Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: pat362 (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (3575)  |   Threads Started (31)

251-300 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 Page 6 7 17 27 37 47 57 71 72 Next Page >

05-08-17  06:05pm - 2785 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
The death of Microsoft's Operating System XP made things significantly better for me because that was probably the worst operating system when it comes to viruses and malware. It was so bad that Microsoft couldn't keep up with all the A..holes making new and more devious ways to fuck with people.

These days I use Win 7 and I have yet to be infected with anything. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-30-17  10:20am - 2793 days #15
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^At what point will a majority of Trump voters reach buyers remorse? I mean of all the candidates Trump is the only one who didn't know that being President is hard, that passing laws is very difficult, that Foreign Policies are very important because pissing off your enemies is bad but pissing off your allies is so much worse, that trade means you have to give up something to get something back, that what you say is just as important as what you do because when these things aren't in accord than people stop listening to you.

If I was an American and last week my President said that he already misses his old life and he's only been president for a little more than 3 months in a four year term than I would be wondering what the hell that means for the next 3 years and 9 months. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-29-17  10:50am - 2794 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Maybe but there seems to be a general consensus among many observers that the Trump Wall is by far the biggest issue facing Trump at the moment. I don't know if you heard the story but Rush Limbaugh attacked Trump on his syndicated radio show and the very next day Trump came out and said that he still planned on building the wall. Of course that will never happen because the Congress will never dish out billions of dollars for the wall. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-28-17  06:58pm - 2795 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by merc77:


Even with all that against him Trump still won the election. Everyone knew this going into the election booth so it shows the voters didn't care.


I don't know about you but personally I'm not exactly sure how Trump managed to get elected. He and Hillary were the two most detested candidates in the history of the United Sates and I think that Hillary was probably doomed from the beginning because she was slightly more detested and distrusted. I wonder what the results would have been if the person under FBI investigation at the time of the election had been named.

Originally Posted by merc77:


Do you think two thirds of both houses of Congress and 38 US states will pass any new amendment in the near or foreseeable future?


Let's see. You have a republican President, a Republican Senate and a Republican Congress and the only thing they managed to do in the first 100 days of the new Presidency is to nominate Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court and the Republicans had to destroy 200 years of Democracy to get it done so that tells me that very little will get done. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-28-17  06:45pm - 2795 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Jason33:


I do genuinely want to help people with requests like this, but generic descriptions just won't be enough to do so.


I wouldn't have a problem helping a regular poster who had a similar request as the OP but the strange thing is that regular posters usually don't ask those kind of questions. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-25-17  03:27pm - 2798 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^The professor who correctly predicted the Presidential elections for the last 30 years is doing the talk show rounds claiming that this is what will bring down the Trump Presidency but sadly for everyone it will be way too late to fix all the cluster fucks he will have created before getting impeached.

Mind you he may very well go down in History has being the President who brought sweeping changes to the Constitution because you know that no future President will be able to withhold releasing his taxes, put his multi-million/billion businesses in a blind trust, be able to put most of his family members in key roles, be an admitted sexual predator(Clinton was first) or be so ignorant of what is involved in being a President that most of your statements regarding simple things make you look like a complete idiot. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-25-17  03:14pm - 2798 days #22
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Amanda:



I may be biased.....
But I would like to say that our reviewing team tries to be as honest and objective as they can.



I don't know if you are biased but I have no doubt of the honesty of the reviews on TBP because I remember a time prior to PU when there were maybe 3 or 4 honest porn review sites on the net and as far as I know TBP and Rabbit are the only two from that time that are still alive today.

That doesn't mean that I agree with every review on TBP because I don't. I'm not suppose to agree with all of them anymore than everyone is suppose to agree with mine. I also don't always accept their version of facts regarding the content on some sites but I put that down to a lack of info on the part of the reviewer regarding the content. I mean if a site claims to have exclusive content and you have never seen it elsewhere than you will take them at their word until proven otherwise. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-23-17  11:09am - 2800 days #17
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by mbaya:


I never found even one decent site featuring Indian women. I think the one positive review for DesiPapa was a lot of wishful thinking.


