Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: messmer (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (2582)  |   Threads Started (156)

2351-2400 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 9 16 23 30 37 47 Page 48 49 50 51 52 Next Page >

12-13-08  02:06pm - 5853 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


I'm also a picture person and have the same issues as Messmer. The "Walmart's of Porn" (the big network, high volume dealers with mediocre quality like Brazzers, RealityKings, Newsensations, Naughtyamerica, etc.) always seem to skimp on the pictures which frustrates me.

When you compare picture files to video files, it's not that difficult to bring the standard "Walmart" sized 900x600 pixel shot up to 1200 or 1600 without sacrificing harddrive or server space. They do have digital cameras out there capable of taking nongrainy pics at that size ;) I think a lot of these sites tend to use "enhanced screen caps" (using stills from the digital video being shot) but techonology still lets you get better product than what they're kicking out.

It really makes no sense to me considering it would take so little effort to make picture content better then what they do. Granted, the majority of users are more into the vids but why marginalize a small part of the consumers by failing to move their picture standards into the 21st century?

Having ranted, I would add that Pinkpanthers suggestions are good. The DDF sites (I guess they're not a network)also produce good photos and so does Suze Randall (3 site network).


Thanks for the rant, Wittyguy. I needed that because I feel the same way. A large majority appear to be in love with Gonzo style hard core videos while only a handful of users like pictures, or so it seems. And no one is interested in catering to a minority. I will have a look at the DDF sites and Suze Randall and might subscribe it they are not too "Twisty"-ish. Picky, picky! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-13-08  01:57pm - 5853 days #4
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Well, messmer I don't expect much of a response to the thread, but thanks for your reply. Strangely enough, out of all the sites I mentioned, not one is genuinely British. Oh god, we lost the British car industry, now we don't even have a decent spanking site we can call our own.

There was other stuff I could have mentioned but the post was becoming far too long. One irritation I found with Girls Boarding School was that because a lot of the clips are cut up into two minute segments, you find a lot of the clips being tailored around this. There is quite often two strokes, then lots of talking, lots of walking around. There is a LOT of talking and walking around on GBS and not a lot of action. The videos do look good quality, whereas on Realspankings the earlier clips were better, but with poorer production values. The later clips, IMO had better production values but weren't as good.


I can't make a meaningful comment, squirrel, because I know nothing about the sites or subject except to commiserate because I've been disappointed so many times during the year+ I've been subscribing to various sites. I yet have to find one that doesn't have an irritant in it .. my biggest is the accursed SAMENESS when it comes to picture and video. They're stuck in a groove. Same postures, same actions, same irritating talk, same lack of context.

Aw, maybe it's me. Maybe, as Glover keeps saying in the "Lethal Weapon" movies: "I am getting too old for this sh*t!" :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-13-08  11:30am - 5853 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


SexyBabes.tv is a network of sites, including babelicious.com and dreambabes.com & eurobabez.com. This is all licensed material, so you may have seen this material posted on other sites if you have membership to other pic sites, such as Twisty's.

Twisty's network is also heavily pic-oriented.

The 21st sextury networks of sites lean heavily toward the pic content, though they also have vids - if you join lower rung sites on the network, such as MandyIsKinky.com, you get immediate access to more of the high-quality network sites quicker, then you have access to 2 more every month that you remain a member. Most of the best quality content, aside from the content on SweetSophieMoone.com, originates on ClubSandy.com & PixandVideo.com


Thanks, Pink Panther, I must have a look at these sites. I was a member of the 21st sextury network and loved the quality of their videos as well as of their pictures. The only complaint I had when I reviewed one of their sites was that the picture sets presented the same scene as the videos. It would have been my dream to see separate sets, model only, rather than (excellent, granted) stills of the hard core video. I'm not much into hard core unless it is g/g. That is quite tolerable! But as someone wrote earlier in another area, you can't have it all! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-13-08  09:12am - 5853 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

I have always preferred pictures to videos and was wondering if there are any Networks that carry sites that specialize in pictures? All the ones I've seen so far (Brazzer's, Reality Kings etc.) are hardcore video sites.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-13-08  09:05am - 5853 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Hi Squirrel, love of spanking and enemas appear to be two typically British "niches" as I've noticed over a long period of time as a Porn User. I would not call them perversions, they are fetishes and we all have at least one. I never take offense because I assume, with good reason, that both parties to a spanking agree to it wholeheartedly, but it's not my thing.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-09-08  07:55am - 5857 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


There was a comment by a comedian, who loved hardcore porn, about why he loved it. He said the difference between hardcore and softcore was that with softcore the girl is with someone and seemingly coming on to you, because there is no one else there. The fanatsy is you could have her, whereas in hardcore this is not the case because someone else is already having her.

