|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
turboshaft (0)
|
| 1901-1950 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 38 | Page 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
| 02-12-09 07:09pm - 5791 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
B/g are not my favorite either, and I think because it tends to actually ruin the fantasy for me. Instead of just one (or more) beautiful girl(s), there's some dude taking over and seemingly calling the shots. Okay, unless it's just a one-on-one POV, then he probably is not really in charge, but the simple fact that there is a guy present fills in where my imagination normally would. I almost universally cannot compete physically or sexually with even a fraction of what I see porn studs do, so generally the less I see of them the better. I don't mind the occasional b/g, but too often and it ends up heightening the reality of what I see onscreen (regardless of how little of it is actually real), rather than whatever twisted fantasies I think up in my mind. Some of my all time favorite models over the years have been ones who have only done solo or girl-girl work, or that was all I had seen of them. All too often I eventually see a girl's b/g work and have been strangely disappointed, as if all the hype I had worked up in my head was too good to be true. If I never see a girl do a b/g scene, I can always imagine things like Well, she might do this, or I bet she likes this with a guy, but when reality finally appears, it can be a cold, unsatisfying slap in the face. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-11-09 11:33am - 5793 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Off topic here, but Wittyguy you have a hilarious new avatar -- I almost forget about the Berenstain Bears! I definitely don't remember that line in any of the books, though it has been a few years since I last read them. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-07-09 04:38pm - 5797 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, it's probably Rocco's gentlest role, and that's saying a lot for him. I loved "Frivolous Lola" (Monella); it is very lighthearted but dirty, and the pacing really makes for a fun viewing. The looks that the male characters -- including Brass in his typical dirty old man role -- give to Lola whenever she's around are priceless. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 01:25pm - 5798 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Sometimes these closeups get a little awkward because they have to fit the camera and a burning hot light between the guy's legs, then when he changes positions sometimes he'll just throw it into reverse and bump into the camera. I always laugh at these moments because I can't understand why they don't choose to edit these out. Another camera-bumping culprit is these stupid platform high heels that every girl seems to be required to wear at some time or another, and usually through the whole damn scene! They look uncomfortable to the girl, and potentially eye-gouging or testicle-smacking to the guy, never mind how often they swing into the side of the camera equipment. These weird closeup angles never look very comfortable for the guy. The girl will be on the edge of a bed or couch and the guy leans in from one side or the other, one hand on the couch or bed and the other at his waist like he's stretching his back. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 01:00pm - 5798 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I really liked "Romance" -- Caroline Ducey is a beautiful actress! Plus, including Rocco as a character makes for some interesting scenes. How do the French do it? Maybe it's just genetic, but they have made some fine films with explicit sex in them. Tinto Brass makes erotic comedies that I find very entertaining. His focus on the female behind, as well as his characters' constant pursuit of it, is hilarious and not entirely fictional either. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-06-09 12:44pm - 5798 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I would not consider any of these strictly porn just because they are pretty soft, but they are classics. I have seen a more recent one, "Emmanuelle's Intimate Encounters," which was made in 2000. It has a terrible plot but it stars Holly Sampson (aka Zoe from ALS Scan) pre-implants, and she looks incredible. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 08:22pm - 5798 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I have seen nowhere near the amount of porn that other users here have, and nowhere near the amount of classic porn either. Any of the classic porn I have seen (say, made 20 or more years ago as a rough guide) is sort of out of context since I saw it years after it was shot. So I was wondering: what porn, if any, do users consider timeless? That is, what has aged well, and is still as good, nearly as good, or even better than the first time they saw it? I am asking this as a question of what users think should be preserved for future generations of perverts, a sort of Global Porn Vault (like the Svalbard Global Seed Vault in Norway) in the event of some horrible electronic apocalypse, or a large scale disaster that depleted our current porn stocks. It seems to make sense to start with what classics we should preserve, then work our way up to more contemporary material, but any suggestions on work that could withstand the sands of time is welcome. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 07:32pm - 5798 days | #56 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Thanks! You are definitely right about the porn leftovers; I am still enjoying a few things from the '90s. Granted, it's not much, but some porn can age quite well, while a lot can get stale really quickly. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 12:17pm - 5799 days | #54 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