And you never will. Just look at the number of performers of Indian descent but born outside of the Country doing porn and you quickly see that it's so tiny that it can be considered non-existent. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-23-17  11:04am - 2800 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'm with you guys on this one. I can't remember the number of times where I identify all the squares and than I get a new batch of images because somehow I didn't pick all the correct ones. The only positive thing I can see with the pictogram captcha system is that it's an improvement on the text version. I often had to ask for a different one because I simply had no clue what the words were. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-22-17  04:56pm - 2801 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by jook:


I joined for that very reason - desperation for Indian porn. But truth be told, I felt like burning my eyes out after looking at the women, the majority of whom ranged from a few pounds overweight to obese and many who looked like they could be collecting social security.


I'm not sure how aware you are on this particular subject but you are not likely to ever find good Indian porn anymore than you can find good Chinese porn or good Middle Eastern porn. There is a very strong cultural taboo when it comes to people who do porn and it's the kind of taboo that can get you killed so you can understand why women would rather not appear in anything that is remotely close to porn. You can imagine why it would be hard to shoot good Indian porn.

Your Desipapa site didn't get better score than any of the other themed sites. In fact most of them all have the same score. What that tells me is that you are better off looking for a different fetish because if you don't than you will only regret each other membership. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-21-17  06:51pm - 2802 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I know what I'm writing makes me a sort of dick but frankly I'm fine if that's how I'm perceived when it comes to these type of requests. I refuse to help anyone that asks for information regarding a scene, performer or what not that he once saw if that person has never participated in the forum or if his participation is basically always asking to identify something.

For some reason those request always make me think that the person saw that video on a tube or torrent site and is now looking for more similar free stuff but because the scene was stolen than the tube or torrent site made sure that it would be harder for any producer to find his stolen so the names of the performers were omitted or changed. Thalas may be not be in that category but simply a decent young man who is genuinely interested in finding a scene he once saw on dvd but somehow I don't think that's the case. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-21-17  06:35pm - 2802 days #15
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


"I thought the site was fantastic despite the horrible video quality, cross checks and lack of support."



The first thing I would think of if I read that someone thought that a site was fantastic but the video quality is horrible would be that this person is either trolling us or should step away from the bong because he clearly not in a proper state of mind to review a site. There is no way that you can have the word horrible and fantastic in the same review.

I'd be more inclined to believe that there is a certain level of personal bias if there is mention of cross sell and lack of support issues. The first because the person probably got conned into buying something he or she had not planed to do and the second because some people get pissed quite fast if they lose access to their site for a day or two. It's happened to me a couple of times and it's a little annoying but not something I bother mentioning in my review. Especially if it happens once and then everything is great afterwards. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-18-17  03:27pm - 2805 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by Will P:


I don't know if I think that it's "fishy" for people to rate sites without writing reviews, after all, the same thing happens on online shopping

Sometimes when you read someone site review, you realize that it comes down to something very subjective - like they didn't feel the site had enough green-eyed blondes named April.


I think the score is fishy when it varies significantly from the other scores. The only time I don't necessarily think it's fishy is if there is a review where you can see the thinking behind the score.

Now some scores are based far too much on the bad personal experience of the reviewer rather than as a pure analysis of the site's content. That score will affect the overall rating of the site but with a review to accompany it than you are able to identify the reasons behind the score and make a better judgement. The same couldn't be said if the person only posted the score. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-17-17  06:00pm - 2806 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by MargulisAZ:


I just join sites for a month then go back after a year or two or three when more updates have built up.


I can't help but feel that if you are able to hold up joining a site for a year or more than I don't think you're all that interested in their content. I mean I have a few sites that I join maybe once a year but I am very picky with my porn and most of those sites update with one new video per week. I couldn't see myself only joining only once a year let alone every 2-3 years.

