|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
lk2fireone (0)
|
| 3501-3550 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 13 | 24 | 35 | 46 | 57 | 70 | Page 71 | 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
| 05-14-09 12:43pm - 5701 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User  Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
You've got a good name at PU, and will continue to be part of the active membership in the future, I hope. I'm sure my feelings are shared by most, if not all, of the PU members. | |
|
||
| 05-11-09 02:11am - 5705 days | #13 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I remember reading about a few divorce cases where male actors were accused of viewing porn on their computers. The inference is that they are morally degenerate, and possibly unfit to have custody of any children in the marriage. You expect lawyers to use any arguments available in a divorce, especially in high-profile, big-money cases where actors are involved. But I would assume that the same arguments could be used in any divorce case. So being open about any porn that might be on your computer with your SO could come back to bite you in the ass if there's a breakup down the road. That would be a weapon that could be used against you. Edited by Staff on May 11, 2009, 04:43am (Khan: fixed quote) | |
|
||
| 05-11-09 01:39am - 5705 days | #49 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
TalonIcefire, do you drink your coffee before or after viewing your daily dose of porn? By the way, nice avatar. | |
|
||
| 05-09-09 01:00pm - 5706 days | #47 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
OK, I admit that I might have been wrong. I thought the big opening for Wolverine meant a poor open for Star Trek, because how many movies can people see? And Wolverine just opened last week, so it's still in competition with the newly opened Star Trek. But current estimates are for Star Trek to earn $72 million for its start. This includes $7 million from Thursday night screenings. Wolverine earned $87 million North American opening (without Thursday night screenings). But that's a very strong opening for Star Trek. | |
|
||
| 05-08-09 06:35pm - 5707 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Most actors have a great self love, but William Shatner takes it to the extremes. The greatest love of all is his self-love. Does he masturbate? Every time he opens his mouth, I think he's wrapping it around his penis. I doubt the recession has changed his opinion or his self-worth. From IMDB.com: "At first, Shatner believed that as the star of "Star Trek" (1966), he was supposed to "outshine" the rest of the actors. He said later he came to appreciate the merits of an ensemble cast, and each member's contribution, working on the show." Is that supposed to be humility, recognizing that cast members besides himself might be making a contribution to a show that he is in? A personal quote from James Doohan, who played Scotty on the original Star Trek: "I like Captain Kirk, but I can't say that I'm very fond of Bill Shatner." | |
|
||
| 05-07-09 07:46pm - 5708 days | #14 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I downloaded the winrar program from the internet years ago because I had downloaded a rar file and couldn't unzip it. Then I kept the winrar program, and paid the shareware fee. Actually, though, the winwar program was still working even after the "trial" period expired, as far as I was concerned, from my usage of the program. I'm not that technically inclined. When I paid for the winrar program, I got an email with a license key that was supposed to unlock the program, but the key was attached as a RAR attachment, and I couldn't open the stupid RAR attachment (I couldn't find it in the stupid email). That was almost 3 years ago, Sep 17, 2006. I'm not sure if I ever did open the RAR key to get the license key or not, but I do use the winrar program occasionally to unzip files. I still have the original email that contains my license key, so maybe I will play around with it to see if I can actually see the key, and maybe use it to unlock the winrar program. Or maybe I already have unlocked the winrar program. Like I said, I downloaded winrar about 3 years ago, but I don't know if it is unlocked or not. But the winrar unzips the files I need it for. So what the heck difference does it make, whether it's locked or unlocked? Edit: I found the confirmation email with the license key, and found that I had gotten the key from it already. But I opened the key file and re-registered the copy, just in case. Edited on May 08, 2009, 10:23am | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 02:55am - 5711 days | #38 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Thoughts on the Star Trek movie should probably be put on hold until the movie is released this Thursday, May 7, in the US. Wicked Domme, your link leads to 404 Error : The page cannot be found. http://www.wickeddommes.co.uk Are you in hiding? Edit: There's something funny going on. When I click on the URL in your reply, it leads to a 404 error (The page cannot be found). But when I click on what is apparently the same URL in my reply, it does lead to your wickeddommes page. Both URLs appear to be the same, so I don't understand why one URL leads to a 404 error and one URL leads to the wickeddommes page. http://www.wickeddommes.co.uk http://www.wickeddommes.co.uk Edited on May 05, 2009, 03:04am | |
