Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

951-1000 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 19 Page 20 21 28 35 42 51 52 Next Page >

11-17-11  01:03pm - 4784 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I like women of color, but I am not a fan of guys in porn in general.
I do not download straight black on black videos, not because I am racist. Cause it does nothing for me. Now two ladies of color can do it.

I personally do not watch the video for the guys anyways so color is not really and issue. But when they show black porn, they tend to focus on the dudes dick, and well being I do not care much for dicks, I avoid these.
Guys with a healthy size doesn't bother me, but when I can not see a the women he's doing cause his dick is blocking out the sun, well not much fun for me.

I was raised in a very liberal setting in California, didn't even know what a race was until I got older and people kept pointing out they were This American and That American color.
I grew up to think we were just people.

If I do not like black porn, it doesn't mean I am racist it means I do not like black porn. If I do not like gay porn that doesn't make me a homophobe either, I just do not like gay porn. I like Lesbian porn and if I didn't would that make me a homophobe? I love solo single and Lez black women, so because I do not like sex scenes with male female would that make me Racist ?

Can't we all just get along ?




HI CT, it's the remarks that offend me! I love black women, but not because they are black but because the overwhelming majority of them have natural breasts of a shape I adore! Of course, if a white or asian woman has the same features then I don't make any distinctions. Edited on Nov 17, 2011, 01:56pm

11-17-11  08:49am - 4784 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


Someone will utter under his breath: "racist!" Or maybe, after they read my views on the subject: "politically correct knee jerk liberal" but I cannot stand those videos that make it a point to stress the fact that one of the partners is black, or white.

This one invariably sets my teeth on edge: "My wife always wanted to fuck a black guy!" (No I am not jealous about the supposed difference in size)

Or this one, white stunt cock to black woman: "Who do you prefer? White men or black men?" Of course in those videos the white man always wins as the color of the woman's choice.

People are being treated like exotic animals just because their skin color is different. I suppose producers of videos think it's a compliment to Blacks when the "husband" says my wife always wanted to try a Black .. but to me it's a weird form of racism.

I am looking forward to a time when the difference in skin color is no longer mentioned because both are seen as "just people."

11-17-11  08:17am - 4784 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by picdude:


Guess this shows how hard it is for sites, you don't like interviews, I on the other hand do like them, if they're done right. Though agree not every scene needs them theres a time and place.
I like interviews in gonzo type porn where theres no scenerio etc, interesting and helps get an idea of how dirty the girl is etc, shows a little of her personality, makes her more real.


You got me wrong. I like interviews if the right questions are asked. For instance, I collect most interviews when it comes to softcore/midcore sites. My beef is with many of those DVDs where the girls are asked the same stupid questions over and over. Sometimes the interviewer even forgets what he just asked a second ago.

11-16-11  10:40am - 4785 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I think some of the comments are right on while others miss the mark. I dislike the interviews with their inane questions but dislike it even more when a scene starts with both actors naked and in action already? I generally dislike music in a video but find it a must in solo scenes where otherwise the model just sways a bit to a tune that only she can hear.

I heartily dislike all those drawn-out copulation feasts where every position under the sun is tried yet would have a hard time if the action were kept mostly missionary. All you see there is a pair of hairy buttocks pumping away.

Most of those outlandish, backbreaking positions are meant to show more pussy and to make an overly long scene less boring. My greatest wish, when it comes to videos, is to see a reduction from the obligatory twenty-five minute fuck fest to about ten minutes. Sheesh, who wants to see anyone go on and on and on like that.

Which leads me back to my pet peeve. How do you fill the extra time if you want to put three - four scenes into a video?

We're all agreed that most interviews are moronic, this leaves a more gradual leading up to the action which could be easily done if the scene showed the model getting slowly undressed.

Any editor should be in danger of losing his balls if he kept cutting that important part in a scene. Edited on Nov 16, 2011, 10:44am

11-14-11  09:48am - 4787 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
What else? A site with mature ladies (over 40) in erotic lingerie .. and no, this does not mean thongs!! I go along with less tattoos and fake boobs as well.