I am currently waiting before I join Brazzer and although it's likely to be a few more weeks before I do join. It will still be only a few months. Now it's true that it has been many years since I last joined RK and it's likely to be many more years before I bother joining because they rarely produce the kind of porn that I enjoy. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-12-17  07:09pm - 2811 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Let me premise that in no way do I disagree with your list but see below why those examples aren't a good sample on which to base a theory that the line between porn and mainstream cinema is getting thinner.

Originally Posted by merc77:


9 Songs (2004) Kieran O'Brien
Love (2015) The first mainstream movie with porn shot in 3D
Nymphomaniac (2013) Shia LaBeouf


What do the above 3 movies all have in common? They are all European. You could easily add 3 or more movies to your list where there is just as much if not more sexual intercourse happening. Europeans have always threaded the needle when it comes to incorporating various levels of sex in their movies going as far back as Caligula adding actual sex scene post production. The other noticeable thing that I want to point out is that for the most part the sex scenes in these 3 movies all star fairly unknown actors. Some of them may have some big names but they certainly aren't having actual sex in their scenes.


Originally Posted by merc77:


Ken Park (2001)
The Brown Bunny (2003) Chloe Sevigny
Shortbus (2006)


Of these 3 movies only Chloe Sevigny is a well known and well established actress and although she did shoot an oral sex scene with the director/actor. I seem to remember that they tried to downplay that part of the movie and it can also be argue that Chloe paid a hefty price for doing that BJ scene because she was more or less blackballed in Hollywood. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-11-17  06:35pm - 2812 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I don't think you will see actual hardcore sex scenes in mainstream movies any time soon but the idea seems to pop up from time to time. Seeing that most celebrities and especially actors and actresses make more money from their name brand than they do from making movies means that they will never do anything that might affect that brand. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-10-17  03:31pm - 2813 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I saw a few of the Emanuelle movies in theater as well as on late night TV. Same goes for Story of O which starred the Future Bond Girl from Moonraker Corrine Cléry. Almost any movie starring Edwidge Fenech would have played in an 18 or older theater.

My favorite porn movies are probably all from mid 70's to late 80's. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-08-17  10:57am - 2815 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I ACTUALLY THOUGHT THAT SHE WAS QUITE GOOD IN RABID AND IF IT WASN'T FOR THE FACT THAT SHE DID PORN FIRST. I THINK SHE MIGHT HAVE HAD A FAILRY DECENT CAREER IN MAINSTREAM MEDIA. SHE CERTAINLY HAD THE LOOK, THE DRIVE AND THE ACTING CHOPS TO MAKE A GOOD RUN. OF COURSE SINCE SHE WAS PRIMARILY A PERFORMER OF THE 70'S AND 80'S THAN MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT THAT MOST PERFORMERS OF THAT ERA NEEDED TO HAVE A CERTAIN LEVEL OF ACTING TALENT TO DO PORN STILL MAKES SENSE. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-07-17  03:21pm - 2816 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I didn't mention any of the males but your two suggestions are excellent examples. You can add Richard Bolla, Ron Jeremy, George payne, Eric Edwards and Joey Silvera to name a few.

The only AVN awards that may be worth paying attention are the ones that are pre-2000 and maybe even as far back as late 80's to early 90's. At some point it stopped being a true award recognizing the talent of the performers and more a marketing tool for the owners of AVN. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-05-17  05:56pm - 2818 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Yeah I have to concur with you. III and IV are the best. Yours is also quite good. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-05-17  05:52pm - 2818 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I'd say almost any performer from the 70's and early 80's needed a certain level of acting talent because so many of the movies in those decades was scenario driven. Just take a look at Annette Haven in Barbara Broadcast or Veronica Hart in Amanda by Night for examples. If we look at those from the mid 80's and late 90's than two names come to mind. You have Ginger Lynn and Tracy Lord. Both women went on to appear in multiple mainstream projects.

In the 90's you had Ashlyn Gere who was able to parlay her acting talent from porn roles into some mainstream TV roles on shows like X Files, Space Above and Beyond and Millenium.

In more recent times I would say that Sasha grey is an obvious name but look at Dana Dearmond and India Summer as well. Long live the Brown Coats.

