| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
376
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
There seems to be a bit of a gap; to me, the first two options sound very familiar (what age is college there?)
I chose MILFs, but in general it's, anywhere from mid 20s to 40 for me.
|
01-29-12 01:01am
|
Reply
377
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
Definitely hot. The hottest possibly being Scottish. At a tube station I sometimes go to, I've never even seen the Scottish platform announcer but her voice makes me weak at the knees.
Does anyone know of any, presumably UK, sites which feature any Scottish girls talking dirty?
|
01-27-12 12:15am
|
Reply
378
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
That's a bit of a personal question... oh, hang on, where are we?
A no for me... but interesting as such things are to ponder, am inclined to believe Jay G that it's better as a fantasy.
(Sour grapes?)
|
01-25-12 05:46am
|
Reply
379
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Sounds a bit risky to me :| Having said that, I feel I'm getting to the age where I can get away with - or at least think I can - slightly more inappropriate behaviour, so never say never...
|
01-23-12 12:27am
|
Reply
380
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
On a small site, eg with weekly updates, and where I like the general style, I may download everything. But a larger site, just the stuff that appeals - even on my favourite sites, there is usually some stuff that doesn't work for me.
|
01-22-12 12:21am
|
Reply
381
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Good poll - hopefully we get enough votes to get a picture of who's where!
|
01-19-12 02:59am
|
Reply
382
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Rarely - I have a list of sites to try, so if one of those was on the discounts list it would give it a bump on my list; but I'd be unlikely to browse/join sites purely because they are cheaper.
|
01-18-12 12:13pm
|
Reply
383
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
It depends on the content. Photos I can take or leave; videos, if it shows the personality of the model (assuming they have one!) then I think it lends to the appreciation of their sets/videos. For this reason, I especially like interviews with the models; they have some good ones at Petites Parisiennes, and some great chat-show type ones at Juliland.
A couple of folk have said it's OK in addition to, rather than instead of, normal content. Surely that's very subjective on the site and the frequency - eg if a site updates daily, with 2 BTS updates a week, is that good or bad?
|
01-18-12 12:11pm
|
Comment
384
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
|
01-16-12 06:36am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
385
|
XL Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
As per the esteemed gaypornolover - another hugely comprehensive review, good to have you on board and look forward to more!
|
01-16-12 01:53am
|
Reply
386
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
I've got two which I use online and can remember the number for both of them... although I always have to check the expiry date, so I guess I miss the point :|
|
01-14-12 05:53am
|
Reply
387
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
Thomas20's Reply
I didn't find the girls fat - plenty of slim girls there, but also lots who are just regular girls and IIRC only a few I would class as chubby; but there are fun attractive girls across that spectrum.
But for someone used to/preferring the nude photo sites, especially the Russian/European based ones, I can see how the healthy, regular girls may seem a bit curvy?
|
01-11-12 01:08am
|
Reply
388
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Review
Wasn't expecting to see a review from rearadmiral on this - but I too am easily swayed by a good offer and I'm glad you liked the site!
Perhaps as a hardcore fan it's more a breath of fresh air to see softcore; whereas I tend to soft/midcore material so found this lacking in tease/playfulness a bit; it's not even the nudity levels since I've found non-nude material that I find more exciting. Agree with Ergo Proxy in that their better stuff seems to be from a while ago; many of the sets I downloaded were a good few years old.
I'm glad you expanded on the technical aspects of the site; I didn't stress enough that it just can't be faulted in size or features.
And definitely concur about the animals :| I am fond of animals, but not in that way; I prefer my smut without any at all!
|
01-11-12 01:03am
|
Reply
389
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd rather there weren't limits, but I'll accept them if I like the site enough (and I'm unlikely to reach them anyway).
It depends on the content as to what the limits should be; if it's enough to comfortably get what I want from a site within the month, I don't mind.
Eg when a member of Girls Out West, the newer movies are huge, some I think 6GB or more; a 20GB limit there could stop me downloading a few in one go which I might want to.
OTOH, for a photo site, sets may be 100-200Mb; a 20GB limit would let me download 100 sets in a day - which I am unlikely to do. There I'd accept a 10GB limit.
|
01-11-12 12:51am
|
Reply
390
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As others have said, it's more likely the bad experiences which will put you off, rather than the other way around.
If I need to ask something before joining a site, then the reply, if any, from the webmaster will certainly affect that, as it will affect rejoining if I had an issue while a member.
