Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
Forum Thread A note about the site and any replies from other users.
Porn Users Forum » A doctored image or am I going blind or mad or both?
1-32 of 32 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home

08-07-10  10:43am - 5158 days Original Post - #1
ByteMaster (0)
Active User

Posts: 52
Registered: Jun 09, '08
Location: United Kingdom
A doctored image or am I going blind or mad or both?

Hey chaps (and chapesseses) I've been looking at this image for half an hour now, racking my brains, where the heck is her left foot? to me it looks like her left leg goes into the brick work. Even if her foot was bent and pointing towards the wall her toes would stil be visible

Her right foot is clear to see and the dark area above is a shadow on the brick work, cast by her left leg. I cannot see anything that resembles a left foot LOL

*before clicking rest assured the image and the gallery are a free preview from playboy.com*



http://www.babe-envy.com/images/babes/pb...imee-addison/15.html

08-07-10  11:23am - 5158 days #2
anyonebutme (0)
Active User



Posts: 294
Registered: Aug 23, '09
She clearly has both feet in that photo. Nothing looks doctored to me. Her toes are behind the front bricks.

08-07-10  11:37am - 5158 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by justme:


She clearly has both feet in that photo. Nothing looks doctored to me. Her toes are behind the front bricks.


I can't believe it, we agree for once. I can see part of the model's left foot, the toes are hidden by the angle of the wall.

08-07-10  12:25pm - 5157 days #4
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
It's looks like her feet are just behind the bricks, but really, are you supposed to be looking at her feet in a photo like this? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

08-07-10  03:21pm - 5157 days #5
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Some people are fixated on feet (or toes). Not my thing, but it's a fetish for some. Subtract 20 enjoyment points for cutting the feet out of the photo.

08-08-10  12:41am - 5157 days #6
graymane (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,411
Registered: Feb 20, '10
Location: Virginia
She's in a bathing area and seemingly marked with some suds. Looking closely, you'll see that area of her foot and leg engulfed in a bubbley suds giving it the appearence her foot is molded into the wall.
As for the extra wall to the right covering her toes, looks to me as an avant-garde concoction to enhance the scene.

08-08-10  09:37am - 5157 days #7
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
I'm not sure why that photo would even cause any confusion, but I think that we have different enough computers and monitors with different resolutions that pics really do look quite different to some of us.

I remember having a back-and-forth about the pics on Pier999, or whatever it's called, where some people were talking about the remarkable clarity and detail on their pics, while to me the remarkable thing about their pics is to apply lacquer-like photo treatment to eradicate anything that might possibly be confused with natural skin tone.

08-08-10  10:42am - 5157 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


I remember having a back-and-forth about the pics on Pier999, or whatever it's called, where some people were talking about the remarkable clarity and detail on their pics, while to me the remarkable thing about their pics is to apply lacquer-like photo treatment to eradicate anything that might possibly be confused with natural skin tone.


That's the same problem I had with Twisty's, I had a hard time finding natural skin tones .. yet thousands like the site. Maybe it is a matter of different monitors painting a different picture.

08-08-10  10:55am - 5157 days #9
Advent (0)
Active Webmaster




Posts: 103
Registered: Aug 13, '09
Location: Tampa, FL
I was just at AVN and I had a couple people look at this and I have to say most (including myself) were found this to be a little creepy. None of us could figure out what was going on with her foot though. Owner Kick Ass Pictures
CumEatingCuckolds, FootFetishDaily and Kick Ass Pictures

Please feel free to contact me with concerns or comments, I would love to hear from you.

08-08-10  11:22am - 5157 days #10
mistresskent (0)
Active Webmaster




Posts: 188
Registered: Feb 02, '09
Location: Kent, UK
Originally Posted by ByteMaster:


Hey chaps (and chapesseses) I've been looking at this image for half an hour now, racking my brains, where the heck is her left foot? to me it looks like her left leg goes into the brick work. Even if her foot was bent and pointing towards the wall her toes would stil be visible

Her right foot is clear to see and the dark area above is a shadow on the brick work, cast by her left leg. I cannot see anything that resembles a left foot LOL

*before clicking rest assured the image and the gallery are a free preview from playboy.com*



http://www.babe-envy.com/images/babes/pb...imee-addison/15.html


I'm gonna play detective here peeps!