11-12-11  06:32pm - 4789 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Unfortunately one of the rapes in 2002 occurred in the shower area of the team's locker room and witnessed by a former player, then graduate student, now suspended-with-pay assistant coach. What's so screwed up here is the guy (you can find out his name easily enough if you want to) first went to his father for advice, who then told him to go to the head coach where the incident was kept quiet with all the others they knew about.

This seems to go against the theory of the bystander effect, where bystanders are less likely to help someone because others are around. Granted the guy told someone, but you think telling it to the police would also happen eventually, especially since it was the rape of a 10 year old. One could assume once it had been reported to the police, though not necessarily the campus police, that this whole thing would have come out in the open then.

I guess one lesson is that as an institution grows in power and size it can become very susceptible to corruption.

Some food for thought: "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." and "There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it."


Yes, I read about the shower room as well but since it involved an 11 year old my mind incorrectly transferred the act to a different location because I couldn't see a boy that young in a College setting. But you are right, of course. My mistake.

As to your last two paragraphs I also agree. Institutions like the Scouts or the Church or Colleges up to now desperately tried to save their reputation and their very existence by sitting on the evidence rather than going to the Police because their survival depends on the continuous generosity of the faithful or alumni or parents who want to see their kids to grow up straight. Any hint of wrongdoing and the contributions are in danger of drying up so let's sweep it under the carpet. Sad!
Criminal!

That's why reporting an incident of sexual abuse to a superior is not enough. It has to be the Police, in every case of child abuse, or a job with the institutions who are so valuable to society otherwise will continue to be looked upon as a tempting prize by predatory pedophiles. I hope this incident will finally teach everyone a lesson and make our kids a bit safer in institutions that are meant to help them.

Now if we could only do something about all the stuff that goes on behind closed doors without our knowledge, with victims who are too scared and powerless to speak up.

11-12-11  10:51am - 4789 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Sexual abuse is not restricted to College Football. Actually, the way I read it, the offenses weren't even committed in College but in a group started by the abuser to "help" troubled youth. How ironic and sad. But the sad truth is wherever there are churches with youth groups, scouts, junior sports teams etc. there will be the predators. One of my earliest recollections, way back in the late forties, is that of my scout leader shooting himself at the Swiss/German border when he was about to be arrested for homosexuality and pedophilia. In those days both were illegal. He never touched me but the lives of others were severely effected by his actions.

11-06-11  02:34pm - 4795 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by otoh:


There is a new model, Elisa, at my favourite haunt, Petites Parisiennes, with a lovely figure, blonde hair, and pale freckly skin:

http://www.petites-parisiennes.com/membe...seules.php?modele=70

Works for me!


Sorry, otoh, they want my username and password!

11-06-11  02:32pm - 4795 days #75
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


In my experience most women actively care more about what other women think of their look than what men prefer. Most women seem to aim for no bottom, hidden nipple shape, no VPL and neat hair.

Most men I talk to prefer a round bottom, visible nipple shapes, VPL and hair that looks more like it has seen a little action.


Oh, yeah! Count me in when it comes to the latter! Sad, that women no longer care as much about what men think .. this explains to me the disappearance of erotic lingerie!

11-05-11  10:18am - 4796 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Part of the problem of social networking sites, particularly Facebook, is that they want you using them a lot, and if you don't then they're are going to bother/remind you that you haven't logged on in a while.

I signed up for a Facebook account a few years back, but haven't done anything with it beyond opening it and they periodically send e-mails reminding me of pending friends and that I haven't logged on recently. With sites like Facebook around, which has a constantly changing privacy policy, it's a wonder people care about keeping anything to themselves, much less away from a company with an unnerving amount of your and your friends' personal information.


Yes, they probably do send emails to slumbering members but I am not a member of Twitter or Facebook. Yesterday, I got the same sort of reminder from AOL! AOL??? I thought they were long gone. In any case, I've never done business with AOL either. Somebody has something unpleasant hidden in those embedded links, I am sure. I know one thing, I'll never find out what it is.