04-04-17  03:27pm - 2819 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


IF YOU'RE WILLING TO WAIT 5 YEARS FOR PU TO FIX THEIR CURRENT PROBLEMS, YOU'RE A BETTER MAN THAN I AM.

IN 5 YEARS, I WILL PROBABLY BE DEAD AND BURIED.

(CONFUSED STATE OF MIND.)


JUST MAKE SURE THAT IT'S IN THAT ORDER. YOU REALLY DON'T WANT TO BE BURIED BEFORE DEATH. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-22-17  03:22pm - 2832 days #10
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
ON a completely unrelated subject. I read somewhere that Trump and his lawyers are suing a young man to force him to take down his site because he has kittens punching Trump on his site. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-20-17  03:12pm - 2834 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^No need to thank me. I like doing PSA. If I have cured you than let me add that I want the Putin looking guy to be wearing a bear costume while he's giving it to Donald. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-19-17  05:35pm - 2835 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I've been of the opinion that they were probably dead the moment that Patrick Collins(the long term owner) decided to stop producing porn and sell the studio. They lost all of their most popular directors prior to that happening and the people that came after them were simply not up to the task of making decent porn. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-17  05:56pm - 2837 days Original Post - #1
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada


I would have written in the comment section but the site in question is not the one TBP/PU are currently associated with. That one is the old clubelegantangel.com. So for now be advised that if you stumble upon the newly created elegantangel.com thinking that it's just the newer version of the other site than be forewarned that it is not.

The new site is a stand alone streaming only site that does not actually say anywhere on it's various pages that it is a streaming only site. If they were 10$ to 15$ than that might not be a big deal but their starting price is 30$ for one month and unless you have never joined EA than you will be paying a steep price for half a dozen new scenes. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-17  05:18pm - 2837 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^I have had my email address since I first started going on the net and I refuse to change it to avoid getting junk mail. I get significantly less junk mail now than I used to. The sites that would have sent me stuff are now dead. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-17-17  05:16pm - 2837 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^The only Trump parody that I want to hear about is the one where a Trump looking performer is getting gaped by a Putin looking performer. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-15-17  03:29pm - 2839 days #11
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Although I can see why you might want to compare Lana with Sasha. The reality for Lana or any other current performer is that she will never be able to achieve half of what her predecessors could because the industry is not remotely similar to what it was half a dozen years ago. As many as 30 of the studios Sasha worked for are either dead or they are dying. The lost of those 30 studios did not mean that you got 30 new ones to replace them. it simply means that performers lost 30 possible employers.

An average performer who started doing porn in the last 3-4 years can probably shoot for maybe 20 studios but that is only if she has a certain look and is willing to do just about anything legal in porn. If she doesn't have the right look or is unwilling to do certain things will more than likely doom her to a career that lasted less than a year.

Lana in my opinion is above average and she has added a few more things to her repertoire but the studios that would have fought over her aren't there to support her desire to do more porn so she will sadly stop doing porn long before she gets close to what Sasha managed to do. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-14-17  03:11pm - 2840 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I could be wrong but I think you will wait a very long time because I don`t think it`s a show that can easily be made into a porn parody. I`d also like to add that I think the general interest in porn parodies is dying down. Couple that with the increase in production cost and what you get is a recipe where studios don`t want to invest any large amounts of money to produce something that will have a tiny return on their investment. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-13-17  03:06pm - 2841 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I get them all the time. I don't mind if I get them while I'm a member as long as I still get them once I'm not. The price they have on those special offer is often lower than what you can get elsewhere but I got a special offer to join Jules Jordan and on the offer it said 50% off the regular price. I clicked on the link and the join price they have is 29.95$. I wasn't aware that Jules was now charging 60$ for a month membership. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-08-17  03:35pm - 2846 days #4
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I guess beastiality would only be a problem if the Beast was a woman.