I have always thought the kick from watching hardcore was that the beautiful people are paid to have sex for our entertainment, not imagining it was me in the porn clip. I have never thought it was about projecting my fantasy or imagining it was me having sex. I just consider annoying people in porn to be a distraction from what I want to watch. Just as I would consider someone scratching their fingernails down a blackboard to be a distraction while watching porn.

The reason I get annoyed at small irritating things in hardcore is for the same reason I get irritated at small distracting things when I'm having sex. The phone ringing, a car or house alarm constantly going off, people arguing outside - it's all a distraction and a bloody nuisance. That's why in porn, I hate the dork guy in front of the camera who can't shut the f**k up, or the cameraman who is constantly talking and being an idiot. They're a distraction and a total bloody nuisance. When that happens my fantasy is taking out a baseball bat, and beating the living shit out of them.

But as Cybertoad says, this is just my view on this. My guess is there are about a thousand others, all with different ideas of why we love porn.


I basically agree with your views when it comes to hardcore. I don't think there is a single video where I put myself in the scene, P.O.V. tries to make it easy but even then it takes more imagination then I possess. I think your remarks that people are being paid to perform for us are right on and I don't see anything creepy about it, even if someone else thought so. And I agree when it comes to irritants: my biggest one is the clicking of cameras during a scene which brings home the artificiality and calculated nature of the whole set-up. That's why I prefer pictures, soft core but showing pink, solo or g/g, at least they allow me to use my imagination.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-04-08  03:45pm - 5862 days #39
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


[off topic post for Denner]

Noting that Denner appears to be the sole Danish Voice of Porn here caused to me think what other great things/people came out of Denmark. Off the top of my head I can only think of four:

1. Hans Christian Anderson (who is currently rolling in his grave after seeing his creations get morphed in commercial crap after being swallowed by the Disney juggernaut);
2. The existentialist philosopher Soren Kierkegaard (who coined the phrase "leap of faith" and still has the best philosophical treatise title ever: "The Sickness Unto Death");
3. Niels Bohr (nobel winning nuclear physicist ... apparently the Dane's got tired of constantly being overrun by the German's and finally got someone to help build the ultimate deterrent - nuclear weapons!)
4. Those awesome tasting butter cookies that come in the big blue can (by far the best thing from Denmark that I know of ;)


5. The StrØget (where I bought my first porn magazine). Told you that Canada was restrictive until the age of the Internet when they finally had to take their thumb out of the Dyke because the flood couldn't be stopped.

6. Tivoli Gardens

7. Tuborg Lager Beer .. best beer in the world!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  06:07pm - 5863 days #36
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Drooler:


"Streaming only! Great!"

No, I don't think that's going to wind up in the "+" box of a PU review. DRM is like those tapes at the beginning of a Mission Impossible episode. (Boy, am I dating myself!). "This tape will now self-destruct in 3 seconds. SSssssssss."

Streaming would be like Phelps dialing up and listening on a secured line.

But for the sake of argument, should streaming ever become the modus operandi of Internet porn, I'll just delve into my substantial collection of already acquired, DRM-free I-porn.



LOL. Nicely put. I know I'd do the same thing, I'd look at all the stuff I'm holding in reserve, with the added advantage of being able to save a chunk of money on a monthly basis until that fad wears off.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  02:12pm - 5863 days #16
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Agree,
Yes this is true. I like a trim, not a cut lol.
I mean I do not want to have to break out a weedeater to get to the pond. But I also do not want desert sand in the Sahara either LOL
I am over teh hill and almost under it LOL so
I bush in the hand is worth a bird somewhere, as my mind wondered off into the forest .

What were we talking about?


Darned if I know, I'm over fifty! Oh, yeah, now I remember: hair! I remember reading all those smutty books in my misguided youth where the women always had a "luxuriant" bush and it was meant as a compliment.

However, trimmed is fine with me, too, even though I wouldn't turn away "luxuriant!" :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  11:22am - 5863 days #33
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Sorry if this is off topic, but I didn't know whether to make the comment here, or on the next big thing in porn thread. I do agree with Wittyguy when he says the the future is in streaming. There will be uproar from porn users if they try to stop downloading, but with the amount of free porn and copyright theft porn out there, it could well mean the end of downloading as we know it.

The price of porn at the moment is I think, astonishingly low (but don't tell the porn sites), so I can see a very large rise in prices for downloading material. I can see the cheaper wholesale video sites like Video Box go with downloads of older stuff, while the more independent sites stick with streaming. Then after that, they sell the older stuff to Video Box, or whoever. This is what happened when they first started releasing big movies on video. First run big movies were expensive to buy at first, some companies would do rental only. Either way you couldn't own a new big movie very cheaply. So it may go this way for first release porn.


I think streaming is fine when it comes to pre-viewing a video or while you are waiting for one to download and have nothing better to do, but I can't see it as the next trend.