The one site I visit consistently, though, is Petites Parisiennes - very largely because the webmaster is helpful and affable; answers all queries and responds to - and often acts upon - all suggestions via the forum.
Having said that, If I didn't get a reply from a webmaster, but I knew the site actually worked and I liked the content, I would probably rejoin. I'm pragmatic if nothing else...
|
01-11-12 12:46am
|
Reply
391
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Concur with Cap'n - a great and thorough review, Brad. A shame the site is lacking; one thing that appeals to me there is the mix of models; eg I like Asian and Latina models, but wouldn't necessarily join a purely Asian/Latina site; but sadly few sites have a good spectrum of ethnicities. I'm tempted by melina.com which seems good in that area, although it's just a small site.
|
01-09-12 09:11am
|
Reply
392
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
Boutique Media's Reply
..cont'd
This lack of pre-joining information is a shortcoming compared to, er, another Australian site I could mention - a shame since I love the slightly raunchier nature of your content :)
|
01-09-12 08:10am
|
Reply
393
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
Boutique Media's Reply
Hi Annie - firstly, thanks for the great work at GOW, I really enjoyed it, loved the models and wrote a review a while back saying as much.
Regarding the review above; BradlyH is right in that it's fairly subjective; although I have written my fair share of very subjective reviews too so I can't really fault the reviewer for that. Fantasy is perfect models for some; and more real, attainable girls for others.
I do feel ps2008 should have been more aware of the amateur nature of the models before joining; it's what GOW is about. However, in his defence, one of my cons in my review was your relatively limited tour; I think you'd be well served by showing eg the update schedule, model index, etc to browsing guests?
|
01-09-12 03:22am
|
Reply
394
|
Bare Maidens
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I've chanced upon this site before and am tempted... I like smut with a bit of an angle to it, so both this and Cosplay Erotica are on my list.
And although I can't find a model list there, I think Bare Maidens features Mosh, who is absolutely my favourite model. Definitely one to consider!
|
01-08-12 01:49am
|
Reply
395
|
The Life Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Tangub, thanks for the fine review! This is another site that's been on my list, but like you I was under the impression that it was rather racier than Met Art et al. I particularly like things like the fetish wear and mild bondage you mentioned - as such it's a disappointment to learn it's very much in the minority, as is the more explicit material the home page teases us with.
To learn that it's more similar to MA is very helpful; I have a few others that can be promoted up the list. Perhaps if there was more than just one set of Valentina Vaughn...
|
01-08-12 01:40am
|
Reply
396
|
Holly Randall
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
Aha - I was a member at Holly Randall a while back (will likely join again sometime) and remember that model. I find thenude.eu invaluable; a quick search there shows a few other sites you can find her:
http://www.thenude.eu/Tiana_4543.htm
|
01-06-12 07:28am
|
Reply
397
|
N/A
|
Reply of
slutty's Reply
Good call slutty.
I was going to say no, since it doesn't work for me at all. Perhaps because we (at least I) like to imagine the models as somehow attainable; suspension of disbelief is key, but seeing her pregnant stretches the point a bit much :|
But if it were my own partner, then I'm sure I'd be quite happy to, er, dive in.
|
01-05-12 05:10am
|
Reply
398
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Khan, thanks for the helpful reply! Of course I understand that the goal here is to promote and inform about actual sites, and so site-specific activity is encouraged.
As such, I didn't particularly expect forum participation to count - so I guess it's just a bonus that poll replies - such as this one ;) - do!
|
01-04-12 11:40pm
|
Reply
399
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Comment
Still my favourite site too. It's changed a bit this year; we've lost some of the variety in locations, no outdoor shoots etc; but we've made up for it with some great new models, great lingerie and a helpful webmaster providing almost made-to-order sets.
I'm sure I'll be resubscribing (and not at all defiantly... :| ) - $15 is a steal for a daily updated site, but the one year seems to have stayed the same - now equivalent to 10 months, so arguable as to whether it's a good buy?
|
01-04-12 11:14am
|
Reply
400
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Only when I have something to contribute to a particular subject (or at least I think I have something!).
Just as an aside, I wonder why forum participation doesn't qualify for a raffle ticket. I can see how site-specific contribution does, such as reviews and comments - but if eg adding trust ratings and poll replies do, shouldn't forum posts also?
|
01-04-12 11:09am
|
