|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » Solo girl "non-nude" sites..? |
| 1-22 of 22 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
| 01-03-09 02:45pm - 5831 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
Star138 (0)
Suspended Webmaster Posts: 6 Registered: Dec 22, '08 |
Solo girl "non-nude" sites..? I just read a post about sologirl websites, and what everyone thought of them... my question: has anyone here ever joined a Non-nude solo girl website? and if so, why? I just don't understand why anyone would want to pay $30 a month for pictures of a girl (regardless of how hot she is) when she's not even nude?.. especially when there are so many other sites with so many girls, that ARE nude.. is it just me, or does that seem silly? | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 03:34pm - 5831 days | #2 | |
|
atrapat (0)
Active User  Posts: 182 Registered: Apr 19, '08 Location: Non-USA |
Probably not the norm but I once joined a now extinct solo non-nude site but I wasn't aware that the girl didn't get nude at all. I didn't fill ripped-off, though; sure she found a thousand different ways to hide certain body parts but the girl was hot and it isn't the silliest porn purchase I have ever made. I think it's a niche like any other. I doubt all those who buy the Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition do it for fashion purposes. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 03:48pm - 5831 days | #3 | |
|
Tree Rodent (0)
Active User  Posts: 708 Registered: Oct 29, '08 Location: UK |
To me it is just silly. A bit like paying the price of a 4 month round the world cruise and getting a weekend in Frinton-On-Sea. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 07:47pm - 5831 days | #4 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
start138, It's just you...Sorry I couldn't help myself. In reply to your inquiry. I don't know why anyone would pay anything for a non-nude solo site. Unlike atrapat, I'd feel cheated if I tought a girl got nude on her site and found out that she didn't after I joined. I'm pretty sure that all of us join a site to see girls in various states of nudity. I can understand joining a site thinking that the girl does some hardcore material and finding out that she does not. There are quite a few of those with ambiguous wording in the preview page. I tend to steer clear of all of those. That's false advertisisng and these people do not deserve my money or for that fact anyone else's. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 08:06pm - 5831 days | #5 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User  Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
I joined True Tere (or is it TrueTere) for a month and it was non-nude. First, I LOVE Latinas, and Mexican girls in particular, and this model is gorgeous. Plus, I've always liked non-nude stuff. I'm first and foremost a panty-man, but I also love tight jeans, skirts, VPL, downblouse, tight clothes of various types, like spandex. I like a bit left to the imagination. I especially like pics of women that are not intended to be titillating (or I should say, where the woman or model is not posing for the express purpose of titillation), like lingerie/underwear/swimwear ads, film and TV vidcaps, and public candids of the milder, less-intrusive variety. My favorite pics when I was a lad were ones I snipped out of the Sears catalog back when Cheryl Tiegs was working with them. A glimpse of that woman's breasts and areolae behind revealing fabric of some kind was more exciting to me than any nudie shots I could get a hold of. I also joined Butts Road once, which is all non-nude, since I am a butt-man of the old Stagliano school. I love breasts, but there's just something about the booty. I also love nude pics. But when all is said and done, my favorite pics probably fall into the non-nude category. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! Edited on Jan 03, 2009, 08:13pm | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 10:43pm - 5831 days | #6 | |
|
troglodite (0)
Suspended Posts: 4 Registered: Apr 09, '07 Location: Huntington, WV |
I have joined a couple, though I don't recall any that were among my favorites. I did a month at Callista Model and another at Brooke Marks knowing that I was joining a non-nude site, and I also have been at some semi-nude sites like Katie's World and Karen Dreams. All of those sites were interesting, but I don't nearly as often go back and sift through the content I saved from those sites as much as I have for some of the better full-nude sites I've joined like Brooke Skye, Little Summer, etc. I've come to learn that if a girl can look good enough in her tour, I'll eventually probably end up joining (unless she doesn't speak English - kills the "girl next door" image for me I guess) if the reviews and content look interesting enough. She has to kind of push the envelope of non-nude though. I don't think I'd ever join one where the model was fully clothed all the time. Basically - I'm a sucker on rare occasions, but those are fairly few and far between. :) | |
|
||
| 01-03-09 11:17pm - 5831 days | #7 | |
|
badandy400 (0)
Active User  Posts: 869 Registered: Mar 02, '08 Location: ohio |