Most of us are basically collectors and streaming only would be just as distasteful to us as DRM.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  11:18am - 5863 days #32
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		PU, the reviews, the comments, the forum are highly addictive! I find myself coming to this place various times during the day and night in order to mingle as well as get the latest!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  11:05am - 5863 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jd1961:


And don't get me started on the mandatory crotch shaving. I think it's a law in pornoville.


LOL. I just had to go to look up your age, it seems that most under twenty-five almost insist that the model be shaved and hair is now considered distasteful or, worse yet, a fetish, where only a generation ago shaving was considered to be kinky! Unless you are talking about the act of shaving itself. I haven't come across too many of those in the videos I watch.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  09:22am - 5863 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


Oh please please god don't let them bring back plot lines, or talking in porn! Those old fashioned plots had 50 minutes of talking and 10 minutes of action.

I think it was John Stagliano (Buttman) who really got the genre started. He developed his style as video gradually took over from film. I think very few porn makers produce the same quality as Stagliano. He is one of the few who seems to genuinely enjoy what he is doing. He sadly caught HIV but still makes porn with a passion that most of the others do not have.



Talking about old times, some of the most erotic movies I've been privileged to watch over a life time were main stream, mostly story and had very little "action." Never ending hardcore action has never been erotic in my eyes. I need the trimmings as well as the bird! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-03-08  09:13am - 5863 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Hilarious. I wish I had your gift, wittyguy. Thanks for making my day (using Clint Eastwood voice).
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

12-02-08  04:08pm - 5864 days #8
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by jd1961:


Gonzo porn was great when it first arrived on the scene because most of it had a sense of humor to it, like "Shut Up And Blow Me", but nowadays it's pretty grim and most of it shows rutting scenes with a lot of guys furtively pulling their puds, and all the stupid cliches like hair pulling and spitting, and ugh...


The spitting really gets me. Also irritating, but on a lesser scale, is the model slapping her own butt in every second scene you watch! I'm not particularly keen on Gonzo but can see why there is so much of it. It made it easy for producers to churn out DVDs by the thousands because all you need is a couple of actors and a camera. I sure miss the old fashioned story lines leading up to sex, as inept and corny as they were at times.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-28-08  07:37am - 5868 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheSquirrel:


There's usually very little coincidence involved when money's at stake. I know they are considered generally trustworthy by the people here, but they have just about the worst exchange rate for converting dollars into pounds. Denner, I think they are all devious in their own way, certainly from what I have read on the forums and reviews. What Jeffrey has said about Epoch makes me very wary of them too.


I keep using CCBill because I consider them trustworthy but you are absolutely right when it comes to ripping off customers when it comes to the exchange of foreign currency. One site I subscribed to a few months ago when the Canadian Dollar and the U.S. Dollar were almost at par listed the US price at $19.95 and they charged me $ 26.00 Canadian. Epoch is better when it comes to conversion (extra charges.)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-27-08  06:32pm - 5869 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I don't think I'm being to naive in saying that I believe that for the most part we all give honest scores to our reviews. We may not agree on the actual number, but that is why it's very important to have a detailed review to justify that score. Of course if the score and the review
don't seem to make sense then I tend to assume that this particular reviewer as an ulterior motive. For me a 100% score is not possible, because I don't believe there is never a possibility of improving something.


Totally agree!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-27-08  06:06pm - 5869 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Just had to poke my two cents i here :-)
I actually do not think abby winter was all that great :-)

My point being , that being fair to one site may not be fair to another.

I take only my own point of view in consideration when placing a review. I have taken great inputs on how to go about a review. But why ia m fair the niche and how goo they are only plays a small part for me, i am more concerned how they do what they do.

Again just my input and two cents.



Fair enough, re. Abby Winters, that's where subjectivity comes in again. I rated it by its faithfulness to its niche. I don't know of any other site with the exception of another Oz site, Girls Out West, whose amateurs look like amateurs. Most other "amateur" sites take the amateurs and then make them up to look like pros. That's one of the reasons why AW got a high mark from me. There were others as well, of course, the lay-out, a very good search engine, an abundance of models. I will grant you that a site that true to its niche can sometimes become boring if you stay longer than a month but I still stick by my assessment of it! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-27-08  01:31pm - 5869 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Just a small observation. When doing a review you not only have to be fair to the site but also to all the competing sites in a particular niche. That's why two of my ratings were over 90. Both Abby Winters and Girls Out West are the best in their field you have to rate them higher than the many inferior sites in the Amateur niche, even if they are not perfect.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-27-08  01:06pm - 5869 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Khan:


Here in the US we're celebrating Thanksgiving today. Here's wishing all our users have a safe and happy holiday.