Maybe she has gammy toes? Because what I can see is some shadowing "mid left foot" of the questioned picture...

It look like her previous Phalanges meets Metatarsals bone joint (Ball of foot) is resting on the internal elevation of her right heel.

Its obvious that there is some cloning of the left leg to make a straight line with shadowing. Her left leg is also going in such a direction that you would only be able to see part of her foot besides..

All that said, she's fit, in a picture and pretty much showing off all, so thanks for highlighting.. been staring at it for at least half an hour.. he he. Mistress Kent xx

http://www.mistresskent.com
http://www.mistresskent.co.uk

08-08-10  03:51pm - 5156 days #11
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
That's Aimee Addison? Well, she looks good in black! I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-08-10  04:46pm - 5156 days #12
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by messmer:


That's the same problem I had with Twisty's, I had a hard time finding natural skin tones .. yet thousands like the site. Maybe it is a matter of different monitors painting a different picture.


Different tastes, for sure. My biggest beef with Twisty's is that, even when they allow natural skin tones on the bodies, they blur the faces. What the fuck? If they think the models are ugly, they should hire different models - why blur the faces so often?

It's why my affection for ATK Galleria grows by leaps and bounds. They actually show what their models look like - what a concept!

08-09-10  09:44am - 5156 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Different tastes, for sure. My biggest beef with Twisty's is that, even when they allow natural skin tones on the bodies, they blur the faces. What the fuck? If they think the models are ugly, they should hire different models - why blur the faces so often?

It's why my affection for ATK Galleria grows by leaps and bounds. They actually show what their models look like - what a concept!




ATK Natural and Hairy was my home quite a few times in the past for the reason you mention but I gave up eventually because the last couple of times I subscribed the models were wearing too little (therefore no exciting lingerie as they stripped slowly) and were done taking off their clothes on page one, which made one set basically look like all the others with only the faces changing. An eighteen year old might be excited by nudity but someone over fifty needs a bit of spice added. I really miss that site. If only they returned to their earlier ways of giving me models that come gift wrapped in nylon or silk once in a while. But I guess younger photographers and models who have grown up with styrofoam cup bras and thongs don't know any better. And just like with rap and hip hop I'll have to get used to the idea that the times have changed on me!

08-09-10  12:23pm - 5156 days #14
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by messmer:



But I guess younger photographers and models who have grown up with styrofoam cup bras and thongs don't know any better.


Where is the web site with teens wearing styrofoam cup bras and thongs? I don't believe I've seen it yet. But if the teens are pretty enough...

08-09-10  02:03pm - 5155 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Where is the web site with teens wearing styrofoam cup bras and thongs? I don't believe I've seen it yet. But if the teens are pretty enough...


Oops! I meant foam rubber. As to thongs .. that's all I see. Not one buttock in sight that's covered!

08-09-10  04:44pm - 5155 days #16
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Different tastes, for sure. My biggest beef with Twisty's is that, even when they allow natural skin tones on the bodies, they blur the faces. What the fuck? If they think the models are ugly, they should hire different models - why blur the faces so often?

It's why my affection for ATK Galleria grows by leaps and bounds. They actually show what their models look like - what a concept!


Blurriness is exasperating. Twistys does a LOT of it at the face, and so does DigitalDreamGirls or "Desire" or whatever, I don't care. Sites that do fancy it as "artistic" to apply "selective focus" or other such euphemistic blather as a justification for RUINING what would be a good shot for the PAYING USER!!!!! ARRHHGGHHD*(A^%@*!!!

