| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
351
|
I Feel Myself
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Comment
"Joining is like to be getting a member of some special community which despises the watcher of "common" porn"
Whereas I'm not that familiar with the site, I agree with you wholeheartedly, EP - especially as the webmaster has basically concurred with the statement.
I confess it was a bit of a step for me to admit I like smut enough to pay to join sites, but having got over that, I've learned a lot about what turns people on, and whereas my tastes are fairly restrained and/or vanilla, I wouldn't at all judge what others like in that respect - and although some porn is obviously mass produced, there is plenty that's not, and features amateur, real models, but that is still proud to be smutty and pornographic.
This isn't a comment on the site itself; again there are different types of porn that appeal to different folk and if this works for people (it may well do so for me) then great. But this is a site where folk pay to see girls masturbate and I can't really see how that's not porn :|
|
03-21-12 08:43am
|
Reply
352
|
Joy Mii
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I concur - I'm not generally into hardcore but like it occasionally and this site is high on my list. From what I've seen, I agree with you about the lighting and colours - it has a clean, modern feel which sets it apart from much other porn.
I guess this is similar to X-Art but for some reason I am more drawn to Joymii, it seems to have more character - have you joined both?
|
03-19-12 08:56am
|
Reply
353
|
Figure Baby
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Aha, thanks for the info, Cap'n - I haven't joined the site since the new photographer started.
I actually quite like the style I see on the previews - but it is a little more glam/mainstream. If the previous photographer is no longer featuring, I think it's a shame not to have the two different styles - there was a more relaxed, natural charm to it.
|
03-19-12 02:24am
|
Reply
354
|
European Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Concur with tangub - this was on my to-join list, there are a lot of models I like on there. But - assuming all set/videos were accessible to members before, I can't at all see the logic of increasing the price fourfold because the site has stopped updating!
|
03-19-12 02:21am
|
Reply
355
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I chose poor preview. I don't mind if a site has limited content, slow updates, or few or no videos. I'm pragmatic enough not to even care (too much) if they charge a few extra $ for non-US visitors. But I would like a good idea of what to expect, so I applaud sites that give members good samples and full browse access to all sets and models.
|
03-19-12 02:13am
|
Reply
356
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Probably less - not for want of sites to join, I have a long list - just that I seem to have less time this year. I haven't joined a site yet in 2012!
|
03-19-12 02:11am
|
Reply
357
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
As others have said, anything humiliating baffles me as much as it turns me off. But as per Denner, not into anal, and especially gaping - and any kind of prolapse activity is guaranteed to provoke a very genuine I-wish-I-handn't-seen-that response.
|
03-05-12 10:07am
|
Comment
358
|
90s Panties
(0)
|
|
03-02-12 05:55am
Replies (3)
|
Reply
359
|
66 Latex
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
I concur with tangub - both in thanks for another good review, and in being a bit uninspired by the settings. This is definitely the kind of glam latex wear that appeals to me... but I prefer a bit more context to drive the imagination - the plain studio backgrounds are lacking a bit and make it perhaps more of a non-starter for me than for you.
|
03-02-12 05:51am
|
Reply
360
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's not the most important factor, but a factor nonetheless - although I suspect more for cheaper sites.
In that I would certainly mark up a site I like for being cheaper - OTOH, if a site is a bit more expensive... well, I knew that when I joined, so I don't necessarily count that against it.
As my mum always told me, something is worth whatever you are willing to pay for it... although I'm not sure she had smut in mind :|
|
03-02-12 05:34am
|
Reply
361
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
I think it's a combination of model and site - sometimes one chooses, sometimes the other. Agreed it can be confusing! But there are a couple of good sites around that help locate the aliases.
|
02-28-12 11:18pm
|
Reply
362
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Well, overwhelmingly yes - I am all for parity and it is simply a rule that's different for men and women, and it shouldn't be that way.
However, although that logical part of me thinks that a topless woman is no different from a topless man, that breasts are no big deal... there's the part of me that's here at PU/TBP. Breasts are a big deal :) and there's a case for preserving mystique...
|
02-24-12 12:56am
|
Comment
363
|
APD Nudes
(0)
|
|
02-23-12 01:34pm
Replies (0)
|
Comment
364
|
Bella 1010
(0)
|
|
02-22-12 06:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
365
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Concur with Denner - thanks for a great review, this looks like a fine site, but the content is perhaps a bit too, er, focused on the business end of things for me. I am, however, looking for a slightly racier-than-my-usual join so will bear it in mind!
|
02-22-12 02:37am
|
Comment
366
|
Sexy Panthose Models
(0)
|
|
02-22-12 02:34am
Replies (0)
|
Reply
367
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
Well, that was easy.
A fairly decisive poll, I suspect...
|
02-22-12 02:15am
|
Reply
368
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Reply
Thanks for the tips - Latex Heaven is definitely more my sort of thing (lightweight? me?) Will also keep an eye out for Latexotica, since the link to Lilly Roma also looks like my sort of thing. Speaking of which, are you familiar with fetish/pinup model Mosh? She's not too explicit, but definitely my favourite model, bar none.
|
02-20-12 03:37pm
|
Reply
369
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Reply
Thanks for the reply! It's not so much explicitness that I'm looking for (although it doesn't hurt...) - more a sense of tease and eroticism. I've seen plenty of non-nude material that's more exciting than I found Met Art, I suspect they have strict guidelines on how cheeky/sexual the models can be regardless of how naked they actually are. Sounds like Femjoy might be similar...
|
02-20-12 03:34pm
|
Reply
370
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I don't hate them but I'd rather not see them. Prefer to see girls' natural skin colour, whether it's pale or dark - tan lines being the obvious effect of wanting to change it.
|
02-20-12 07:46am
|
Reply
371
|
Rubber Passion
(0)
|
Reply of
LatexRyan's Review
As per other users, welcome and thanks for a great review. A shame about the DRM and other issues with this site, which would be an immediate turn-off for me - besides which, although I like latex, I prefer milder, more glam-type fetishwear than seems to appear here. But either way, I look forward to more reviews from you!
|
02-19-12 10:38pm
|
Reply
372
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
MisterMark's Review
MisterMark, as per gaypornolover, thanks for an excellent and comprehensive review. This site is vaguely on my shortlist, it has sets of a lot of models I like, so it's good to find out a bit more about it.
You mention it trails behind Met Art in terms of features and quality - do you feel it has any more eroticism to it? I felt Met Art lacking in that respect; not to do with the degree of explicitness per se, but more that there is little tease or cheekiness in it.
|
02-19-12 10:29pm
|
Reply
373
|
MetArt
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Review
Excellent review, tangub - I'm glad you found Met Art a little more exciting than I did! Also glad you noted Jenya D - probably my favourite model there, her sets have a bit more of a spark and more eroticism than most - I found many lacking that, even sets from models who do harder stuff elsewhere.
|
02-19-12 10:24pm
|
Reply
374
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I'd say somewhere between personable and openminded. As previously noted, I suspect women tire of the bad-boy thing after a while, but perhaps they never tire of a guy who a) can make them laugh and b) actually listens to them?
|
02-19-12 01:38pm
|
Reply
375
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
As per messmer - I use it as a shopping list of potential sites to join. It would be good if it could be reordered manually, to put those with more potential at the top.
I knew you could also favourite members, but I haven't used it for some reason.
|
02-19-12 01:34pm
|