|
||
| 05-05-09 01:20am - 5711 days | #36 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I can agree with Wittyguy, GCode, Toadsith, PinkPanther, turboshaft et al, that piracy is not a good thing. I recently read of a case where a man sent a notarized letter to a court asking to be excused from jury duty. A photocopy of the letter can be found at: http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/yea...09/0430091jury1.html I believe the man's letter was a model of clarity and forthright opinion. He wrote: "Apparently you morons didn't understand me the first time. I CANNOT take time off from work. I'm not putting my familys well being at stake to participate in this crap. I don't believe in our "justice" system and I don't want to have a goddam thing to do with it. Jury duty is a complete waste of time. I would rather count the wrinkles on my dogs balls than sit on a jury. Get it through your thick skulls. Leave me the fuck alone." After the man was summoned before a judge, the man did apologize for the letter, and he was excused from jury duty. | |
|
||
| 05-04-09 04:23pm - 5711 days | #30 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The following is sort of a rant/ramble: My movie collection is way over 100 titles. The movies are certainly not all classics, just a collection of movies I thought I would like to see at least once. Sometimes it's almost as cheap to buy a movie as to rent one (I don't belong to Netflix yet, but might join someday). But we have to be alert to legal challenges about what we as Americans are allowed to watch. The US Supreme Court today (May 04, 2009) basically said that in certain cases, free porn might be illegal. The U.S. Supreme court today ordered a federal appeals court to consider reinstating the $550,000 fine that the Federal Communications Commission imposed on CBS over Jackson's breast-baring performance at the 2004 Super Bowl. The appellate court said the incident lasted nine-sixteenths of one second and should have been regarded as "fleeting." The FCC previously deviated from its nearly 30-year practice of fining indecent broadcast programming only when it was so "pervasive as to amount to 'shock treatment' for the audience," the court said. The case is FCC v. CBS Corp., 08-653. Someone should have to pay for making viewers look at Janet Jackson's breast. I think she appeared in Playboy years ago, with naked breasts, but to expose herself on national TV is obviously a crime against the United States. Did she truly expose herself by accident, or was it really a plot to lower our moral standards? | |
|
||
| 05-03-09 10:02pm - 5712 days | #26 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
No need to wait for the Star Trek movie. Wolverine opened this weekend, earning $87 million in North American box office. Worldwide total is $160 million for the weekend. That leaves no money for tickets for the upcoming Star Trek. And who wants to wait around for a retread movie anyway? Any PU members going to see Wolverine, please take a video camera along with you, and post the clip onto the PU site for the rest of us who cannot afford the movie-going experience. Post anonymously, because the FBI and other law-enforcement officials are investigating a copy of the film that was released onto the Internet. I read somewhere that Hugh Jackman was crushed by the pirated Internet release of his film. But maybe now he will be able to spring back with his adamantium-enhanced body as the profits roar in. Edit: The video camera was a joke. Not really suggesting anyone illegally tape a movie. But I do think the potential punishment for taping a movie is hard to believe, with the prison time and fines equivalent to the sentences some criminals suffer for manslaughter or murder. Edited on May 03, 2009, 10:20pm | |
|
||
| 05-03-09 04:00pm - 5712 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I've heard that Apple is easier to use, but also that it's more expensive. Also, after learning to fumble my way around with a PC, would I be willing to start fumbling with an Apple? Probably not in this lifetime, but maybe in the next. | |
|
||
| 04-30-09 02:15pm - 5715 days | #35 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
You can download a single picture set with BlackWidow. I have not used the other 2 site ripper programs, but I am almost positive you can download a single picture set with either program, without downloading the entire site. For BlackWidow, you paste the URL of the page with the photo set with the thumbnails, that you want to download. It almost certainly works the same for the other two software rippers. When I have the time, I will download each of the other two rippers, and try them out. But you should be able to use either one of them to download single unzipped picture sets, without having to download the entire site. To have to download an entire site before you could download a single picture set would be extremely time-consuming, and would be a serious strike against any site ripper program. | |
