Goth Girls Reviews & Comments
Top Sites
|
Top rated and most active sites in the niche. |
Top Rated
No Sites Found.
|
|
Most Active
No Sites Found.
|
New Reviews
|
Latest 3 user reviews in this niche. |
1. Burning Angel (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 3 months (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Alternative, tattooed, rebellious, sounds like my college years, except for the tattooed part.
This is a large site with 1,544 scenes but take note: It has not updated since mid-November 2021. That is two months. It was averaging two scenes per month. There have been none over the last 2 months. I don’t know if the site is now dead or not.
The newer scenes can be downloaded in 4K.
If you like hardcore porn, you will probably like this site a lot. Including hardcore lesbian scenes. Which is unique to me. You don’t see really hardcore lesbian scenes on a regular basis.
Bondage, BSDM, gags are all featured in different scenes. |
| Cons: |
It’s not updating. That is a newer problem. The last update was on November 14, 2021. I have kept up with this site for several years. I wouldn’t be surprised if it starts updating again. They seemed to be going through some changes with the types of scenes. Maybe it’s just temporary?
I believe the lesbian scenes really stand out as good. The rest of it is going to push a lot of boundaries for people. It’s quite hardcore and rough. |
| Bottom Line: |
My original interest site was based on the fact that I was kind of alternative, rebellious young woman in college. I never did get into the tattoos. I think the star of the site, Joanna Angel, is really sexy. I had enough reason to like the site and keep up with it. I won’t talk too much more about the sudden stoppage of updates. If/when it changes, I will update the review or post a comment. Right now, it has been over 2 months since the last update. There was a change going on. The site adopted a theme of having 3-4 scenes that followed a similar story. I believe overall, the site is a definitive hit or miss site. I don’t believe there’s much middle ground for porn fans. If you dislike tattoos, the site is pretty much out for you. If you don’t like hardcore porn, the site is pretty much out for you. They’ve not found a happy medium. The lesbian scenes are even much more hardcore than we expect from two or three women.
The quality is there. They have up to 4K downloads. It’s not as hardcore or polarizing as Kink Network. It’s close. You have to throw in the tattoos. The majority of the newer scenes do take a more BDSM, bondage, gags, whips style approach. I believe that is hit or miss. I don’t mean the person swinging the whip. I really like the lesbian scenes on this site. The reason is, I have never had a lesbian encounter and there’s a part of me that believes this more hardcore style is what it would really be like. I’m not at liberty to discuss psychological and therapy topics. I do know there is a certain level of physicality in lesbian relationships. That and Joanna Dark keeps my interest on this site.
Some of the lesbian parts I have noticed: There seems to be real sub/dom tension between the women. Some of these women are not regular porn stars. I haven’t ever seen some of them on any site. The lack of an established role leads to very intense sex. It’s as if each one is trying to establish their dominance over the other. They do not leave out the parts you would expect from a lesbian scene. There is passionate kissing. You can see the escalation of emotions. The women’s bodies even react how their bodies should, between hard nipples and very wet lower regions. There is a realness there. It is why I don’t like BDSM between a male and female. Physically, the likelihood of a female being dominant over a male is just not that likely. If he’s an establish sub and likes that role. That more understandable, but it loses that tension. Someone needs to make a purely lesbian site where neither woman is the established dominant one. That is something porn lacks.
That is the strong point of the site for me. It’s enough reason to keep up with the site. I do have problems with believability in porn. Having a site where I can see and feel the tension, it fixes the believability problem.
The rest of the scenes are standard harder than normal hardcore. I’m surprised how long some of the scenes are. The people are going at it at a fevered pitch. They’re lasting 40 minutes. As a viewer, I believe that loses some of the enjoyment. It becomes punishing to watch. That is the hit or miss aspect for me. Hopefully, the site will return to updating. It is not the first time the site has had a layoff. They were shooting some scenes as self-shot to avoid the Covid restrictions. It could be anything has delayed the current updates. My recommendation is based on my own experience. If you can find certain styles of scenes on this site that, do it for you, it’s a really good site. I don’t think anyone will like all the styles of scenes. Maybe takes a little patience. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
2. Burning Angel (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
-Site theme is models with lots of tats and piercings.
-Recent videos have your choice of definition of 160p through 2160p for download.
-The streaming option is 288p through 2160p.
-There is a daily download limit of 300 GB for videos. Which is huge. That would allow you to download about 90 4K videos per day, or 353 720p videos per day. So I don't consider that a con at all.
-Customer support is excellent. There is 24/7 for email, telephone, and live chat. I suggest using live chat, since that's the fastest way to get a response.
-They use some recognizable stunt cocks, like Steve Holmes and Markus Dupree, as well as models like AVN hall of famer Joanna Angel. So the channel uses big name talent in this niche, which I think of as extreme hardcore goth. Not my cup of tea, since I like cute teens with minimal tats and piercing.
But it's a matter of taste. If goth sluts are your fetish, you could find plenty of content to your liking. |
| Cons: |
-The main con is the navigation. Adult Time and it's channels are difficult to navigate. You can't easily get a listing of all the videos at a channel. Or all the models at a channel.
-Memberships need to be understood before you join. The monthly membership is usually streaming only. The simplest way to get downloading privileges is to get an annual membership, but most PU members only want to join for 1 month. There is a monthly membership that gives downloading privileges, but it's hidden, and not usually visible. I suggest using live chat, to see if customer support will offer you a discounted monthly rate that includes downloading privileges. I know at least one PU member who got a monthly Adult Time membership with downloading privileges for the same price as a monthly streaming only membership.
-The acting is terrible. The plots are unbelievable.