I'm a long-term MetArt subscriber who was none too pleased at today's gallery of Lorena when I discovered that a really nice pose of her showing her ass had said derriere in a blurry mess in the shots larger than the thumbs.

Are these people really THAT stupid or just lacking in taste?

But I'm not too keen on ATK Galleria anymore either. They have too many shots at a distance from the model. I guess I'm hard to satisfy. Comes with knowing what I want, I suppose. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-09-10  05:53pm - 5155 days #17
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Twistys is using the same photog as Digital Dreamgirls/Desire for a lot of their stuff these days - good reason for comparison.

Met Art is all over the place, given their numerous photogs, though they usually have clearer pics than Twistys standards.

08-09-10  05:55pm - 5155 days #18
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
I think I've got the blah blues. I look at the latest photoset for Lorena B, "Milika", and my erotic response is zero. This is a model with a very pretty to lovely face, nice body, the photos, I think are nice and crisp, clear shots, nice poses, nice facial expression on the model, good skin tone. And I might as well be looking at a door post for all the sexual excitement I feel.

This is a very pretty girl, and I think the photoset is very well done. But it doesn't do anything for me.

Maybe I'm blind, or just not a connoisseur of art or erotic photos, but I didn't notice a blurry ass. It's a nice ass, a lovely ass, it just doesn't do anything for me.

There are some models I do like, at least some of their photosets. Like the photoset of Anita C, "Presenting Anita C". That girl has a great face, fantastic body, the colors in the photos are lovely, including skin tone. You look at the photos in this set and you could drool over them.

That's just me. Maybe someone else might think the "Presenting Anita C" photoset is just blah or boring. Because it is a softcore set. But I don't think it gets any better than this photoset. Lovely model presented in a great way.

08-10-10  04:36am - 5155 days #19
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
All of the pics of her ass are blurry. Bizarre, because the pics of her face are quite clear. At first I thought it was an issue of perspective and camera focus - face in front, ass in back, face is clear, ass is blurry.

But then there are pics where the ass is right there in front - still blurry - wtf?

08-10-10  04:19pm - 5154 days #20
Drooler (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 1,831
Registered: Mar 11, '07
Location: USA
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


All of the pics of her ass are blurry. Bizarre, because the pics of her face are quite clear. At first I thought it was an issue of perspective and camera focus - face in front, ass in back, face is clear, ass is blurry.

But then there are pics where the ass is right there in front - still blurry - wtf?


Yeah. If I really, really want to see the ass blurry, I'll buy some eyedrops, open a good "ass" pic, apply drops, then immediately cast eyes to the computer screen. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England.

08-10-10  04:28pm - 5154 days #21
Sevrin (0)
Active User



Posts: 80
Registered: May 30, '10
If I see Lorena's beautiful face and lovely butt in the same frame, I'm afraid I'd rather see her face in focus. There are a couple of fairly sharp butt shots in that set, though.

Exhibit, uh, A ^_^

http://members.met-art.com/members/model/lorena-b/gallery/20100809/milika/image/35/high/

Anita C, on the other hand, has that vaguely tipsy look that used to bug me about the otherwise astonishing Andrea C back in the day. Maybe the "C" stands for Chianti?

As for the left foot in question, it does look photoshopped. The right foot is in sharper focus, and there's a suspicious looking line of pixels at the far left of that "foot". Perhaps it was covered in foam and they wanted a more foot-like thing there.

Jaimee is a very beautiful model. I wish there were more black models of her calibre at sites other than Playboy. Renee Tenison and Daphnee Duplaix were goddesses back in their time. MET and Hegre have each featured one, but that's not nearly enough. I love beautiful black women, but most of the ones who are in porn seem to have already experienced the joy of childbirth, which isn't a plus in my book. Porn needs more Heather Hunters. Many, many more.

