Welcome GUEST!      CREATE ACCOUNT - Forgot Password?

Create an account to share your experiences and more!

E-MAIL   PASS  

Auto Log-in Future Sessions (on this computer).
  
User Forum Our new user message board where users talk porn!
Porn Users Forum » User Ranks » User Post History

Post History: mbaya (0)

Filtering Options Select Option
Keyword Search
     Find within...  
View Options All Posts (891)  |   Threads Started (63)

301-350 of 891 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Page 7 8 10 12 14 17 18 Next Page >

05-15-17  03:16pm - 2778 days #7
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I want to revive this thread as it discusses the topic of billers.

I hope it is of help.

05-15-17  01:24pm - 2778 days #10
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I double checked and found the name for Kink's biller. It is RocketGate.

05-15-17  07:41am - 2778 days #6
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I have used Verotel with never a problem. Many have had problems using Centrobill for German Goo Girls, to the point where PU will not do business with them.

Many proprietary billers are not a problem. Kink has one and it is just fine.

05-09-17  12:46pm - 2784 days #6
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I had XP for years. No malware from paysites ever.

The bottom line is that paying for porn should and does provide a decent degree of protection even before you use any protection programs.

I would never advocate not using antivirus or other methods of reducing the likelihood of malware. That is just common sense.

But,surf for free porn and who knows what can happen to your computer?

05-08-17  12:33pm - 2785 days #2
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I have never been affected by any of these when using pay sites.

05-04-17  11:35am - 2789 days #180
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Please check into Premium Bukkake. It looks interesting, but a bit expensive.

05-03-17  12:02pm - 2790 days #151
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Thanks Amanda and everyone at PU!

04-29-17  08:38am - 2794 days #31
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by jook:


Not to digress, but as long as the subject revolves around reviews and not wanting to open a new thread...

I find myself checking other review sites more these days. Perhaps it's my changing taste and wanting to check out lesser known and non-mainstream sites that caused me to stray from PU. To me, a big drawback of TBP is that a site cannot get listed without the agreement of TBP and the site. As a result, many sites that may be of interest are not listed. At least of interest to me.

This is likely no news to many or most of you, but I consider myself to still be a relative newbie at all this.

There's a plethora of review sites, some that seem to have a vested interest in the sites that are reviewed and others that are independent. Obviously, the independent sites are more objective than the former. However, I found that independence and more objectivity don't necessarily equate to a better or more accurate review. The good news is that I found TBP reviews to be at least as accurate, if not more so. However, generally speaking, PU member reviews are by far the most reliable. Again, the downside is the limitation on sites listed in TBP and hence, the limitation on sites reviewd.

I heard about a site that I was interested in joining not listed on PU, and hunted for reviews - korea1818, billed as the only or one of the only truly Korean sites. I stumbled across reviews in "rockitreports" and "allasianreviews." While the information seemed sincere and to have no vested interest, they were not up to muster and not as thorough as PU member reviews. I think the problem with all the review sites, including TBP is, as was mentioned earlier here, PU users look at sites a lot more in depth and critically than anyone else.

Random and probably naive thoughts for the day. Carry on.


I see you looking into a lot of Asian sites. One I joined quite a few years ago was Asian American Girls. I have not been back since, so I don't know for a fact that they even have HD. However, it was very interesting and as well a different and unique site.

04-27-17  04:54pm - 2796 days #26
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I have to agree with Jook here. I once joined a site based on a review under old TBP/PU management. Once I joined the site, what I saw bore zero resemblance to the review. In fact it seemed to be what the site would have told someone to say and not based on the reality that anyone would have seen in less than five minutes on the site. I doubt that the reviewer ever actually logged in. I will not mention the reviewers name or the site as this is ancient history at this point.

I hope that no one presently working on the TBP site would do that. Edited on Apr 28, 2017, 02:34am

04-23-17  07:02am - 2800 days #15
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by jook:


I joined for that very reason - desperation for Indian porn. But truth be told, I felt like burning my eyes out after looking at the women, the majority of whom ranged from a few pounds overweight to obese and many who looked like they could be collecting social security.

Anyway, my point in all this is more about TBP and Rabbit. Very disappointing. And thank God for PU, the only place to get the real skinny on a site.I suppose I still don't understand the relationship between PU, TBP and Rabbit. I thought they were all affiliated with Rabbit joining a short time ago.

I never found even one decent site featuring Indian women. I think the one positive review for DesiPapa was a lot of wishful thinking.