I don't care if there is a gay character in the movie but that doesn't mean that I'm not scratching my head as to why there is one. I mean last I heard Beauty and the Beast is suppose to be a fairy tale about a fair maiden who sees the beauty inside a hideous beast and this breaks the curse he was placed under. Disney went to the trouble of copying almost everything that is in the 1991 animated version and there is no mention of the sexual preference of any of the characters in that movie.

Why make a live version of the animated movie and then add stuff that was never there in the first place. It doesn't add anything to the story and doesn't make the story any better for the LBGTQ community. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-06-17  05:17pm - 2848 days #8
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Maybe I missed something but the site looks a lot like a generic tube site where the content is not well identified and clearly not necessarily vintage in nature. I'm a huge fan of vintage porn but the site must properly identify the content. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-04-17  10:58am - 2850 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
How about: In The Crack? Long live the Brown Coats.

03-03-17  05:57pm - 2851 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Is it possible that Twitter created this new service so that they can make some money from let us say more adult oriented entertainment? The reason I ask is that it's common to read that a so and so had her Twitter account blocked because she posted nude or hardcore content to her twitter. Twitter having a paying premium membership could open the door to those performers who want to show their fans a little more than they currently can on the regular Twitter. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-03-17  05:52pm - 2851 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^It's illegal but probably next to impossible to prosecute anyone for doing it. Long live the Brown Coats.

03-01-17  03:12pm - 2853 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
You will never find true voyeur porn like you describe for the simple reason that it's illegal. Not sure if you are aware but regulation 2257 basically states that producers of adult content must be able to prove on demand that the performers who appear in their movies are all of legal. You can imagine how difficult that would be for someone who films strangers having sex and then uploads the videos to his site.

John Leslie had a series of movies called The Voyeur. They weren't true voyeur movie so much as filmed in such a way that the viewer is made to feel as though he is a voyeur to the action happening on screen.

Even if filming strangers having sex wasn't illegal. My interest would be less than zero because I already dislike most POV style videos and a voyeur one is by far the worst kind because it's both a static shot and far from the action. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-26-17  05:50pm - 2856 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Consider yourself lucky because there have a been quite a few posts on another forum regarding this very subject and the performers never come out looking very nice. In some of them they come out sounding like miserable people and although I agree with you that it's good to know. Part of me can't help but feel that it would have been better if I had never known about their personal views on some subjects because this way I could have enjoyed their work.

It's much worse for mainstream performers because they have so many more fans. Let's pick Mel Gibson as an example. I can still watch Mel Gibson but in many ways I now know that I'm looking at an asshole. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-23-17  02:17pm - 2859 days #9
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^100$ is a lot of money for a gadget that you may not like, may not work like they advertise and one that you may quickly realise is a lot more annoying to wear than any pleasure you deride from it's wearing. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-21-17  06:04pm - 2861 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


JESUS,WHAT A WAY TO KILL A FANTASY.
LOL.
OR MAYBE UGGGGHHHHH.



Sorry about that. My level of patience in regards to all these gimmicks is at an all time low. I would much prefer that producers think of better ways to entice people into paying for porn and this latest thing is not the way to go.

Did you check out the link? I can just imagine someone walking on someone wearing the goggles and mask while watching a live show and simply walking out, getting in their car and never coming back. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-20-17  06:18pm - 2862 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^No I would not want to smell or for that matter taste the pussy of my favorite performer because the reality is that it's going to smell and taste like she is just getting over a yeast infection on top of an STI...or two.

Mind you maybe that's what they're going for. After all It is suppose to be virtual reality and there is nothing more real than tasting the pussy of a woman who has sex with multiple people for a living. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-14-17  06:36pm - 2868 days #5
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
I don't personally follow anyone on social media platforms and that goes double for porn performers. In fact if I had one piece of advice to give to someone who is considering following his/her favorite performer than it would simply be...Don't Do It. The main reason why you would want to avoid following your favorite performer is that you may discover that they are quite boring, quite dumb, possibly very racist or mostly care about getting free stuff from fans that gladly spend their hard earned money buying an article on their girls Amazon wish list. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-14-17  06:16pm - 2868 days #6
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Don't know if it says something about me that I didn't care one way or the other when Playboy announced that they were no longer shooting nudes. The days when Playboy was for lack of a better word PLAYBOY are long gone. The internet killed Playboy the same way that it has more or less killed most other print medias. These days people read magazines on their tablets or computer and why shouldn't they when the photos will be significantly superior to anything you can print on paper and you won't have to find a place to store the magazine once you have read it.

