|
|||||
|
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
messmer (0)
|
2351-2400 of 2588 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 | 37 | 47 | Page 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | Next Page > |
12-13-08 02:06pm - 5853 days | #5 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks for the rant, Wittyguy. I needed that because I feel the same way. A large majority appear to be in love with Gonzo style hard core videos while only a handful of users like pictures, or so it seems. And no one is interested in catering to a minority. I will have a look at the DDF sites and Suze Randall and might subscribe it they are not too "Twisty"-ish. Picky, picky! :-) | |
|
12-13-08 01:57pm - 5853 days | #4 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I can't make a meaningful comment, squirrel, because I know nothing about the sites or subject except to commiserate because I've been disappointed so many times during the year+ I've been subscribing to various sites. I yet have to find one that doesn't have an irritant in it .. my biggest is the accursed SAMENESS when it comes to picture and video. They're stuck in a groove. Same postures, same actions, same irritating talk, same lack of context. Aw, maybe it's me. Maybe, as Glover keeps saying in the "Lethal Weapon" movies: "I am getting too old for this sh*t!" :-) | |
|
12-13-08 11:30am - 5853 days | #3 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Pink Panther, I must have a look at these sites. I was a member of the 21st sextury network and loved the quality of their videos as well as of their pictures. The only complaint I had when I reviewed one of their sites was that the picture sets presented the same scene as the videos. It would have been my dream to see separate sets, model only, rather than (excellent, granted) stills of the hard core video. I'm not much into hard core unless it is g/g. That is quite tolerable! But as someone wrote earlier in another area, you can't have it all! :-) | |
|
12-13-08 09:12am - 5853 days | Original Post - #1 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I have always preferred pictures to videos and was wondering if there are any Networks that carry sites that specialize in pictures? All the ones I've seen so far (Brazzer's, Reality Kings etc.) are hardcore video sites. | |
|
12-13-08 09:05am - 5853 days | #2 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hi Squirrel, love of spanking and enemas appear to be two typically British "niches" as I've noticed over a long period of time as a Porn User. I would not call them perversions, they are fetishes and we all have at least one. I never take offense because I assume, with good reason, that both parties to a spanking agree to it wholeheartedly, but it's not my thing. | |
|
12-09-08 07:55am - 5857 days | #22 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I basically agree with your views when it comes to hardcore. I don't think there is a single video where I put myself in the scene, P.O.V. tries to make it easy but even then it takes more imagination then I possess. I think your remarks that people are being paid to perform for us are right on and I don't see anything creepy about it, even if someone else thought so. And I agree when it comes to irritants: my biggest one is the clicking of cameras during a scene which brings home the artificiality and calculated nature of the whole set-up. That's why I prefer pictures, soft core but showing pink, solo or g/g, at least they allow me to use my imagination. | |
|
12-04-08 03:45pm - 5862 days | #39 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
5. The StrØget (where I bought my first porn magazine). Told you that Canada was restrictive until the age of the Internet when they finally had to take their thumb out of the Dyke because the flood couldn't be stopped. 6. Tivoli Gardens 7. Tuborg Lager Beer .. best beer in the world! | |
|
12-03-08 06:07pm - 5863 days | #36 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
LOL. Nicely put. I know I'd do the same thing, I'd look at all the stuff I'm holding in reserve, with the added advantage of being able to save a chunk of money on a monthly basis until that fad wears off. | |
|
12-03-08 02:12pm - 5863 days | #16 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Darned if I know, I'm over fifty! Oh, yeah, now I remember: hair! I remember reading all those smutty books in my misguided youth where the women always had a "luxuriant" bush and it was meant as a compliment. However, trimmed is fine with me, too, even though I wouldn't turn away "luxuriant!" :-) | |
|
12-03-08 11:22am - 5863 days | #33 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I think streaming is fine when it comes to pre-viewing a video or while you are waiting for one to download and have nothing better to do, but I can't see it as the next trend. Most of us are basically collectors and streaming only would be just as distasteful to us as DRM. | |
|
12-03-08 11:18am - 5863 days | #32 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
PU, the reviews, the comments, the forum are highly addictive! I find myself coming to this place various times during the day and night in order to mingle as well as get the latest! | |
|
12-03-08 11:05am - 5863 days | #14 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
LOL. I just had to go to look up your age, it seems that most under twenty-five almost insist that the model be shaved and hair is now considered distasteful or, worse yet, a fetish, where only a generation ago shaving was considered to be kinky! Unless you are talking about the act of shaving itself. I haven't come across too many of those in the videos I watch. | |
|
