| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
626
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Although here we have very diverse tastes, I think in general we're not representative - to start with, as some folk have said, most people here agree on disagreeing with many common porn themes such as fake boobs.
But more than that, the fact we are here itself makes the difference; that we are interested in porn, rather than just - just :) - using it for instant gratification. Discussing it intelligently and rationally (and paying for it) puts us in a different demographic from the majority of consumers, so as such our views are likely to be different.
|
05-17-11 11:58pm
|
Reply
627
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Thanks for another great review! My own score for this site is high; I thought yours might be a little too high, but then reading your review, you've got a point :)
PP isn't perfect, and perhaps a little niche - but as with you, the quality of material and originality of concept means it remains my favourite site despite having been through quite a few.
|
05-15-11 03:07am
|
Reply
628
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Great review tangub, I guess your findings were similar to mine. I did like the mixture of models there - there are so many sites that concentrate mainly on east European models - who are stunning, but I do also like British and French models, and it's good to see a variety in one place.
|
05-15-11 02:45am
|
Reply
629
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
BradlyH's Review
Brad, good to see you here and a great review - I liked FB, but like you I'd have liked to see it be a bit more erotic, especially given how lovely some of the girls are.
The site itself is exemplary in operation and agree that 'favourites' feature is good - would like to see that on more sites!
|
05-14-11 03:22am
|
Reply
630
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
If it's a site I might be interested in joining, I'll check the facts and review over at TBP. Both here and there are equally valuable resources.
|
05-13-11 01:37am
|
Comment
631
|
Vana Web
(0)
|
|
05-12-11 11:49pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
632
|
Queen Snake
(0)
|
|
05-12-11 12:21am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
633
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Instant turn-off for me! If I really, really wanted to see, I'd fake an address; but chances are I'd just go elsewhere.
|
05-11-11 12:06am
|
Reply
634
|
N/A
|
Reply of
jamy's News
Great to see you here Jam! Apart from the great material you have, the more sites I visit, the more I realise how exemplary your searching facilities are - far better than most bigger sites. I never had a problem with Billing France, but hope that CCBill will attract a few more customers!
|
05-10-11 01:11am
|
Reply
635
|
Ero Berlin
(0)
|
Reply of
t9chome's Comment
This is a site that's been on my to-try list for a while, so a discounted price would definitely bump it up...
|
05-09-11 12:45am
|
Reply
636
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
I'm stuck to choose an answer here. I'm not sure if I'd say exotic, just different; for instance I quite like (east) Asian girls, but not specifically because they are 'exotic'; just because I do, in the same way that some folk might like big boobs or blondes.
So I guess the appeal of interracial sex is valid; but to class it as taboo is, I think, quite offensive. Either way, it's not something I specifically look for, or specifically avoid; in that way I guess it's just like any other sex.
|
05-08-11 02:34am
|
Reply
637
|
Petites Parisiennes
(0)
|
Reply of
fredv's Review
Hi Fred, great to see you here :) And a great review of PP - it's good to know that someone else sees it to be as good as I do.
Perhaps the most telling part of your review is 'And even the girls which are not my favorite types have something to offer here.'
I found the same there - we all have our preferred type of models, but despite all the models being so different there, I found at least one or two sets I liked and downloaded for every one.
|
05-08-11 02:25am
|
Reply
638
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
mr smut's Comment
Having recently joined, it seems that recent material is a touch more explicit; some of the later videos feature more touching and I guess softcore masturbation. It's still relatively tame compared to more typical porn, but still a good site with some nice scenes and ideas.
|
05-05-11 03:50pm
|
Reply
639
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I'd say I do like erotica, but not art-nudes... although I guess that's a subtle, and subjective distinction. For me, I think, erotic photography focuses on the context; eg the situation, a tease, voyeurism, a clothing or other fetish, believable actual or hinted masturbation.
Whereas I see art nudes focused purely on the body of the model; which, with no context, I find a bit boring.
|
05-05-11 12:14am
|
Reply
640
|
N/A
|
Reply of
atrapat's Poll
Although I deal with the stuff at work, and understand the dynamic of it; personally I don't really get social networking, and don't use twitter or facebook under my own name. I'm also something a minor conspiracy theorist and I really don't like having so much info out there with my name on it.
As to PU; suspect that even among those who do use it, many may prefer not to share their proclivities with their FB friends! I guess it would be interesting, if it were here, how many folk would link up their (real name-based) social networking accounts.
|
05-02-11 09:39am
|
Reply
641
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Excellent question :)
Looking through the last two months, it leans towards casual: Summer dresses, jeans & t-shirts, sweaters & miniskirts - but also some evening dresses, business suits. It's all quite nice stuff too; not tacky or gaudy. The kind of clothes that girls actually wear.
