and have an Ipod feature as well and even a small playstation portable. Also added are apps for Android and my preferred IPhone. but I found neither compelling enough to use or go through the mild learning curve associated.
The quality of the videos are good with nice production values but they are softcore for sure and some seem repetitive, especially if shot by the same person. The photo's are sharp and clear with not too much fodder in the sets, but like the videos and one of my main gripes, look the same when certain photo artists are used.
Some of the artists just have the same old style over and over and the same backdrops as well which gets boring quick to a true photo enthusiast. But quality is there which brings me to my main gripe and one that frustrated me greatly and dropped my rating several points.
The search features are deplorable for such a quality site. Forget typing in blond or red hair and blue eyes and such for it isn't there. And when you go to the models section your eyes will cross trying to pick out models that float your boat.
It is very clunky and difficult to pick through for the photos are not always reflective of the models you will see upon clicking on them. It took me the entire allotted membership time to dig out the models and zip files and vids I wanted to keep and this is just unacceptable for a site that should have a search feature that matches the overall quality of their productions.
You can search models A to Z or by name and we all know models names change from site to site and that is another gripe towards better model identification. The main stay models they do have, unfortunately are more PG, meaning no views of the real goods, save a shadow or two.
Another negative was when I joined it took three hours before I could log on which was a major turnoff, but all sites generally come with one glitch, so no big deal. However, it took CCBill five business days to respond to a complaint and had I been down that whole time, they would have been extremely slow to repsond to the issue.
That is not necessarily a problem of the FEMJOY staff who uses their services. They also offer EPOCH as a way to pay as well. There is one cross or upsell to watch for when signing up.
Overall, the quality of the models and photography and such is well above average, but in my opinion this site trails Met Art and especially MPL a site I now think sets the pace for art nude erotic photography in this niche.
I recommend FEMJOY for those interested in these types of sites and feel it is a very good site. I am a very picky purveyor and I found quality but not without some serious work and the aforementioned crossed eyes.
One telling thing for me which makes it clear it'll be another two years before I revisit was that in the entire month of the membership, save two days left, I downloaded 10 of 63 photo updates, which shows a slight decline in quality per average. I dowloaded the majority of 19 models content.
That to me is a great value but I expected more in that I waited over two years between memberships. If this makes any sense, I was both a satisifed customer that was a little disappointed at the same time and I absolutely detested how hard it was to search the models for the material I covet.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
This site has some of the best looking women, as well the shear amount of pictures and video is why I signed up for a year long membership. Their updates are on a daily basis and that was another reason for my sign up.
Cons:
The site design and the throttling:
There needs to be a search ability meaning like most sites you can search hair color / Breast size and so on. Have not found that here.
Throttling is insane, Meaning just surfing the site can cause the throttling to kick in and ban you for 3 Hours. Plus downloading does the same thing.
I understand the need to throttle people on downloads but not the site activity.
Suggestion to the site if they read this is to add a meter to the site on each users profile so the user can see how much data has been used and slow it down.
I have a very fast internet connection and its frustrating to get that your limit message even while looking at pictures on the site or streaming video.
Bottom Line:
If you sign be prepared to go extremely slow and do not spend to much time on the site or you will get limited and since there is so much content is almost impossible to review without getting limited.
The Pictures and videos are really nice
Update. Sent email to webmaster concerning the throttling and they came back and said they are reviewing the throttling and possibly going to remove the restrictions. But the other statement that got me was leeching and their statement the throttle is set to keep people from leeching their site.
But the issue with that is I'm paying for access so leeching is not a true statement if it was free then I understand but this is a paid site.
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
Pros:
+ huge archive of models
+ natural looking girls
+ up to 3 daily updates
+ pics up to 4000 px resolution (available in 3 different sizes [hi, med, low])
+ HD vidz
Cons:
- download limit
- unhandy search function
- uninspired/uncreative photo series
- only nude models (no undressing)
Bottom Line:
If you are searching for young and innocent looking teens, Femjoy is the right place for you. It offers you tons of beautiful and naturally looking girls. But that is no longer a unique feature today.
