Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » Raffle Winners!
401-450 of 504 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Page 9 10 11 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

01-08-19  11:34am - 2175 days #410
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Hello fellow Porn Users! Hope the holidays treated you well and a happy new year to all. May 2019 bring lots of sexy babes and booties

For this week, we're going to shake things up! As we were away for the last two weeks, we're going to up the prizes! For this one week only, these will be the prizes:

1st prize will be $200
2nd prize will be $150
3rd prize will be $150

Deadline to get your reviews in is Thursday 10th of January where we will draw the winners!

Good luck and don't forget to get your reviews in

01-08-19  02:53pm - 2175 days #411
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
Woo hoo! This works out great as I have a review close to being finished. (Is there an emoji for crossed fingers?)

01-10-19  11:51am - 2173 days #412
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
We have the winners! Thank you, everyone, for providing your in-depth reviews. They were all equally brilliant!

*drumroll please*

1st prize goes to... Dracken! You can read all his wonderful reviews right here

2nd prize goes to...Skippy! You can read all the excellent reviews right here on his profile - they're all worth it, I promise.

Last but not least, 3rd prize goes to...exotics4me. Congratulations! You read his porn literature right here.

Congratulations everyone!

Now it's the time we'd like to here from you guys!

We've realised by raising the prizes, we were flooded with a lot more reviews which is amazing. So, we're thinking of shaking things up. Y'know, new year, new Porn User!

A main feedback we've heard is that there has been a lot of reviews for the same porn sites. To help with this problem, we're thinking of scrapping the 3rd prize (usually $50) and replacing it for a free 30 day membership to a porn site of your choice. With this membership, you'd still be eligable for the raffle if you write a review.

Let me know your thoughts and questions! Keep up the good work guys!

01-10-19  12:14pm - 2173 days #413
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I like the idea of a free membership and that topic has come up in the past.

I am not so sure that will generate diversity in reviews of sites to any great degree. Giving away memberships at the end of last year created a lot of reviews, but many were of the same sites as they are part of Adult Time.

Do the third prize free memberships have to be used on sites listed on PU? I would go back and rejoin Premium Bukkake, but it is not listed any longer.

01-10-19  12:35pm - 2173 days #414
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:



A main feedback we've heard is that there has been a lot of reviews for the same porn sites. To help with this problem, we're thinking of scrapping the 3rd prize (usually $50) and replacing it for a free 30 day membership to a porn site of your choice. With this membership, you'd still be eligable for the raffle if you write a review.


I think the main reason many PU members submit rev9ews of the same porn sites is that we tend to go back to the sites that gave quality content for a reasonable price.

Many times, or even most times, when you join a new porn site, that has no reviews, the quality is questionable: You end up saying, "Why did I waste my money on this site, when there are so many better buys around?"

Of course, some new great sites do come out once in a while.
But you're taking a chance on a new site that hasn't been reviewed before: and newer sites usually have less content, so you're paying a high price to see what's there.

But if PU wants to offer 3rd place as a 30 day membership, fine with me.
Sign me up for MPL Studios. They have some almost beautiful models over there.

Also, side note: the Adult Time network seems like a fantastic deal: a low cost way to view (and download) over 100 porn sites.

Has PU reached out to list them yet?
I know one PU member who complained that he never got the Adult Time membership that was advertised.
And customer service apparently did not respond to his email asking for help.

01-10-19  01:37pm - 2173 days #415
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:



Has PU reached out to list them yet?
I know one PU member who complained that he never got the Adult Time membership that was advertised.
And customer service apparently did not respond to his email asking for help.


We are working with Adult Time to get reviews done for not just the network, but also the new series they will be creating for the Platform (they are really leaning into the Netflix model, so there will be no new sites, only new series).

Adult Time says the network won't be ready for a review until March/April (still Beta Testing), but we should have reviews of the series coming up shortly. Because it's in beta, not all members get access to Adult Time yet which is why some see it and others don't.

01-10-19  04:25pm - 2172 days #416
rearadmiral (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,453
Registered: Jul 16, '07
Location: NB/Canada
I'd support the idea of scrapping the third place prize in place of a monthly membership at a site. I realize that PU is user-generated as opposed to TBP which is a commercial site, but what about the third prize being a membership to a site from the list of sites waiting for a review? Perhaps the better option would be to offer the membership to a site from that list but not require a review. Most of us would write one anyone I'm guessing.