That's pretty funny, but we are all guilty of thinking we somehow outsmarted the inevitability of obsolescence. Every single time I buy some sort of electronic I always think "I am so smart, this is more than enough space/speed/coolness to suit my needs." Then a few months later reality slaps me in the face for being such a know-it-all ass. It's kind of a reverse of when you're hungry and your eyes and brain are bigger than your stomach, so you take more than you can eat. (Actually, I tend to have this problem with big sites, but instead of my stomach it's my hard drive.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-05-09 11:52am - 5799 days | #32 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I am sort of with badandy400 on this one, seeing someone with a T-shirt and realizing they are a member would be a mix of cool and creepy. The web gives us the luxury of sharing our thoughts without actually having to see each other or travel, at least beyond our desks. Maybe some sort of subliminal advertising would be cool; you see an ad and subconsciously become aware that you must go to PU, but you are not sure why. Very small grass roots advertising would be pretty funny too; imagine some college kid at a big sporting event or concert passing out stickers with a PU logo on it. (I just mention this since I am in school and have to deal with idiots passing out brochures about awareness and diversity every hour of every day, which are nowhere near as interesting as this site.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-03-09 01:31pm - 5801 days | #17 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Just a guess, but is it some illustration for "20,000 Leagues Under The Sea?" "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-03-09 01:28pm - 5801 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
InTheCrack seems to pretty good at this, that is NOT talking! It is amazing to watch an entire video and not hear the cameraman/director/resident creep chime in with their words of wisdom. Sadly, I am so conditioned to hearing some douchebag's thoughts (uh, including my own occasionally) that a silent video can take some getting used to. I personally don't like hearing my own voice on camera, so I could never imagine speaking as much as some of these guys (they are 99% guys) do, much less in such a repetitive and corny way; "Ooo, you're so hot/nasty/slutty. What's your age/measurements/fantasies/ideal penis size?" Granted, few models have much worth saying, but these interrogations are so routine, why would they even try? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-02-09 10:17pm - 5801 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Wittyguy touched on this subject somewhat with a past thread about infidelity and porn, but I was wondering if marriage and porn can coexist -- practically and peacefully, and I mean more than it being just a little secret from a spouse. I am not married myself, so I cannot really answer the question, and I was wondering what users thought, but the prospect of having to give up porn for a marriage would make me look for a new partner. Therefore, at least in my case, the two would have to coexist, otherwise there would simply be no marriage. I also think that that porn could help as much as it could hurt a marriage. I will make a guess and say people would probably rather catch a spouse with some porn than with some stranger; but on the other hand I could see it being the cause for some divide in, or even the end of, a relationship. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-02-09 02:23pm - 5802 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It would be interesting if some of these companies did try and really create something, rather than just spit out one video after another. I would love to see something that was really edited, instead of the usual two or three loooong takes with a couple of jump cuts thrown in to hide the girl wiping her ass or the guy's effort to furiously whack his way to the finish. Oh, and are there cameramen and women who can keep their damn hands of the zoom buttons? It seems like every site has a strict policy of constant zooming in/out, as if lenses movement is more important than the talent's actions. I have yet to meet anyone who can naturally magnify their vision and just zoom in on something, so lots of zooms are very unnatural visually. I understand everyone loves good closeups in porn, but a little patience and control would be a welcome miracle. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 02-02-09 01:58pm - 5802 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I don't think I really want to direct because of the potential of so much frustration with the talent, plus the limits of equipment, set, crew, etc. I would much rather edit, or just be on set as a photographer but not as a director. I would not want to have to yell at my favorite actress or lose my temper over something I thought I loved. I am sure there has always been options for those who could afford to have an imperial-level of control over sex, or at least sexual entertainment, without any of the real work required of a director. I think directors do it because they love porn and/or they want to make it better, or they are simply working towards "legitimate" entertainment, and the repetitiveness and workload are a part of the job. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-31-09 11:34am - 5804 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This is why I like solo girl stuff -- no guy choking or stretching a girl within an inch of her life, plus it seems more comfortable for them, and they don't have to put on the same 'ol me-so-nasty act. None of this Circus Sex is that new, but it now feels like the standard in American porn. I do not necessarily find it so much degrading as simply boring and repetitive, so when I watch a video it can be hard to tell what studio shot it because they all look and act exactly the same. Some poor girl is just such a horny/nasty/whatever slut that she wants to get thrown around/beat up/gagged/used as a spittoon until the guy feels that it's time to jerk his way to the finish line. I have lost count of how many times I have seen this from multiple studios over the past few years. Sometimes the girl is very attractive and even gets into it, but with all the tears and spit smearing her makeup so she looks like some kind of sex clown, it can be pretty hard to enjoy. Maybe we can blame somebody like Max Hardcore, but I don't think he wanted his style to become a standard, because now his videos don't seem as outlandish or really very different. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 02:55pm - 5806 days | #28 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I only have three external hard drives -- 500GB x2, and 300GB x1 -- and only one of these is for porn (a nearly full 500 GB drive). With your setup it sounds like you should have a complex shelf and cooling system built to handle the heat (and I am not talking about "passion" here) of all that wonderful material. Plus, with all that equipment it seems like you really are some sort of double agent organizing all the confiscated obscene material for the government, but your true loyalty is with the porn industry, with whom you share an off-the-books, unspoken professional relationship. Officially you do not exist, but you are legend within the porn world -- viva badandy400! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 02:30pm - 5806 days | #7 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I honestly miss the writing a little too. Now, thanks to all the Maxims and their spawns, you have practically as much nudity as Playboy without actually be a nudie mag. Plus, their "articles" are little more than advertisements simply telling you what to wear, eat, drink, think, and then what pill to swallow to make it all feel better. Most sites are no better because you have too many douchebags making porn just to "meet lots of women" and score some cash, so when they try writing something on their site, well...it don't read very good much. At least Playboy actually published articles (considerably more than 100 words) that were written by writers, and employed real photographers as well. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-29-09 02:14pm - 5806 days | #38 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, I read this bog too; very funny. He did not actually name FTV Girls, but I had my suspicions since I am a former member and remember their ALS-like content and the multiple models they shared. You just cannot replicate what ALS does, at least not without looking like a copycat, and a weak one at that. If you like nice sets and sports cars, then FTV might interest you...but I thought this was PornUsers! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-25-09 02:28pm - 5810 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Maybe the porn industry, like every other business, just wants to get its customer base hooked for life, and therefore if they think the younger guys prefer shaved then that's what they will primarily shoot. Yes, the older guys (you can define "old" however you want) have the same color money -- they probably have more money, in fact -- but if the people in the business see shaved as the future, than that is what we will see as customers. Me personally, I love the shaved look, and my favorite sites are majority, or even 100%, shaved. A bush every now and then is nice, partly just because it is getting so rare, but I would not like it as the norm like it was back in the early days of Playboy. There was a recent Q & A with Hefner in a recent issue of Time. He claimed his magazine was not porn (this was asked in a recent PU poll), and that he also did not feel like a dirty old man. My guess is he feels like a filthy rich dirty old man, which is a little different. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-23-09 02:18pm - 5812 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
It sounds like VideoBox to me, but without actually naming it I am smelling some waft of spam... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-23-09 02:14pm - 5812 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Queefing (SP?) is a natural side effect, given what goes on in porn, but I can't say I have a particular fetish for them, in porn or real life. To me they are really more funny than sexy or attractive, though without question better than any ass fart. Compared to something like squirting, them seem to be 100% genuine, if not completely intentional. I think if I were to experience a girl who could squirt (it's definitely on the bucket list), and it was as much as what I always see in porn, I would be highly suspicious, though not necessarily unhappy. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-23-09 01:57pm - 5812 days | #35 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Isn't that a little bit of a problem with watching DVDs on a computer monitor, since DVD resolution is something like 720x480, or around there? I find they look nice on a big analog TV, but not quite as good as an HD video (that is, actually shot in HD) looks on a monitor. When I sort through my collection, the older videos tend to get the axe more than photos because they end up looking so tiny compared to photos on bigger monitors. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 01:02pm - 5816 days | #14 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Forgot to add that I hate it when girls smoke. This doesn't affect pussy odor specifically, but it doesn't help, least not starting with breath. Smokers just don't smell very good, and I don't like girls with husky, sandblasted voices. I can't count how many times in porn I have seen a model I like...only to see her light up BTS or at the end of a scene. Is it just me, or does it seem like 95% of female porn models smoke? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 12:23pm - 5816 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I am not big on odor, and it would be pretty hard to do within the audio and video limits of porn, and I have seen quite a bit of stuff that I was glad I could not smell. As far as real life is concerned, I really prefer more of the natural-to-none style of odors. Problem is, we live in a heavily and synthetically scented world of perfumes and chemicals, so we all reek, good or bad. Even us guys (are there any girls here at PU?) have trouble finding something that goes on the body that doesn't choke us with some scent. I don't have too much problem with periods -- it's nature, get over it -- but I definitely don't prefer it either, no more than girls would prefer that we fart and burp more. I do like creamy pussies (not bloody), but that too is cyclical and differs from girl to girl. Girls do generally smell better, but it is just not purely by nature. Humans have sweat glands and it's a dirty world, so there is something to be said for good hygiene. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 11:53am - 5816 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Love landscape photos -- they are just more pleasing to my eyes. Plus, aren't a lot of photography books (at least the big coffee table tomes) published in this format anyway? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-19-09 11:49am - 5816 days | #12 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
30"? Wow! That's getting up there, especially if it's on a desktop, but it's still probably weighs a fraction of what a CRT with a screen half that size would. But to PinkPanther, I'd recommend getting a monitor with a lot of connectors -- not just VGA -- so you can use it as a TV too. Most have numerous ways to hook up a DVD player or computer, but it's good just so you can get a little more bang for the buck. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-12-09 03:21pm - 5823 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think the addiction label (including porn) is one of those things that tells you more about the accuser than the accused. Do people really care about the ones they so seriously, and so quickly, condemn? Or, are they just trying to further their own personal agenda? Sadly, it is often the latter, as rearadmiral and Drooler mentioned above. I am not a fan of, say, people who use drugs (whether or not they are "addicted"), but I am not about to instantly damn them for something I know little about, especially when I don't understand the circumstances/choices/etc. of their lives. (Maybe it's not the drugs that were the source of the problem, but whatever it was that led people to the drugs in the first place.) We all want to accuse a group, or someone, of one thing or another, but are we willing to do anything to actually help them? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 02:30pm - 5829 days | #2 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hmm...creepy, but interesting. The technological revolution marches on. I am not surprised it mentioned the courts would probably eventually get involved (damn lawyers and judges trying to reign in on people having a good time), if they could prosecute it as interstate prostitution. You'll probably end up having to pay some sleazeball overseas to to get your virtual reality fix. Still, why $400 when I don't necessarily seek out, or even enjoy, hands free sex or masturbation? Some would argue they (hands) do as much dirty work as the dick. I remember hearing something similar to this last year for women, but I don't remember much else. Like the article mentioned, they have had decades of "research," and loads of options from which to choose their masturbatory paths of pleasure, though not necessarily quite like this. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 01-06-09 01:59pm - 5829 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
You can already buy projectors to hook up to your DVD player, PS3, laptop, whatever, but they are nowhere near as affordable as a nice big computer monitor, though big flat screen TVs are somewhat in their league. The question here is, not when is an image too big, but how big you do really want to see whatever it is your viewing? Already, closeups are bigger than normal (life-size) on my 15" WS laptop -- how freakish/cool/educational are they going to be beamed out to a 10'x8' wall? Obviously, some videos like POV, plus photos with more wide shots, would be pretty interesting to see in this size. It is just that a lot of porn, minus the "epics" and "big budget" titles, is not really shot for huge projection, like many films are, but can still be enjoyed to a degree on a big screen. I do like big images -- hell, I love them -- but I still keep a lot of the smaller and smaller images from the '90s because, size aside, I do still enjoy them. Eventually, they may appear like thumbnails compared to today's mammoth pics, but I will cross that bridge in the future. One thing I don't like is when older images are upscaled or "remastered" in an attempt to match today's sizes. It never really works, especially if the sources were not that big in the first place. It is cool to see sites rerelease old material, but you just cannot make something out of nothing. This may be treading on what others have said in related threads, but regardless of size, the photos, and the photographers who create them, need to be good in order to justify the larger and larger sizes. It doesn't matter if it is 12000x8000, if half the image is out of focus, the lightning is all wrong, and the model is stuck in a forced and fake pose -- it will still suck! Bring on the big images, but bring better photographers as well! "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 11:56am - 5835 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Ah, notorious porn dialogue! It can make or break a scene, turning it from cheesy to creepy to just plain bad. I don't think the worse scenes are bad solely because of terrible lines, but they definitely disappoint. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-31-08 11:48am - 5835 days | #10 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I have been pretty amazed at how close In The Crack's videos match their photos, assuming they don't do too much to the videos. They tend to shoot blazingly-lit photographs with lots of detail (it's all in their name), so I thought there would be a ton of touch-up, but it's mostly getting rid of a few ass zits and such. ALSScan is good too, and they shoot photographs that simply look real, not that bizarre fake look that so much porn ends up being, where models are buried in suits of makeup, with bodies that look like they were created digitally. I know ALS still uses makeup, lighting, etc., but they do it so it's not so obvious. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-30-08 09:44pm - 5835 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I am not sure if I have seen the same one as you, but I have seen a few outdoor scenes with a couple flies getting in on the action -- very distracting, and arguably one of the top things to so easily and completely ruin a scene, at least for me. One a buddy showed me a few years ago was with Brandon Irons (the SlapHappy dude) and some girl who was getting her ass gaped by him. I don't think I watched the whole thing, because he just wanted to show me the part where he gapes her ass, spits in it, and gets her to blow bubbles while he held her open. Yum! I don't doubt there are some of us here whose fantasies are equally as crazy/nasty, but I do doubt that we all that creative or ever act upon them. Judging by other people's reactions, it was probably their worst scene ever. Nowhere as abusive or weird as some stuff gets, but definitely "plain absurdly crass." "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-29-08 10:42am - 5837 days | #5 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Wow, thorough post with a lot of specific and great points! I do often prefer photography to video because of its focus -- literally and figuratively -- on the subject at hand. Oh, the number of videos have I seen with great ceiling and floor shots combined with a Blair Witch-approach to capturing the action or the model(s)! Is it so hard to get the cameraman/director/whoever to calm down and just shoot the goods? In photography, however, I like how you can just hit 'Delete' and keep what shots you want. But how many of us really want to sit and edit a video down to a watchable, tolerable piece? I find myself watching compilations, because they often cut out the fluff, and just leave a few minutes of action. I know they are probably made to just get me to buy the source DVD, but still, the pacing can make them really enjoyable. (Sorry, I just don't like "epic" porn.) One great point I really agree with:
I love it when a performer just loses herself in the shoot -- no glances at the crew, no ridiculous poses, just focused on herself. I think the one problem is that in solo shoots the models do not focus on "us" the viewers (audience), but the "him/her" viewer (cameraman). You can tell because she is relating to whoever is operating the camera, not who may be watching in the future, or just simply taking too much direction. I thank the filthy perverts for making the material we love, but I don't need to hear them talking or panting in the background. Sex scenes are a little bit better about this, I suppose because there is a second actor/actress with whom to interact and make a good shoot. It does not always seem as natural in girl-girl shoots, where a girl is truly more totally absorbed in the action as in girl-boy shoots. Girl-girl scenes do seem to be the most comfortable for girls, but seem to lack the raw passion of girl-boy. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-28-08 02:25pm - 5838 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Any resolutions for the New Year -- porn-related or otherwise? I am not much for them myself, but I will try and seek out better porn (though honestly this is more of a daily resolution, and I am sure why everyone is here anyway), and maybe write more on PU. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-27-08 06:15pm - 5839 days | #7 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I fortunately have not had much experience with customer service this year, but I do appreciate the people at ALSScan. I am a frequent member there, and EVERY e-mail comment I have sent them would get a reply within at least 48 hours. I also made a recent comment on their review page here at PU and the webmaster addressed all of my points in his blog the following week. They were good to me last year too; when I got a new CC, for some reason they couldn't just change my info, I instead had to rejoin whenever my current membership ended. They gave me a quick reply and offered my some free DLs from their DVD website without me even asking for anything. I was pretty impressed. (ALS is 100% American, so I can't speak for how they treat customers from overseas, but they seem to be totally honest to U.S. fans.) "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-27-08 01:28pm - 5839 days | #12 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I think this is why I like the solo or girl-girl fisting; the girls have the smaller hands and don't come off as such aggressive jerks when they do it. A lot of these male performers are pretty big, and their hands are no exception, so it seems to be a little much for most girls. I don't really prefer seeing anything past three or four fingers when a guy's stretching and straining some poor girl's anatomy. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 27, 2008, 05:56pm | |
|
||