There can be a certain appeal. Chasing after something that is unattainable. Just watching and hoping for that one nip shot that they did not notice before posting. It can take one back to when there were and full nudity was unheard of, rather the more voyeuristic approach was there. Perhaps they are chasing the excitement they felt when at a friends house and hoping his friend's sister would accidentally pop out of her small top. Admitting my own weirdness here. I have been watching a chick who sells cloths on ebay....never shows her face, but has very nice breasts. I have one picture so far of a shot where you can see her nipple. A nip slip is not exciting that it is a slight picture of a nipple, of course I can look anywhere and get so much more. Rather it is a little more exciting in that I know it was not supposed to happen. Another side of non-nude models is that they maintain a certain innocence. Also consider than some girls look absolutely gorgeous in lingerie, a nice dress, or just about anything. While that same girl might not be so pleasant to see nude. No woman has natural cleavage. It is all artificial. Whether it is created by a bra or by implants, it is still not natural. And who does not like cleavage?!?! :) I personally do not go much for non-nude sites. But I greatly prefer sites to feature scenes where the women and dressed from the onset...or and the end for a little change up. Many of my truly favorite photos are of the women before they are nude. "For example, badandy400 has taken it upon himself to become the one man Library of Congress for porn with a collection that surely will be in Guinness Book of World Records some day." ~Toadsith~ PU Interview | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 02:16am - 5831 days | #8 | |
|
ramscrota (0)
Suspended  Posts: 54 Registered: Jul 04, '07 Location: Geelong Vic Australia |
I joined one, because I was not aware that it was non nude. It was a complete dog. | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 04:45am - 5831 days | #9 | |
|
Drooler (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 1,831 Registered: Mar 11, '07 Location: USA |
No, it's not just just you. A few months ago, I unwittingly signed up for eronata, and that's a girl I'd already seen all over the place sporting nothing but her natural charms. I reviewed the site, too. Was also told here in reply that the non-nude crap (my word choice) was coming to an end. I look at sites like onlytease and see all of this exclusive stuff of these dynamite babes and think, "Why? Why stop and park at Lingerie Junction?" Never have joined it. Oh, also know this about mypreciousvirgins. They have LOTS of non-nude stuff, along with some nice nude stuff, too. I'd recommend the site for a first timer with that caveat in mind. It's got a quite a volume of content now, even though the updates come slowly. I wanted something new, so I left England for New England. Edited on Jan 04, 2009, 04:48am | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 10:36am - 5831 days | #10 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I'd love to hear from those that have joined sites without nudity whether you were hoping for some nudity inside the members section. As well if the no nudity means that the model doesn't do something like wet t-shirts. In my book a non-nudity site means that the model is always wearing clothes and does not reveal anything. I prefer that any site involving nudity also has the models dressed. I don't know about the rest of you, but my biggest turn on is imagining what the girl looks like under those clothes. There is the anticipation, then follows the tease, and has more clothes are removed you get more and more excited. I think that this is my biggest turn off of most of todays pron. Nothing is left to our imagination Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 11:45am - 5830 days | #11 | |
|
atrapat (0)
Active User Posts: 182 Registered: Apr 19, '08 Location: Non-USA |
I'm sure others have more experience than me but, at the defunct site I mentioned before, the model would sometimes go fully naked but cover her nipples or her pussy with her hands, a belt or some other prop. You wouldn't even catch a glimpse of her nipples through the fabric and I don't remember her ever doing any wet T-shirt set. To anyone interested in seeing endless variations of covering body parts, you may try Cam With Her. It's a pay-per-minute cam site but also a membership site that gives you access to free members-only daily cam shows where the models are forbidden to even show her nipples. All the content in the membership site is non-nude. I must say, though, that members there seem to be enthralled with the content as it is anyway. One of the Cam With Her models just opened a topless-only solo site: Love Gisele; we may say it's a niche within a niche :) | |
|
||
| 01-04-09 05:35pm - 5830 days | #12 | |
|
Wittyguy (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,138 Registered: Feb 04, '08 Location: Left Coast, USA |
A long time ago I joined OnlyTease which doesn't limit itself by any means to clothing but a lot of the models don't get fully naked and many tend to cover the boobs when they do. I sort of enjoyed it because it was well done and somewhat provocative and had some pretty attractive models. As a general rule, I wouldn't join a fully clothed site and I tend to stay away from solo sites overall. I think in order for the non-nekkid thing to work a premium has to be put into the tease factor which seems to be becoming more of a lost art. | |
|
||
| 01-05-09 06:02am - 5830 days | #13 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User  Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Yeah, I've joined 'em - they're a dying breed. Here's the thing I like about 'em. Do you ever watch movies made during the days of the "code" where they couldn't have too much violence and they couldn't have too much sex so they had to have witty sexual innuendo and good scripts and stories and things? That's how I look at the non-nude thing. If a site's going to be good being non-nude they gotta give you a lot of the model's personality and put her in hot sexy outfits and tease the crap out of you really really well. And if they do that, it's fun - and can be a lot more creative than the forumulaic "count the pics of tease, count the pics of topless, count the pics of bottomless, now here's the pussy" stuff that's all over the fucking place - and the good ones don't photo-shop the model so you can't tell what she fucking looks like. | |