11-05-11  10:12am - 4796 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I sympathize with the cleaning woman and echo Andy Rooney's remark in your previous article:

"There are a lot of know-nothing boobs who don't appreciate the modern art being put up in public places in all our cities," he declared peevishly one week. "I know this is true, because I'm one of those know-nothing boobs."

Amen to that, Andy! Me too!

11-03-11  06:13pm - 4798 days #17
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by juicyjasmine:


I am here to tell you good news. messmer! I am 40 and I love to tease with my clothes on!! I think many younger girls have no idea how to be sensual without taking their clothes off. I am so amazed sometimes. I love the art of the tease and the seduction. It makes that private time all the more hot when it comes!
JuicyJasmine


You made a very good point, Jasmine. The art of teasing and being sensual is gradually being lost.

In the porn world I think it is lost already. I just got finished reading an excellent review about a site that has introduced "instant forward to your favorite sexual position or act." (According to the reviewer)

This new feature which allows you to skip instantly the parts you don't like should be hugely popular with the many who consider foreplay in all its forms just a waste of their time! A shame.

Sex in a porn video is a given, however sex only is boring to most who managed to live longer than thirty years!

11-03-11  11:14am - 4798 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I keep getting emails from Twitter and Facebook, notifying me that there are messages I haven't responded to. Except that I'm not a member of Facebook or Twitter. Those of you who are might think twice before you click on any of the links provided in the email.

11-03-11  11:02am - 4798 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
While an Ultra High Resolution Picture may not look much different on a monitor from that of a lower resolution one, just enlarge it to scroll to various body parts of interest and you will see why most of us prefer "UHR."

If I can't see every pore, every strand of hair, every bit of weave in the garment the model wears I feel cheated. I agree with lk2fireone that in normal viewing it is hard to tell the difference between 968x1300 and a picture that is 2000x3000 but I do like the option of zeroing in on some choice bits to get every detail.

When it comes to pictures of lower value than 600x800px then forget it. No matter how popular they were with me at the time they do not look good on a monitor that is set at a resolution of 1680x1050, and I have deleted all but a handful.

BTW, 968x1300, isn't bad (for now!) .. just at the lower end of the "very good" scale.

11-02-11  12:47pm - 4799 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
^ As an outsider I am even more appalled that a partially revealed breast should have become an issue and evoked such a large fine in the first place. So strange, the U.S. Porn industry is the largest and most productive in the world yet, in prime time, you can't even show a shielded nipple lest a child be corrupted.

Yet, as I've stated many times before, for some reason real world violence, including the sight of dead bodies is okay ... even when the children are still awake.

As to the speed of the judges' decision, Canada is not much better. Here, too, the windmills of justice turn with agonizing slowness. It is not unusual to see present day trials in connection with offenses that are three or more years old.

10-31-11  07:35pm - 4801 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Ed2009:


I'm in the early stages of starting a new one that fulfils the first two, but C I miss. My girls are going to be in the 20-40 (mostly 20-35) age group.

I'm just hoping there is enough demand out there. From my experience I'm not convinced it's a good idea putting photos and video on the same site. Most people seem to strongly prefer one or the other.


I agree, Ed, that normally it isn't a good idea to put photos and videos on the same site.

I really have nothing against videos, I download them all the time, but find that mixed sites that started out as pure softcore get corrupted after a while because there always seems to be an element that clamors for more hardcore content.

The webmaster will eventually oblige them and there goes another softcore site. That's why my search for a photos only site .. less of a chance of it turning hardcore.

Too bad you couldn't have built your site with models ranging from 35 - 60. There are so many MILF sites already. Can you at least make it different by putting your models into some alluring undies for half of the set?

I understand though how hard it must be to get a mature (over 40) model to pose, unless you want to be reduced to using the same small pool of models one sees almost ad nauseum on the various mature sites. Edited on Oct 31, 2011, 07:38pm

10-31-11  06:20pm - 4801 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I wouldnt mind finding a site like this. If you are ever so inclined and find one please let me know.
LOL, ya most Milfs are younger then me. So I tend to look at Milf as My Age I'd Like to Fuck LOL.
Just sometimes they are so young its just not as sexxy, at least not to me.


