|
|||||
|
| Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History |
Post History:
turboshaft (0)
|
| 1951-1958 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 26 | 32 | 39 | Page 40 |
| 07-28-08 02:43pm - 5991 days | #10 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This is a problem with me as well, though I don't spend hours trying to decide I still spend way too long on two digits that may have very little impact on those who read all of a review. I am a Netflix member too and their five star system is great for quick and easy scoring though I still end up reading some reviews and writing a few myself. Granted it seems a lot easier to find people simply being offended by certain films rather than trying to give a more objective review like the ones here. I have only reviewed a few sites so far and most of those I have given pretty high scores, but I have sites like PornUsers to thank for it. The more I learn about a site before ever paying a cent the more I usually end up only joining what I like and eventually giving a good review. The fact is I don't want to pay for something too low quality or too far out of range of what I enjoy. A good example would be something like Hegre Art, or possibly Met Art; I have read some very favorable reviews here and they look like good sites with quality content but they are probably too glamorous for me. I am just using these as examples, I am not saying they are bad sites but I probably wouldn't be interested enough to ever join, and therefore will probably never review them. I am sure we have all been disappointed by porn, even if we didn't pay for it, but particularly let down when we did. This sucks because we feel like we wasted our money but it also helps to warn potential users about sites they should avoid, or at least reconsider before joining. I find it helps to learn about what a user prefers to really understand his or her score and review. If someone is really into girl-girl then I might expect a somewhat honest review if a site is totally lacking in girl-girl content, but I would also expect some bias towards girl-girl themed sites in general. For me a site like ALSScan is easily my favorite. I have been a fan and frequent member for a long time and so I when I finally wrote a review I gave it a very high score (97) and probably won't change it anytime soon. I love this site, but I also understand that their content may not be for everyone so I tried to mention the stuff -- like all the pissing and speculum scenes they do -- that many members wouldn't want to pay for. I think it's important no matter how good or bad a site is, or how much you love/hate it, to make a note of what kind of content they are really offering and how they are offering it. Is a site only videos or just photos? Is a site all-girl? Does it only offer exclusive content, and is it all archived? There are many other important things to consider but generally users shouldn't be in the dark after reading a review. This why I don't like super short "I hate this site! It's the worse ever!" or "Oh yeah, this rocks!" reviews that tell you more about the reviewers' emotional states than what they are reviewing. Maybe it would be best to score sites in ranges rather than exact numbers, since a one or two point difference really doesn't say much. The five star system is probably too simplistic, but maybe giving a site an "80s" instead of an 83 or 84, or "90s" instead of 96 or 97 is as adequate as the current system. Like everyone else has pretty much said it really is the review, not the score that judges the site, so I don't think it is too much of a problem anyways. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 07-25-08 09:56am - 5994 days | #26 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
What about Monica Sweetheart? Probably not quite as big as Silvia Saint, but she still has done a lot of work in the US. There are a lot European girls, particularly Czech, who are on American pay sites where they sometimes equal the number of American models, and sometimes even outnumber them. Europe hasn't produced a Jenna Jameson equivalent yet, but they still have had plenty of women achieve at least moderate success (in porn terms) in the US. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 07-25-08 09:39am - 5994 days | #21 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
This really sucks for any of their customers in those "test" areas. Pay-per-view or pay-per-bit is a really stupid idea for something like the internet. I would rather find another service (though many of these providers operate almost as monopolies) than waste my time and money worrying about whether or not I have reached a ridiculously low DL limit. This is all because these companies want to make more money without investing in any significant upgrades to provide better service. Consumers have very little say in the matter as all the "throttling" and "capping" is legal and becoming the norm. Other users have noted that this is all controlled by a few companies making up the rules as they see fit (profitable) and small companies have no practical way of becoming competitive due to the costs of providing services to relatively large areas. I understand this is just how business works but whatever happened to the customer is always right, or at least trying to maintain a loyal customer base? "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 07-22-08 11:05am - 5997 days | #2 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hmm, just off the top of my head... - Hustler's "Barely Legal" - "The Violation of..." (all girl series) - Jules Jordan's "Ass Worship" - Ed Power's "Dirty Debutantes" "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 07-16-08 12:27am - 6003 days | #2 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Man, it's kind of hard picking five, but here are mine: American List: - Melissa Ashley (aka Anne Howe, sometimes just Ashley or Melissa) - Belladonna - Ariana Jollee - McKayla Matthews (she was a Seymore Butts Tushy Girl for a few years) - Aurora Snow (though not her really early stuff) Honorable Mentions: - Violet Blue - Ember - Gauge - Audrey Hollander European List: - Sophie Moone - Nella (aka Jana Miartusova) - Orsi (Lisa on ALS Scan) - Annette Schwarz - Monica Sweetheart Honorable Mentions: - Isabella Camille - Regina Hall - Jana Irrova - Silvia Saint "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove Edited on Jul 16, 2008, 12:31am | |
|
||
| 07-14-08 11:14am - 6005 days | #9 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
True Crypt's site says the "plausible deniability" is for cases where users are forced (by "adversaries") to give their passwords, such as in cases of extortion, but I didn't read anything about law enforcement serving a warrant. I doubt most sex offenders/pedophiles are really worried about extortion, or at least not as much as simply being caught. It's probably just not in good taste to explicitly advertise a software feature that would appeal to sex criminals. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 07-08-08 11:14pm - 6010 days | #6 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
I wouldn't call German porn anymore disgusting than US porn you can find pretty easily. That's the thing I like about European porn in general, particularly German; they have no problem with showing content the way we seem to, and fans have no problem finding it. Why are we so scared (particularly the bigger studios making movies) of fisting or pissing, but have no problem with all the crazy anal or cumshots we come up with? Anyways, there are quite a few hot German models that don't just watch the clock or act overly fake like too many Americans, and who still seem to enjoy making wild porn. I too really wish there was a decent German site that wasn't too much $$, especially considering the current exchange rates... "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 04-23-08 09:58pm - 6086 days | #10 | |
|
turboshaft (0)
Active User Posts: 1,958 Registered: Apr 01, '08 |
Hmm...3D? I don't know, seems like an expensive thing for porn to ever really embrace. U2 probably have a lot more money than many porn studios and probably most websites, so I don't it see being the next big thing. Like others have mentioned here, true HD (actually captured on HD equipment) is probably the next big thing. I am sure it costs a little more to produce but probably pays off when customers are willing to pay for higher quality content. I doubt 3D has the same appeal as HD - more gimmick than innovation. "It's incredibly obvious, isn't it? A foreign substance is introduced into our precious bodily fluids without the knowledge of the individual. Certainly without any choice. That's the way your hardcore Commie works." - Gen. Jack D. Rippper, Dr. Stranglove | |
|
||
| 1951-1958 of 1958 Posts | < Previous Page | 1 | 2 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 26 | 32 | 39 | Page 40 |
|