|
||
| 04-30-09 12:51pm - 5715 days | #32 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
How to download a non-zipped photo set: HTTrack [1] is one impressive product: it's easy to use, has an excellent user interface, offers every feature you could want, while being blindingly fast and free of any adware. If you like to download web sites so that you can "browse them offline", this is the product to get. HTTrack is compatible with all windows versions, and is GPL licensed freeware. WinHTTrack is the Windows release of HTTrack, and WebHTTrack is the Linux release. There are no official binaries supplied for the Mac OS, but the FAQ list details on how they can be compiled from the original source files. Alternatively, there is the free edition of PageNest [2], which allows you to download and categorize websites, as well as browse them within the programs own viewer. PageNest can also show what new or updated content has added to an archived website. The Pro version of PageNest, among other things, adds the ability to schedule auto-updates to archived sites. To get httrack: http://www.httrack.com/ To get pagenest: http://pagenest.com/ I haven't tried either program, but they are supposed to be easy to use and have gotten nice reviews. Both programs are free, which is a lot better than spending $40 like I did for BlackWidow. And BlackWidow is not perfect, because I've had problems downloading some sites/photo sets with BlackWidow. Edited on Apr 30, 2009, 02:02pm | |
|
||
| 04-30-09 12:16pm - 5715 days | #31 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
How to download a non-zipped photo set: I paid $40 for BlackWidow, but there are supposed to be free web spider software programs that do the same thing. I will try to find a couple of good ones and post a link to them here. | |
|
||
| 04-25-09 03:47pm - 5720 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I've heard that the best defense is a good offense. Maybe you should have kept the site open, and instead of sending the profits to the school, you could have invested them in AK-47 assault rifles. From Wikipedia: "The AK-47 was one of the first true assault rifles and, due to its durability, low production cost and ease of use, the weapon and its numerous variants remain the most widely used assault rifles in the world�so much so that more AK-type rifles have been produced than all other assault rifles combined." I was impressed with PinkPanther's response to the poll question of how he would feel if he found out his favorite model was transgender: PinkPanther wrote, "I'd follow the great American tradition - I'd go buy an assault rifle and go on a murderous rampage! And before anybody gets all upset, let me assure you - I'm kidding - totally kidding!" (I suspect PinkPanther didn't want to hassle with the FBI or Homeland Security.) You had to close your web site/blog because of legal trademark issues: It would have been expensive and time-consuming for you to fight it. But I think it was unfair. At least Oprah Winfrey and Mutual of Omaha have plenty of money to pay their lawyers. The same holds true for Microsoft and Disney and Apple and all the big corporations: Legal fees are part of doing business. That's the system, and the little guy gets a kick in the head. | |
|
||
| 04-25-09 06:04am - 5721 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
If a phrase is trademarked, does that mean I, or the average citizen, can not use it in an ordinary or commercial sense without the permission of the trademark owner? I was reading a news story, and I have a hard time understanding the implications of the story. It appears that Oprah Winfrey and Mutual of Omaha are suing each other over who has the right to use the term "AHA Moment". Let's say that I wanted to sell T-shirts with the slogan, "AHA Moment". Would that be illegal, unless I had legal permission from the trademark owner? (I'm not really planning on selling T-shirts, with or without that slogan. I'm just using selling T-shirts as an example.) Another point: Mutual of Omaha says the term has been used widely for 100 years. So what sense does it make to now allow Mutual of Omaha to take out a new trademark on the phrase, if the public has been using it for 100 years already? Wouldn't that be like taking something the public has been using, and now saying that only the trademark owner can legally use it from now on? For the lawyers to make money on this issue seems like an incredible waste of time and money (except the lawyers won't consider it wasted money, since they are the ones that will profit from this nonsense.