| 12-27-08 01:19pm - 5839 days | #7 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I saw a DVD a few years back that included a girl-girl scene where all they did was spit on each other's faces. It was kind of amusing, but not particularly stimulating, and one of those "Is this even porn?" situations that we all experience from time to time. (Sorry, don't remember the title, if anybody was interested.) But the whole guy-in-a-girl's-mouth is not really my thing. I just watched a scene yesterday where, among other things, the guy spit right on the girl's face. Not very nice, and she didn't look like she was expecting it. He never did it directly into her mouth, like a lot of other videos, but it came off as just as dirty. She was quite attractive and I don't think I would have the heart to be such an ass to her -- probably why I am not a porn star. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-27-08 01:00pm - 5839 days | #11 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Kind of ironic that pornographers shooting fisting would be punished by the long arm of the law! But seriously, I wish law enforcement would be directed to spend its time and money on more serious problems. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-27-08 12:55pm - 5839 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Yeah, I am in the time to time category, rather than it being my all out favorite thing to see. I have joined sites that include it, though not exclusively, or more so than anything else. I know there are at least a few fisting-focused sites out there, but I have never been a member. I think the scene he got in trouble for was actually Chloe being fisted by Alisha Klass, his main Tushy Girl at the time, in the original version of Tampa Tushy Fest Part 1. I remember first seeing a clip of it on a friend's computer, but the current release of the DVD has the fisting strategically cut out of the scene but everything else intact. It is obviously the same exact scene (identical location, lighting, models, etc.) just a few minutes shorter. It didn't seem to hurt or help the scene, but nonetheless silly that he had to go to court over it. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-26-08 12:14pm - 5840 days | Original Post - #1 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
We have mentioned fisting in other threads and in a few polls, but I don't think anybody has really talked about it too much. I was wondering what members' thoughts are about it. If you like or love it, then do you think there should be more of it, or that others are really missing out? If you dislike it, or just plain hate it, then what are your thoughts as well? I admit I have quite a bit of bias here; I prefer solo girl, and girl-girl porn, and there can be quite a bit of good fisting in those categories. My personal problem is that there is very little, if any, in more mainstream U.S. porn. I remember a few years back when Seymore Butts got in some trouble over a girl-girl fisting scene, sort of reinforcing a no fisting rule in American porn movies. The scene was as consensual as they get, but I doubt any producer or director wanted to be in the hot water that Butts was in. Personally, I view solo and girl-girl fisting as far less "obscene" -- and certainly less degrading -- than a lot of boy-girl content in U.S. hardcore porn. People have no problem regularly slapping, beating, choking, and generally disrespecting female performers, but if a model masturbates with her fist then all hell breaks loose. Obviously a Max Hardcore-level of content is not respectful either, but it seems to be a stupid double standard. Thoughts? Comments? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-26-08 10:17am - 5840 days | #8 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I recently read that there has been a new political party formed in Australia to fight things such as this firewall; the Australian Sex Party. And no, I'm not joking. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Dec 26, 2008, 10:22am | |
|
||
| 12-25-08 10:17pm - 5840 days | #4 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This is pretty scary, even if you live in the U.S. and have been subject to its various forms of censorship your whole life (freakin' FCC is a good example). While it's easy to not watch TV or listen to the radio, how many of us are really willing to give up the Internet? Whether it's research, or the "research" that we members prefer to do, or anything else for that matter, how much speed and freedom can sacrifice? And what if it is part of that 1 to 8 percent that was wrongly blocked? Any members from Australia have thoughts about this (assuming you're legally allowed to have any)? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 09:53pm - 5847 days | #13 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Maybe I should have clarified myself a lot more: I don't really have any problem with public nudity, but I think public nudity as porn is just dumb. I don't think witnessing nudity, or even sex, whether or not it is public, is going to hurt children. But porn -- not sex -- is a different story, and explaining it to a young child would not be very pleasant (actually, the prospect of ever being a parent would be scary enough for me). Our society has definitely got its head screwed on backwards as far as nudity and sex goes though. I am sure everyone remembers the Janet Jackson bare breast thing a few years back ("The horror! The horror!), and I think some TV networks even got fined as a result. Why, I don't know, but if instead they show something as violent as someone getting disemboweled, or decapitated, or shot to death -- as long as there is no nudity! -- no one bats an eye. I think if our biggest problem was only kids getting into sex, instead of, say, picking up firearms and killing their peers, we would be pretty well off... Nah, better keep locking up pornographers, censoring all nudity, and stop wasting time with things like gun laws and violent crime instead. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 12-18-08 02:16pm - 5848 days | #5 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I haven't posted in a while, but shooting in public is one of my pet peeves. I am not sure which irritates me more -- public nudity or public sex -- because I think they are both equally stupid and pointless, at least in terms of what makes for good porn. Public nudity is often advertised as "wild" or "crazy," but it is too boring and repetitive to be anywhere close to that. Wow, a model is getting naked in public, pretty crazy. What's worse is when a good site stoops to this level, and repeatedly. I am thinking of ALSScan, because as much as I love their work, they continually shoot and release this junk to members. In fact, their latest bonus was "Billy Raise - Nude in Public!" It is 400+ photos and 20min of her posing around strangers, plus the obligatory run in with the cops. Public sex is just as bad and comes across as the Jackass of porn; a bunch of douchebags with a camera, who don't seem to really care what they do, as long as it is on tape and in front of an unwilling, and often uninterested, public audience. I think if someone is really serious about making porn then they don't start with a public place in which to shoot it, especially if it is hardcore or BDSM. No, children should not be exposed to it, even public nudity, which is not very innocent if it is being shot for a porn site. I definitely agree with Wittyguy here; free expression is a great thing, but most of us probably have little patience for a porn crew guffawing and sneaking around in a local public area just to make a video. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 09-23-08 10:15pm - 5933 days | #4 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
There are a lot of things I love about Virginia, but their big ol' list of sex laws definitely isn't one of them. Technically intercourse between anyone who is not married is still on the books as a misdemeanor, though this was found to be unconstitutional a few years back. Regarding porn though -- defined as "obscene" -- it is also illegal: here and here. You might possibly be able to shoot in Virginia if there was no way to prove the material was ever actually captured there, but this would be a big legal risk. VA is just not the place for making porn (well, neither is most of the US as you mentioned), and the laws are pretty Draconian to say the least. Remember: Virginia is for lovers...as long as they are married, straight, and decent. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Sep 23, 2008, 10:20pm | |
|
||
| 09-04-08 11:02am - 5953 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I like to think of myself as a collector rather than an addict. I can go for days, weeks, and much longer without watching/downloading/collecting anything with pretty much no problem. I certainly don't like it when I have to but I can still deal with it and be unaffected. If I thought I was an addict I don't think I could go very long without porn, whether I really needed to or not. Sometimes I just don't have the time, energy, or money to spend on porn, so it goes on the backburner and I get to it when I can. This is probably why I collect; I will get what I can, when I can, and then still know I have porn for whenever I have some free time. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 08-25-08 10:32pm - 5962 days | #2 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This is a very valid concern, especially considering the price of some sites. I think everyone knows the big sites that pretty much max out in quantity (Videobox and Met Art for example) and still offer quality content and memberships at decent prices. But new sites can always be kind of a poor deal because they so rarely can or do offer much in the way of quantity versus older archived sites, and I think this validates a lower score no matter how good/great/heart-stopping the content is. Personally I try to steer away from new (1yr or newer) sites because it's inevitable there just won't be the volume to hunt through and enjoy like bigger sites. If you could own a really nice sports car it wouldn't be much fun if you could only drive it a few miles -- well, I'm paying my money so I should get something back, right? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 08-25-08 07:59pm - 5962 days | #14 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I can't say that I am tired of certain models as much as I am tired of them doing the same thing over and over again on multiple sites -- very boring and repetitive! It's as if no matter where you first see them they will continue to perform and look a certain way until they try some crazy niche site (though it can occasionally be interesting to find a model's older material, even if it's softcore). There have been models over the years that I could not find enough of, or at least enough decent material of them. It can be a letdown to find a performer you really like and then never see her again. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 08-04-08 10:11pm - 5983 days | #3 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Women have always been a significant part of porn so I am not surprised that they are spending 25% of the money fueling it, but kind of hard to believe anybody would realistically think that "women don't watch much porn." No, maybe not as much as us guys but probably more than thought. The industry today seems very male dominated -- even if women make up the majority of the stars it's still men who make up the majority of the decision makers; directors, webmasters, producers, etc. More women, as both consumers and producers, could have a very positive influence on porn and steer it in the right directions. I think if there were more women directing and making porn it would attract and keep good talent; models could be shown more respect, and, like Drooler mentioned, it could make it more sensuous and interesting. And if more women were watching porn, that is if people knew how many actually were, it could make for demand of better material. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 1901-1950 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 7 | 12 | 17 | 22 | 27 | 38 | Page 39 | 40 | Next Page > |
|