04-23-17  06:59am - 2800 days #14
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


MBAYA POSTED A COMMENT ON THAT SITE YEARS AGO.
IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN A HINT. BUT BECAUSE IT WAS YEARS AGO, IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN DISCOUNTED:
========================
mbaya (412) 08-26-08 07:53am

weak

When I was a member about a year ago I was very disappointed. The videos were small clips, not full length and there were none of any quality worth watching. I saved none, not even one video. Very grainy, poor lighting, shot from too far, etc. There were some dead links and the navigation was far too difficult. I suspected that there was more content than what I saw, but it was probably rotated out. I hope there are as many videos now as stated on TBP, but I also hope their quality has improved A LOT.
================================
YOU MIGHT NOT ALWAYS AGREE WITH HIS SCORES/OPINIONS/WHATEVER,
HE USUALLY GIVES DETAILS THAT SUPPORT HIS VIEWS.


Thanks for mentioning me and my comment. I also was taken in by nice reviews, so I felt obligated to post a comment. It is very sad that this site never got any better.

02-23-17  11:41am - 2859 days #154
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
This sounds like a site I would like. Did you join? If so, how many videos are there?. The preview shows only 15. Thanks!! Edited on Feb 23, 2017, 11:45am

02-12-17  01:41pm - 2870 days #8
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
My point is not at all whether or not TBP does a good job.

They get most facts corect, but they often miss others. A good example is not seeing that there is a download limit. That is due to the nature of being a professional reviewer for TBP or any other review site.

What I was getting at is that I suspect that TBP doesn't and may never see things from the same viewpoint as a PU member would. I think the pricing issue is one of focus and can be addressed.

02-12-17  12:10pm - 2870 days #6
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I want to mention a side issue here, but not hijack the thread. it seems to me that TBP reviews are nearly always different from those on PU for a reason.

When TBP reviews a site two things are true. One, they don't sign up because they are interested in the content and two, they don't spend enough time downloading and giving us an evaluation of the member experience.

TBP reviews are often, maybe even usually, superficial and lack a lot of detail that is fairly common in PU reviews.

I suspect that the pricing issue here is mostly caused by rushing through a site just to get the review done and therefore making management happy.

02-06-17  06:52am - 2876 days Original Post - #1
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey


I have avoided sites that don't offer downloads and feel that is a major con. As a result I am not familiar with their quality. Are there any sites worth recommending that are streaming only?

12-24-16  08:20am - 2920 days #3
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I tried to check out Fetish Network and got a virus on the preview page. I got rid of it using CCleaner and then found that the PU link to the site shows the price as 29.95.

Glad to see you back and posting Pyrenees.

12-15-16  07:01am - 2929 days #2
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I appreciate you are trying to help, but I don't understand anything about this. Can you please explain?

12-08-16  10:30am - 2936 days #8
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I also reviewed melonechallenge. I liked it as well and maybe you would like that. I posted a review today on povtrain.com and that seemed very real and unscripted.

11-17-16  10:14am - 2957 days #106
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
In my review I mentioned this issue. I never really got an answer, but it is less than 40GB.

11-08-16  02:50pm - 2966 days #55
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I am glad you came here and want to participate. Welcome!

11-08-16  02:46pm - 2966 days #109
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I really appreciate the honor of winning a prize this week. My review was for Stiffia.

10-17-16  07:34am - 2988 days #3
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Does anyone have something to add?

10-15-16  09:10am - 2990 days Original Post - #1
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey


Recently I saw many bj videos that just didn’t cut it for me. I got to thinking about what is in common about the better bj scenes.

I don’t consider it a bj scene if it starts as a bj, then goes to other sex and then he finishes orally or facially. That is a normal run of the mill sex scene in pornland, not a bj.

I prefer that the model’s face is always visible. From a short distance is ok, POV not so much. Scenes from the sides, especially for the money shot, don’t seem very erotic. There are some side view whole body scenes that work well if the model has an exceptional body though.

Money shot scenes should be either in the mouth, preferably, but I also like facial endings. Other parts of the body shots do nothing for me.

I much prefer that she finish him and don’t care much for the usual where she is passive while he finishes himself.

What advice would give webmasters about what you like?

09-26-16  05:09pm - 3009 days #19
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by merc77:


If they do remasters of old material, they should state such. Most just recycle old videos and call them new without the benefit of remastering.

There is only so much remastering the old stuff they can do as it does cost money for them to do so.

Many state the videos they have brought back were remastered and I am fine with that as they are not saying the videos themselves are new.

The original post is about recycling older videos that have not been remastered and classify them as new. That is a problem the webmasters of those sites need to address.


The problem with the quality of remastered material is not that it costs money to do and they don't want to spend. The problem is that you can only improve poor quality video just a little bit. That is how you get something grainy, maybe even with artifacts. You can't make an old video true HD, although the specs are reasonably good. There is real HD and then there is remastered better than the original quality.