So especially that fact makes Femjoy a little bit limited in my humble opinion, because you'll find 99 % outdoor sets and complete nude girls from the beginning of the photo series.
What you see is what you get: nude teens. If you're looking for something more, you won't find it here.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ massive model archive
+++ up to 3 updates per day
++ lot of contributing photographers (+180)
++ big hdv video archive
++ images up to 4000 px
+ functional site
+ Iphone / PSP compatible
Cons:
--- download limit & partially slow
--- search function is unhandy
-- just one good photographer (Stefan Soell)
-- bulk photography
- hard to get in the mood
- they make you feel how hard they want your money
Bottom Line:
After X-art, I was seeking for another compelling site full of nude teens with a higher rate of updates and a solid archive.
Femjoy looked familiar to a couple of other sites I've seen before, which gave me a "related-to" feeling but didn't care for the moment.
They have a huge archive for galleries and HD videos is an acceptable quality. It was a little hard to get into the right mood by all the functional and plain and passionless presentation of the girls.
Stefan Soell seem to be the best of all contributors there, at least for me.
Femjoy is a good site for outdoor fans and those who like young girls being naturally naked.
Don't expect the girls doing anything fancy, they don't!
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
- Very natural looking models
- Classy, semi artistic and professional photography
- The atmosphere of the photos are very nice
- Constant updates to the site
Cons:
- No hardcore
Bottom Line:
Femjoy is not a site for everyone. It's not smut and not a blood pressure raising hard core site. The site studies the enigma of natural beauty itself and put it in place in softcore orientation. Although the term 'erotic' can be applied semi-heartedly, Femjoy can be catergorized as 'classical nude glamour softcore', something you would find in the photography sections of book stores.
In my mind, Femjoy is one of the most natural softcore photography sites I have visted. The models are usually in their most natural state, in many sizes and for some seeing, models with untrimmed pubes can be something we think back to in the 1970s and 1980s. The lack of using heavy makeup also brings the perspective of realistic beauty back to life. If you're bored of looking at nudes, also check out the scenaries of the photos.
As for the photography, it is professional and definately classic glamour. Some of the photo's artistic styles are cleary taught out from master glamour photographer John Kelly.
I would rank this site as one of the top 5 natural softcore sites on the Internet. Other than Femjoy, I'd also recommend MetArt, like what other reviewers have mentioned.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
PROS:
-Over 200.000 poster size photos
-All photo series come in up to 4000 pixels resolution.
-Photo sets available in 3 different sizes: hi res, med res, lo res
-Zips for photo sets, for each res: hi, med, lo
-over 700 models, many are extremely attractive
-over 100 contributing photographers
-830 additions per year
-10 new HDV movies per month
-Tiny watermark
-No download limit
-No DRM
-choice of multiple formats and definitions for downloading videos
-special new low price $29.95(USD) for 60 days/recurring
-billing from CCBill, a reliable outside billing company
Cons:
PROS: (continued)
-content 100% exclusive to this site
-updates are dated
-no automatic time-out from site
CONS:
-Basic navigation, could be a little easier to use. To download a photoset or video, select the model, look at the photosets or videos available, select the photoset or video you want, then (if it's a photoset) select the res you want, and download the zip file. At met-art, it just seems
simpler to download the zip files than at femjoy.
-Searching is easier at met-art than at femjoy.
-Site is strictly soft softcore. No hardcore at all. Girls only. Boys not allowed. If a girl
touches herself, or one girl touches another, it is the lightest brush, not erotic at all.
-Don't always prominently list who the photographer is for each photo set or video. So if you want to know the photographer (to keep a personal, manually created list of the photosets, date of posting, title, photographer, etc.), you have to hunt around to see who the photographer was.
Bottom Line:
CONS: (continued)
-Limited to slender white European teen. Site advertises that models are from all over the world, but everything I saw looked to be indistinguishable from teen European. "Our girls come from all over the world - even from Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, the US, Scandinavia and not only from Eastern Europe."