Just a thought.

On another note, I've certainly written re-reviews of sites I've reviewed earlier but I always try to play by the rules and make the review different. Actually, for me to write a re-review something major has to have changed with the site or with my thoughts on it. That happened with Hookup Hotshot, for example.

01-11-19  09:08am - 2172 days #417
merc77 (0)
Disabled User

Posts: 291
Registered: Apr 17, '16
It does make sense to have the third prize be of lesser value than the second prize. Most contests like this do that sort of thing. It is still a wonderful prize as a free month is good for those of us with limited funds for entertainment. "Dogs think people are Gods. Cats don't as they know better." - Kedi (2016)

Dogs have masters; Cats have staff.

01-11-19  10:49am - 2172 days #418
dracken (0)
Active User



Posts: 29
Registered: Aug 01, '09
Location: Chicago
Thank you for the prize. Very pleasant surprise

As far as changing the third prize, honestly I don't think a free membership will be that interesting to me. I already have yearly subscriptions to most sites I'm interested in and I don't think if I had a choice of any site I'd really go with something I never tried before. I'd probably feel like I should use it on sites that don't have discounts or are more expensive.

What if you had a second raffle where you can get a free membership for reviews of sites with no other reviews or offered more points in the raffle for reviews of sites that don't have any other active reviews?

01-15-19  12:37pm - 2168 days #419
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Aaaand we're back with our usual raffle! This week was a little shorter considering we drew the winners on Thursday. We've heard your thoughts and will update you if things change ☺

This week, the winners are:

In first place we have lk2fireone! You can read his passionate perfect porn poetry right here.

Second place we have rearadmiral! To contemplate his name, this week he provided an extensive interview Tushy Raw

Last but not least, there is elephant! His in depth analysis of Net Video Girls is an absolute gem.

Prizes will be given throughout the week! Thank you again guys and keep up the good work!

01-15-19  02:38pm - 2168 days #420
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Thanks for the raffle prixe.
And for the compliment that my reviews are poetry.
I try, but there was a review, by Cybertoad?, that was real poetry.

01-17-19  08:55am - 2166 days #421
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Prizes sent! Giftcards should be popping into your inboxes soon!

Thanks guys! Keep reviewing. We'll be back next week

01-18-19  05:09am - 2165 days #422
elephant (0)
Active User



Posts: 585
Registered: Jan 11, '07
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:


Prizes sent! Giftcards should be popping into your inboxes soon!

Thanks guys! Keep reviewing. We'll be back next week


Hi Freddie, thanks so much for the raffle prize. I've not received any giftcard yet though. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE

01-18-19  06:54am - 2165 days #423
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by elephant:


Hi Freddie, thanks so much for the raffle prize. I've not received any giftcard yet though.


I should be on the way right now!

01-18-19  07:42am - 2165 days #424
elephant (0)
Active User



Posts: 585
Registered: Jan 11, '07
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:


I should be on the way right now!


Cheers again Freddie, just got it. "Women are like tricks by sleight of hand, Which, to admire, we should not understand." WILLIAM CONGREVE

01-22-19  11:42am - 2161 days #425
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Another week, another batch of wonderful winners. I don't know where you guys are, but over here it's a frozen wasteland so the only thing that's making me happy is shilling for some sweet, sweet porn.

Here are the winners!

In first place, we have the fierce mbaya for his wonderful review on Girl Rimming!

In second place, there's marcdc1 for the literature that is his Spring Thomas review!

And last but not least, there is Wraith0711 for X Virtual! .

Giftcards will be sent in the next upcoming days. Thank you for everything and for all the other reviews, thank you for your hard work and don't forget to add in your reviews for next week! You guys keep this forum alive and my cold, cold corpse beating in this cold January

01-23-19  08:27am - 2160 days #426
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Gift cards all sent! Spend well and responsibly

Tune in for next week and keep your reviews coming!

01-29-19  11:23am - 2154 days #427
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
New week! New Raffle!

We this week's winner!

In first place, there is the ever poetic lk2fireone, for his amazing reviews, including Adult Time which you should all read right now!

In Second place, we have Shen! Read the video for TS Seduction right now!

Last but not least, there is Goujo! Read his view of Creampie Thais and be entranced!