09-26-16  02:54pm - 3009 days #16
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by lk2fireone:


I don't know if this is the same idea or not:
But some sites re-issue older material (videos and photos) in higher definition.
And they call it "new" material, with a new posting date.
So, in a sense, that is acceptable to me: especially if the content is improved visually.
But some porn members in the past have commented that this type of content often shows signs/defects of artifacts and other problems that translate into quality that has not improved over the older, original content.
I don't remember specifically when I read about this at PU, but it was sometime in the past.

I think the process is called "remastering" older content.


Yes that is remastering and I would be fine with that as it constitutes improving the original. I would not be happy if they called it new and gave it a new date though.

09-26-16  11:38am - 3009 days #14
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
What I feel is best for webmasters is to be upfront and let prospective members know that they have an archive site. Further if the price were appropriately cheap, I know I would possibly join if it looks interesting.

09-26-16  11:34am - 3009 days #4
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
This thread is from a year ago and is still apropos.

Anyone who is willing to get involved here is needed. We have lots and lots more members who never get their voices heard.

09-25-16  01:00pm - 3010 days #3
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I think a well written, logical coherent review can make a case for a high score. I still think that 100 is too perfect to be deserved though. I think the reason why so many PUers are against high scores is that they are written by newbies with A) no sense of perspective as they have not joined many sites and B) are not well presented cases that are persuasive. Why would anyone be impressed with a review that sounds like a shill, even when they are not?

09-25-16  11:00am - 3010 days #11
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I would add to this that there are many archive sites that recycle.

Why would anyone pay for longer than a month if there will never be anything new? Yet, they offer multi month membership options.

This is so dishonest that you could lose interest in ever paying for porn again.

I think this contributes to the increase in pirating.

Webmasters are contributing to their own problem by dishonest self defeating stupidity.

09-24-16  09:56am - 3011 days #2
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Nice to hear from you and welcome!

08-29-16  07:42pm - 3037 days #13
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I like the idea of questions as opposed to pros and cons. Too many reviews written by newbies don't have enough information to be useful. While it sounds good to say that we need more reviews, I would much prefer a smaller number of more quality reviews that are useful.

Getting newbies to be more complete is hopeless, in my opinion. Many times I have asked questions so that the newbie can elaborate, to find that they don't respond or may give a sarcastic answer in response. If someone feels that spending ten or fifteen minutes putting together an incomplete review that is not informative is what they want to do, that is all that they will ever do. VERY few tiny reviews lead to the reviewer improving and become a regular or even a semiregular here.


As far as reviews getting repetitive and therefore dull, we each have our own individual writing style and that is probably inevitable. I can only say that I try to make my reviews interesting.

By the way, I don't think that Pat was at all giving the newbie a hard time. I know him for several years now and he is very, very polite and respectful.

08-20-16  06:48am - 3046 days #11
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by malikstarks:


I remember getting hit up by ransomware a few years back. I didn't pay the ransom (I ended up using a tool called Norton Power Eraser to get rid of the virus) but I ended up losing all of my text based and picture files (videos were fine).

I've never been a victim of ID theft luckily. I have recently been paying about 9 bucks a month for Lifelock for what it's worth.


I have been hit with ransomware and got rid of it by using CCleaner.

07-07-16  07:26am - 3090 days #75
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Thank you so much for my prize. I have not as yet received the link to Amazon.

05-25-16  07:40am - 3133 days Original Post - #1
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey


Actress Emma Watson recently admitting to having joined OMGYes.com. Here is a link: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/articl...es-women-orgasm.html.

This is a paysite, but not exactly porn. It is definitely x- rated in that it is designed to educate, enlighten and empower women about having orgasms. I see in the link that about half of the members are men and half women.

I think that PU should consider listing the site. I wish I could volunteer to write a review, but cannot join at the present time due to finances.

How do you feel about listing this site that is admittedly not really porn?

05-24-16  05:52pm - 3134 days #67
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
What we see in this week's winners is something truly a first for PU. Two of the three winning reviews were of sites that are not heterosexual. I sincerely hope this encourages more gay reviewers to participate. Congratulations to standard and BradR!! Edited on May 24, 2016, 06:14pm

04-01-16  05:36am - 3187 days #35
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I took a look at bluepillmen. Looks interesting but only a handful of videos for 24.95? They need to offer much more if they are to last.

03-30-16  08:21am - 3189 days #48
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Thanks for the honor. However, I have not as yet gotten the link for Amazon.

02-17-16  06:25am - 3231 days #11
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
In a previous forum post I asked GCode if he was interested and he accepted.

02-06-16  05:35am - 3242 days #5
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Great to see you again my friend. We have new management that is very involved in making PU the best it can be. What has also changed is that we have several female members that are active forum participants.

We always need more reviews. The chances of winning are much better than when you were last here.

The interviews have also been revived. Would you like to be interviewed? I think you would be a great subject.