|
||
| 01-05-09 06:13pm - 5829 days | #14 | |
|
pat362 (0)
Active User Posts: 3,575 Registered: Jan 23, '07 Location: canada |
I'm old school porn, so I remember a time when there were no naked girls right at the beginning of a scene unless she just happened to sleep in the nude and that's where the sex scene begins. I much prefer the tease, so a semi nude girl and for me that's any girl that does not show any of the naughty stuff is great, but at some point I do want to see the naughty bits. All tease and no nudity sis not much better than all nude and no tease. Long live the Brown Coats. | |
|
||
| 01-05-09 06:23pm - 5829 days | #15 | |
|
PinkPanther (0)
Active User Posts: 1,136 Registered: Jan 08, '07 Location: Oakland, CA |
Some sites are gonna give you one thing. Some sites are gonna give you something else. I don't particularly expect every site I join to give me the full spectrum of what I like. If they do, hooray. If they give me enjoyment with what they do, that's a good site. I'm a simple man. I just want to be turned on. If they turn me on, I'm happy. If they don't turn me on, they aren't doing their jobs. | |
|
||
| 01-05-09 07:58pm - 5829 days | #16 | |
|
williamj (0)
Active User Posts: 102 Registered: Sep 29, '07 Location: usa |
Seriously for me what's the point...After seeing the XXX sites I can never go back. Will | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 01:39am - 5829 days | #17 | |
|
atrapat (0)
Active User Posts: 182 Registered: Apr 19, '08 Location: Non-USA |
I think PinkPanther's last post sums it up very well: if a site turns you on, it's a good site. Everyone is entitled to their own tastes and those tastes can be as broad as you want. On a similar subject, I've never understood people who despise softcore models because they don't do hardcore. Or those who expect all boy-girl models to do double anals on all their scenes. I prefer when models do only what they are comfortable with. If non-nude models are not comfortable with taking off all they clothes and can get a living out of good old teasing, good for them. I'd rather see a good tease than an XXX scene where the girl is obviously not happy to be there. | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 11:31am - 5828 days | #18 | |
|
Cybertoad (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,158 Registered: Jan 01, '08 Location: Wash |
I joined Next Door Nikki and did a review, Video was yukk. but she was ok to watch, just missing something. I ended up deleting nearly all of te content, was a waste of good T & A hard drive space LOL Since 2007 | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 03:37pm - 5828 days | #20 | |
|
messmer (0)
Disabled User  Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
As far as I am concerned a site can be 99% non-nude and still be very exciting and erotic but there has to be that one percent of complete nudity or I feel cheated. Teasing is fine as long as it leads to a climax of some sort. | |
|
||
| 01-18-09 07:42pm - 5816 days | #21 | |
|
flapss (0)
Suspended Webmaster Posts: 4 Registered: Jan 18, '09 Location: sydney |
That's how I look at the non-nude thing. If a site's going to be good being non-nude they gotta give you a lot of the model's personality and put her in hot sexy outfits and tease the crap out of you really really well. _______________ Watch Sample Rap Music of what goes on backstage in the dressing rooms at http://www.rapraw.com/ | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 05:29am - 5816 days | #22 | |
|
TalonIcefire (0)
Active User  Posts: 13 Registered: Dec 30, '08 Location: Terra, NAmer, USA, TX |
There's something to be said about the beauty of women while clothed. I like the beauty of women regardless of the attire. However, I cannot see why anyone would willingly pay for admission to a site showcasing "clothing only" models. There are billions of images to be found on the internet with this concept in mind and they're free. Hell, before they took a leave of absence, I was a regular visitor to Sexydesktop.co.uk; a free site that specialized in non-nude and coincidentally nude women for your background entertainment. Letum prius Dedecus | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 12:45pm - 5815 days | #23 | |
|
WeeWillyWinky (0)
Active User Posts: 243 Registered: Jun 03, '07 Location: Havasu City, AZ USA |
There are also billions of nude and even hardcore images that you can get for free. I still occasionally surf TGPs, various bulletin boards, blogs, Webshots, Flickr, Photobucket, plus a plethora of sites like Watcher's Web and Private Voyeur. But by and large, pay-sites save me a lot of time and effort. Pay sites are obviously an advantage when it comes to video, but I've payed for several sites almost strictly for pictures. The non-nude sites I've paid for offered something in a specific niche (or a particular model), offered lots of it, of fairly high quality, and all without the usual headaches associated with free sites, like spam, re-directs, dead-links, pop-ups. Collecting free pics, and looking for stuff that I want, in general, wastes a lot of time, and time is money. You know what I hate the most about selfish people? It's that they don't think enough about MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!! | |
|
||
| 1-22 of 22 Posts | Page 1 |
| Thread Nav : Refresh Page | First Post | Last Post | Porn Forum Home |
|