You'll surely know about that day, CT, because you'll hear me yelling with delight all the way from Canada! There were a couple of British sites like that, but last time I looked, which was some time ago, their quality was horrendous with their best picture sets weighing in at 800x600px ... and there weren't too many of those.

10-31-11  06:12pm - 4801 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


Sometimes it seems that the forum can langusih for a few days with almost no comments being made or threads being added. Last night I asked if anyone knew of a site called Mary Alicia and that sunk to the bottom like a rock in a sea of posts. I'm not saying that's a bad thing because I always get worried when things seem to slow down here. With all you guys doing the same thing I feel less like a pervert...

So is it winter setting in, stuck at home for Halloween waiting to deal with egg throwing bastards or what???


A temporary spurt of energy in my case, rearadmiral!

10-31-11  06:10pm - 4801 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I can find the first two, but that last one is hard.


Don't I know it, CT. Nothing against teenies (I am subscribing to Nubiles at the moment) but would feel so much more comfortable with someone closer to my age! Ah, well!

10-31-11  06:05pm - 4801 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by rearadmiral:


I suspect that you're right, that there are no sites with the niche you're looking for. I'm convinced that for every site that has a MILF or mature niche there are a hundred youth/teen oriented. I have to confess, though, that I'm okay with that. Sorry!


I know you are, rearadmiral! 18 - 23, right?

10-31-11  04:02pm - 4801 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


... that among tens of thousands of Porn sites there is not a single one that specializes in:

a) Quality Photos only,

b) Softcore only (which, by my definition, can include masturbation),

c) Mature Women over 40 going from fully dressed to fully nude?

I am even dropping my demand for sexy lingerie. C'mon, someone ... anyone ... give me a break and name that site.

10-31-11  02:30pm - 4801 days #70
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Capn:


Visible Pantie Line.

Cap'n.


Hey, I like VPLs as well. Why do so many ladies try to do away with them?

10-31-11  02:24pm - 4801 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Wondered if anyone uses them for porta-porn or for sufin etc.
I do not either, but with the explosion of pod this and pod that wondered.


Okay, thanks, CT. To this old geezer phone sex meant dialing a number and talking to some housewife who liked to make a bit of money on the side by pretending to be smoking hot! It was only a bit later that the penny dropped re. hand held devices.

10-31-11  02:19pm - 4801 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


One thing I noticed is new widescreen monitors are not as forgiving to older formats. The old CRT's made old porn look good or at least I thought so. I have some older porn and my widescreen even shrunk down makes it look distorted and really crappy, same with tube sites.


I have a wide screen monitor as well and agree when it comes to older material. For some reason pre-HD material does look crisper and cleaner on a CRT. Same with Television, most of my lower channels (non-HD) do not look as good on my LCD, wide screen TV, as they did with my old CRT TV.

10-31-11  02:12pm - 4801 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Just wondered what and how much do the PU members use their phone for porn? And how >?


Are you talking about plain phone sex or Porn via hand held devices, CT?

In any case, I'm with the Cap'n. Never have, never will.

10-31-11  02:08pm - 4801 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Further to the subject:

I read (saw on TV) only a couple of days ago that an alarming number of young men are experiencing erectile dysfunction these days because they have been de-sensitized by looking at too much porn and real life just doesn't live up to their expectations.

Was the author of the study objective or was he/she promoting a cause .. ? I have no idea !?!

So, asking our younger members: Has Viagra and Cialis become prematurely important in your life? Would you agree with the author of the study?

10-31-11  01:06pm - 4801 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Nothing will ever be able to compare to the feeling of holding a naked, warm, loving body in your arms. Porn has never managed to replace that in my life and I've been at it a long time. It would really be too bad if a new generation felt differently. Nothing like the real thing.

One thing mentioned in the article surprised me: that young porn users would prefer "enhanced" breasts to natural. Strange, if true.

I prefer the natural non-pornstar look anyway so the girl (woman) next door is my ideal, not the glamorized version found in most sites. So, college co-eds, take heart .. there are others like me as well who will find you not only desirable but who will be willing to invest their lives in a loving future with you!