The sets that don't start fully dressed, have various lingerie and nylons. A couple of sets I liked include one doing housework, starting in a loose white top and panties... that very predictably got wet; another starting with just a sweater and fishnets; the latter getting torn to shreds. All good stuff in my book.
|
04-30-11 07:44am
|
Reply
642
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I guess it varies according to the review. Reviews are by nature subjective, and if a site really works for somebody, it's good to see them enthuse about it. OTOH, if the review is little more than 'this is the best site ever!!!!!!!!!!' that doesn't really help the site at all.
|
04-30-11 12:28am
|
Review
643
|
Breath Takers
(0)
86.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good mix of British, French, US & East European models
- Mostly natural models
- Some nice outfits and plenty of good lingerie
- Some fun outdoor shoots
- High-res pictures and zips
- Good update schedule, 3 sets + 1 video per week
- No daft BGM in videos |
| Cons: |
- Some navigational oddities
- Pictures often not sharp @ 100%
- Some sets and videos a bit too tame |
| Bottom Line: |
This site has been on my list to join for a while, and and April's reduced pricing was enough of an incentive to bump it up. It's a little close to the kind of art-nude material that does little for me; but there's enough material with some context (situations, strips, voyeur etc) to take it into my preferred erotica genre.
The photo sets are good; although the same locations crop up often, there is plenty of variety with some cheeky outdoor upskirt shots and the like. Many feature strips, from fully dressed to completely nude; and when the clothes do come off, there is some really nice lingerie to be found, ranging from cute and girly to sophisticated and lacy.
Lighting is natural, with associated shadows; and a lot of bokeh (selective focus) is used - both really work for me, but perhaps not to everyone's taste.
The content itself is relatively tame; many photo sets feature the models teasing with panties, slipping their hand inside before removing them, but inserting fingers/toys is rare. But perhaps a bit less so than since the last review here - there are some closer shots and some more recent videos do feature masturbation - which for me, is a welcome change.
Videos themselves are HD, and I really like that there is no background music; the photographer isn't afraid of a little silence or rustling sheets, which then - sometimes - gives way to the preferred sound effects of the models themselves as they, er, get to work. The videos sometimes suffer under natural light, but are overall of good quality.
My gripes are minor. Navigating is odd; from the updates list you can view the sets, but not download zips; you need to click through to the model's page then to the set again to find them. And although the pics are 4000px, they are often a little grainy when viewed at full size; this is perhaps the photographer using a higher ISO so as not to use too much lighting. But 4000px is more than enough so this isn't a big deal.
Overall, this is a good site that's just a little - not quite as much as I'd like, but close - more erotic and sexy than some staple art-nudes. As such, I find myself with a similar score to anyonebutme's. |
|
04-29-11 01:35am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
644
|
N/A
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Poll
Perhaps I'm just a prude, but these extreme/giant insertions don't really do anything for me. Being able to... would surely mean... oh, you get the idea.
|
04-28-11 01:24am
|
Reply
645
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I didn't find it that noticeable - although the images don't quite stand up to scrutiny at full size, they are a little grainy. But no big deal since 4000px is pretty big.
I like it, but does have subtle lighting and frequent bokeh - anyonebutme found some sample galleries at http://www.goldinaraw.com/?p=1
|
04-27-11 04:28am
|
Comment
646
|
Breath Takers
(0)
|
|
04-26-11 12:46am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
647
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I'm keen to join this site sometime too - seems a little racier than Abby Winters - but their preview area is a bit lacking, it would be good if non-members could see lists of sets/videos/updates, which would more than answer your query. (Which I apologise for not doing!)
|
04-18-11 12:25am
|
Reply
648
|
N/A
|
Reply of
yote78's Poll
I don't really remember having crushes either. But I do get them now... for example on a co-worker who's fearfully efficient, for some reason that's quite exciting.
|
04-17-11 10:06am
|
Reply
649
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
As others have said, it's useful; but it's no more so than simply listing any regional variation in price.
I'd be quite happy just to see the $ price from the US and the $ price from elsewhere. Eg on the join page for a site I'm looking at, it says $25/€25 - what I see in the UK (when clicking on $ rather than £) is $28.89, ie somewhere in between.
|
04-17-11 04:25am
|
Reply
650
|
Totally Undressed
(0)
|
Reply of
asmith12's Review
Looking at the sample, this looks quite fun - although like you I'd hope that real girls applying for a job wouldn't fall for that dodgy looking couple interviewing them!
I just wish it was subtitled... I'd love to hear what kind of ludicrous explanations they are coming up with to ask the girls to undress.
|
04-15-11 04:43am
|
