Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password? Create an account to share your experiences and more! E-MAIL   PASS   Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).

User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!

Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0) Filtering Options Select Option Keyword Search      Find within...   All Thread Title Messages View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

1551-1600 of 2588 Posts

< Previous Page

1

2

9

16

23

31

Page 32

33

37

41

45

51

52

Next Page >

09-23-10  03:44pm - 5204 days	#4
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Capn: Simple short answer..... No, I am not satisfied with that. Never have been, never will be. You knew that already though! Cap'n. Yep, I already knew, Cap'n!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-23-10  03:11pm - 5204 days	Original Post - #1
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	... with DVD scenes that start with the model naked already or that show her fully clothed one moment and then show her, without transition, completely nude and ready for action a split second later? Are you content with picture sets that contain approx. 12 pictures of the model fully dressed or partially undressed and another 90 pictures with her fully nude? I know we've discussed this over and over in other threads (tease factor etc.) but this time I'd like to know who the folks are that prefer complete nudity right from the start and what makes them prefer it that way? There is no judgment involved because I realize how different peoples' tastes are, just want to know what makes you, as a Porn User and collector content with the majority of the Porn found in most sites nowadays and what makes me such an odd ball in wanting something different?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-23-10  02:33pm - 5204 days	#2
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	My personal opinion is that no one (except for medical reasons) needs a boob job. The perfect size for each and every one of us can easily be found among natural girls, from an "a" cup to EE and up. Make mine b or c saggy, please! BTW, I made the horrible mistake of subscribing to the Playboy channel the other day .. after watching the first few shows I called in a panic (slight exaggeration) to cancel because all I saw were inflated breasts. Maybe Hugh Hefner is responsible for the flood of models with enhanceds now saturating the Porn market.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-23-10  02:22pm - 5204 days	#14
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Capn: I appreciate that, but I am trying to keep the number of harddrives I have at a sensible level. From a users point of view though, I think it is daft to spend time downloading 100Meg when you only want 30Meg of it. Cap'n. I never asked, Capn, but are you on dial-up? I tried your custom zip a couple of times but after short consideration found really no difference between choosing the pictures I wanted to keep while I was on the site or by downloading and then deleting the ones I didn't want on my computer. As a matter of fact (from habit) I actually prefer doing it the latter way. Of course, a 100MB download, would take no longer than a blink of the eye with High Speed .. that's why the question.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-19-10  07:38pm - 5208 days	#16
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Capn: I get the impression that may well be a variation on the Apprentices' Long Stand. 'Go down the Stores & ask for a long stand.' Cap'n. You might very well be right, Capn!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-19-10  03:05pm - 5208 days	#14
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by lk2fireone: messmer, did you ever get un-baffled? Did you find a specific reason why your Internet connection was sticky? Inquiring minds want to know! Do you still have that problem? Or did the problem go away/get solved, because of tech help or The Hand of God or whatever mystery controls the Great Computer Gods in the sky? Or have you been cut off from the Internet entirely, and that's why we haven't heard from you in days? Speak to us, o brother. Or write a snail letter to PU telling us you are still all right. (Can we send a snail letter to PU, if our Internet connection goes down on us?) First of all I want to thank all of you for your suggestions. I couldn't answer before this because I was away until a few hours ago. What it boiled down to was this: I left Tuesday morning leaving my instructions with grandson to pass on to the technician when he shows up. Grandson starts computer and all seems well. No sticky links, speed is great. Technician shows up, same result, everything is as it should be! He thinks my problem might have been because they worked on some "nodes"??? farther down the street from me. Haven't a clue what a node is, maybe the technician is counting on that , in any case everything is a-okay now. Thanks again to all of you for your helpfulness!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-13-10  07:36pm - 5214 days	#6
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Khan: There's a good chance they're right about the firewall/anti-virus being the main cause, however, one other thing you might check is the DNS server your connection is using. They really put me through my paces over the past few days, Khan. They did check the DNS server I am using and there was mention on Saturday that there was a huge loss of "packets" and while waiting to recover them I would time out in the meantime, that's why it took so long. They frankly acknowledged at that time that the problem must be at their end but after they got no complaints from anyone else and after my packet loss was greatly reduced today (according to them) yet my problem persisted they felt the problem had to be with me after all. I know that I am stumped, but then I'm not a tekkie! Who knows maybe PP and Pat and you are right .. maybe Microsoft issued a security patch that is now messing me up or possibly AVG altered something through their daily update. In any case, thanks to all! BTW, even the links within PU to other areas of the site are extremely sticky and take an eternity.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-13-10  06:29pm - 5214 days	#4
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Thanks for your thoughts, PP and Pat. I'd rest easier if it hadn't happened suddenly without any changes to the set up on my part!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