10-31-11  12:41pm - 4801 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Two years later:

I'm a Porn snob. If it isn't top quality I don't want to look at it. So, tube sites are out, not only from principle but also because of the low quality of the "free" material they are willing to give you until you decide to upgrade.

And to respond to the original question albeit a bit late. I had never heard of the sites mentioned until the webmaster (maxmixdv) brought them up.

10-21-11  10:56am - 4811 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Count me in when it comes to being a full body fan! That's why I also prefer landscape type pictures. I hate videos and picture sets where half of the content shows nothing but close-ups of the genitals. Even in one of my most highly rated sites (AW) it has always bothered me that every picture set contained a series of photos that showed nothing but trunk shots, starting at the waist and going to the upper thighs. I would trade those pictures any time for a full body shot even though I would get less detail.

Actually that is not altogether true either, in this age of Ultra High Resolution even a full body shot can be spectacular when lovingly scrolled.

10-21-11  10:48am - 4811 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by user2000:


Yes, saggy breasts look real. The success of the 'Readers Wives' magazine format a few decades ago was largely because these women looked real, 'attainable' from a porn fantasy point of view.

Works of silicone with oddly placed nipples just look unnatural. Sometimes you wonder how well the porn industry actually knows its customers?


Regrettably I think the Porn Industry knows its customers all too well. How many times have I seen the remark: "I don't care if they are fake or natural as long as they're big!"

I hate that darn shiny perfection, those perfect orbs that are in such obvious contrast to the rest of the body, the flattened out nipples .. arghh, yet the boys go crazy over them. I think this forum is an exception rather than the rule because most of us despise "bolt ons!"

10-20-11  06:16pm - 4812 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by user2000:


I think the appearance of the MILF category must testify to the fact that many women, having gained some middle age weight, looked better (and more real) than their younger counterparts.


You might very well be right. Too bad so many "MILFs" decided to get enhanced breasts in order to look younger. Nothing like a little bit of a mature sag to a breast!

10-20-11  02:27pm - 4812 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by user2000:


Round & Brown looks great. Bootylicious Mag too I think. Are we a minority liking this stuff?


Yes, we are. Do you ever read the comments in VideoBox when they update with a DVD containing larger women? The place goes mad with negativity. Do not ever dare update anything that isn't young and skinny, is the usual reaction. And those of us who like so-called niche material (which is anything that is not young and skinny) wait for weeks for something that suits us.

10-20-11  08:52am - 4812 days #114
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


Why I said "many tattoos," not all, because there are exceptions to every rule (assuming there are even rules for job interviews anymore).

People always say "males should wear a suit, blah blah blah," but I'm betting this would not be referring to a bright purple suit with gold buttons and other bling.

Rules were made to be broken, if not completely exploited for their loopholes.


Re. Your rules for job interviews. It might very well be that a new generation is so used to tattoos that the interviewer him/herself might have a tattoo or two and they might end up admiring each others Ink!

10-19-11  10:07am - 4813 days #109
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:




I agree, the employment argument against many tattoos is like arguing that genital piercings will keep you from ever getting a good job.


What about all the tattoos these days that snake their way up the side of the neck? They are very obvious and visible.

10-17-11  07:09pm - 4815 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by monty4321:


Ethnicity - I love variety (it's not a must, but it would nice)
real or fake boobs - doesn't matter to me much
age group - not real preference [(20's through mature (40's)]
size - petite through thick (not fat)
tats - no preference (nothing wrong with a little)

My biggest issue is: the site must have good quality large photos with. Take a look at what I wrote here to get a better idea https://www.pornusers.com/profile_activit...eviews.html?id=15245

Let me know if I should provide more detail.


I just read your review of ATK Exotics and thank you for saving me a subscription. It appears our tastes are alike when it comes to natural pictures, rather than orangey tinted ones, as well as when it comes to a preference to see every pore of the model in a high resolution picture AND a wider use of landscape rather than portrait. However this won't help you with a site and I can't help you there because I am still looking myself. Good luck to both of us.

