| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
1
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
..... which has now come through so I'll be joining up again later in the month :-)
|
12-14-11 09:59am
|
Reply
2
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Sounds good! Though I'm still waiting on that refund :-\
|
12-12-11 10:21am
|
Reply
3
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
:-) Yes there appears to be quite a bit of interesting content on the network from browsing through the update pages.
Will be joining up again (for full site access) later on in the month - as long as they give me my refund!!!
|
12-09-11 01:39pm
|
Reply
4
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi, and thanks for the advice! Someone from Diesel has got back to me and said that they will be refunding the membership fee - am waiting for it to go through.
|
12-08-11 10:11am
|
Comment
5
|
Ivana Fukalot
(0)
|
|
12-06-11 10:45am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
6
|
Glamour Flower
(0)
|
Reply of
tangub's Reply
Hi there. No it certainly does not and I did email the Webmaster quite a few times to try and resolve the issue. But I only got the one reply. I thought (and suggested) that they might consider providing an alternate username/password for me to use, but got no reply. It's interesting what you suggest about the problem maybe not occurring if I'd opted to join using the primary biller (Segpay). Hadn't considered this as an issue before, but will bear in mind in future.
Yes, this site/network is indeed on the pricey side. Especially considering my recent payment of around the same amount for a yearly membership at MetModels*! (* using upgrade from membership at MetArt)
|
07-06-11 02:33pm
|
Reply
7
|
Glamour Flower
(0)
|
Reply of
rearadmiral's Reply
Hi. I agree with you exactly re what you said about going through tried and trusted billers. I always try to use Ccbill or Epoch wherever possible. Segpay was the default biller for this site but I opted for the Epoch alternative instead.
As was the case when artnoir reviewed Glamour Flower some time back there are still no zips available for members at this site, which is a shame and which also makes gathering quite laborious and time-consuming. But at the same time maybe makes you pay a bit more attention to what you are actually gathering! I joined the site to get hold of sets of a few models, namely Dary (aka Dariya A - see http://www.thenude.eu/Dariya_A_3194.htm), Petra E (see http://www.thenude.eu/Petra_E_5757.htm) and Sally (aka Sveta see http://www.thenude.eu/Candice_4822.htm) and there were some nice shots of these girls on the site. Checking some of the photos I see that they come in at 2592x3888 - certainly not to be sniffed at, but it should be said that some of the shots do come in a bit blurry sometimes. This may well be because some of the sets are shot in a public/'risque' setting (eg Dary flashing/exposing herself in a taxibus and in a metro subway, or Elizabeth doing the same out and about in a park) and the photographer is probably a bit less steady with their hands (and quite possibly not using a tripod!) than they would be in a confined studio setting. I liked the out-and-about/public exposure nature of these sets, though it should be mentioned that not all of the sets are like this. Many are run of the norm interior/exterior sets more usually seen elsewhere. Apologies if I've gone on a bit! Hope some of this is of interest to you.
|
07-06-11 02:17pm
|
Comment
8
|
Glamour Flower
(0)
|
|
07-05-11 02:04pm
Replies (9)
|
Reply
9
|
Try Teens
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
Hi there - I've been a member of Tryteens for coming up to 3 months now, and my membership is almost at an end. The issue with the live chat popups that you mention is a fairly new one, which started around 2 weeks ago I think. Very, very annoying I agree. Glad that I didn't have to put up with it for the majority of my membership.
|
06-28-11 01:22pm
|
Reply
10
|
Hard Fuck Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
Maines Own's Reply
Many thanks for your reply. I'll have to give this one some thought!
|
04-05-11 01:20pm
|
Reply
11
|
Hard Fuck Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
Maines Own's Review
Visiting the site I see that some comments complain that the action is 'too' hard. Obviously the name of the site does give an indication of the action on offer! I do like the look of the site as I have not seen some of the actresses in action before and may well consider joining in the future on account of this - but would prefer to avoid anything too extreme (eg. dangerous/violent). Have you encountered anything in the clips you've seen which warrants a mention on this count? Gangbang, double-anal etc etc. I'm fine with.