-No model bios. |
| Bottom Line: |
Adult Time advertises itself as the only (porn) subscription you need.
I personally think that's over-hype.
There are plenty of other porn sites worth joining.
But for fans of hardcore sex, there's no denying that Adult Time gives you plenty of bang for your buck.
You get over 250 channels, 55,000 episodes and 8 releases per day.
That covers a wide variety of niches. And most of the content is high quality: no schlocky goods on sale that I can find.
With so many niches covered, there should be plenty of hardcore action to fill your hardcore needs.
Not everyone at the PU site is thrilled with the Adult Time network.
But I personally think the Adult Time network is one of the best bargains in porn today (and that is true for the last few years).
Burning Angel used to be a separate site. But it was folded into the Adult Time network a few years ago.
I don't believe it still exists as a separate site: it only exists as a channel in the Adult Time network. Does this make a difference in your membership to Burning Angel?
Yes.
As a channel in Adult Time, navigation in Burning Angel gives you what I consider the Fucked-Up Click Navigation System. Years ago, as a separate site, it was much easier to navigate through the Burning Angel content. In today's world, as part of Adult Time, you need nimble fingers to go Click-Click-Click to find what the hell the content is at Burning Angel. I've been a member of Adult Time for about 3 years now (I know, most PU members only join for 1 month at a time), but I think some of the channels are excellent, especially Pure Taboo, and there's plenty of content for me to find. I just wish the navigation was easier, so I could find the content that I like.
What is the site theme of Burning Angel?
Hardcore sex.
With models that are heavily tattooed and heavily pierced.
The sex is a mixture of boy-girl, 2-guys-1-girl, 2-guys-2-girls, girl-girl, blowjob, vaginal, anal, BDSM, cum drinking and swallowing.
The plots are simplistic, the acting is kindergarden-level.
To watch these videos, turn off your brain, or get really drunk, or snort a couple ounces of cocaine.
Note: some of these videos show the actors drinking cocaine. I've heard of snorting cocaine, smoking cocaine, injecting cocaine, but drinking coke is a new one on me.
I guess you have to watch Burning Angel to learn the uses of cocaine.
Don't use cocaine without the supervision of your medical doctor.
Coke can be dangerous to your health.
Anyway, the plots and acting of the models are at the kindergarden level.
The fake moans and groans of excitement are patently fake.
-Note: Many of these videos have been nominated and have won AVN awards.
AVN is the adult video industry trade magazine.
Burning Angel videos have won best action thriller, best sex comedy scene, best actor, best director, etc. So even though I think these videos are trash, experts in porn think they are among the best videos in porn. I think these videos are shit. But porn professionals think many of these videos are pure gold.
You need to watch a few of these videos, to see if they fit your tastes.
I'm giving Burning Angel a score of 75. That's very subjective.
Main negatives are:
The navigation is terrible.
The plots are stupid.
The acting is terrible.
The main benefit of the channel is it makes you realize how wonderful some of the other channels really are. |
| Respond: |
0 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
3. Burning Angel (0)
Pay |
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Major points for artistic quality and production values of these very tattooed models having sex.
1504 scenes, newer scenes have 4K and 8 other video options from 160p to 1080p.
One update per week though they did miss a week recently.
The sex has two speeds, rough and rougher.
Interesting Halloween-themed scenes including a grown-up Wednesday Addams look-alike.
Looks like they spend a fortune on some of their scenes and that someone sat with a notebook writing every step of the scene out. |
| Cons: |
Unique gets boring too. Though they have a story with most scenes they barely touch on it before it becomes just another porn scene except with tattooed performers.
Some of the guys are just hideous to look at. |
| Bottom Line: |
I come from a culture that is very accepting of tattoos. In our history, they were often revered as a show of royalty. As an expat in America, I still have the intrigue towards the tattoos, but haven't got one myself.
Maybe it's just me thinking too much, but do people with tattoos always have rough sex? Does it come with the territory? I like rough sex porn. It's just it seems like every scene here is recorded in double speed.
Some of the models are really pretty. Some of them look like their tattoos make them prettier. A lot of the guys on here look like a full body tattoo would be an improvement.
They have 1,504 scenes, streaming player works great, I only download the scenes with models I like (Karma RX, Lily Lane, Gina Valentina) are a few of those. I do think Gina's inclusion is funny. She's nothing like most of these models when it comes to number of tattoos or piercings, but she's a very pretty woman.
If you're into anal they have 330 scenes with anal. It honestly seems like more than that after watching multiple scenes all with anal.
I think the best scenes on here are the solo scenes. There are only 132, but you do get very rough masturbation from those 132 scenes. It fills in a niche that isn't very popular. Most solo scenes stay firmly in the softcore genre. Joanna Angel, one of the most prolific models on the site has an outstanding balcony masturbation scene. I really think they should focus on releasing more of these solo scenes. The last one was nearly 18 months ago.
That is my one major complaint. The scenes over the last year are interchangeable. They're still creative, they're still different than normal porn, but only until you get over the shock of the body art.
It's a polarizing site to me. There are people who will hate it for all the tattoos and implants and there are people who will love it just for those reasons. I know a site like this promotes an alternative lifestyle and that's where I think they miss. An alternative lifestyle would have solo, lesbian, orgies, swingers, but instead, the majority of scenes are just male/female.
It's recommended for those that like tattoos and if you are into solo scenes the ones here are very good. |
| Respond: |
2 Replies
- Add Reply
|
|
*Newbie reviews and ratings don't count toward a site's overall score/rank until the user reaches the Rookie status level (5 points). This rule is needed to help prevent fake (or heavily biased) profiles and reviews.
View All: New Reviews
|
New Comments
|
Latest 3 user comments in this niche. |
|
|
|