PS. Actually something just occurred to me, have you tried Abby Winters yet? Their pictures are very clear with natural colors and they have a nice variety of amateur models. You might find them a bit too tame but I liked the site. Only thing I didn't like is their tendency to show too many rump shots while I like to see the whole body. Edited on Oct 17, 2011, 07:13pm

10-16-11  06:44pm - 4816 days #699
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by turboshaft:


I'm not sure if that's entirely true, and, like so many of the viewpoints on PU, it may be generational. Many of the young in the Middle East appear to want more Western-style life and culture. That doesn't mean they want the U.S. military there, or some American-backed dictator, but I doubt they really want to live in a theocracy or kingdom in the 21st century. But I don't think this means an abandonment of their religion or history either.

Older generations are probably far less welcome to any Western influence, and given the history of the region I could understand why. A bigger threat than the Tunisian example would be what has happened with Iran over the decades. They overthrew a king in 1979--who was the result of the U.S. and the U.K. backing a violent overthrow of Iran's democratically elected leader in the '50s--and the resulting chaos did not lead to a freer Iran. Instead they got an oppressive theocracy that's been run by a series of septuagenarian Ayatollahs in man dresses, who make up rules on everything from free speech to appropriate hair styles--hardly anyone's concept of modernism or freedom.

Sorry if you're a religious person, but to me Iran's government is a prime example of why too much religion is so harmful to people.


I don't doubt that many young people want more western style life and culture but there's a counter balance of young Muslim people who live in Western Society who yearn to return to more traditional values.

This incomprehensible fact (to me) is the scary thing. There are many Muslims who were born and grew up in Germany for whom the taking up of the veil and the living of a more traditional life has become the thing to do.

Maybe it is rebellion against Turkish parents who had taken on more western ways, maybe it is a genuinely religious thing, who knows .. but they willingly put themselves back under the yoke of fundamentalism.

Even in Turkey itself, a country that has been secular since the beginning of last century an Islamic Party now rules who was only recently attempting to bring back the veil. Only their own constitution stopped them.

In Iran and Afghanistan women did far better under odious oppressors like the Russians or the American backed Shah. They were doctors, lawyers, teachers, scientists. Can you honestly say that once the dictatorial forces were removed it was only old men who made everyone revert to fundamentalism. Oh, I know there are exceptions. You are right, there are many young people you yearn to experience our freedoms with all the excesses those freedoms bring with it, but the majority of those Muslims who live in Iran and Afghanistan seem to wish to live under their "good, ole religion." Even the Afghan Constitution is based on the Koran.

Using your example, it was not the old grey bearded Ayatollahs that brought about the present state of affairs. They would have never achieved their present position of power without all those enthusiastic young RELIGIOUS firebrands, who even though slightly older now still support them to this day.

In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood will have a lot to say in the months to come. In Yemen, if their protests turn out to be successful you will have to worry about a lot of new recruits to Al Quaida. You may mark my words. Only recently Christian Copts in Egypt had their churches burned and their lives threatened because they trusted the new powers to do the right thing. Yet those same powers sent tanks crashing through their ranks when they protested the persecution. After all, they were only Christians.

In any case, you are absolutely right when you say too much religion is harmful to people .. I am a firm believer in the separation of Church and State and wouldn't have it any other way. Truly religious people in power quite frankly scare me.

But when considering North Africa and parts of the Middle East, including the Arab Peninsula please remember that it's not only a handful of old people who are reluctant to change or give up their power who are causing the problem. If you are Muslim, you will live by your interpretation of what the Koran says .. there can be no separation of Church and State with them because in Islam, faith and politics cannot be kept separate. You live by the Sharia law which leaves no room for compromise when it comes to other religions or ways of living!

Sorry!

10-16-11  02:01pm - 4816 days #23
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Micha:


Halloween Porn?
Saw one recently where a young lass, ringing a doorbell for her treat, was invited to reach into a bag that was held at waist height by the degenerate looking homeowner. What she found surprised and intrigued her. I don't remember the rest.


Aw, come on now, you can't leave us dangling like that .. try to remember!