08-11-10  11:04am - 5154 days #22
Khan (0)
Suspended



Posts: 1,737
Registered: Jan 05, '07
Location: USA
Sevrin, are you aware you posted a link to a members' area of that site? Obviously, only current members to the site will be able to pull up the page. Former PornUsers Senior Administrator
Now at: MyPorn.com

"To get your ideas across use small words, big ideas, and short sentences."-John Henry Patterson

08-11-10  05:20pm - 5153 days #23
Sevrin (0)
Active User



Posts: 80
Registered: May 30, '10
Originally Posted by Khan:


Sevrin, are you aware you posted a link to a members' area of that site? Obviously, only current members to the site will be able to pull up the page.

Oh, I'm aware. But lk2 is obviously a member (isn't everyone?), and I was attempting to help him find that which he seeks.

08-11-10  07:57pm - 5153 days #24
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Everybody at PU who has an educated taste for porn is or has been a member of met-art. That is my personal belief.

08-11-10  09:29pm - 5153 days #25
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Everybody at PU who has an educated taste for porn is or has been a member of met-art. That is my personal belief.


Hey! I've never been a member of Met-Art! What about me?

Granted my tastes run the gamut from through and finally to outright disgust so you probably don't want to include me. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

08-12-10  12:40am - 5153 days #26
lk2fireone (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,618
Registered: Nov 14, '08
Location: CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Hey! I've never been a member of Met-Art! What about me?


Because of your honorable PU career, turboshaft, I am hereby making you an honorary Met-Art member. That honorary membership, plus a check for $99, entitles you to a one-year subscription to Met-Art. Be sure and let them know about your honorary membership when sending in the cash, so I can get proper credit for drumming up business for Met-Art.

08-12-10  01:39am - 5153 days #27
Capn (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,740
Registered: Sep 05, '09
Location: Near the Beer!
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Because of your honorable PU career, turboshaft, I am hereby making you an honorary Met-Art member. That honorary membership, plus a check for $99, entitles you to a one-year subscription to Met-Art. Be sure and let them know about your honorary membership when sending in the cash, so I can get proper credit for drumming up business for Met-Art.


That smooth & eloquent footwork indicates a real talent for diplomacy, court room debate...



or selling 'pre-owned' cars!

Impressive dodging.

Cap'n. Admiral of the PU Hindenburg. 2009 PU Award
Hilarious Post of the Year 2010 PU Award
( I would have preferred it to be Helpful Post of the Year for Guys who Hate 'Retail Therapy' ) :0/
Sanity is in the eye of the Beholder!

08-12-10  02:49am - 5153 days #28
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


Because of your honorable PU career, turboshaft, I am hereby making you an honorary Met-Art member.


Honorable? Ah man, I was hoping I had a dishonorable PU career here so far. I guess I'll always be a dreamer. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

08-12-10  05:55am - 5153 days #29
PinkPanther (0)
Active User



Posts: 1,136
Registered: Jan 08, '07
Location: Oakland, CA
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Honorable? Ah man, I was hoping I had a dishonorable PU career here so far. I guess I'll always be a dreamer.


Fine, I'll put you on my Most Dishonorable PU member list - anything to make you happy, turboshaft - I'll even put a next to your name if you want

08-12-10  04:42pm - 5152 days #30
turboshaft (0)
Active User

Posts: 1,958
Registered: Apr 01, '08
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


Fine, I'll put you on my Most Dishonorable PU member list - anything to make you happy, turboshaft




I'm sure this will come up at the end of the year when Wittyguy hands out his forums awards. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove

08-13-10  06:51am - 5152 days #31
eleqtric (0)
Active User

Posts: 3
Registered: Aug 13, '10
Is it just me or is her left feet way too big?

Nicelooking chick though

08-13-10  06:54am - 5152 days #32
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Its great to see a female participate on PU. Would love to hear more from you. Are there any paysites that you would be interested in reviewing?

1-32 of 32 Posts Page 1
 
Thread Nav :  Refresh Page  |   First Post  |   Last Post  |   Porn Forum Home


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.02 seconds.