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< http://movies.yahoo.com/news/movies.eonl...egal-moment-20090424 Oprah, Fellow "Aha" User Having a Legal Moment Source: E! Online Fri Apr 24, 2009, 2:11 pm EDT Are they telling us that Oprah Winfrey isn't the only one allowed to have an "aha moment"?! That's what Nebraska insurance company Mutual of Omaha is saying in a lawsuit filed Wednesday in federal court against the queen of daytime's Harpo Productions, which claims it owns the term "AHA Moment." Mutual, the self-proclaimed official sponsor of the aha moment, sued to protect its right to use the phrase in advertising after receiving a request from Winfrey's camp to "cease and desist" its ongoing "What's your aha moment?" campaign. According to Mutual's marketing materials, the term refers to "those amazing, uplifting, inspirational moments that changed [people's] lives." When Mutual tried to lay claim to the term in February, nobody tried to stop them then, the company said. "The term 'aha moment' has been used widely in the public vernacular for a century," Mutual said in a statement Friday, per the Omaha World-Herald. "Mutual of Omaha's research to obtain its federal trademark uncovered no competing federally registered trademarks, and the trademark application received no opposition." Harpo spokeswoman Lisa Halliday said that the two sides are hoping to reach an amicable solution. | |
|
||
| 04-25-09 05:31am - 5721 days | #4 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
That's what I told him, Khan. But I think maybe he wanted a URL to help identify the model, because Asian names don't always translate easily into English. Porn stars can have a zillion different names, because that's the nature of the beast. But when you translate from a foreign language into English, it can get even more complicated, especially when you are translating from Chinese or Japanese or Korean or any of those Asian places. That's because they talk funny, I think.:) | |
|
||
| 04-24-09 11:54pm - 5721 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Maria Ozawa is gorgeous. http://www.mariaozawa.us/ We are not supposed to post links at Pornusers for free photo galleries or free sample galleries. It's against the site rules. | |
|
||
| 04-24-09 05:09pm - 5721 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Welcome, Max from maxmixdv.com. You seem to be a very cheerful/enthusiastic person. Glad you have joined the site. | |
|
||
| 04-22-09 02:58pm - 5723 days | #12 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
A suggestion. Eliminate the intro/home page that is: http://www.rockchicksandbikerbabes.co.uk/home.php And replace the contents of that page, which has little information, with the first page of your tour page: http://www.rockchicksandbikerbabes.co.uk/tour.php Then, once you get a second tour page, you can add a link to that second tour page. Your intro/home page at: http://www.rockchicksandbikerbabes.co.uk/home.php gives little information. I think you're much better off using your current tour page as the home/intro/tour page to your site. If you want to keep the current intro page, rename it as the "Updates" page, which is the more usual name for the information it shows. And put a link for the "Updates" page. But use the "Tour" page as the Home/Intro/Tour/first page you see as a non-member. That page gives you nice pictures to look at, and some basic information about the site models, etc. The current Intro page is less interesting, less colorful than your Tour page. Also, could you photo shop the 2 thumbnails of the sample video clips you show on the Tour page? Make each thumbnail brighter so you see the model more clearly and the thumbnail picture stands out more clearly. Presentation can make a big difference in how appealing a product is. Edited on Apr 22, 2009, 03:46pm | |
|
||
| 04-21-09 07:06pm - 5724 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
All the replies to your question of tour content make sense to me. The tour pages are one of your main selling points. It lets potential subscribers see what the site offers. At a minimum you need: -listing of models, with a thumbnail for each. -listing of model videos and photo sets, with: ----a few screenshots for each video. ----thumbnails for each photo set. ----maybe 3-4 low-resolution pictures for each photo set. -a few short video clips (45-60 secs long) as a preview to give idea of quality and style of your videos. It would take a little work/money to make the tour, but it should pay off with more subscribers to your site. There are lots of sites out there competing for cash. If you don't give a sample of what you're selling (in your tour), why would people buy your product? Regards. | |
|
||
| 04-20-09 09:18am - 5725 days | #12 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'm not a fan of videos. I usually prefer pix, because they are much easier to collect and view. After spending a couple of days looking thru the junky videos at pornaccess.com, I'm even more of a pictures fan. I'm hoping I can find some videos that I really like, but so far, almost everything I've found is junk, as far as my personal taste is concerned. And my patience is running out. I only paid $5 for 30 days access, but as far as I'm concerned, they should have paid me. | |
|
||