Happy Thanksgiving, Khan. We celebrated ours a month ago, may yours be as good .. and I am thankful to you and the staff for creating such a great place for us where non-mainstream views can be so freely expressed.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-22-08  02:07pm - 5874 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


A number of reasonably big name porn stars will do private shows, but if you want to be a part of that show, you'll need to get tested by an approved facility. I can't recall the name of the porn star testing agency, but they certify a set number of places, and usually the star will require papers certifying that you aren't carrying any disease from one of those certified testing places - even if you use a condom. After a few incidents, the industry has become quite careful considering the prevalence of condom-free porn. That said, it would certainly be much easier to use a normal escort service.

Still, the U.S. is prudish both socially and legally about prostitution. Socially, it is very rare to hear any American talking about using any form of prostitution - most people aren't even remotely comfortable with the idea, even when visiting countries where it is very legal. As for the legality issue, you can end up being labeled a Sexual Offender which may require you to notify your neighbors that you are a sexual offender whenever you move and have your address listed on public awareness sites. Personally, I think going for a toss in the hay with a working girl is very different from raping children, but the government doesn't always see it that way.


Canada is prudish and illogical, too. Just like the U.S., if not worse! Being European in origin I have always marveled at the stupidity of making a movie R rated because some actress is taking a shower in it, while they rate a slasher movie PG. Go figure the mindset of the censors!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-22-08  02:01pm - 5874 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Hey, WWW, nothing to do with the subject I know but I love your avatar! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-22-08  01:57pm - 5874 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		My favorite was Leslie, formerly found at Aunt Judy's I think, then they moved her to their Archives. I'm not sure if she's still modeling.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-16-08  10:29am - 5880 days #37
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I like to see the flaws in my women.


Many of us do! But I'm afraid you are right, many more
don't otherwise we wouldn't see all that silicone and that photoshop look with so many models, and sites like Twisty's wouldn't be so popular. Looking at Playboy has ruined a whole generation! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-15-08  10:28am - 5881 days #35
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:



Until then I think the interim next big thing is going to be natural bods/absence of photo-shopping - at least I freaking hope so! I am so sick of the photo-shopping/painting/shellacing of pics of great looking women!



You and I, both! And I fervently hope you're right!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-15-08  07:03am - 5881 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by IKnoPorn:


"Don't bother answering" ??? Really ?????

Take a cold shower, don't masturbate or have sex or look at porn for a week, maybe go camping (right now would be perfect, you'd freeze your ass off) then come back. You might change your mind.


Thanks, your reply was very helpful! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-14-08  06:37pm - 5882 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

It is almost as if every web site featuring pictures of solo models has gone into automatic cruise mode.

Be it ATK, Older Women, Aunt Judy's, AllOver30, Twisty's, some of the better known ones, all seem to have developed the same style of wooden photography with the models basically in the same outfits, the same posture, the same situation .. office, kitchen, locker room, class room and that infamous ante-room to the shower used for all those interminable make-up shots (you need to go to Aunt Judy's and Older Women for those).

You might accuse me of becoming jaded and that there are only so many scenarios one can play with but I was at a site yesterday that still featured a lot of the models of the past, taken in the past, between 1999 and 2003 and while the picture quality was poor the sets themselves were exciting in the way the models posed, the clothes they wore (more), the sets they had been placed in, the ability of the photographers to bring the best out of their models.

They seemed to be more erotic and exciting, while nowadays every site and its photographers appear to be imitating the others.

It is almost as if the photographer goes for a cup of coffee after telling the model, just get undressed while his camera is set to automatically take a picture every two seconds without a human operator, and where the model, lacking direction, indifferently takes off the three or four items she's allowed to wear in a series of 150 pictures.

That's why on some sites one can see up to fifty pictures of a model taking off her suit jacket. At least that's the only explanation I have for the poor and listless quality of most sets.

There are exceptions of course but there is a numbing sameness to the whole thing that's beginning to be hard to ignore.

Don't bother answering because I'm just having a little half depressed nostalgia party all by myself while pining for the good old days of porn where you could expect something different and exciting now and then, be it in pictures or videos. Man, I think I'm getting old! :-(
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-14-08  02:03pm - 5882 days #26
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


I never got any discounts for any of my memberships, but then it's been over a year since I had one at SC.

I have many faves that I check up on from time to time. One was PJ, but I don't see her there anymore. I had a long email exchange with her and she sent me a very long list of her various appearances on the net. I am having trouble with names at the moment....

One gal to definitely look at is named Azzy. Currently she is 51 and has an INCREDIBLE bod for those years (not that I'm far behind!). There are several models over the age of *sixty* who are still worth looking at.

Yes, my ex was beautiful. I hope I can say that now that I'm divorced and not sound like I'm bragging. She was beautiful, yes, but she was the devil on skates. Tricksy little hobbit she was.....