Well, from the geography I learned in the Dark Ages (1960s), Spain, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, and Scandinavia were in Europe. The US might not be in Europe, but how can you tell a US model from a model who is European? Simple answer: Look at her passport. Duh. Everything I saw at Femjoy was European teen, as far as I could tell.
-Most photo sets are solo models
-A small percentage of photo sets and videos are two female models. But there is no erotic contact
between the models, unless you can sense the Vulcan mind-meld auras within the models.
-Model bios: none
BOTTOM LINE:
This is one of the better/best softcore European teen glamour photo mega-sites.
The site ranks up there with met-art, mplstudios, justteensite, mypreciousvirgins, etc.
The main value is in the photosets. Huge number of models, a large number should appeal to almost
anyone's taste (but almost all models are slender white European teen).
There are a number of short videos, 2-6 minutes long, super softcore, high quality, great focus,
good to very-good color, good lighting, nice soundtrack.
The videos are more interesting than met-art videos, but that is not saying much. You are watching a lovely girl doing very little: she stands up, sits, lies down, smiles, walks. There is no plot to the videos. Another nice factor in the Femjoy videos is how clean they are, in the sense you don't hear a distracting photographer giving directions, you don't have annoying photoflashes going off in the video shoot.
There are a large number of Femjoy member comments inside the site about how great the models look, how wonderful the photography is, how artistic and erotic the photos and videos are, how this is a wonderfully clean site with no dirty, vulgar elements. If you are into super softcore, with models wearing minimal makeup, no tease at all (unless you supply it yourself in your own mind), this is the site for you.
Even though Met-art is very simllar to this site in the softcore approach, I find Met-art photos
much more satisfying: the models at Met-art are better looking because of greater use of make-up,
greater use of costumes, with more effort put into making the photoshoots more individualistic with varied sets and backgrounds.
I think Met-art navigation is simpler and easier to use to search the models available. It is also
easier to download the files at Met-art.
If Femjoy deserves an 87 for its fine photography, then Met-art deserves a 97 for its fine, more erotic photography, plus easier navigation, plus free video cams. There are no free video cams at Femjoy.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
· tons of new teens
· images up to 4000px
· hdv movies (several formats)
· 100 contributing artists
· clean and simple design
· good update frequence
· iPhone version
Cons:
· speed occasionally low
· download limit
· worst search ever
· flip-book photography
· 99% nude girls from the first image
· 1-3 sets for most of the teens
Bottom Line:
Like Met Art, Femjoy offers a good variance and tremendious amount of teen content.
You seek for young and innocent looking teens and natural photography, you're at the right place. Femjoy will blast you away with thrilling softcore and fulltime nudes.
I am personally overdozed with the teen-niché and seek for a site with real women now.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+High Quality photos
+HD Quality videos
+Lots of updates
+Good mix of models
Cons:
-Every set pretty much starts off with the model already nude. No teasing and/or clothes at all.
-Each gallery is set up where the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
-With no clothing, all the sets seem to start running together and looking the same.
-And as others have stated, most of the photos don't seem to have much life.
-Videos appear to be nothing more then moving photoshoots. You'll get a few closeups but doesn't really seem to be much reason to watch them.
Bottom Line:
I logged into my Playboy Cyber Club account the other day and saw a offer for so much off a FemJoy subscription for Playboy subscribers. So figured I'd give it a shot. The quality of the site is outstanding, both photos and videos. Unfortuantly each set starts with the model fully nude. No clothes, lingerie, bra & panties or anything else like that. So after awhile each model and each of her sets start to blur together and feel the same.
While the photos are great quality, I didn't like how in the preview gallery the top 1/3 is the highest quality(normally 3000 or 4000px) the middle is 2nd highest and bottom 1/3 is lowest. Would be nice if you could set it up so each gallery automatically came up in the highest quality.
The vidoes are in HD and as good of qualty as other sites HD videos (Playboy, MCNudes). But with no clothing or anything else, there doesn't seem to really be much of a reason to watch the videos.