| 04-19-09 05:14pm - 5726 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Recommendations for evidence eliminator/scrubber/etc.: I never used one. My understanding is that to be completely safe, if there is sensitive material on your PC (financial data/porn/whatever), use a hammer or incinerator on the hard drive. That's what the US Department of Defense is supposed to do. Otherwise, no matter how many times you delete the sensitive material, real experts are supposed to be able to retrieve it. There are supposed to be programs that should safely delete data from a hard drive, but like I said, the US Department of Defense destroys its hard drives instead of using a computer program to wipe the data. | |
|
||
| 04-17-09 08:45pm - 5728 days | #9 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Pornaccess.com is running a special this weekend: 30 days Membership at 5.00 USD That is a full membership. I joined today. If you do join, make sure to uncheck the "special" offer to join another promoted site when you give your credit card information, unless you want to join that other site. Also, you need to cancel at least a few days before the 30 days end, or you will be renewed at $29.95/month. PU has a special rate of $14.95/month that you can use for pornaccess, if you want to stay a member. Edited on Apr 17, 2009, 08:50pm | |
|
||
| 04-17-09 08:20pm - 5728 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I don't review every site that I join. Reasons for not reviewing a site: As already stated in other replies: -site is not that interesting, not worth the effort to write a review. -junk sites that are part of a network. Haven't really joined a lot of network sites. I did join Pornaccess today, and there are a lot of sites here that don't appeal to me at all. These are tiny sites that have a few videos with some poor-quality pix to accompany each vid. I'm hoping to find the "good" sites that are buried among the junk. | |
|
||
| 04-17-09 07:08am - 5729 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Dearest Khan, Can you describe the advantages of a webmaster account over a user account? Over the years, I have been a paying member of various online adult sites. To me, it sounds more impressive referring to myself as a webmaster rather than a simple user. Perhaps I could have both types of accounts? Then I'd be a webmaster as well as a user. That would be almost as good as earning a new badge. Respectfully yours, lk2fireone Edited on Apr 17, 2009, 07:12am | |
|
||
| 04-15-09 06:07am - 5731 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
A quick list of sites for Piper Fawn: http://www.eurobabeindex.com/sbandoindex/ariels.html (She has been featured on a large number of different sites.) The URL above also has links to free sample galleries of her from different sites, that are worth checking out. Just click on each thumbnail in the galleries section to bring up the sample gallery. She has done 2 hardcore b/g sets I know of: 1 set where she is with 1 guy. 1 set where she is with 2 guys. But most of her video sets are solo, or her with a girl. If you are still a member of Met-art: Two of the best photosets I saw of her were posted at Met-art and Metmodels. The Met-art set was posted 2005.01.04, named "Presenting Gabriela", by Magoo. The Metmodels set was posted 2006.07.22, named "Fresh", by Magoo. Met-art and Metmodels have used different names for her, so searching for all her photosets, even at these two sites, can be frustrating/incomplete. Actually, looking at your icon, I now realize why these porn stars have so many different names. It's only human nature to want to change our self. Didn't you used to be an elegant icon with red lettering? I thought your earlier icon was much nicer. Nothing wrong with the current one, just liked your previous icon a lot. Edited on Apr 15, 2009, 06:21am | |
|
||
| 04-13-09 01:08pm - 5732 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Marilyn Chambers was found dead at her L.A. apartment Sunday, April 12. The former porn star was found by her 17-year-old daughter. No cause of death has yet been determined. I met Chambers at a convention a few years back. She seemed very friendly, very open. Sorry to read the news. She was only 56, which now seems young to me. | |
|
||
| 04-09-09 07:12pm - 5736 days | #22 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I haven't been arrested for this yet, but in the Los Angeles area, prostitution is definitely considered a criminal offense. Eddie Murphy was involved in L.A. one time where he picked up a transvestite prostitute, and the sheriff's deputies stopped him and arrested the prostitute on a prior warrant for prostitution. Eddie Murphy stated that he was just doing the prostitute a favor by giving "her" a ride, not realizing that "she" was a "he". Hugh Grant, the British actor, was arrested in Hollywood and charged with indecent conduct with a prostitute in a public place after meeting her on Sunset Boulevard. Maybe they don't care in the SF area, but L.A. knows how to keep its streets clean of crime and criminals. Maybe that's why "The Streets of San Francisco" was taken off the air, because the streets were too dirty for decent citizens to view any longer. Edited on Apr 09, 2009, 07:25pm | |
|
||