Now if they want to bring back nudity to Playboy than it's my sincere hope that they do so only for digital medias and forgo going the magazine route. Printing media is dying due to cost and nothing can save it. The best you can hope for is to barely survive with advertising but that's not a route Playboy can really use. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-12-17  05:48pm - 2870 days #12
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Maybe I missed it being mentioned in one of the above post but all the sites the OP mentioned are owned by Mindgeek so if there is a bait and switch happening than I recommend you pay close attention to the parent company of the site you are interested prior to joining just to be on the safe side.

You can add this to the reason why Mindgeek is so hated in the porn industry. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-06-17  05:50pm - 2876 days #3
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Thanks for the mention. Now there are two kinds of streaming only sites. There are those like Hot Movies and AEBN who sell their customers streaming time. These guys are expensive but they will often have content that is not available anywhere else on the net so buying some streaming time is well worth it for those gems. Another advantage to these streaming only sites is that they now offer content only available on clips4sale stores so it's nice to be able to see whether it's really worth it to buy the video for clips4sale.

The other kind streaming sites are the ones like Digital Playground. I tend to consider these guys to be sort of dicks because they could easily make all their content downloadable but instead screw around with the membership options. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-03-17  05:54pm - 2879 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Is it possible that one of the reasons is that they were slapped with an injunction that forced them to remove the birth date of actors and actresses after one of them complained that the site accurately posted her age and she lost job offers because of that?

Frankly there are so many trolls on the net today that it's getting to the point where there are no safe place to discuss any subject without getting the most foul and obscene comments posted from those trolls. Then you have them starting weird threads just to fuck with everybody else. Long live the Brown Coats.

02-01-17  06:34pm - 2881 days #2
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
As much as visiting the past can seem appealing when you first think about it. I think the reality is that you will be very disappointed once you join her site because the most recent reviews all have rather low scores and her site looks like it a decade old...Which it is and looks like it as well. Long live the Brown Coats.

01-29-17  11:39am - 2884 days #20
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^They sort of make sense but the bizarre things about this thread is that the OP premise that he wants to find really hot girls to film having sex so that he can use them on his non-existent website, a website that does not exist because he doesn't have the money, isn't clear on how he will get the money, it's also not too clear what the site will be about, other than reference a site that produces a brand of porn that is not very popular with many paying members and even less with the women willing to appear in porn and when you put all those things together than you are left with more questions than answers.

This feels more like a guy who is looking to hire really good looking escorts/prostitutes to have sex with him who will also allow themselves to be filmed. That's great if he can make it happen but the finish product will not be something that can be uploaded to a website because that's not how porn is produced. In fact the filming will in no way alter the fact that if he is found to be doing that by the police than he will be accused of soliciting the services of a prostitute. Long live the Brown Coats.

01-26-17  05:50pm - 2887 days #13
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
Originally Posted by BigBallerSodaPo:


Don't worry about money for now. I'll come up with it even if it takes me a few years.


Thanks for your reply. I won't be able to help you with your endeavour because I get the feeling that you aren't really interested in creating a porn site so much as film yourself having sex with women. if I'm wrong than sorry. Long live the Brown Coats.

01-25-17  03:22pm - 2888 days #7
pat362 (0)
Active User



Posts: 3,575
Registered: Jan 23, '07
Location: canada
^Your question was quite good but a little too premature for me. That doesn't mean that I haven't seen some nice videos this year but I have only downloaded about 30 so that is a small sample to have a decent opinion of what 2017 has to offer. Long live the Brown Coats.

251-300 of 3575 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 Page 6 7 17 27 37 47 57 71 72 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.18 seconds.