Overall the site is great at what it does. Nice quality photos and vidoes, which is a big selling point for me. Most of the models are very attractive. It's just the sets seem blah. With no clothing, the only real difference between each set is the background. I myself like the mixing it up that other sites do. So if you want nothing but nude women, then this site would be great for you. If you like any kind of tease, then I'd advise against FemJoy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+++ beautiful locations
+++ beautiful models
+++ mostly right mood of the models
+++ professional photography
++ "best of FEMJOY"
+ daily updates
+ variety of video formats
+ reasonable default for pic size (fits into normal screen)
Cons:
-- nude-only, almost no undressing
-- movies are recording of photoshoots
- no "extras"
- lack of categorized search
Bottom Line:
After trying MetArt (see my review) I've decided to try another top-rated site with about the same idea. As a result of reviews being that close, I will mostly compare these two sites.
But first, I shall note that screenshot on PU doesn't do justice FEMJOY's home page - it looks really ugly, while FEMJOY's design is very clean and clear.
Now to site comparison on different accounts:
1. "Art". IMHO MetArt is a bit better in this category (while FEMJOY is good, MetArt's pictures are IMHO a bit more "artistic", at least the covers).
2. Beauty of the girls. IMHO about the same ("stunning" is the right word for it).
3. Mood of the girls. As it was mentioned about MetArt, girls there look "bored"; as Monahan has put it for MetArt, "There is no real "fire" in many (most?) of the pics". It is IMHO MUCH better with FEMJOY, so FEMJOY is a clear winner here.
4. Quality of photography. IMHO about the same (MetArt has better "covers", but FEMJOY gets it IMHO a bit better "inside" galleries).
5. Beauty of locations. IMHO MetArt has a bit better locations overall.
6. Variety. Because of clothing and undressing on MetArt, they win this one.
7. "Extras". Free web-cam obviously brings MetArt some extra value.
Bottom line: these 2 sites (FEMJOY and MetArt) represent about the same niche, and while they obviously have their differences, overall I can't say that one is clearly better than the other one, hence the same rating for FEMJOY as it was for MetArt.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
* Beautiful Girls
* Lots and lots of Girls
* Very High Quality Pics & Videos
* Download Different Video Formats
* Regularly updated
Cons:
* Download limits do apply
* Lack of Creativity
* A little bit expensive
Bottom Line:
* For those who are only willing to fork out a few months worth of membership, download limits do apply, 2 gigs an hour, might seem like a lot, but for those with fast and unlimited internet access, and a mind set to download a lot of content, that is really not much, (this is called leeching).
* Gorgeous naked girls, no doubts about it, young hotties, and a whole lot of them,(which might collide against my previous comment).
* Easy and simple to use menus.
* Above all, absolutely amazing and stunning girls, and well worth getting a membership, just sit back and relax, this site is surely worth it.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
# this site spoils pic lovers; models are shot either in lavish interior settings or beautiful outdoor settings.
#if you have a large flatscreen monitor, these Femjoy pics, vids will rock on that monitor
# beautiful woman in beautiful setting is mastered; probably the best aesthetic photography of its type.
# two updates per day; and 10 new HDV films per month.
# many video options: WMV 640 x 360;WM HDV 1280 x 720; Quicktime 640 x 360; Quicktime HDV 1280 x 720; iphone 320 x 240
# some of the pics made me gasp, simply beautiful
# some updates are marked best of to identify exceptional and popular shoots
# navigation is non convoluted, large magazine style avatars; simple to see what they have; you just click on the month of the year that you want on the left hand side.
# pics come in three sizes either 4000 X 2667, 4000x 2667 or 3500 X 2333, 2333 X 3500; and 1200 X 800, 800 X 1200 pics; 800 X 533, 533 X 800
# offers two months for $49.95 which is $25/ mo
Cons:
# this is not atk style photography, no pussy play- just models posing.
# vids are models posing, are of lesbian models posing, dancing, walking in scenery, interacting in scenery- but not hardcore
# $34.95 a month is on the higher end for those who want to pay on a month to month basis
# models do wear clothes to start out the set, but most sets are strictly nude for those who want to see the models wear clothes
Bottom Line:
If you like enjoy the shape of a woman in the nude posing or being filmed in natural light of a beautiful indoor or outdoor settings. Then this site will interest you.