Thanks for any info :-)
|
04-04-11 02:29pm
|
Reply
12
|
Hard Fuck Tales
(0)
|
Reply of
Maines Own's Review
Thank you for an excellent review. You have provided a great deal of helpful information and managed to keep the review interesting at the same time!
|
04-04-11 02:01pm
|
Reply
13
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Interesting point of view Cap'n. It sounds like you're probably more of a connaisseur than me when it comes to this type of thing! I am working on it though :-) I can appreciate what you're saying to a certain extent though -over at Rigin-Studio at the mo (and elsewhere previously) I'm finding some of the photos towards the beginnings of some sets (where the models are clothed/partially clothed) more erotic/a turn-on than the later ones when the clothes have come off!
|
03-31-11 11:47am
|
Reply
14
|
Morey Studio
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Review
Sorry you had what sounded like a bit of a disappointing time there, but thanks for the informative review anyway.
Low resolutions of 'high-res' pics are indeed quite frustrating, I agree. I'm currently a member over at Teen Dreams (admittedly not an art photography site, but still) where I've happily downloaded a number of (older) sets only to be disappointed by the lower resolution of so-called 'high-res' photos - blurring any attempt to zoom in and get a better look at things.
|
03-30-11 02:05pm
|
Reply
15
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Trip999's Review
Hi there! Thanks for your comment. As a member over at sister site Met-Art (I'm on their yearly membership which came in at just under £60 when upgrading from a one-month recurring membership) I've also enjoyed seeing Skokoff's work there too. Much as I don't like recommending the competition (!) there's a site which you might not (?) have come across called Paysite Discounts (paysitediscounts.com/). They don't offer a discount on membership to Skokoff's site but thought that I'd mention it in case any of their other deals might be of interest to you. Should mention that I have not personally used them so am not sure if/how their discounts are affected by regional pricing.
|
03-30-11 01:23pm
|
Reply
16
|
Skokoff
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Many thanks! I hope that this one was a little bit more informative and less 'rambling' than the others I did previously :-)
|
03-29-11 02:15pm
|
Review
17
|
Skokoff
(0)
83.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- High quality photography (2592x3872 portrait, 3872x2592 landscape in high quality)
- User-friendly site design/layout. Everything works!
- A number of very attractive models, especially Vera (Annabella, Irishka and Natasha also very nice!). Site features 93 models in total. Site has models index page - (http://www.skokoff.com/models.html)
- Zip downloads: available in high, medium and low quality
- Download managers permitted
- (Tongue in cheek) The back button doesn't stop working as with some other sites (eg Metart)!
- Cams/liveshow section available (have not checked it out myself though) |
| Cons: |
- Somewhat limited content as site only dates back to June 2008 (52063 photos in total). If site stays in operation, and updates keep on coming, this situation should obviously improve in time.
- Site does feature video clips but only 29 in total
- A little bit more in terms of models biographical info would be nice - eg likes, what they do outside of modelling. A biographical page attached to the end of each zip download (as happens with more recent Met-Art sets) would be great. |
| Bottom Line: |
I like to have my fingers in several pies at once, both hardcore and softcore and recently joined Skokoff to fulfil my ongoing desire for the latter. This is a very good site, though it cannot compete with the likes of sites like Met-Art (where I'm also currently a member) when it comes to sheer numbers/quantity of sets. Rather something more akin to a 'boutique' site where I have personally ventured mainly in order to pick up specific sets - but have indulged in the other material going whilst I'm around.
Nice and easy to use site, zips available - unlike my next destination - Rigin-Studio - where zips have been done away with (nominally, according to the owner, in an attempt to combat piracy).
Skokoff had been on my radar for a while and I finally got round to becoming a member about two weeks ago. Happy that I did.
A softcore, mainly photo site you will not find any masturbation/toys here as is seen at sites like Nubiles or Teen Dreams. This is an erotic photography, and not pornographic, site :-) There are a number of sets with 2 girls posing together, kissing and sucking of boobies/simulated fanny-licking permitted! |
|
03-28-11 02:15pm
Replies (8)
|
Review
18
|
Double View Casting
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I became a member of First Anal Quest (firstanalquest.com) just under a month ago, and thereby gained access to Double View Casting, which is very much a sister site to firstanalquest. I presume taking membership in the first instance of Doubleviewcasting would conversely allow respective access to Firstanalquest though I offer no guarantees!
I wasn't too sure what figure to give Doubleviewcasting. If it had been a stand-alone site I would have awarded it a much lower figure, for reasons given in 'Cons' section. Joint access to Firstanalquest though is a/the major pro about this site due to the increased amount of material that is thereby available.