12-03-08 09:22am - 5863 days | #12 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Talking about old times, some of the most erotic movies I've been privileged to watch over a life time were main stream, mostly story and had very little "action." Never ending hardcore action has never been erotic in my eyes. I need the trimmings as well as the bird! :-) | |
|
12-03-08 09:13am - 5863 days | #21 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hilarious. I wish I had your gift, wittyguy. Thanks for making my day (using Clint Eastwood voice). | |
|
12-02-08 04:08pm - 5864 days | #8 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
The spitting really gets me. Also irritating, but on a lesser scale, is the model slapping her own butt in every second scene you watch! I'm not particularly keen on Gonzo but can see why there is so much of it. It made it easy for producers to churn out DVDs by the thousands because all you need is a couple of actors and a camera. I sure miss the old fashioned story lines leading up to sex, as inept and corny as they were at times. | |
|
11-28-08 07:37am - 5868 days | #9 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I keep using CCBill because I consider them trustworthy but you are absolutely right when it comes to ripping off customers when it comes to the exchange of foreign currency. One site I subscribed to a few months ago when the Canadian Dollar and the U.S. Dollar were almost at par listed the US price at $19.95 and they charged me $ 26.00 Canadian. Epoch is better when it comes to conversion (extra charges.) | |
|
11-27-08 06:32pm - 5869 days | #9 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Totally agree! | |
|
11-27-08 06:06pm - 5869 days | #7 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Fair enough, re. Abby Winters, that's where subjectivity comes in again. I rated it by its faithfulness to its niche. I don't know of any other site with the exception of another Oz site, Girls Out West, whose amateurs look like amateurs. Most other "amateur" sites take the amateurs and then make them up to look like pros. That's one of the reasons why AW got a high mark from me. There were others as well, of course, the lay-out, a very good search engine, an abundance of models. I will grant you that a site that true to its niche can sometimes become boring if you stay longer than a month but I still stick by my assessment of it! :-) | |
|
11-27-08 01:31pm - 5869 days | #2 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Just a small observation. When doing a review you not only have to be fair to the site but also to all the competing sites in a particular niche. That's why two of my ratings were over 90. Both Abby Winters and Girls Out West are the best in their field you have to rate them higher than the many inferior sites in the Amateur niche, even if they are not perfect. | |
|
11-27-08 01:06pm - 5869 days | #2 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Happy Thanksgiving, Khan. We celebrated ours a month ago, may yours be as good .. and I am thankful to you and the staff for creating such a great place for us where non-mainstream views can be so freely expressed. | |
|
11-22-08 02:07pm - 5874 days | #11 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Canada is prudish and illogical, too. Just like the U.S., if not worse! Being European in origin I have always marveled at the stupidity of making a movie R rated because some actress is taking a shower in it, while they rate a slasher movie PG. Go figure the mindset of the censors! | |
|
11-22-08 02:01pm - 5874 days | #10 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hey, WWW, nothing to do with the subject I know but I love your avatar! :-) | |
|
11-22-08 01:57pm - 5874 days | #2 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
My favorite was Leslie, formerly found at Aunt Judy's I think, then they moved her to their Archives. I'm not sure if she's still modeling. | |
|
11-16-08 10:29am - 5880 days | #37 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Many of us do! But I'm afraid you are right, many more don't otherwise we wouldn't see all that silicone and that photoshop look with so many models, and sites like Twisty's wouldn't be so popular. Looking at Playboy has ruined a whole generation! :-) | |
|
11-15-08 10:28am - 5881 days | #35 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
You and I, both! And I fervently hope you're right! | |
|
11-15-08 07:03am - 5882 days | #3 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, your reply was very helpful! :-) | |
|
11-14-08 06:37pm - 5882 days | Original Post - #1 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
It is almost as if every web site featuring pictures of solo models has gone into automatic cruise mode. Be it ATK, Older Women, Aunt Judy's, AllOver30, Twisty's, some of the better known ones, all seem to have developed the same style of wooden photography with the models basically in the same outfits, the same posture, the same situation .. office, kitchen, locker room, class room and that infamous ante-room to the shower used for all those interminable make-up shots (you need to go to Aunt Judy's and Older Women for those). You might accuse me of becoming jaded and that there are only so many scenarios one can play with but I was at a site yesterday that still featured a lot of the models of the past, taken in the past, between 1999 and 2003 and while the picture quality was poor the sets themselves were exciting in the way the models posed, the clothes they wore (more), the sets they had been placed in, the ability of the photographers to bring the best out of their models. They seemed to be more erotic and exciting, while nowadays every site and its photographers appear to be imitating the others. It is almost as if the photographer goes for a cup of coffee after telling the model, just get undressed while his camera is set to automatically take a picture every two seconds without a human operator, and where the model, lacking direction, indifferently takes off the three or four items she's allowed to wear in a series of 150 pictures. That's why on some sites one can see up to fifty pictures of a model taking off her suit jacket. At least that's the only explanation I have for the poor and listless quality of most sets. There are exceptions of course but there is a numbing sameness to the whole thing that's beginning to be hard to ignore. Don't bother answering because I'm just having a little half depressed nostalgia party all by myself while pining for the good old days of porn where you could expect something different and exciting now and then, be it in pictures or videos. Man, I think I'm getting old! :-( | |