Sorry about the divorce, www. Couldn't have been easy! And thanks for the tip, I'll have a look at Azzy!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-14-08  12:56pm - 5882 days #2
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Denner:


Been wondering about this for quite some time:
WHY does almost every US pornvid (and even now a lot of euro ditto) has to end up with socalled facials.
No matter how fine (og bad) rest of the scene is, it has to end up with the male actor jerking himself off in the face/eyes/mouth/nose of some sweet girl/woman - is it not that way in about 80-90% of all hc-videos?
Ok, some (a few) scenes the girl is able to do the final jerk a male actor off to ejaculation. (much better)
What is it with that facials - is it some latent wish with all/most US pornusers - even a lot of sites do a great number of swallows.

How many PUs do actually end thier own sex with partners - girlfriends, lovers, wife or other jerking them self off in their face?
Pardon me, but do it has something to do with the fact that oral sex for a period once was official banned in the US?

Ok, pornflics also focus on male ejaculation, but to me it seems quite as good to watch it between tits, on stomach (after fucking) or back after doggystyle - I think its called. Anyway I still do not get the erotic feeling when a girls/models face gets covered in sperm - maybe I'm a bit old fashioned, but like some views....



I think facials came about as a search for that which is different. Ever since the Internet removed the barriers concerning sex many porn users have become jaded when it comes to ordinary intercourse or to oral sex. I am not keen on facials either but I know that I quickly switch channels on late night TV when they show yet another movie with a lady doing a bj on Randy Spears. Ho hum, I've seen it hundreds of times before, show me something different. That's why anal is big at the moment, that's why facials are big .. shock value. However, that too shall become ho hum and we can only guess what will be next .. if it isn't censorship! And that's why I still mostly prefer pictures to videos because they allow me to create my own fantasies, which is always more exciting than raw reality.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-14-08  10:48am - 5882 days #24
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by WeeWillyWinky:


I've had Southern Charms in my bookmarks for years. Almost had the wife with her own site there until she chickened out. Damn, she would have been popular! Ah well...

Anyway, one thing I like about SC is the abundance of free pics. Unless they've changed things in the last month or so, you can get full-sized samples from every single updated set on the whole site. Last time I visited there was an SC TGP, a giant list of recently updated sites, and a whizzing advanced search utility.

I subbed to over a dozen models there. My favorite was an exotic model who went by the name of Chantel at ATK, and that may have been her name at SC, but I can't remember. I emailed her and she emailed me back. I was in love.

Then the little boy fell out of bed and woke up... :)



Knowing your exquisite taste I would have subscribed to your wife's site, www. :-) I have two favorites on SC even though I never subscribed. One is Camilla, the other is Celeste. The one thing that always stopped me was the "subscription to one model" factor (if I read the site's policy right). A given model's previous sets could be downloaded in a day and after that you would be forever waiting for updates. Plus, some of the updates are not so hot. Why do so many models at SC decide to get into a red Santa suit at this time of the year, for instance? I hate cute! :-) Or she might decide to retire as many of them do.

Do you get any discounts if you subscribe to multiple ladies? That is a real tempting site for me. True amateurs doing it more for the thrill than for the money, or at least so it appears.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-10-08  09:25am - 5886 days #22
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


Yea messmer you have mentioned it before, I am very sympathetic to your case as we both share a love for older women (although not quite the same way). I however have a very strong foot fetish that can make up for a dearth quantity in mature porn (would love to see a site truly combine both). Anyway I gave you some ideas the first time you posted about this, I guess I'll try again.

The mature market is dominated by Europeans unfortunately. I don't much care for Euro porn (for a number of reasons), but I have subscribed to a few sites that were to good to pass up (namely LustyGrannies and Mature.NL). The Europeans tend to have a much more liberal view of sexuality as something to be enjoyed by all ages. Here in North America, particularly the U.S sex is only supposed to be for younger people. I think we are just now starting to come around (hence the derogatory term "milf"). I think in the years ahead we will see more and better quality mature sites. The opportunities for market growth in porn is in the fetish market, the mainstream stuff is already way over saturated.

Anyhow I do have at least three site ideas for you based on what I THINK your tastes are (no offense, but you seem a little picky). Here goes:

1. Village Ladies, villageladies.co.uk
This is a British based site that focuses on amateur women 40 and up. Lots of Lingerie, seemingly huge archive (based on my observation). I have not subscribed here yet, but it is on my list.

2. Dixie Cuties, dixiecuties.com
This site is really amateur, based on submitted pics. I have found some gems here though

3. Southern Charms, http://www.southerncharms.com
These are a bunch of individual model sites with most of the women being North American. I know it's expensive at $14.95 for one model, but if you really do enjoy mature women, I defy you not to find a bunch here to like.

The first one I know you'll like (if you haven't already seen it). The other two I know are a reach but you might as well have a look.