I recommend this site especially to those with large flat screen monitors - these pics are gorgeous. videos too. Previously, I had a flatscreen when I was a member a few months ago. I rejoined 2 months for $49. I currenlty have a small laptop so I don't have the advantage of seeing the full potential of these pics/ vids.
When I joined this site, I wasn't sure that I'd like it. I was unsure about joining a nude site. But there are gorgeous updates like Koysusha, under the tree..or Larissa. some of the models arch their back and tilt their head back and let lose with their hair flowing in the breeze such as on top of a rock; or wade through a gorgeous field of yellow flowers or purple thistles, and it is gratifying to look at in a way that I didn't think was possible.
You can get your rocks off to this style photography believe me. This site proved to me that it can be done; and quashed the hardcore-is always-better theory. The gorgeous models in beautiful landscapes: mountains, shoreline, river, meadow can grow on you just the same as hardcore. So I would suggest this site for those who want to try it. There are many backgroundable pics in this site and very few wasted pics.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- High quality site that has a site full of content
- Videos checking in 1280 on high end over 5000 bitrates
- Pictures go as high as 4000 on high end and come in zip files as well
- Good download speeds for me, about 20% faster than my average download speed.
- Site navigation is good enough, which is important for a site with this much content
- Couple of updates per day
- Thank goodness, they have some models here that are well built, some of these artsy sites stick to those 102 pound models, but this one has some different sizes.
Cons:
- Videos can be a little on the tame side, not quite as bad as Met-Art
- Something that I am not real fond of, starting out nude. This for me takes away part of the fantasy
- Nothing close to hardcore, though they don't advertise that they do, wanted to mention it for anyone reading this.
- Price is too high at $34.95
Bottom Line:
I have mixed feelings about this site. I really like their quality, the large pictures and HD video, but keep in mind that the older sets of pics and videos are not this high quality. Also, if you are like me and like to see the girl clothed, then stripping down to nothing, you won't find much of that on this site.
I really didn't take much off my score for those negatives because the site is trying to stress the beauty of a naked female, not the beauty of a stripper!
The site navigation is easy, but you will still get the feeling that you are missing something, because there is so much content. I was happy with the download speeds, and the speed of the site, despite having so many things on each page.
I was also happy to see models that weren't tiny skinny, this to me is important when trying to show the beauty of a naked woman. And it was a worry I had before joining the site.
There also are some exotic looking models, which you rarely see on these art sites. Still, there could be more and need to be more. You will find some well-known models like Eufrat, Ariel and Suzie Carina. One slight complaint is that the g/g photo sets are just boring. I don't know how many more g/g sets I can look at of the women leaning against each other.
Oh and you can't use any download manager that I know of. I tried 3 different ones.
Overall for a month, I was satisfied, even with this high price, and I will recommend it for one month, maybe 2 times per year. Recommended!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- First Class Erotic Photography.
- Ton Of Material.
- Beautiful Models.
- Hi-Res Photos, Zip Files.
- No Download limit.
- Hi-Def Video, NO DRM Protection.
- Frequent Updates.
- Useful Member Interaction.
- Fast Download Speed.
- Very Attractive, Fun, Interactive Site.
- Exclusive Content.
Cons:
- Expensive.
- No Hardcore.