|
11-14-08 02:03pm - 5882 days | #26 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Sorry about the divorce, www. Couldn't have been easy! And thanks for the tip, I'll have a look at Azzy! | |
|
11-14-08 12:56pm - 5882 days | #2 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I think facials came about as a search for that which is different. Ever since the Internet removed the barriers concerning sex many porn users have become jaded when it comes to ordinary intercourse or to oral sex. I am not keen on facials either but I know that I quickly switch channels on late night TV when they show yet another movie with a lady doing a bj on Randy Spears. Ho hum, I've seen it hundreds of times before, show me something different. That's why anal is big at the moment, that's why facials are big .. shock value. However, that too shall become ho hum and we can only guess what will be next .. if it isn't censorship! And that's why I still mostly prefer pictures to videos because they allow me to create my own fantasies, which is always more exciting than raw reality. | |
|
11-14-08 10:48am - 5882 days | #24 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Knowing your exquisite taste I would have subscribed to your wife's site, www. :-) I have two favorites on SC even though I never subscribed. One is Camilla, the other is Celeste. The one thing that always stopped me was the "subscription to one model" factor (if I read the site's policy right). A given model's previous sets could be downloaded in a day and after that you would be forever waiting for updates. Plus, some of the updates are not so hot. Why do so many models at SC decide to get into a red Santa suit at this time of the year, for instance? I hate cute! :-) Or she might decide to retire as many of them do. Do you get any discounts if you subscribe to multiple ladies? That is a real tempting site for me. True amateurs doing it more for the thrill than for the money, or at least so it appears. | |
|
11-10-08 09:25am - 5886 days | #22 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
No offense taken and you are right about the Village Ladies, malikstarks. I have a few sets of theirs in my possession. Only trouble is since I got the new widescreen, high pixel monitor their pictures don't look so good any more! :-( Must check if they are now offering them in a larger size. Southern Charms drove me crazy because I didn't know on whom to settle (figuratively speaking):-). My favorite site to try would be Mature.NL but their monthly subscription price puts them out of reach of the average person. At the moment it would be close to seventy bucks Canadian for one month! Thanks for refreshing my memory. Off to take a look at VL and SC once again! | |
|
11-10-08 08:05am - 5886 days | #21 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
You did your best, shooterbo!! That's all anyone can ask for. :-) Some folks are just plain fickle! | |
|
11-10-08 08:03am - 5886 days | #20 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, David, but I'm definitely not into chatting. My wife would not appreciate it! :-) | |
|
11-03-08 07:34pm - 5893 days | #12 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Welcome back and I am truly awed, Toadsith! Incredible knowledge concerning computering! I am the person for whom Windows was invented so, in sincere humility, I bow before the master! :-) And you answered my question with your statement above. Thanks! No wonder other reviewers and I seem to be on such different wave lengths at times. | |
|
11-03-08 12:59pm - 5893 days | #9 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Cybertoad, for going to this length to help me. My basic problem was that I wanted to decrease the pixels but keep the wide screen, just to see if some of the videos that had been praised by others and were found wanting by me looked better with a lower setting. No matter what resolution I tried I ended up with a 4:3 ratio desk top rather than a wide screen one. With my previous operating system/graphics card I could always preview the dimensions in connection with any given setting but with this graphics card I can't. Is wide screen even possible if I reduce the default setting (1680x1060)? | |
|
11-02-08 11:42am - 5894 days | #7 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, cybertoad, much appreciated! | |
|
11-02-08 07:46am - 5894 days | #14 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Nope! :-) | |
|
11-02-08 07:43am - 5894 days | #5 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, so, Toadsith where are you? :-) | |
|
11-01-08 02:21pm - 5895 days | #3 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Hey Cybertoad, thanks! I, too, have a 22" monitor (actually officially it's a 21.5" Samsung widescreen. So, a 1280x1024 pixels setting would actually make a video look better? At least that's how I read it. I tried various settings yesterday but always ended up with the old 4:3 format for my desktop. :-) I wouldn't mind losing some desktop space if 1280x1024 is helpful and doesn't cause deterioration to pictures and videos. Let me know if I read you right! Please! P.S. Just came back from resetting to 1280x1084 and still came up with the old 4:3 format rather than widescreen. What's the correct number for widescreen. My present graphics card doesn't give me a preview. Thanks again. Edited on Nov 01, 2008, 02:25pm | |