09-13-10  05:46pm - 5214 days	Original Post - #1
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	For the past three days I have had a heck of a time connecting to most of my sites. I have to wait for ten seconds or longer before I connect and then another 5-10 seconds before the page will be loaded completely. I am on a super high speed connection, my speed tests proclaim that all is fine, showing an average speed of about 3MB/s, yet every time I click on a link there's that long pause before anything will move. I've tried other browsers, like Chrome and IE (my default one is Firefox) and the results are always the same. I have a technician from my local ISP coming to my place tomorrow but am afraid he'll just take a look at the speed and proclaim: nothing wrong here, to my great embarrassment. Does anyone know what would make my computer hesitate all of a sudden when it comes to connecting to a site .. any site? The Operating system is Windows 7. Thanks for any possible insights or tweaks!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-13-10  09:08am - 5245 days	#35
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Man, I wish I were able to do stuff like that, RB!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-09-10  02:03pm - 5249 days	#15
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by lk2fireone: Where is the web site with teens wearing styrofoam cup bras and thongs? I don't believe I've seen it yet. But if the teens are pretty enough... Oops! I meant foam rubber. As to thongs .. that's all I see. Not one buttock in sight that's covered!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-09-10  09:44am - 5249 days	#13
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by PinkPanther: Different tastes, for sure. My biggest beef with Twisty's is that, even when they allow natural skin tones on the bodies, they blur the faces. What the fuck? If they think the models are ugly, they should hire different models - why blur the faces so often? It's why my affection for ATK Galleria grows by leaps and bounds. They actually show what their models look like - what a concept! ATK Natural and Hairy was my home quite a few times in the past for the reason you mention but I gave up eventually because the last couple of times I subscribed the models were wearing too little (therefore no exciting lingerie as they stripped slowly) and were done taking off their clothes on page one, which made one set basically look like all the others with only the faces changing. An eighteen year old might be excited by nudity but someone over fifty needs a bit of spice added. I really miss that site. If only they returned to their earlier ways of giving me models that come gift wrapped in nylon or silk once in a while. But I guess younger photographers and models who have grown up with styrofoam cup bras and thongs don't know any better. And just like with rap and hip hop I'll have to get used to the idea that the times have changed on me!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-08-10  03:03pm - 5250 days	#4
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Well, I am happy that we have webmasters/mistresses in our midst. I enjoy their contributions and their helpfulness. And I only remember one who shamelessly shilled for his site but that was a long time ago and I don't even remember his name anymore. This present group of WMs is honorable and they add something special to this forum.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-08-10  10:42am - 5250 days	#8
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by PinkPanther: I remember having a back-and-forth about the pics on Pier999, or whatever it's called, where some people were talking about the remarkable clarity and detail on their pics, while to me the remarkable thing about their pics is to apply lacquer-like photo treatment to eradicate anything that might possibly be confused with natural skin tone. That's the same problem I had with Twisty's, I had a hard time finding natural skin tones .. yet thousands like the site. Maybe it is a matter of different monitors painting a different picture.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  11:37am - 5251 days	#3
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by justme: She clearly has both feet in that photo. Nothing looks doctored to me. Her toes are behind the front bricks. I can't believe it, we agree for once. I can see part of the model's left foot, the toes are hidden by the angle of the wall.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  11:29am - 5251 days	#50
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: I do like full panties in silk or satin. Any sort of full panties. I always like a clean line, which is why I like tight jeans and tights. It's why I have never liked stockings and suspenders. I don't like the legs beng broken up. (Although that does sound a bit strange) Maybe there's something about stockings and suspenders that reminds me of 80 year old prostitutes on a street corner with a kilo of makeup, asking "want a good time deary?" "Yes, that's why I'm off to see the cricket." Sorry to disappoint you messmer, you can join the long queue on the left. I feel quite comfortable on the left so don't mind if I do. But to get (semi) serious for a moment. This is where our tastes differ once again because I like ridges rather than clean lines. I like to see the outlines of panties under a dress, or the straps of a garter belt as the dress tightens temporarily over a thigh. To me that's immensely sexy. Tights as well as the hated thongs rob me of that small additional pleasure. But there's nothing wrong with having different tastes otherwise there would be only one porn site.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  09:32am - 5251 days	#48
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by mistresskent: No problemo.. French Shorts.. the ones with slits up the side... now they are totally sexy with cami vest x Oh, yes!! (panting)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  08:28am - 5251 days	#46