Bottom Line:
I couldn't wait to review this site because it may be the best one I've seen, and I've spent a lot of time there and haven't scratched the surface. A treasure trove of high class material. Photos go up to 4000px, available in quickly DL'd zips. Browse them by thumbnail or flash slide show. You can rate the sets, and leave comments, and add to favorites. Here's why this is great: there is an option to view what everyone else is picking as a favorite, it continually updates. It's fun, and you find great stuff that way by viewing someone's fave photo, which is linked to the set. It's easy to get lost here, there's so much stuff. The videos are great too, with a hi-def option of 1280x720 (wmv & QT), plus a more standard size of 640x360. You can preview a vid before DL. I'm not always a fan of the softcore vid, but these are very nice. They look great, and BTW, the girls here are gorgeous. So many of them, many well known, others not. Photography and videography is total first class, not some schmoe with a camera. It's fun just to be in the site, the search engine could be better, but Femjoy is well built. The price was recently increased to $34.95, the high end of steep. But if any site could justify this, I guess this one could.It updates frequently. You will not find any hardcore action here.It's difficult to know where to start, they do have a random selection link that brings up different sets each time. But you can get lost in this site and never find your way out.
Was a member approx. 2 months prior to this review.
Pros:
Lovely girls
Girls presented in an extremely erotic and tasteful manner
Great picss
Lots of pubic hair
Love the fact that shoots are in intersting places eg outdoors, in the woods, on a railway line, etc
Cons:
Scenes too much the same -they all start nude. no sense of the tease by an erotic strip
Videos very dull (for the same reason)
Too softcore for my liking
Bottom Line:
An extremely good niche site for people who like softcore high quality nude pics. If that's your niche, then this site's for you.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
+Regular updates of 2 photosets per day from Nov. 2006; one per day before then
+Usually very beautiful European women and great photography
+Exclusive content
+Archive from June 2004
+3 pic sizes: 800, 1200, and 3-4000px, in zip or singles for photosets going back to May 2005 or so; earlier sets max at 2-3000px
+More recent videos at 1280x720 in WMV or Quicktime
Cons:
-awkward navigation (but you can get used to it, and some features you might come to like)
-occasional excessive darkness or light, or blurriness where you don’t want it
-middle size on earlier galleries is 1000px
-a few galleries are only 25 or so pics
-“Best of” links are just to sets that were published earlier, but first-time members might like them being pointed out
-sometimes a sluggish server response, but it’s been improving
Bottom Line:
FemJoy has become one of best softcore nude photography sites out there, pretty much on a par with MetArt. The models include Nikky Case, Susana Spears, Bambi, Peaches, Jana Mala (here as “Jane”) … and others with aliases too numerous to mention.
Since I first joined in Sept 2005, it’s had a makeover: a more visually appealing design and better organization. The navigation is a learning experience, though.
As a member, you open to the latest updates. Click one, and the next page has links to rate the gallery, download zips of it, make a comment on it, or just go somewhere else in the site! But what about that gallery, which you haven’t even seen yet? Why not just go straight to it, and put the gallery-related stuff in it?
The actual gallery opens in another window of one to several pages, or you can “View All” on a single page.
Choosing pic sizes depends on where you click on a thumb (top = largest, middle = 1200px); this feature I like now, but for a while I didn’t even realize that the little thing at the top of the page was a “visual” explanation of it. (Too cryptic? Your call.)
Another thing is the models index. You can either search by name, or FemJoy name, or you can view ALL of the approx 400 models at once, alphabetized, on one page! Even if they just put them in A-D, E-H, etc. visually separated sections, there would less “overload.”
FemJoy: excellent quality content + some interesting features + a few quirks.
Follow-Up:
Since I wrote the above review, they've recently changed to a more tasteful and visually appealing design that's also easier to use. Just wish they had more ways of searching for models, like, say, ATK Galleria does. The model list is so long, it's staggering. (Kinda like being in the orgasmatron in Barbarella.) One thing is clear: they are doing a lot to make this site better.
Was a member approx. 4 months prior to this review.
Pros:
*High resolution pics
*Models are stunning
*Content is updated frequently
*Did I mention the models are hot?
Cons:
*Video section is an after thought
*No hard core content
*Navigation is cumbersome and sluggish
Bottom Line:
Femjoy seems to be a knock off of Met-Art but the content is fresh and on a lucky day, you find dozens of extremely attractive nubile models to drool over. The video section is not very exciting and imho, if you want videos on your site, do a 100% effort and make it worth the subscription price.
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