Thanks for writing in folks! All your reviews were fantastic - we read them all with a careful eye Keep up the good work!

Gift cards will be sent out in the next couple of days. See you next week!

01-30-19  01:41pm - 2153 days #428
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
FreddieAdmin,
When you click on the hot link to send an email to you, a page comes up that states:

This User is Invalid.

You've reached a user that is invalid or no longer exists.

Could someone fix the link, so private emails can be sent to you?

I need help with a membership prize that was given to me a few months ago from PU, around 2018-10-22.
The site used to be named: porndoepremium.com
The current name is: letsdoeit.com

When I enter my login details (username and password), the site says: wrong email or password.

But the link to recover or reset the password is based on the username that was given to me for signing in, which I don't have access to.
My username at the site is: 15rabbit(at)porndoe.com
(I substituted (at) for the @ character.)


Or send me an email with the name of the support staff I should make this request to.

Thanks in advance.

lk2fireone

01-31-19  10:14am - 2152 days #429
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


FreddieAdmin,
When you click on the hot link to send an email to you, a page comes up that states:

This User is Invalid.

You've reached a user that is invalid or no longer exists.

Could someone fix the link, so private emails can be sent to you?

I need help with a membership prize that was given to me a few months ago from PU, around 2018-10-22.
The site used to be named: porndoepremium.com
The current name is: letsdoeit.com

When I enter my login details (username and password), the site says: wrong email or password.

But the link to recover or reset the password is based on the username that was given to me for signing in, which I don't have access to.
My username at the site is: 15rabbit(at)porndoe.com
(I substituted (at) for the @ character.)


Or send me an email with the name of the support staff I should make this request to.

Thanks in advance.

lk2fireone



Thanks for flagging! Will get that fixed ASAP!

My colleague or myself will reach out to you about the PornDoe issue and hopefully it should be dealt with soon

Gift cards all sent! Thanks guys for writing in! Looking forward to reading the new ones for next week

01-31-19  10:43am - 2152 days #430
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Freddie, thanks for the quick response.

And for the gift card, as well.

01-31-19  01:59pm - 2152 days #431
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Freddie,

My login problem at Letsdoeit was solved.

I emailed their support, and they changed my email address.

But thanks for the help.

02-05-19  10:28am - 2147 days #432
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Another week, another raffle!

For this week, in first place we have exotics4me! Read his wonderful reviews right here! Everything you need to know about Met Art X and much more.

In second place, we have rearadmiral! You can read is absolutely excellent review of Nympho now.

Last but not least, there's Mikek for his concise take on Porn Sluts!

Gift cards will be sent later this week! Keep the reviews coming and see you all next week!

02-05-19  10:31am - 2147 days #433
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
A review that should have earned zero points should not ever win anything. Sorry. Ban me if you want but this is a shameful disgrace.

The raffle rules explain how much content is needed for a one point review. This has close to zero information and only 97 words of content. The raffle rules state 150 words minimum. This review says almost nothing and may even be written by a shill.

Are there rules any longer? Apparently not. Edited on Feb 05, 2019, 10:49am

02-05-19  10:54am - 2147 days #434
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by mbaya:


A review that should have earned zero points should not ever win anything. Sorry. Ban me if you want but this is a shameful disgrace.


Winning member Joined two day in, short review, reviews a site with no reviews, then two new users give a review on the same site. And being trusts are disabled to give others a warning, this really sets a precedence for abuse. Not too mention, really both new reviews were only 30 minutes apart, by two members, that just joined and they win. Who over sees these things ??

WOW , thats messed up people. I agree @Mbaya, the results are supposed to be ones we can trust.

I could care less that I didn't win,but is pretty obvious what this was. Since 2007 Edited on Feb 05, 2019, 10:57am

02-05-19  10:58am - 2147 days #435
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I don't have to win, I understand how this works.
Thanks Cyber.

Recently I disabled my account because the rules were suspended to have a member win in two consecutive drawings.
This not right.

02-05-19  11:04am - 2147 days #436
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I don't have to win, I understand how this works.
Thanks Cyber.

Recently I disabled my account because the rules were suspended to have a member win in two consecutive drawings.
This not right.