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Sorry I meant to add the P.S. to a previous message.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  08:26am - 5251 days	#45
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by messmer: How can you NOT like garter belts and stockings, squirrel. You're a sore disappointment to me especially since you voice a preference for a) cotton and b) tights (pantyhose). To this day I consider pantyhose to be the killer of eroticism when it comes to clothing. That flash of white thigh above the stocking tops was always a heart stopper for me. You don't get that with tights. Tights reveal too little while thongs reveal too much. And I'm with Mistress Kent when it comes to full briefs in sheer or at least in nylon/silk. P.S. I love camisoles (something I ignored in Mistress Kent's original post for some reason).
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  08:20am - 5251 days	#44
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by slutty: I also can't stand the thong, I understand the purpose for ladies wearing tight clothes, but think it looks really odd. I agree with you on the cotton panties, however I disagree on the garter belts - i love boustiers and pretty much anything with lots of clasps or hooks (more fun to unwrap)! I don't think liking lingerie is an age thing, although I would imagine that tastes might vary somewhat by age. No wonder we keep meeting on the same sites, slutty, except for that cotton panties thing .. but as I stated in another place I seem to be getting used to them along with the shaved look!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  08:16am - 5251 days	#43
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: Thought I was all alone in hating thongs. Can't believe there are one or two on here who don't like them. Sorry mess - I hate garter belts too. Cotton panties are great. Just want to see somethnig that looks like it's meant to fit the body, so I love tight jeans and prefer just normal panties to something that doesn't look though it's meant to cover anything. This means I also like tights. Yes, I'm also old enough to like lingerie too. Is it an age thing? Not really sure. How can you NOT like garter belts and stockings, squirrel. You're a sore disappointment to me especially since you voice a preference for a) cotton and b) tights (pantyhose). To this day I consider pantyhose to be the killer of eroticism when it comes to clothing. That flash of white thigh above the stocking tops was always a heart stopper for me. You don't get that with tights. Tights reveal too little while thongs reveal too much. And I'm with Mistress Kent when it comes to full briefs in sheer or at least in nylon/silk.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-07-10  08:04am - 5251 days	#249
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by lk2fireone: Laurence Fishburne is a major star, and has been for many years. You would think, if he wanted to get his daughter into the movie business, it would be simple and easy for him to do. Not necessarily to make her a star, but at least to get her small parts in movies. Will Smith, an even bigger star, got his son Jaden, age 12, into movies where Will was a star or producer. And the son Jaden is already a star at age 12: The Karate Kid, The Day the Earth Stood Still, Pursuit of Happyness. The kid must have some talent, but the relation to Will Smith certainly didn't hurt. Sound reasoning, lk2. It wouldn't be the first time that a quote was put into someone's mouth by folks like "People" etc. Just repeating what I read at the time.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-06-10  02:41pm - 5252 days	#244
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by lk2fireone: How do porn actresses get along with their family because of their being in porn? Obviously it depends on the actress, and the family members, but attitude is a large part of it. Laurence Fishburne's daughter is in a porn film, and her family will have to deal with it. >>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<< Laurence Fishburne's Daughter: 'Being In An Adult Film Is Not A Big Deal To Me' Source: Access Hollywood Fri Aug 06, 2010, 11:24 am EDT Laurence Fishburne's daughter Montana is speaking out about her decision to appear in an upcoming adult film. "Being in an adult film is not a big deal to me," Montana, 18, told People. "It's something I always wanted to do. I have always been comfortable in my body and with my sexuality� I am not in porn to get into acting. I am in porn because I wanted to be in porn." The daughter of the "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation" star told the mag she shot the video without telling her family. "I had already filmed it by the time they knew, so I didn't give them a chance to talk me out of it� so I could pursue what I want to do without being constrained by them," she explained. Montana hopes her dad will one day be proud of her decision. "I hear through relatives that he's upset but I haven't talked to him directly for him to tell me his feelings," she said. "I hope it's not hurting him. It wasn't done to hurt him� But I think it will take time and talking through the issues. Eventually, I hope he will be proud of me." When contacted by the mag, a rep for the actor declined to comment. Copyright 2010 by NBC Universal, Inc. All rights reserved. >>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<< I read the same thing somewhere on the Internet only the other day, can`t remember the source, with one significant difference, there Montana was quoted as saying that she did the porn movie to draw attention to herself with the hopes of being noticed by the mainstream movies industry.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-06-10  10:58am - 5252 days	#35
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by mistresskent: Freya used to do a range in Black called "Zita" sheer cups and bloody stunning. Models are very natural on Freya aren't they? x They are gorgeous! I just wish they ran a "porn" site on the side so I could get some nice, super high-resolution sets of pictures of them in that fantastic lingerie!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-06-10  10:54am - 5252 days	#17