10-16-11  10:00am - 4816 days #697
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I keep uttering dire predictions to my loved ones when it comes to the so-called Arab Spring. Everyone is celebrating the new "democracies" in Egypt, in Libya, in Tunesia and the ones to come in Yemen and Syria .. but everyone seems to forget the threat of fundamentalist Islamism that these populist movements are bringing with them. The Tunisian example listed above is a classic example of what may happen when the people of the Muslim world finally get a say in how to govern themselves ... not very encouraging. As a matter of fact it is downright scary how many ordinary folks in the Middle East and Northern Africa would love to take their societies back to the middle ages in the name of Allah!

10-13-11  01:15pm - 4819 days #396
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Khan, could you please add www.paikay.com if possible. Thanks.

10-13-11  10:14am - 4819 days #47
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by hodayathink:


Have you ever heard of Nica Noelle? If not, take a look at her movies.


No, I'm afraid I have never heard of her. I searched this site, found nothing, then tried to Google where I was led to some tube sites (which I have no intention to visit), then went to Videobox where there also was no mention of Nica Noelle.

10-12-11  02:45pm - 4820 days #18
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Micha:


most of them I can eventually figure out, but CNFM had me stumped


Are you sure it isn't CFNM which stands for Clothed Female(s), Naked Men.

10-12-11  12:26pm - 4820 days #688
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I got used to watching all movies on my Wide Screen TV. Not having a car makes that decision a fairly easy one. One thing no one ever mentions is the noise level of the average Theater movie. I am half deaf and most movies were painfully loud even for me when I still went to see them. I wonder what made the theater owners decide that blaring noise was best?

10-12-11  12:12pm - 4820 days #43
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


lol - you can't provoke me Mez - I happen to like and admire you - have for a long time.

To answer your question. As you might have suspected over the time I've been here (and only cause I've said it) I'm into oral sex - blowjobs - deep throat to be specific.

Well, honestly, there is no foreplay that is going to make that better. Like I said - if I was being able to play in real time then foreplay would be okay. But in the movies it's like going to a strip club - bores the crap out me cause I can't taste the candy.

So I'd rather just get to the nitty-gritty.

But more specifically to your question, Gonzo can pretty much bore me most of the time. It's not easy finding the right girl, right attitude, right skills to get Woody to stand up and salute. But it's not watching foreplay that's going to help. And, I tend to edit out all the intercourse, anal, foreplay, tease from what is my final view.

Ok, so I'm not very imaginative but at least I'm honest. It's how I rock right now and other than my libido going into the toilet which it will soon I'm sure, that's what's going to keep my interest.

But look Mez - that's me - I wouldn't want to put that onus on anyone else. That's why we chat here is to see what makes ppl like us tick.

Bon appetite my friend.


Fair enough, my friend! I know what it's like to favor a particular niche or act so I can understand why you would edit anything that doesn't turn you on.

As you may have guessed by now, stripping, sexy lingerie before the actual sex is mine .. "tenderness" was actually a bit of a misnomer I just don't like a model fully dressed one moment and then down on her knees, naked, the next. (Did I say that before?)

I guess that influences the way *I* look at everything. If the undressing is missing then the whole scene is boring to me.

Cheers and I'm glad you took my remarks in the right spirit.

10-11-11  02:32pm - 4821 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


So this makes it easy to gather lists of names, ISP addresses, and other information about people who want to view porn.

Since there is so much hacking going on, maybe, as a public service, someone could publish on a web site everyone who opts to view porn. Their names, street address, and any additional information that might be of interest to neighbors, relatives, and the rest of the free world.


An unintended result of revealing the names of all those who opted in might be to help legitimize porn because 90% of all adult males would choose that option, and once the anti-porn minority saw the millions of names on that site they'd give up the fight that cannot be won!

BTW, the 90% part is a figment of my imagination but I can't be too far from the truth because every single man I know likes porn in some form or the other.

10-11-11  10:33am - 4821 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada


http://news.cnet.com/8301-13506_3-201185...mp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20


10-11-11  09:46am - 4821 days #41
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jberryl69:


well Pat don't let me put words in your mouth - McMac Porn is what I want ... If I want a story I'll purchase an Audio book to listen to, but there is not story in porn (like there is no I in TEAM - or something like that). It's interesting though that I will not eat at a McPlace or any other fast food place but I will eat at McMac Porn for sure.