No offense taken and you are right about the Village Ladies, malikstarks. I have a few sets of theirs in my possession. Only trouble is since I got the new widescreen, high pixel monitor their pictures don't look so good any more! :-( Must check if they are now offering them in a larger size. Southern Charms drove me crazy because I didn't know on whom to settle (figuratively speaking):-).

My favorite site to try would be Mature.NL but their monthly subscription price puts them out of reach of the average person. At the moment it would be close to seventy bucks Canadian for one month! Thanks for refreshing my memory. Off to take a look at VL and SC once again!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-10-08  08:05am - 5886 days #21
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by shooterbo:


If you use this websites "search" window and plug in the word "mature", you will be presented with 259 websites to check into. If there is nothing there for you, I don't know what to tell you.


You did your best, shooterbo!! That's all anyone can ask for. :-) Some folks are just plain fickle!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-10-08  08:03am - 5886 days #20
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by David19:


My mother, who is 41 years old, is a chathost on ifriends.net. ifriends has chathosts of all ages but there are quite a number who are definitely over 40 and some over 50. I've visited her room on ifriends.net from time to time and she is definitely hot.


Thanks, David, but I'm definitely not into chatting. My wife would not appreciate it! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-03-08  07:34pm - 5893 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Toadsith:


In a nut shell, reviewers with older display technology will usually perceive smaller resolution videos better than reviewers with newer display technology. The reviewer with the small display will automatically perceive a video that is the same size as the native resolution as his display as being as crisp as possible - because, for that display, it is as crisp as possible. Any videos above that resolution will be down converted to that resolution in order to fit on the screen.


Welcome back and I am truly awed, Toadsith! Incredible knowledge concerning computering! I am the person for whom Windows was invented so, in sincere humility, I bow before the master! :-)

And you answered my question with your statement above. Thanks! No wonder other reviewers and I seem to be on such different wave lengths at times.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-03-08  12:59pm - 5893 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I am not sure what kind of monitor you have or video card or player all these can affect the output so here is some baisics.

Ok heres a small lesson we all remember the old monitors well, The character size on a 15-inch monitor at 800- by 600-pixel resolution is almost identical to that on a 21-inch monitor at 1280 by 1024 pixels.

Another factor you should consider when choosing your resolution size is the screen refresh rate. Depending on your video card capabilities and your monitor size and capabilities, you can adjust how often the screen refreshes (measured in hertz) (see Display Properties in Windows Control Panel). The faster you can adjust this, the easier it will be on your eyes. I prefer mine at 70 hertz. But when you increase the resolution, the available refresh rates that your monitor can do will decrease. (i.e. moving resolution up from 1024x768 to 1280x1024 may reduce the available refresh rates from 100 Hz to 90 Hz - just an example, don't know exactly what the numbers would be)

So the point being why the resolution may increase your refresh may decrease this is why , even though my monitor will show a wider bigger screen, the picture is clear and
smooth at a lower resolution, I run a 512mb vdeo card and my monitor maxes at 70. So I lower the refresh to 65 and decrease the monitor resolution . This doesnt make it as big as it an be but makes it dam clear and quality is better.


You can take avantage of a big screen without stretching the videos to the max.
It will fill the screen not stretch the resolution if you make the scren resolution smaller and max the refesh rate.

You may need to play around with it some but this is what works for me I use KMplayer and WMP

TRue: bigger is better, but only if your monitor, and video card allow for both to be maxed if not lower it a slight amount you may be surprised it will look better.
My HD alows what ever I want so I picked a nice medium fo doing work and watching video surfin etc.

Hope this helps.


Cybertoad


Thanks, Cybertoad, for going to this length to help me. My basic problem was that I wanted to decrease the pixels but keep the wide screen, just to see if some of the videos that had been praised by others and were found wanting by me looked better with a lower setting. No matter what resolution I tried I ended up with a 4:3 ratio desk top rather than a wide screen one. With my previous operating system/graphics card I could always preview the dimensions in connection with any given setting but with this graphics card I can't. Is wide screen even possible if I reduce the default setting (1680x1060)?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-02-08  11:42am - 5894 days #7
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Yea , mine has a preview on it le me see what I can get it Toadsith doesnt figure for ya. Busy day today.


Thanks, cybertoad, much appreciated!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-02-08  07:46am - 5894 days #14
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


I'm a Drug Counselor will that help :-)


Nope! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-02-08  07:43am - 5894 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Me thinks that Toadsith, the forum master, would probably have the answer on this one.


Thanks, so, Toadsith where are you? :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-01-08  02:21pm - 5895 days #3
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Cybertoad:


Heres a hint that I use personally, I have a 22in wide screen HD LCD. Top resolution is 1680x1050
1680x 1050 is not possible by most videos my monitors max at 75hz's But this is not a practical size for videos heres why!

First on my monitor 1280 x 1024 on this makes so so videos nice. Will vary depending what size you have.