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: LOL sometimes brutal reality just comes and kicks you in the bollocks. Aw, don't mind him, squirrel. Justme likes to play the Devil's advocate and the cynical detached observer in order to stir things up now and then. This forum is more than just a collection of masturbators! I've developed quite an attachment to many of the members for their passion, their honesty, their tolerance, their knowledge of things other than porn, and come here more often for companionship and an exchange of ideas rather than talk about the joys of self-gratification!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-06-10  10:40am - 5252 days	#4
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: Messmer - New Sensations is the Reel Pass network. Take a look at the reviews before committing. I would say one of the drawbacks is that the quality is not great spec compared to some of the top notch sites. They are similar to porn.com and brain pass. They do have some good pics though. It is all very much the same standard with little exceptional material., at least it was last time I looked. But surprisingly as with some of the other low cost sites you can find some good stuff in there. Sometimes I prefer this sort of network to something like 21 Sextury simply because the 21 style is reported as very much the same across all their sites. That means too many close ups and cut off bodies. At least on some of the New Sensations/Reel Pass sites you get to see the whole girl on occasions, and they have some surprisingly good pics too. Others may disagree with this opinion. It's just I get sick of sites who show too many close ups and everything looks the same. I like the way porn.com and NS have some good stuff if you look for it. The network does have Unlimited Milfs but there are a lot of fake breasts in there. Overall it has all the negatives you would expect from a cheapish network, but I quite like it. It may be fast food but it occasionally tastes good. 21Sextury is my best hated site. I took out a long term subscription to them as well, in order to get all my Older Ladies sites now rather than having to wait for them, and then found out that three of the four sites they carried were dead and their contents could be downloaded within a week. Now I go to the site once a week for my ONE update and that's it because I, too, dislike 21Sextury's style. All other niche sites are similarly neglected, with only the Sophie Moone type of sites being nurtured. I confess that this is entirely subjective because all those glossy, tanned, unblemished, gorgeous teenies leave me cold, while 21Sextury's success is built on featuring exactly that type of model! These are also the sites that update with regularity they are their bread and butter because that's what their youth oriented clientele prefers and they happen to be in the majority. I haven't looked at their pictures (I prefer softcore sites for my pics) but heartily agree with you about all those truncated close ups when it comes to pictures in general. I yearn to see a model full figure, preferably in a landscape shot once in a while, rather than all those pictures that show her from belly button to upper thighs. I hate that. Talking about Porn.com, I found all kinds of German videos on their site which was a pleasant surprise. Of course, looking at them a few years later it is obvious that they've been overtaken by technology and they will probably bite the dust soon. Nowadays it is either HD or very high quality for me, or nothing! That goes for picture sets as well. Which brings me to New Sensations! I read the comments, including yours above, and judging by some of them the picture quality of the videos is not the greatest which would stop me from subscribing to the site. I wouldn't use it as a picture site because, see above! Nice talking to you, squirrel, and thanks for mentioning 21Sextury so I could rant a bit about them!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-06-10  09:13am - 5252 days	#2
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: A lunatic asylum the way things are going. But apart from that cheery thought, I have been considering which site to join next. It's a right motley bunch. Contenders are 18Eighteen, Team Skeet, New Sensations, and VideosZ. I have noticed the biggest controversy seems to surround VideosZ. I am well aware of the drawbacks of New Sensations, but you know, this is the only one of the four that doesn't try to steal your money by tricking you with pre checked cross sells. I have avoided joining a pre checked cross sell site for nearly two years. Given half a chance I would grab whoever is responsible for that sort of behaviour by the throat, and rip out his fucking larynx. Unless he's bigger than me, then I would hire someone to do it. Apart form this I am intrigued by the Diggler review which seems a little harsh. I can always trust a Denner review and there are also some other trusted reviewers giving this one a high mark. I also noticed the Diggler/Ace Of Aces feud. The truth is out there somewhere but this site seems to divide opinion. It will probably be New Sensations. They have pics, and don't have pre checked cross sells, so I wont have the urge to kill anyone when I join. I have a long term subscription to Videosz (done in a moment of insanity when I thought I could save some money that way) and the biggest fault I find with the site is the fact that they do not cater to those who like niches the way American Vice did. At least Reg threw us a bone now and then. I have not downloaded a single scene in over a month because all the updates look the same except for the faces. I must have a look at the New Sensations you mention, I had never heard of them until now.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-10  06:52pm - 5253 days	#3
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Have you considered Abby Winters? Their solo site looks like a good match if you like decent pictures of attractive women! Not too many dildos or tattoos last time I was there, just a bunch of natural young women.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-10  06:41pm - 5253 days	#33