You are certainly not alone in your preference for McMac Porn, jberryl69, otherwise the market wouldn't be flooded with the stuff. What amazes me is that you still get a kick out of the gonzo, let's get straight to it, stuff.

Truthfully, my first reaction was, jberryl69 must be a young man until I checked your profile. Don't you ever get tired of same old, same old? I am not trying to provoke you, it's an honest question without any desire on my part to be confrontational.

10-10-11  12:18pm - 4822 days #19
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
^ "Too big for my little brain to sort out, thus as an Atheist I will admit I could be WRONG! Sort of backsliding into Agnostic territory."

Words of wisdom! With me it worked the opposite: backsliding from complete conviction into "agnostic" mode! Not in connection with the existence of God but in connection with how He works.

Most of us tend to put him into a denominational box but I've come to the same conclusion as you, my brain is simply too small to sort things out, so I am unaffiliated with any church or dogma.

I do disagree with you in connection with:

"It is hard to believe ... that religion & porn have any relationship other than being polar opposites."

They became polar opposites. It wasn't always so. In ancient Greece Temple Prostitutes played an important part.

10-10-11  11:26am - 4822 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Be of good cheer, cybertoad. It may take longer these days but I promise you'll be good until you're 75!

However it is at this age when you might run into two problems:

a) your porn saturation point has been reached and most offerings become ho-hum, and,

b) all the stuff that turned you on in your youth, and still turns you on now, like ladies clad in teddies, and full back panties and baby doll pajamas and slips and nylon (NOT fishnet) stockings and garter belts and high heels, has become obsolete and has become a rare find in the world of porn.

And you end up moaning and bitching about the lack of eroticism till those who are younger than you throw up their hands in despair and hope they'll never have to look at anything you write again!

Wait, I got carried away .. in any case, take heart, you're good for a few more years yet! But it will take more stimulation each year, that's for sure!

10-09-11  06:50pm - 4823 days #36
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


Nothing wrong with fast-forwarding through the parts of a scene that don't appeal to you but at least you have that opportunity. It's very different for someone like me who wants more than just a naked girl lying in bed about to get f..d because I don't have those parts.


How true!! Sigh!

10-09-11  06:45pm - 4823 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
I used to say that every Christian appears to have a God and Jesus of his own making. A Deity who has been reshaped and refashioned to reflect the individual's personal make up.

Come from a dysfunctional home with a harsh father and chances are that your God will most likely be harsh and judgmental as well, come from a kind and loving home and your God will probably be kind and loving. This is my view only and is not necessarily true but I believe it!

At the moment I think of myself as an "agnostic" Christian, someone who believes in the basics of the faith, but not so much in all the baggage that has been handed down to us, in all the limitations of "religion," this cage of our own making, with all of its restrictions and "certainties" and guilt inducing little tricks that attempt to keep us on the straight and narrow.

As far as I am concerned, kind people do not have to be coerced to be kind. They would be kind even if God did not exist and the hateful ones, the destroyers would destroy and hate, God or no God.

Except in the latter case, if they are "true believers" they would attempt to justify their cruel actions by quoting all the harsh passages in the O.T. or the Koran and deceive themselves into thinking that they are doing the will of God.

I am not arrogant enough to think that I have God, His nature or His actions, all figured out. I carry many doubts around with me and will most likely take them to my grave. I hope that I will be pleasantly surprised, but who can be sure.

I am only sure of two things, a) it can't hurt to act in a loving manner and b) that "whatsoever you sow, that shall you reap!"

Experience has taught me that those two truths are eternal and immutable. Thus endeth the lesson!



PS. And when it comes to Porn, in the light of all the despicable, cruel, destructive things individuals and nations tend to do to one another, I think the liking of Porn would rank way down on a Deity`s list of moral offenses. But, again, I feel presumptuous even saying that. What do *I* know.

951-1000 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 6 10 14 19 Page 20 21 28 35 42 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.07 seconds.