| 04-09-09 02:18pm - 5736 days | #18 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Cricket is where they swing their bats at the other people and often miss? I've seen cricket played in the movies, but never in real life. Soccer seems to be a lot more popular. Maybe you could explain the attraction of that game for me. I like viewing porn much better, pix or even vids. | |
|
||
| 04-09-09 02:01pm - 5736 days | #16 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
That's right, you don't count. (You set yourself up for that one, ha-ha.) I also don't count, cause I don't care about baseball (even tho I live in Los Angeles, CA). | |
|
||
| 04-09-09 01:13pm - 5736 days | #20 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
An interview like that would get the site banned from PU. We have standards to uphold, remember. Do you want the wrath of Khan to come down upon you? | |
|
||
| 04-07-09 07:17pm - 5738 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I think some of the "Behind The Scenes" can be interesting. Maybe they show some details of how the vid or photo shoot were set up, maybe there's some model background/interviews. If you like a particular model, it's a chance to see a flash of what's she's like outside of a photo shoot or video. At least that's that the idea behind an interview, but most interviews are often canned bullshit. But we can still fantasize, can't we? | |
|
||
| 04-05-09 05:23pm - 5740 days | #51 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I was looking over some Luis Royo paintings, and I realized that, in addition to the spikes coming out of their heads, most of these girls/women have implants as well. Is there silicone in fantasy-land, or do they use something else? Maybe the blood of virgins? | |
|
||
| 04-03-09 06:29am - 5743 days | #25 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I prefer Burger King to McDonald's. Burger King has a special, 2 whoppers for about $3, which is a pretty good price. Also, it's easier to get refills on the coffee at Burger King, which has the coffee machine where the customer is able to get to it. McDonald's used to have their coffee out where the customer could refill himself, but no longer. At least where I live. I don't feel sad going to Burger King. I feel good, knowing I'm trying to save money. Not as good as viewing some great porn, but still, I try to look on the bright side, at least once in a while. It's the little things in life that you learn to treasure, as you get older. Lol. | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 02:19pm - 5743 days | #7 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Just a thought for the less computer-savvy among us. If my PC developed problems or I wanted to add peripherals/whatever, I would never bring it into a Best Buy computer section or any computer shop. For the simple reason I've read where people brought their computers in for repair, and the police were notified there was illegal porn on the computer. The definition of illegal porn is iffy, as far as I know. But I don't want to pay for a lawyer just because I tried to have my PC fixed. | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 09:49am - 5743 days | #17 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I think there was an earlier poll about tattoos. I just don't like them, even the smaller tattoos. Natural is so much better. For tattoos, body ugly is more accurate than body art. | |
|
||
| 04-02-09 12:22am - 5744 days | #2 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I'd give my collection an objective rating in the 50s. -Size: huge, if some cop took a look at my hard drive; small, compared to the pervs that have infiltrated the PU site. -Variety: almost all pictures. Very small amount of vids. The vids are mainly short clips. The pix are mainly softcore European teens. -Organization/layout: personal. The pix are mainly sorted by site and model. The vids are thrown into different folders with no real order. Collection rating for PU members: limited. They would take a look at my collection, and demand a refund on their membership fee: Non-exclusive content, lack of hc, lack of vids, yada...yada...yada. | |
|
||
| 04-01-09 11:53pm - 5744 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Some people don't care whether the breasts are natural or implants. Hugh Hefner (Playboy Magazine) likes large breasts, whether they are natural or not. You can infer that from the playmates the magazine chooses, as well as the girlfriends Hefner chooses. Personally, I prefer natural to implants. Also I don't like huge, over-sized breasts that some people see as a turn-on. But personal tastes, especially in porn, vary. Messmer writes, "Videosz, releasing this abomination today, boldly states: 'When you love big boobs this much, who gives a shit if they're real?'" One of the points of advertising is to grab our attention: It certainly grabbed messmer's. As for the DVD called "100% Made In Beverley Hills", I wouldn't bother watching it, even if it were free. | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 05:36pm - 5745 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Thanks for the responses. I was foolish not remembering to hang my disabled placard from the rear-view mirror. I still think a parking fine of $300 is excessive for this offense. I am definitely going to try to have the fine I pay reduced from $300. The ticket (however much I end up paying) serves as a strong kick to the rear to remember the placard in the future. | |