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by mistresskent: Tell me young man... what did you think of the sites? x Make that "old" man! Would you believe Freya ended up being my preferred site. I loved Jenny's (1) and Arabella's (2) bra and panties sets and would like to see a site that features models in lingerie like that with the addition of garter belts and stockings. Yum! I made a spot check of the other sites as well but some (corsets, girdles etc.) were not my cup of tea, while others featured lingerie that simply didn't get to me the way Freya's did. Not bad for an everyday site!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-10  02:37pm - 5253 days	#239
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Ed2009: I haven't seen Avatar yet. In fact the only people I know who've seen it are my parents and they liked it (and they're in their 60s) but I rarely trust their judgement. I'll wait for it to appear on telly, because it really doesn't look like my sort of movie. My wife and I watched it on TV and liked it. But I guess in order to love it (as my grandson did) you would have to see it in 3D and in an IMax theater.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-10  10:25am - 5253 days	#237
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by turboshaft: Who's to say that other people's tastes are better than yours? If they don't like your choice in films give them a big and move on. That's basically what I do, turbo. I'll keep watching my thrillers, comedies, sf and fantasy movies with an easy mind and leave the appreciation of "art" in cinema to others. There is nothing wrong with this. Some folks look for something deeper, more challenging to the emotions and intellect in their movies and I can understand that and therefore acknowledge them as "experts" because I would never be inclined to dissect a movie but simply sit back and treat it as fast food. Not very nourishing but appealing to my taste buds.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-10  09:56am - 5253 days	#236
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by pat362: I've only seen the movie in the original language with subtitles. If the text matches what is said then there is no mention of suicide. It's a rather sweet love story very much like any romantic teen movie where one person is secretely in love with the popular girl at school but in this case the person is a girl in love with another girl. Like all good love story. They fall in love and live happily ever after. Now that last line appeals greatly to me. My kind of movie, Pat.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-05-10  09:42am - 5253 days	#7
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Goldfish: I haven't been totally happy with the VLC player myself in recent months. I get a lot of pixilating when I use the slider. Yes, you sure do get pixelating when using the slider, Goldfish. I've accepted this as the price you pay for using some of the features like sharpening that only VLC seems to possess. The last two upgrades aggravated things by also distorting a small portion of the picture on the bottom. As I mentioned above it apparently has something to do with using ATI graphics and I was hoping they had found a fix for that when I installed the latest.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-04-10  10:44am - 5254 days	#7
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by pat362: Let's say that this is guy is correct and you can't get pregant if the guy pulls out before ejaculating. The fact remains that most guys won't want to do that and most young men won't be able to. Add the fact that pregancy is not the worst thing that can happen to you if you have unprotected sex. I'd rather teennagers and young people choose the safe way and use a condom. Not as fun but a lot safer. Can't disagree with your last statement, Pat!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-04-10  10:42am - 5254 days	#232
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by pat362: I don't know if you're into horror but if you are then you should take a look at "Let the right one in" also known as "L�t den r�tte komma in". It's a very good vampire story with some actual emotion and interesting characters. The US liked it so much that they hve made their own version called "Let me in". Another Swedish film that I really like is "Show me Love" or the original title "Fucking �m�l". This is basically a love story between 2 teenage girls where one develops a crush on the other and as the film progress falls in love with the other girl but her love isn't return immediately because the other girl is very popular at school and doesn't want to admit to her lesbianism. No to the first paragraph, Pat. I don't like vampire, werewolf or zombie movies unless they are parodies. I don't like horror movies in general. As to the second paragraph r.e "Show me Love" I would consider it as long as it isn't too emotionally draining (girl whose love isn't immediately returned contemplating suicide, for instance .. something Bergman might do!)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-04-10  10:35am - 5254 days	#231
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by PinkPanther: Bergman's stuff is pretty intense. I went to see lots of his stuff when I was living in Boston and was making a point of seeing stuff that I thought I ought to. It's interesting. Among foreign films, I found that I connected most with films from Germany and Japan on a fairly consistent basis while films from other countries frequently left me cold. The German film-makers, like Fassbinder, Herzog & Wenders were directly addressing the post-WW II question of "what does it mean to be human if humans can do that?" I find that kind of searching in a lot of Scandinavian crime fiction, which the Larsson books turned me onto. Great stuff! I think my problem is that I like escapist fare because it is so easy on the emotions. The daily news burdens me enough so I like to get away from it all when it comes to movies. I disliked Fassbinder's and Herzog's work as well. I will never dispute the artistic merit of any of these directors, people with better taste than mine have made that decision for me already. It's just that I'm a "two stars out of five" type of guy, loved and appreciated by all the makers of popcorn movies and summer blockbusters!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-04-10  09:56am - 5254 days	#5