I came back after awhile, which is normal for me.
take breaks)
I saw this and went what ?? I also don't have to win, but I questions the integrity of the process. To not have no fail safes to catch all the obvious signs that appear obvious what was done. And now we can not grade the reviewer. LOL Since 2007

02-05-19  11:23am - 2147 days #437
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
[QUOTE=Cybertoad]
Winning member Joined two day in, short review, reviews a site with no reviews, then two new users give a review on the same site. And being trusts are disabled to give others a warning, this really sets a precedence for abuse. Not too mention, really both new reviews were only 30 minutes apart, by two members, that just joined and they win. Who over sees these things ??



I wonder about the future of PU. The site needs hands on management that acts with maturity and integrity.

02-05-19  11:37am - 2147 days #438
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by mbaya:


[QUOTE=Cybertoad]
Winning member Joined two day in, short review, reviews a site with no reviews, then two new users give a review on the same site. And being trusts are disabled to give others a warning, this really sets a precedence for abuse. Not too mention, really both new reviews were only 30 minutes apart, by two members, that just joined and they win. Who over sees these things ??



I wonder about the future of PU. The site needs hands on management that acts with maturity and integrity.


In a word... Khan... Since 2007

02-05-19  12:20pm - 2147 days #439
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


In a word... Khan...


Khan was a great staff member, but he's not coming back.
(I made a small donation to his gofundme acount (or whatever it was called) when I heard he was sick.

So we have to give the new staff time to settle in and learn the rules.

Amanda was here only 2 years, but she was lovely.

I think Freddie and whatever other staff are trying to do their job, but I'm not sure how much time they are being paid for or how much instruction they've gotten.

But if some PU members want to start a blog trying to help explain their concerns (plus and minus) about the site, the PU staff could read the blog and learn from it.

Just my 2 cents.

02-05-19  12:26pm - 2147 days #440
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Khan was a great staff member, but he's not coming back.
(I made a small donation to his gofundme acount (or whatever it was called) when I heard he was sick.

So we have to give the new staff time to settle in and learn the rules.

Amanda was here only 2 years, but she was lovely.

I think Freddie and whatever other staff are trying to do their job, but I'm not sure how much time they are being paid for or how much instruction they've gotten.

But if some PU members want to start a blog trying to help explain their concerns (plus and minus) about the site, the PU staff could read the blog and learn from it.

Just my 2 cents.


I think the problem is and has always been, the lack o understanding the pulse of this system. Khan and a few others had it dialed in. It then kinda fell apart for awhile. The dark ages. Ive been a member here as long as you two. Maybe a thread of what we think might help. But so much is also put into reviews and this last round looks like no one even processed the hard work by everyone. So creating a thread, who knows if its worth the effort? As we do not really have a member Representative here. Since 2007

02-05-19  12:43pm - 2147 days #441
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Hey guys!

Always appreciate the feedback. Still learning the rules and ropes here, so always appreciate learning more!

As a general rule, we always lean towards inclusivity. I aimed to give a shoutout to a new member in order to promote more engagement, more dialogue between members. My goal is to attract more members, more reviews and more fun. By spotlighting new members and new reviews, I hope for them to return and post new stuff.

In a similar vein, we are looking to implement new initiatives. This is why I asked a while back feedback on the new idea of putting the prize for third place as a new membership instead of the $50.

I, and everyone here at PornUsers, appreciate and adore all the hard work you guys are putting in. I read all the reviews and am astounding by the indepth research, passion and love you guys put into it. You guys are the lifeblood of the forum.

In the future, I'll be reviewing the rules and the reviews more carefully. If you guys feel like making a blogpost of all your concerns, feel free - like I said, I always appreciate the feedback so it's good to know what you guys feel

02-05-19  01:34pm - 2147 days #442
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:


Hey guys!

Always appreciate the feedback. Still learning the rules and ropes here, so always appreciate learning more!

As a general rule, we always lean towards inclusivity. I aimed to give a shoutout to a new member in order to promote more engagement, more dialogue between members. My goal is to attract more members, more reviews and more fun. By spotlighting new members and new reviews, I hope for them to return and post new stuff.

In a similar vein, we are looking to implement new initiatives. This is why I asked a while back feedback on the new idea of putting the prize for third place as a new membership instead of the $50.

I, and everyone here at PornUsers, appreciate and adore all the hard work you guys are putting in. I read all the reviews and am astounding by the indepth research, passion and love you guys put into it. You guys are the lifeblood of the forum.