|
11-01-08 09:15am - 5895 days | Original Post - #1 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I appear to have too many differences of opinion with others of our members when it comes to the quality of videos on certain sites. They will praise them in their reviews while to me they look blurry and far from adequate. No it's not my eyes, HD still looks spectacular, no matter what site I download it from and anything with a bitrate of 2000 and higher usually also looks pretty good as well. So here's my question to a tekkie, if we have one in our midst: would the pixel setting in my monitor (1680x1050) affect older material so it doesn't look quite as good to me as it would to others with a lower setting? This is important because the lower rating I give a site is often based on what I perceive to be the poor video quality. | |
|
11-01-08 08:56am - 5895 days | #11 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
We need our resident Psychologist to look in on this thread. (I forget his handle at the moment: exotics4me?) | |
|
10-31-08 07:03am - 5897 days | #48 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Don't I know it! You wouldn't believe how much I had to delete to make room on my hard drive for the latest HD Videos from FTV Girls and "In The Crack!" :-) Is there another ISP you could turn to or do they all limit downloads in your area? | |
|
10-30-08 03:51pm - 5897 days | #13 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Well, I know that Abby Winters is the only site I ever subscribed to without consulting TBP and PU first. So to all the sites that got my dollar since Sept. 07 be thankful to the folks of TBP for their reviews, links and discounts! :-) | |
|
10-30-08 03:26pm - 5897 days | #5 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Boy, that's a tough one. You are right when you say that self-mutilation or allowing yourself to be mutilated isn't porn. It's a mental illness. For whatever reason: low self-esteem, extreme guilt .. these people are trying to purge their souls of whatever is eating away at them inside. You see the religious manifestations of this phenomenon in the Philippines on any Good Friday when TV shows videos of people flogging themselves until they bleed. Who knows, maybe there's such extreme guilt in connection with their sexual urges inside the people you mentioned that they somehow try to destroy their sexuality that way or at least punish themselves severely for it. However, seeing that I'm not a Psychologist or Psychiatrist I'm only guessing. Human nature is too complicated and unpredictable for me to ever understand it. I don't even understand myself! | |
|
10-30-08 09:16am - 5897 days | #46 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Boy, I'm glad I don't live where you live! My ultra highspeed costs $ 49.00 with no limitations as to how much I can download over a given period. At least not yet! There's always the possibility that they might take a look at Rogers' business model (if it is Rogers) and say: hmm, 100 Gigs, that's not a bad idea! :-) | |
|
10-30-08 08:45am - 5897 days | #15 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks for the tip, shooterbo. How big is this site? Big enough to make it worth a subscription to "Reality Kings?" | |
|
10-25-08 05:48pm - 5902 days | #42 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I doubt if I'll get back to Europe soon but thanks for the tip re. Czech food. I didn't think it was possible to get a bad meal in Europe (England excluded .. but before anyone from the U.K. takes offense, I hear that the food has improved considerably since I was there last). And thanks for the expression of sympathy regarding the precipitous slide of the Canadian Dollar. :-) | |
|
10-25-08 09:10am - 5902 days | #12 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
That's my kind of site, as long as they undress as well! :-) | |
|
10-24-08 06:35pm - 5903 days | #10 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
Thanks, Wittyguy. I am aware of 40somethingmag.com. As a matter of fact I may have made some replies to various reviews or even a remark or two concerning their huge and intrusive logo. That great big yellow watermark, usually right at the top of the picture, has stopped me effectively from subscribing to one of a handful of sites that would actually suit my taste. In many pictures you don't even have the room to crop the water mark without destroying part of the body, in most cases the head. If you are a member at present maybe you could ask the webmaster why they do their utmost to make each picture look like the cover of a magazine rather than just the first one of a set. I do appreciate your mention of this site, too bad ..... see above! :-) | |
|
10-24-08 06:20pm - 5903 days | #9 | |
messmer (0)
Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada |
I have the feeling that you are right, Rizzo! That would account for the paucity of sites for more mature people. Ah, well, my porn buying has been temporarily put on hold anyway, until our dollar (Canadian) improves, so no harm done. Maybe by the time it's back at par with the greenback some "Grandmas" may just have become bold enough in the meantime to allow themselves be photographed /video taped for those of us who appreciate their charms. :-) | |
|
2351-2400 of 2588 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 23 | 30 | 37 | 47 | Page 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | Next Page > |
|