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Thanks for your help, guys! I did the smart thing and went back to the January 2010 version of VLC as one of you suggested. All is well now except that the beginning of all HD videos is always a five second, torn up, distorted picture mess. But then VLC has always done that to me so I can put up with it as long as the rest of the video is clear.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-03-10  01:01pm - 5255 days	Original Post - #1
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	VLC Player has acted up real badly on me since its last two upgrades. They experienced compatibility problems with ATI graphics and I was hoping their latest patch would correct this but no dice. Does anyone know of a similar open source player where the picture can be sharpened by default. I think WMP is a classy, good looking player but only lets you adjust color etc. but NOT sharpness. It's an important feature for me because I like my picture "crisp" when watching downloaded movie clips and with WMP they all look a bit too soft! Thanks! Edited on Aug 03, 2010, 01:29pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-02-10  10:37am - 5256 days	#13
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by TheSquirrel: Nice one messmer congrats on the 1000. Your contributions have always been highly readable and entertaining. I thought Toadsith would be first to 1000 but it appears they buried him with Patrick McGoohan. I agree! I thought Toadsith would be the first. He was so far ahead of us all I didn't think we'd ever catch up with him. I wasn't after a record, though ... I just like to gab and have the time to do it!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-02-10  09:17am - 5256 days	#9
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Hey Khan, any badges for making a 1000 posts to the forum?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-02-10  09:16am - 5256 days	#8
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Khan: Not to sidetrack the rest of your rant, but I feel this part needed a reply ... I'd be curious where you see those 3 line reviews here at PU. While I know we do get them sometimes, they rarely make it past the approval process. Usually they're disapproved/deleted w/in a few hours of being submitted. I'd say it's *very* rare for a review to be approved if it's under 50 words. Admittedly, some relatively brief reviews are approved. Still, I'd bring to your attention that many of the regulars here started off submitting pretty short reviews. Through their own initiative and coaching from me and fellow users, they eventually came to submit thorough reviews that are a benefit to all. Also, as Goldfish mentioned, until the reviewer has earned 5 points, their reviews don't factor into a site's overall rating score. Anyway, just wanted to set the record straight about the "3 line newbie reviews". Reading between the lines I think what frustrates the squirrel is the fact that he just got finished submitting an extensive and thorough review that not only required a great deal of time on his part but would also be helpful to the site he reviewed and this review is being quickly replaced (and therefore most likely ignored) by some very short newbie review on the home page of PU. People tend to click on the first site review listed. Maybe if two or more reviews are being listed on the home page on the same day the most valuable one could stay on top and not be replaced by a very short and inadequate review???
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-01-10  12:25pm - 5257 days	#227
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by PinkPanther: I saw the Swedish film of "The Girl Who Played With Fire" last night and it was the answer to the trivia question, "Why don't we hear much about Swedish suspense movies?" I LOVE the story. I've read the 3 Stieg Larsson books multiple times. And I know there's the old adage of "If you love the book, you'll hate the movie." Perhaps. I found all of the Harry Potter films to be well-done and I enjoyed those books - though not on the level that these have fascinated me. This was just not a well-made suspense movie. There were MANY scenes that were completely flat and drama-free with nothing in them except some information to move the story along. Sorry, but if you're going to do a scene, put SOMETHING into it - have people act, have some spark of something. They left out all of the dark humor of the books, including the last line of the 2nd book, which was beautiful. Plus they totally distorted the role of the police from that portrayed in the books in both Swedish films and changed the relationship between one of the main characters and the police in both films. Given that, the beginning of the 3rd film will also have to be changed from the book. In every way, I suspect that the 3rd movie - which has less "action" in the story - will be even worse, unfortunately. Skip the Swedish films. Read the books, wait for the David Fincher films to come out. That's my advice. I have high hopes for Fincher to connect with these books and make exciting movies out of them. Somewhat off-topic, but I've ignored most Swedish movies ever since the few I saw that were made by the genius, Ingmar Bergman, either gave me fits of depression or put me to sleep. The only exception, The Magic Flute! Three cheers for Hollywood! Its products may not always possess artistic merit but they sure are entertaining!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-01-10  10:46am - 5257 days	#9
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Drooler: Maybe it's that porn makes us NICE. That's exactly it! No pent-up frustration to make us cranky and aggressive!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