|
||
| 03-31-09 08:15am - 5745 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Matt Dillon pleads guilty speeding, pays $828 fine The Associated Press, March 30, 2009 CHELSEA, Vt. (AP) -- Matt Dillon had his case dismissed after pleading guilty to speeding and paying an $828 fine. The 44-year-old actor was stopped Dec. 30 on Interstate 91 while driving 106 mph in rural Northern Vermont. Because of the excessive speed, he was also charged with negligent operation of a motor vehicle. Prosecutor Will Porter said Monday that Dillon agreed to plead guilty to speeding in exchange for having the negligent operation charge dismissed Wednesday, which he said is common in such cases. Dillon's lawyer, Mark Kaplan, says the plea was a fair resolution for Dillon. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< Personally, I think this is crazy. A movie star pays $828 for driving 106 mph (speeding). That speed, on a public road, is life threatening. I was ticketed $300 (a first offense) for failing to display my disabled person placard when I parked in a disabled parking space. I had the placard in the car, but forgot to display it properly. I showed the placard to the officer who ticketed me, but he said the ticket was already written, and that if I wanted to dispute it, I would have to contact the police department. Was my crime (failing to display a disabled person placard while parked in a disabled person parking space) really 1/3 as serious or dangerous as driving 106 mph on a public road? I realize tickets are used to get money, but shouldn't there be a better connection between the seriousness of the crime and the penalty you have to pay? | |
|
||
| 03-27-09 05:46pm - 5749 days | #3 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
TheSquirrel, your points ranking is dynamic, not static, so you will not remain numero settantuno (71) forever. As you gain more points over other people, or other people gain more points over you, your ranking will change over time. I doubt that the current system was the result of intense planning, but at least partially the result of human nature: we make a wonderful plan to follow, but then, as time goes on, don't follow the plan exactly, because we are doing other things along the way. The PU staff spent time setting up a software program to rank members on a scoring system. The staff said, (Wittyguy quoted): "that the points system would function with earned points expiring after a year or two." But then no software program was put into place to use that idea. I think it's that simple. No grand design. The PU staff just essentially thought that the current scoring system was acceptable, as is. That's my idea. Now Khan or someone else from PU staff will probably come along and crunch me over the head for putting ideas or words into their mouth or head, and state their version of the truth. As for ideas, my opinion is: My all-time favorite icon from Wittyguy is Mr. Head-up-his-ass. That was a classic, and I was sorry to see it retired. Mr. Porn is OK, but nowhere close to Mr. Head-up-his-ass in points ranking or style or just plain cool. But since Wittyguy is the man in charge, he gets to choose (and change) his personal icon as he sees fit. Good thing I'm not in charge of PU staff. Lol. Edited on Mar 27, 2009, 07:59pm | |
|
||
| 03-26-09 10:13am - 5750 days | #15 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
No, it's not Elisha Cuthbert, the actress who plays Jack Bauer's daughter in 24. Two different people. Both are blondes, but the faces are different. Also, Elisha Cuthbert does not do nude pix. I wouldn't mind seeing more pix of either of these two hotties. They are both great-looking women: great face, great body. Edited on Mar 26, 2009, 10:25am | |
|
||
| 03-25-09 07:37pm - 5751 days | #31 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
There was an episode of "Beauty" on Shelley Duvall's Faerie Tale Theatre. Starring Susan Sarandon and Klaus Kinski, based on Beauty and the Beast. On TV around 1984. I thought it was enjoyable. The entire series was quality entertainment for both children and adults, and lasted several years in the 1980s. The Beauty episode was not as sugary as the Disney version, Sarandon was lovely, and Kinski was Kinski. | |
|
||
| 03-25-09 06:44pm - 5751 days | #12 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