In the future, I'll be reviewing the rules and the reviews more carefully. If you guys feel like making a blogpost of all your concerns, feel free - like I said, I always appreciate the feedback so it's good to know what you guys feel


Part of being a leader is to admit when you are wrong and then correcting your mistakes.

Several weeks ago I told you that there was a rule about members winning in two consecutive raffles. Your response was to laugh me off. You could not say that you missed the rule, you said it was suspended retroactively. I was very insulted and put my account on hold.

You did not even notice or care.

Now you say you need time to learn the rules. You could try reading them. it takes less than five minutes.

02-05-19  03:16pm - 2147 days #443
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by mbaya:


Part of being a leader is to admit when you are wrong and then correcting your mistakes.

Several weeks ago I told you that there was a rule about members winning in two consecutive raffles. Your response was to laugh me off. You could not say that you missed the rule, you said it was suspended retroactively. I was very insulted and put my account on hold.

You did not even notice or care.

Now you say you need time to learn the rules. You could try reading them. it takes less than five minutes.



So whom is holding whom accountable in these contests?
And how do you get a job without knowing how to do it?
I means who is overseeing the new people working lack of leadership, caring? Its not just these contest, the reviews in this case are obvious, lets just call it what it was, trolling and fraud, and the staff rewarded them
Maybe Porn Users is run by the Government sure sounds like it.

Give a job to people that don't know how to do it, and then they blame their lack of training. Yet let the reviewers here do what they want.
I would like to know whom of this staff here, whom is your supervisor? Since 2007

02-05-19  04:33pm - 2146 days #444
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Personally, I thought most of the reviews submitted that were eligible for this week's raffle were good to excellent:
rearadmiral
exotics4me
marcdc1
mbaya
Cybertoad

Yes, the 2 reviews submitted by the newbies were poor and wouldn't have been accepted by Khan, or earned a single point:
Seashell143
Mikek

But as Freddie wrote, the PU staff is trying to reach out to new members and encourage them to participate.
There were a few reviews recently that also earned a single point, that should have been rejected under the current rules (I assume the current rules have been in place for years, now).

I don't think that Freddie or any of the current PU staff is trying to tear the site down: they want to expand the membership as much as possible.
And they probably don't have the experience of dealing with fraud or other forms of bad faith that Khan did.

Instead of trying to knock down the PU staff, if any PU member has a criticism or point to make to improve the way the site is run, they can either post to this thread, or start a new thread or blog on ways to improve the site.

That's what Freddie and the other PU staff are trying to do. Amanda mentioned that idea repeatedly: she wanted to make the site better, increase membership, encourage submissions by PU members both old and new, encourage the flow of ideas, the sense of community.

The truth is that the sense of community, the activity of the thread, has dropped considerably since Khan and the previous management moved on.
The new owners are trying to do the things that Amanda wanted: increase membership, improve the site. It only makes business sense.

Like I said, it's just my 2 cents worth.

But I think Freddie is acting in good faith.

One question: off topic: Is Freddie a boy or a girl? Or a man or a woman?
The answer shouldn't make a difference, but I still miss Amanda.
We need more female participation at the site.

As far as Mikek winning this week's raffle based on a poor review, I think since it was announced that he was a winner, he should get his prize.

But in the future, reviews should be graded more stringently: both of the reviews by the newbies were poor (like shit), and should have been rejected, and were not worth a single point.

It's suspicious that 2 newbies posted short reviews on the same day about a site that
had no previous reviews. Maybe Khan would have rejected the 2 reviews for insufficient content and banned the newbies from the site for posting spam.
But like I said, the new PU staff still seem to be learning about porn and running a porn site. They certainly don't have Khan's years of experience.

And they are working to increase the membership. Which helps explain why they are loosening the rules.

But if PU members object, they can post to this thread, or start a blog on how the PU site should be run.

I haven't read the rules for what a review should contain in a long time: but a review should have some value, to give the reader a sense of whether a site is worth joining.
I hope my reviews have some value, but very few members post replies to reviews any more, and you have to wonder how many people are reading these reviews.

End of ramble.

02-05-19  05:10pm - 2146 days #445
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
I tend to not be as forgiving, but in the public service industry I am very forgiving. Restaurants and anyone that has to deal with the public. I run websites, I write Books, and I have a dedication to doing the best I can, by staying up on tech and making sure my product is presented well.

To put the facts more clearly.