08-01-10  09:28am - 5257 days	#14
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by Tom22: If the codec is "Mime Type: video/x-ms-asf" which usually uses a "WMV" extension, I'm afraid the distortion you see when "indexing" (moving the slider bar) is just the nature of the beast. I've found if you cut the video down in size, it solves the problem for the most part. But I have no idea why. Thanks for the tip, Tom. Trouble is the distortion starts from the moment I click on play. Next day I might play the same clip and it displays as it should. That's why my suspicion that the fault lies somewhere with my processor as GlassHouse suggested. Or maybe it's with the latest version of VLC, come to think of it? I was fine for a day with the codec pack I had downloaded then VLC offered an upgrade and ever since I have problems again. I read in some forums that VLC had problems with ATI graphics cards but assumed that they had corrected that in the meantime????
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-31-10  09:52am - 5258 days	#12
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by GlassHouse: It might be your processor speed. I had the same problem but the same version of VLC on another machine plays the video fine. I have the feeling you might be right! I installed the codec, did great for the day but experienced difficulties again the next day. VLC is really unpredictable. Yesterday there was an area of distortion on the bottom of most videos, yet with WMP the picture was fine. Wish they'd change WMP so that the sharpness of the picture could be adjusted. I find that most videos downloaded from places like VideoBox, Videosz tend to be not "crisp" enough.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-30-10  10:11am - 5259 days	#5
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by pat362: It's interesting but not so much the content as the fact that they had to report on it. The fact that they mention that people still believe that you can't get pregnant if the guy pulls out before ejaculating proves that there are some pretty ignorant people out there. This is after they have implemented sex classes in school. Well, we must have been extremely lucky then over a long period time or this fella is right: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12762415?dopt=Abstract
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-23-10  11:04am - 5266 days	#140
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by pat362: Is it possible that the main reason why we don't like implants is because the size that many girls pick is often too large for their chest and therefore they completely alter the appearance of the breasts? There are some girls that got implants and they somehow didn't look like they had them. Absolutely, Pat. They look too big, too round, too artificial on most, plus the ridging and wrinkling when in action doesn't do a thing for my libido. On the other hand if I have to look twice: does she or doesn't she have implants then I have no problem with them .. as long as I don't have to touch them. Of course, this excludes breast restorations after a battle with breast cancer. If a loved one had to go through that I would cheer her on and certainly not find anything repulsive in the procedure. Edited on Jul 23, 2010, 11:09am
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-22-10  09:45am - 5267 days	#31
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by mistresskent: You are absolutely right. Most women do only spend minimum on there underwear. I'd like to point out here that my favourite site for lingerie and absolutely stunning photography is Aubade Lingerie. I've got about 6 special sets from them. Their best range comes out in spring and at christmas they do some AMAZING camisole sets. My everyday lingerie is a much cheaper brand made by Freya, compared to what ladies buy in Tesco's its much more expensive. But I'm 30E in the chest and size 8 waist.. which makes it quite difficult to get stunning lingerie in my size. If you go past a D cup in main street stores, they automatically think you are fat as well as large cupped. A majority of women wear the wrong size i.e... when a lady says she is a 36DD and she's obviously very slim, her cup size is actually likely to be bigger than she thinks. Why? Because tape measures are NOT elastic. As soon as any shop brings out the tape measure I simply walk out. Some excellent ranges to look out for in regards to class and style (and some wicked photography) are Valisere, Vollers corsets, Mochino, Velda Lauder, Charnos (Pin up) and the best panties are Wolbar(knickers in the uk. (Although not porn) oh yes.. and another cheaper but lovely make was Discover Madmoiselle by Lepel. Check it out if you love your lingerie.. happy to discuss any details as I'm totally obsessed by lingerie I'll be happy to check out all the brands you mentioned and I'm even happier to come across a woman (outside) of France who is obsessed with lingerie. You are such a rarity nowadays, even though I find that on British sites lingerie is still more prevalent than on U.S./Canadian sites. So three cheers for the Brits as well!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-22-10  09:36am - 5267 days	#30
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by lk2fireone: I graduated from the Sears catalog many moons ago. Today, I doubt it would even get a rise from me. Life was much cheaper and simpler back then. We didn't even have a Sears catalog where I grew up! We got our thrills from the pictures our more "sophisticated" class mates brought to school!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