The easiest site I've seen so far, as far as "the damn curvy letter guessing pictures", is Just Teen Site. I even mentioned that "secret word is easy to read" when I reviewed the site as a positive feature. There are some sites I could not get into because I gave up on trying to guess what the ^&*(#@ secret word was supposed to be after many tries. So far, I've only been blocked from one porn site that emailed me that my username and password had been hacked. They emailed me a new username and password, and the problem was easily solved. They did not give me credit for the days I was blocked, but it was just a few days, so no big deal. As far as getting responsive emails from porn sites, that's a hit-or-miss proposition. Some sites are good about responding to emails, some are lousy (you might get a form email that's almost worthless), and some sites are downright shitty. The shitty sites don't bother to respond at all. And some of those shitty sites advertise 24/7 support. Just Teen Site never responded to my emails requesting help. And a couple of other PU members (Drooler and snappy) mentioned they never got a response to their emails from Just Teen Site support. | |
|
||
| 03-25-09 05:52am - 5752 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
I think quality and quantity are useful distinctions in rating a site. -How much do you like what is on the site? -How much of what you like/dislike is on the site? If there is a ton of mediocre material, the site does not have a lot of appeal, in spite of the huge quantity. If there is very little material (pix or videos) that is highly appealing or erotic, then the quality of the site, for you, means the site has very little value, and is not worth joining. You need both quality and quantity to rate how much value the site has for you as a user/buyer of the site membership. Price is also a factor in whether you think the site is worth joining. Even tho PU/TBP does not factor price into site score, anyone who joins a site does consider the price to join. Even if the site is free (PU/TBP only rates pay sites), once you joined a free site, you would still go to that site only if you thought it was worth your time. You find a site that is basically worthless for your tastes, or takes too long to find anything worthwhile, you won't spend much time at that site. Met-art offers a huge amount of high quality softcore glamor pix, and a huge number of models (European teens to early twenties) that are extremely attractive. Not every model will appeal to everyone, but if you are into European teens, you won't find a site that offers as much softcore high-quality pix. Quality and quality are useful distinctions. Also, for some people, face and body are useful distinctions. The face might be appealing, the body might be appealing, or both might be appealing. To put it simply, some girls/women have a gorgeous face, and some girls/women have a gorgeous body (depending on personal taste). As for me, I think there are a ton of great-looking girls on Met-art. It has as many or more good-looking girls than any other porn site that I've seen, along with a huge amount of their pix. Actually, thinking about the face and body distinction: There are some she-males with great-looking faces. And they can have great-looking breasts. But when I try to evaluate the lower part of their body, my mind stalls. As a supposed straight, am I allowed to think that part is attractive? Has associating with PU has turned me into a pervert? Should I follow those other courageous souls who have disabled their membership? Or is my daily PU fix more important? Edited on Mar 25, 2009, 07:13am | |
|
||
| 03-23-09 02:31pm - 5753 days | #28 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
If he sticks his finger up his ass, would that be considered an external or internal hard drive? Lol. | |
|
||
| 03-22-09 06:48am - 5755 days | #10 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
Not all perverts are created equal. In the eyes of God (and the Republican neo-conservative Christian Moral Majority), we might be equal. But on the PU site, some have a greater presence (and a higher Points Rank) than others. So when a member like Cybertoad or WeeWillyWinky goes missing, I think at least some of us feel the loss. When a valuable membership becomes disabled, the least we should do is to raise a glass of beer or more potent brew in his honor. I would include Drooler in that category of value-added PU perverts, along with many other worthwhile members. | |
|
||
| 03-20-09 11:45am - 5756 days | #5 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
About a week ago it was reported that a first edition of the first Superman comic was sold on ebay for $317,200. The seller bought the Superman comic book used, back in the 1950s, so he probably paid around $0.25 or so. So like Denner says, there might still be some value in those old Playboys. | |
|
||
| 03-20-09 11:31am - 5756 days | #6 | |
|
lk2fireone (0)
Active User Posts: 3,618 Registered: Nov 14, '08 Location: CA |
One possible solution: Email your billing company, and include: -the date you signed up -your user name -your confirmation order number. Explain the problem again, and ask for a new user name and password. Say that you've written to support many times, and have received no reply. They might give you a new user name, or a new password, and that might get you into the sites you want. I was blocked from a site one time, sent an email to support, and they gave me a new password. So I could then get in. I don't know if that will work for you or not. Just a suggestion. | |
|
||
| 3501-3550 of 3618 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 13 | 24 | 35 | 46 | 57 | 70 | Page 71 | 72 | 73 | Next Page > |
|