1. Two short reviews approved by staff.
2. On A UN-reveiwed website and no one questioned it.
3. Both posted with in 30 minutes of each other.
3. Both Joined the same day.
4. One of the two won for scamming the site.( my opinion)

Thats a failure to check a review before approving it.
Failure to recognize the two reviews by two other people on the same site. Picked a review my dog could have written.
And then did not even verify the review that would have won.

I live each day with excuses, the point is they obviously did not read the reviews and were just pointing and clicking, thats not needing to learn rules, thats ignoring protocol.

I can appreciate defending staff, but thats not our jobs, our jobs are to write reviews and have them fairly judged, that failed on many levels and is not an error or mistake, but neglect. Since 2007

02-06-19  08:37am - 2146 days #446
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
I appreciate everything you guys have pointed out.

I was unaware that these two were posted 30 minutes of each other. I'll be more careful next time reviewing the reviews.

Like I pointed out, I accepted this review with the initial thought of bringing in new people in the community. This is my primary goal as the moderator. With this mind, I'm welcome to any ideas and criticism from you guys. My inbox is always open!

A bit about myself - I am a woman! I grew up in Spain but have spent most of my time bouncing between the UK and North America.

I apologise for all the issues this caused. I will be sending out the prizes to the winners of the week and will be more careful for next weeks raffle.

Keep the reviews coming. I do love reading them.

02-06-19  09:01am - 2146 days #447
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:


I appreciate everything you guys have pointed out.

I was unaware that these two were posted 30 minutes of each other. I'll be more careful next time reviewing the reviews.

Like I pointed out, I accepted this review with the initial thought of bringing in new people in the community. This is my primary goal as the moderator. With this mind, I'm welcome to any ideas and criticism from you guys. My inbox is always open!

A bit about myself - I am a woman! I grew up in Spain but have spent most of my time bouncing between the UK and North America.

I apologise for all the issues this caused. I will be sending out the prizes to the winners of the week and will be more careful for next weeks raffle.

Keep the reviews coming. I do love reading them.


Wonderful post.
Thanks for explaining your position.
And also giving a brief history of yourself.

02-06-19  11:34am - 2146 days #448
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,158
Registered: Jan 01, '08
Location: Wash
Originally Posted by FreddieAdmin:


I appreciate everything you guys have pointed out.

I was unaware that these two were posted 30 minutes of each other. I'll be more careful next time reviewing the reviews.

Like I pointed out, I accepted this review with the initial thought of bringing in new people in the community. This is my primary goal as the moderator. With this mind, I'm welcome to any ideas and criticism from you guys. My inbox is always open!

A bit about myself - I am a woman! I grew up in Spain but have spent most of my time bouncing between the UK and North America.

I apologise for all the issues this caused. I will be sending out the prizes to the winners of the week and will be more careful for next weeks raffle.

Keep the reviews coming. I do love reading them.



Thank you for the explanation, not sure I understand really. This site and reviews are slow, as well as forum postings. I simply fail to understand how so many levels were missed. This site is linked off the main site, so visitors can see what users of sites experience. Not having a reliable system, means they reviews can be seen as not reliable. What staff fails to do here reflects on everyone. And being I asked for a supervisor contact and that was ignored, I now ever more do not trust the process.

I have been a member hear a very long, time. Maybe I am taking this more serious then most.
I have had many websites, and my experience goes back decades. After Khan passed, a few weeks later I asked PU staff if they would need help, as at the time I was home for awhile. After giving them my resume, they turned it down only because they were looking for those with even more experience then me. So then I see how mismanaged the site is and I guess I am going WTH? I studied computer science, have a law degree and admin many websites. And knew this site front back at PU. Sorry, maybe I took this crazy way the site is being run personal, since its obvious the staff here does not have the training or experience that was claimed a few years ago as being needed. Not sure I will write anymore reviews, I think why bother spending time to give a decent review, when I could just post what ever and it counts. LOL So maybe I'll just post short meaningless reviews Since 2007

02-06-19  12:09pm - 2146 days #449
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Freddie,

I think that I will get myself a new id and then make useless five minute reviews. Why should I spend hours making better ones?

You should not send a prize to a shill this week or any week. You have a chance to correct a mistake and you made your choice. You have a hard time admitting you are in error and then acting to rectify the situation.