I will get a better resolution if I lower this still but makes for 1 inch size icons so I do not do that.
1162x864 is about as big /small as I can go and still have quality, but the icons are bigger still. But the video is still better.

Note that the use of the word resolution here is misleading. The term "display resolution" is usually used to mean pixel dimensions (e.g., 1280&#65533;1024), which does not tell you anything about the resolution of the display on which the image is actually formed (which would typically be given in pixels per inch (digital) or number of lines measured horizontally, per picture height (analog)).
The display resolution of a digital television or computer display typically refers to the number of distinct pixels in each dimension that can be displayed.
So if you lower the screen size the required resolution or pixels needed drops making a smoother picture.

The trade off is that why this makes great video you lose screen size for documents, a browser etc as the screen content will be larger.

This make sense hope so if not let me know.

Cybertoad.


Hey Cybertoad, thanks! I, too, have a 22" monitor (actually officially it's a 21.5" Samsung widescreen. So, a 1280x1024 pixels setting would actually make a video look better? At least that's how I read it. I tried various settings yesterday but always ended up with the old 4:3 format for my desktop. :-) I wouldn't mind losing some desktop space if 1280x1024 is helpful and doesn't cause deterioration to pictures and videos. Let me know if I read you right! Please!

P.S. Just came back from resetting to 1280x1084 and still came up with the old 4:3 format rather than widescreen. What's the correct number for widescreen. My present graphics card doesn't give me a preview. Thanks again. Edited on Nov 01, 2008, 02:25pm
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-01-08  09:15am - 5895 days Original Post - #1
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada

I appear to have too many differences of opinion with others of our members when it comes to the quality of videos on certain sites. They will praise them in their reviews while to me they look blurry and far from adequate.

No it's not my eyes, HD still looks spectacular, no matter what site I download it from and anything with a bitrate of 2000 and higher usually also looks pretty good as well.

So here's my question to a tekkie, if we have one in our midst: would the pixel setting in my monitor (1680x1050) affect older material so it doesn't look quite as good to me as it would to others with a lower setting?

This is important because the lower rating I give a site is often based on what I perceive to be the poor video quality.
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

11-01-08  08:56am - 5895 days #11
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by badandy400:


People seem to search out the stuff someone says they should not watch. Any time you hear about a video from somewhere that makes the news it gets pulled from places like youtube, but people then seek it elsewhere when normally they would have never cared about it. I guess it is a desire to be"in the circle" of people who know what it is others are talking about.

Pat is very right, these guys are completely stupid. I wonder if they ended up regretting doing these things the next day?

I still hold in my belief that if you do not want to see something you simply do not seek it out. This kind of thing is not something you find just anywhere on the internet.

As for the censorship, I am tending to the side that making videos of this should not be viewed as illegal, but perhaps the actual activity should be considered, of course then someone would just say it is their religion. Video websites have the option of not showing this type of thing, so I believe censorship can be left to the people to decide on themselves and no legal intervention is needed in this case.

The question still remains unanswered though. What would possess a people to willing slice themselves open? Perhaps these people do not even know themselves. One answer might be they are just looking to shock people. Okay, I am shocked, but my penis is still in one piece, theirs is not. So after the shock subsides it ends up being pointless unless for some self gratification that 99.99% of us could never understand.



We need our resident Psychologist to look in on this thread. (I forget his handle at the moment: exotics4me?)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-31-08  07:03am - 5896 days #48
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


I have Videotron cable internet, and until late last year I had unlimited downloads. Trust me when I say that 100G gets used up really quickly when you are downloading HD stuff.


Don't I know it! You wouldn't believe how much I had to delete to make room on my hard drive for the latest HD Videos from FTV Girls and "In The Crack!" :-) Is there another ISP you could turn to or do they all limit downloads in your area?
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-30-08  03:51pm - 5897 days #13
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Well, I know that Abby Winters is the only site I ever subscribed to without consulting TBP and PU first. So to all the sites that got my dollar since Sept. 07 be thankful to the folks of TBP for their reviews, links and discounts! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-30-08  03:26pm - 5897 days #5
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada 		Boy, that's a tough one. You are right when you say that self-mutilation or allowing yourself to be mutilated isn't porn. It's a mental illness.

For whatever reason: low self-esteem, extreme guilt .. these people are trying to purge their souls of whatever is eating away at them inside.

You see the religious manifestations of this phenomenon in the Philippines on any Good Friday when TV shows videos of people flogging themselves until they bleed.

Who knows, maybe there's such extreme guilt in connection with their sexual urges inside the people you mentioned that they somehow try to destroy their sexuality that way or at least punish themselves severely for it.