07-21-10  07:02pm - 5268 days	#27
messmer (0) Disabled User Posts: 2,582 Registered: Sep 12, '07 Location: Canada	Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky: Also want to add that it's interesting to see the different mind-sets when it comes to what is stimulating. Messmer doesn't find cotton stimulating because of the utility and innocence factor; he finds them non-erotic. I find cotton panties stimulating precisely because they are not viewed as being erotic. I'll admit to being the oddball here. What I find exciting would bore the pants off most guys (or bore the pants back on them, as the case may be). If you guys could see a video-tape of my fantasies you would probably die laughing. Not at all! Someone said the other day on a show I watched: "We all live in our own movie" and I think that what we find erotically stimulating has most often its trigger in an experience in our personal movie (Sears catalogue, early sexual experiences etc.) and would most likely not be understood by those who are on the outside looking in on our lives (movies). You should see my fantasies if you think yours are funny. BTW, I agree that ordinary women shedding ordinary clothes can indeed be erotic. In our case maybe the couple of years that separate us might make the difference between like and dislike of cotton. In my movie, full nylon briefs were it for normal wear!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

1551-1600 of 2588 Posts

< Previous Page

1

2

9

16

23

31

Page 32

33

37

41

45

51

52

Next Page >

Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site. DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER. To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor. Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource. All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com. Loaded in 0.25 seconds.