| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Thanks for the tips - Latex Heaven is definitely more my sort of thing (lightweight? me?) Will also keep an eye out for Latexotica, since the link to Lilly Roma also looks like my sort of thing. Speaking of which, are you familiar with fetish/pinup model Mosh? She's not too explicit, but definitely my favourite model, bar none.
|
02-20-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
352
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Thanks for the reply! It's not so much explicitness that I'm looking for (although it doesn't hurt...) - more a sense of tease and eroticism. I've seen plenty of non-nude material that's more exciting than I found Met Art, I suspect they have strict guidelines on how cheeky/sexual the models can be regardless of how naked they actually are. Sounds like Femjoy might be similar...
|
02-20-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
353
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't hate them but I'd rather not see them. Prefer to see girls' natural skin colour, whether it's pale or dark - tan lines being the obvious effect of wanting to change it.
|
02-20-12 07:46am
|
Reply
354
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
As per other users, welcome and thanks for a great review. A shame about the DRM and other issues with this site, which would be an immediate turn-off for me - besides which, although I like latex, I prefer milder, more glam-type fetishwear than seems to appear here. But either way, I look forward to more reviews from you!
|
02-19-12 10:38pm
|
Reply
355
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Review
MisterMark, as per gaypornolover, thanks for an excellent and comprehensive review. This site is vaguely on my shortlist, it has sets of a lot of models I like, so it's good to find out a bit more about it.
You mention it trails behind Met Art in terms of features and quality - do you feel it has any more eroticism to it? I felt Met Art lacking in that respect; not to do with the degree of explicitness per se, but more that there is little tease or cheekiness in it.
|
02-19-12 10:29pm
|
Reply
356
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Excellent review, tangub - I'm glad you found Met Art a little more exciting than I did! Also glad you noted Jenya D - probably my favourite model there, her sets have a bit more of a spark and more eroticism than most - I found many lacking that, even sets from models who do harder stuff elsewhere.
|
02-19-12 10:24pm
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'd say somewhere between personable and openminded. As previously noted, I suspect women tire of the bad-boy thing after a while, but perhaps they never tire of a guy who a) can make them laugh and b) actually listens to them?
|
02-19-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
358
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per messmer - I use it as a shopping list of potential sites to join. It would be good if it could be reordered manually, to put those with more potential at the top.
I knew you could also favourite members, but I haven't used it for some reason.
|
02-19-12 01:34pm
|
Reply
359
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I've never joined any of the networks mentioned; but my favourite site is Petites Parisiennes - the only one I have a continual membership to. There are a couple of others I may consider doing so for - Breath Takers is good but it's very similar in concept to PP; the other is Juliland, joining which was a huge breath of fresh air - fun and crazy and very unique.
|
02-14-12 11:11am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Poll
I've gone for the third option - If I really liked the content of a very small site, I'd give it a score in the 80s, but would wait until there was more content to go to 90 or more.
|
02-12-12 11:02am
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have a list that I generally choose from. I have some near the top but sometimes randomly decide to go for a less prominent one if the niche particularly appeals. A special offer from a site on my list definitely bumps it up!
|
02-11-12 10:43am
|
Reply
362
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I'm a bit more egalitarian about nylons. I absolutely agree with everything you say about the allure of stockingtops and suspenders - although I enjoy porn, my first love is pinup, and if you look up eg photographer Viva Van Story and model Mosh, you'll see what I mean.
But... I also think pantyhose are a very different, but exciting kind of tease; when worn with no panties, the sheerness both hides and shows what's underneath - and specifically when a model is unshaved, I find that very appealing.
|
02-08-12 03:23pm
|
Reply
363
|
Angel Afterlife
(0)
|
Reply of
Afterlife Cash 's Reply
Many thanks for your reply! I really like the photography on your site - so making the navigation a bit better has definitely nudged it a few places up my list :)
|
02-08-12 03:17pm
|
Reply
364
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
That's a no for me! Not at all interested in celebrity gossip, regardless of how sex-oriented it is.
|
02-08-12 03:16pm
|
Reply
365
|
We Are Hairy
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Reply
'Seeing a glamorized model with fancy lingerie and makeup, sporting a full bush and underarm hair would be totally out of place, IMO. '
Or, at least, put us back in the 1980s :)
Actually, I don't mind a full bush even when glamorous - but I guess it does depend quite how full...
|
02-07-12 12:43am
|
Reply
366
|
Lacy Nylons
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Hey messmer... another good review, thanks. Further to your last reply, I'm a bit more lenient with nylons, I like both tights and stockings, but as a bit of a pin-up and retro fan there's no denying the allure of stockings, suspenders, girdles and the like (and I'm not even fifty!). But just a shame that the videos here don't have much tease - that's surely what this kind of thing is about.
|
02-07-12 12:40am
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
Not quite every day - but most days I'll be on TBP to what's been reviewed/listed, and here to see what's up...
|
02-06-12 11:13pm
|
Reply
368
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'm online pretty much all day for work; much involves hunting down info, documentation, etc - so in that sense under 10%.
But of the non-work time I spend online... no more than 20%, including TBP/PU? But as gaypornolover suggested, maybe a little more if I've just joined a site.
|
02-04-12 04:29am
|
Reply
369
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, I work as a web developer so I'm probably reasonably savvy about what is good and not, and when to be suspicious of something.
More to the point, though, I think the fact we are here, and bother to - and are willing to - discuss porn makes us quite distinct from the average porn surfer. So it's likely our collective likes/dislikes etc are probably not representative of porn surfers in general.
|
02-02-12 04:24am
|
Reply
370
|
Steve Bones
(0)
|
Reply of
tboy's Reply
Dammit, the boner comment is the one I was looking for... feeling a bit slow today :)
|
02-01-12 06:58am
|
Reply
371
|
Action Matures
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Seems like you're back on the mature sites, messmer :) Thanks for the review - I've not joined any Ferro sites, although I've been tempted since they have a few nylon-themed ones, I think. But now we are used to some very good sites, it seems a bit much to charge a full $30 for such a basic setup...
|
02-01-12 12:28am
|
Comment
372
|
Steve Bones
(0)
|
|
02-01-12 12:23am
Replies (5)
|
Reply
373
|
N/A
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Poll
I've only been visiting paysites for about a year, so just one at the moment. But I've joined perhaps 3 others that I will go back to more than once, I'm sure.
|
01-31-12 11:30am
|
Reply
374
|
Ron Harris
(0)
|
Reply of
TalonIcefire's Reply
'In my study, I’ve got two projectors (portrait and landscape, respectively) set up to randomly showcase the various models.'
I have a shelf of racy books in my study, but you, sir, show true dedication :)
|
01-29-12 03:12pm
|
Comment
375
|
Angel Afterlife
(0)
|
|
01-29-12 10:21am
Replies (4)
|