After you are gone, I may yet post reviews. But, for now my participation has ended, as well as my respect for you.

02-06-19  12:13pm - 2146 days #450
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Thank you for the explanation, not sure I understand really. This site and reviews are slow, as well as forum postings. I simply fail to understand how so many levels were missed. This site is linked off the main site, so visitors can see what users of sites experience. Not having a reliable system, means they reviews can be seen as not reliable. What staff fails to do here reflects on everyone. And being I asked for a supervisor contact and that was ignored, I now ever more do not trust the process.

I have been a member hear a very long, time. Maybe I am taking this more serious then most.
I have had many websites, and my experience goes back decades. After Khan passed, a few weeks later I asked PU staff if they would need help, as at the time I was home for awhile. After giving them my resume, they turned it down only because they were looking for those with even more experience then me. So then I see how mismanaged the site is and I guess I am going WTH? I studied computer science, have a law degree and admin many websites. And knew this site front back at PU. Sorry, maybe I took this crazy way the site is being run personal, since its obvious the staff here does not have the training or experience that was claimed a few years ago as being needed. Not sure I will write anymore reviews, I think why bother spending time to give a decent review, when I could just post what ever and it counts. LOL So maybe I'll just post short meaningless reviews


Thanks for the message, Cybertoad. Like I said, I just started moderating here so I'm only learning the ropes and knowing who you guys are, what is a good review, who are the members. I wasn't aware of the extensive past and yes, I'm new here. My aim in all of this was in good faith - by approving the review, I wanted to reach out to a new user that he's accepted into the community with the hopes of bringing in a fresh face to the community. I wasn't acting in bad faith. But lesson learnt.

It would make me and the rest of the PU community sad if you stopped reviewing because I thoroughly enjoyed reading your reviews. From now on, I'm going to be very careful with the reviews before approving them.

02-06-19  12:19pm - 2146 days #451
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by mbaya:


Freddie,

I think that I will get myself a new id and then make useless five minute reviews. Why should I spend hours making better ones?

You should not send a prize to a shill this week or any week. You have a chance to correct a mistake and you made your choice. You have a hard time admitting you are in error and then acting to rectify the situation.

After you are gone, I may yet post reviews. But, for now my participation has ended, as well as my respect for you.


My deepest apologies if I've offended you - it was hardly my intention. I didn't feel like I should correct the past raffle as I already set out the winners. I've learnt from mistakes and won't repeat them in the upcoming weeks.

I'm sad to see you go. I loved reading your reviews!

02-06-19  12:22pm - 2146 days #452
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I blame you as you are the one who is responsible. Your intentions were never the issue.

I will be back periodically to check to see if you have gone yet.

02-06-19  12:27pm - 2146 days #453
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I blame you as you are the one who is responsible. Your intentions were never the issue.

I will be back periodically to check to see if you have gone yet.


Anything I can do to keep you around?

02-06-19  12:29pm - 2146 days #454
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Don't reward the shill.

02-06-19  12:30pm - 2146 days #455
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Originally Posted by mbaya:


Don't reward the shill.


Noted. I won't be doing that from now on. Lesson learnt.

02-06-19  12:31pm - 2146 days #456
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
What does noted mean?

Are you still sending out the winnings or not?

02-06-19  12:34pm - 2146 days #457
FreddieAdmin
PornUsers Staff


Posts: 0
Registered: Dec 06, '18
Yes because I already announced it and I don't want to set the precedence of going back and changing the results. I can promise it won't happen again, though.

02-06-19  12:38pm - 2146 days #458
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
[QUOTE=FreddieAdmin]
Yes because I already announced it and I don't want to set the precedence of going back and changing the results. I can promise it won't happen again, though.

Not an adequate answer.

02-06-19  01:01pm - 2146 days #459
jook (0)
Active User



Posts: 325
Registered: Dec 22, '13
Location: jersey city
The frustration is understood. Many of us spend hours over several days writing a review. I know I have. It upsets me to see reviews that were apparently written in 60 seconds get posted, let alone win a raffle. Not only does it detract from the well-written reviews, but it makes the site look amateurish.

But please, time out. Cooler heads need to prevail if this community is going to move forward and be successful. Freddie apologized profusely and said the mistake won't be repeated. I've done a lot worse things in my life.

Just my 2 cents.

401-450 of 504 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Page 9 10 11 Next Page >
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.