However, seeing that I'm not a Psychologist or Psychiatrist I'm only guessing. Human nature is too complicated and unpredictable for me to ever understand it. I don't even understand myself!
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-30-08  09:16am - 5897 days #46
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by pat362:


It's probably true that for the most part ISP's do not get direct money from porn, but I'm pretty sure that a fair amount of their customers use their service to surf for porn. I know, I do. If tomorrow, I can no longer surf porn because every site is blocked, then I will cancel my ultra hi-speed service and get regular speed. To give you an idea ultra hi-speed is about 70$ while regular is 20$. How many businesses can afford to lose 65% of their profit?


Boy, I'm glad I don't live where you live! My ultra highspeed costs $ 49.00 with no limitations as to how much I can download over a given period. At least not yet!

There's always the possibility that they might take a look at Rogers' business model (if it is Rogers) and say: hmm, 100 Gigs, that's not a bad idea! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-30-08  08:45am - 5897 days #15
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by shooterbo:


In the Reality Kings family the subsite See My Wife is exactley what you want, and it is the only pure "amateur" site that I know.


Thanks for the tip, shooterbo. How big is this site? Big enough to make it worth a subscription to "Reality Kings?"
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-25-08  05:48pm - 5902 days #42
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by PinkPanther:


It actually would be a great time for a Canadian vacation - and currency valuation definitely matters. I went on a tip to Europe mid-September - Hungary, Slovakia, Austria, Czech Republic - and the US dollar was so beaten up there was nothing cheap about any of those places - plus people in the Czech Republic just can't cook - anything. They need to get some Hungarians to come over and teach them, cause it's disgusting how bad it is - as bad as England was when I was there, but at least in England you could go to a Pakistani restaurant and get decent food. Nobody can cook, it seems, in the Czech Republic.

This bit with the incredibly fast slide of the Canadian currency, though, that's pretty intense. My sympathies.

As to this thing about pricing - does pricing matter? Of course it does! Unless you're wealthy - in which case, you're probably hiring expensive escorts instead, then price is a big deal. I've joined a site every once in a while that was more than $25 a month, but never for very long at all. I'll be much more likely to join a site for multiple months to get the lower price, than to pay a higher monthly price - and if I don't think the site is going to be worth joining for the longer period, then I'll skip it altogether.


I doubt if I'll get back to Europe soon but thanks for the tip re. Czech food. I didn't think it was possible to get a bad meal in Europe (England excluded .. but before anyone from the U.K. takes offense, I hear that the food has improved considerably since I was there last). And thanks for the expression of sympathy regarding the precipitous slide of the Canadian Dollar. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-25-08  09:10am - 5902 days #12
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by nygiants03:


Speaking of older woman, I wouldn't mind seeing Sarah Palin nude. Any sites where older woman dress up and have that hot nerdy look?


That's my kind of site, as long as they undress as well! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-24-08  06:35pm - 5903 days #10
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by Wittyguy:


Just to let you know, 40somethingmagazine (I think the webste is www.40somethingmag.com but can't recall) does have pics and vids of women in their 30's to 60's. They a monthly special at $20 going right now. I've never been a member but seen some of the previews through the other sites associated with the production company and the quality looks pretty good and you won't find teeny boppers there.


Thanks, Wittyguy. I am aware of 40somethingmag.com. As a matter of fact I may have made some replies to various reviews or even a remark or two concerning their huge and intrusive logo. That great big yellow watermark, usually right at the top of the picture, has stopped me effectively from subscribing to one of a handful of sites that would actually suit my taste. In many pictures you don't even have the room to crop the water mark without destroying part of the body, in most cases the head.

If you are a member at present maybe you could ask the webmaster why they do their utmost to make each picture look like the cover of a magazine rather than just the first one of a set. I do appreciate your mention of this site, too bad ..... see above! :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

10-24-08  06:20pm - 5903 days #9
messmer (0)
Disabled User



Posts: 2,582
Registered: Sep 12, '07
Location: Canada
Originally Posted by TheRizzo:


I believe the problem with truly older women is that they just are not as easy to find willing to do porn shoots. Especially if these sites try to keep standards of beauty in the mix. Women tend to be wild and free and want the rush or enjoy doing porn when younger, but a lot of them change their tunes as they get older.

Thats my take on it. I know I emailed the webmaster at All Over 30 and he said they actively try to get women over 40 and even harder to get them over 50 but they just are extremely hard to come by.


I have the feeling that you are right, Rizzo! That would account for the paucity of sites for more mature people. Ah, well, my porn buying has been temporarily put on hold anyway, until our dollar (Canadian) improves, so no harm done. Maybe by the time it's back at par with the greenback some "Grandmas" may just have become bold enough in the meantime to allow themselves be photographed /video taped for those of us who appreciate their charms. :-)
Register or Log-In Above to Reply.

2351-2400 of 2588 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 9 16 23 30 37 47 Page 48 49 50 51 52 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.

Loaded in 0.08 seconds.