01-11-16  11:47am - 3268 days #6
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by PussyCat:


The studio submitted The Martian as a comedy. They did that so it would have a better chance of winning Best Picture, which it did, without having too much competition in the Best Drama category. It's common practice during awards season.

Mr Robot is actually a really good show. And I'm so happy Christian Slater won! I've loved him since Heathers. It's on USA Network. Hell, yeah, I'm a GOT fan! Love it.


Thanks for explaining that it was the studio's idea. Stunts like calling it a comedy are exactly why I don't like award shows. Using that logic, they could have nominated it as best foreign language cartoon, as I understand that category has only weak nominees this year.

I hereby nominate The Martian for this years Rise Award for for best porn movie.

The shame of it is that I rather liked the movie.

01-11-16  07:58am - 3268 days #3
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by Amanda:


I was a little flabbergasted that The Martian was in the Best Comedy category. I have seen it and yes, it had its funny moments, but I would never have thought to classify it as a comedy. Matt Damon was fantastic in it, though.

I have also seen the whole season of Mr. Robot and it was a very good show. Thought-provoking with cool plot twists, I do think it was a deserved win. I say this having only seen the first episode of GOT, so perhaps I am not the best judge. I believe I have a few more months to get caught up for the new season.

I have also seen Joy and that is another film that I believe didn't make it into the correct category. Again, it had some humorous bits, but Trainwreck was much funnier.


I loved Trainwreck, but have not seen Joy.

01-11-16  07:34am - 3268 days Original Post - #1
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey


I seldom bother with award shows as I usually disagree with their choices for the winners.

Last night was no exception. I loved the Martian, but best Comedy? Are they kidding?

I think Game of Thrones should win in every category every year, so they picked Mr. Robot. I have never heard of the show. Has anybody seen it and can give an opinion?

Also, do we have any GOT fans here?

01-11-16  06:50am - 3268 days #3
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by luthien:


R.I.P.

He was an amazing artist and songwriter/performer. An inspiration to many. He will be sorely missed, but his songs will live on forever in our hearts.

"We can be heroes, just for one day"


Welcome to PU. Please feel free participate.

01-10-16  03:14pm - 3269 days #33
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by badandy400:


Mbaya is right. Anything goes, just dont be a jerk. A 10 second look at my collection and you will come to the conclusion that 50 shades is mild. I have everything from the passionate erotica at X-Art to the extremes of sites like torturegalaxy and other sites TBP does not review.

So we understand you might not talk about it with coworkers, feel free to here.


You left out that you have the biggest porn stash known to mankind. If I downloaded day and night I could not ever catch up. LOL! Glad to see you here.

01-08-16  09:03am - 3271 days #31
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I understand what you are saying about that little bit of kinkiness. This is a great non judgmental place where no topic is off limit except for rudeness towards each other and our opinions. Feel totally free here.

01-07-16  08:46am - 3272 days #25
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Welcome to PU. It sounds like you know a lot about porn and can be a valuable member here. How did you come to hear about PU? Do you know about the weekly raffle?

01-07-16  06:58am - 3272 days #23
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by Tittyshake:


I really like Naked News, Met Art, Hegre Art, Divine Bitches, Sex and Submission or anything with Tori Black or Stoya.

I recently reviewed Bopping Babes. I think you might like that. Edited by Staff on Jan 07, 2016, 08:45am

01-06-16  02:35pm - 3273 days #2
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
I know you did not ask for a response from a male, but two sites that were reviewed recently were lez kiss and and sapphic erotica. You may find those interesting as well as girls out west and abby winters.

01-06-16  01:28pm - 3273 days #21
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Originally Posted by Tittyshake:


Hey folks,

As per my name, my hobby in life is to watch woman shake their titties... because let's be honest who doesn't?

I'm mainly into photography, glamour, light BDSM and Femdom sites. But I also fully enjoy weird porn that you might be confused as to why it exists. So if you see anything weird as fuck please send it my way. Like that weird pickle fetish where woman pour pickle juice on each other and feed each other pickles. Also been in search of some Justin Trudeau and Barack Obama porn. Anybody come across any...?


What sites have you liked so far? I would love to see a review from you

12-24-15  05:27pm - 3286 days #4
mbaya (0)
Suspended



Posts: 891
Registered: Jul 07, '08
Location: new jersey
Asssmoothie used to be listed. I checked it out back then. It is not clever, just in bad taste as it is an accurate description of the content.

301-350 of 891 Posts < Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Page 7 8 10 12 14 17 18 Next Page >


Home - Sites - Users - Reviews - Comments - Categories - Forum

Contact Us - Announcements - FAQ's - Terms & Rules - Cookies - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Review - Webmasters

Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2024 PornUsers.com.


Loaded in 0.04 seconds.