I suppose the second 'pro' of this site as far as I am concerned is the actresses themselves. A fair few of them are *hot* and I have very much enjoyed seeing them in action. No doubt some of them can be found in action elsewhere on the net(eurobabeindex.com is a great cross-referencing tool for Russian/European gals). |
| Cons: |
I have to admit to giving up early on the 'double view' camera thing. I downloaded the first scene of interest to me in both normal and POV views to see what this double view thing was all about. The standard camera view clip was great. Switching on the POV view however the first thing I noticed is this big nose in the top right hand corner of the screen. Now some might be able to accomodate this type of thing when they're watching their clips and doing their thing....Me, I found it a tad offputting. In addition, the video quality on the POV clip was not as good as the standard camera clip of the scene. And that's where my experience with the POV angle ended. A bit lame I know - apologies.
What else? The number of clips on Doubleviewcasting itself is low (approx 25-30) but as has been mentioned previously this situation is improved on account of material available at Doubleanalquest (approx. 90). |
| Bottom Line: |
(cont'd from Cons - ran out of space)
A good number of the actresses on Doubleviewcasting also feature in different scenes on Firstanalquest.
Download speeds from Doubleviewcasting can be fairly slow at times (down to 68kb/s for me the other night) and I have generally found these to be lower than on Firstanalquest.
*Bottom Line
I very much like the style of action here and on Firstanalquest, though it certainly won't be to everyone's taste: the anal sex is fairly restrained and not very rough, but thereby quite erotic. Users who enjoy a bit more rough (as seen for example on the Norestnetwork) might not find Doubleviewcasting so much to their liking.
In addition I can understand why fans of action where the actresses become more 'involved' (vocally/facially at louder volumes) might want to look elsewhere. Me, I personally prefer more subtlety and lower volumes :-)
Some of the scenes that I have found on Doubleviewcasting (moreso on Firstanalquest) represent the best material that I have encountered so far. A few gems.
Each to their own! |
|
01-13-11 03:00pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
19
|
Cuties Galore
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Thanks for your interesting review. I've never been part of the 21stSextury network before but the Cuties Galore part of it (along with the Lez Cuties/Honeys section) look very appealing in terms of what they appear to offer concerning females engaged in anal play! Will probably sign up for a yearly deal a bit further down the line.
|
01-04-11 03:49pm
|
Reply
20
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Review
Interesting read :-) I might well consider joining at a later date for the content on this site and associated others.
Have come across a few others tonight which you may/may not have come across which also look appealing : rectalfreaks.com and freeanalpassport.com (apparently free to join for 2 days then billing kicks in - see review over on Porn Inspector if interested). Both look strong on anal content w. Russian/E European actresses.
|
11-05-10 04:42pm
|
Reply
21
|
No Rest Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Thanks! A small contribution to what looks like a great resource bank of experiences here.
|
11-05-10 01:58pm
|
Review
22
|
No Rest Network
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I was about to purchase 4 of Mr Grandi's dvds from an online dvd retailer in Italy when I came across his website address on the back cover of one of his dvds. I quickly made up my mind that I was going to join his site instead. If, like me, you enjoy anal action + Russian ladies then this site will not disappoint. There are some very attractive actresses here engaging in the aforementioned activity.
Worth a mention is the presence of about 15 nice double anal scenes on the site (a genre which I am a recent convert to, and very much enjoy).
Users can choose from 2-3 download options for video quality for most clips (normal resolution, HD and Full HD). The quality is very good, as are the photos. |
| Cons: |
Not all the attractive ladies that you come across on Mr Grandi's network - and who you want to see doing anal - do anal. Boo hoo.
Use of a download manager when downloading video clips from this site is an absolute MUST. Frequently dropped connections when downloading will make you a bit terse otherwise! I personally use Free Download Manager which resumes broken downloads. |
| Bottom Line: |
As has been mentioned this is quite a hardcore site/network. Material available to members (but of no interest to me personally) includes a fair amount of lesbian anal fisting and gagging.
I have enjoyed being a member of this site as I like seeing attractive Russian women doing anal, and the site provides a good quantity of this material. The studio Sineplex produced a great deal of this type of material and this is what got me hooked. Discovering Giorgio Grandi and his Norestnetwork was therefore a happy moment for me. More recently I have joined a site called Anal-Pantyhose (part of the Ferro Network) which I am again very much enjoying. The action here is noticeably not so rough (which I personally prefer) as some of the action found on the Norestnetwork.
I'd recommend the Norestnetwork to anyone who enjoys seeing anal with hot looking women, but would maybe advise caution to anyone who might find some of the action mentioned above distasteful/a turn off. Apparently BDSM content is going to be added soon to this network - again, not something for me. |
|
11-02-10 03:28pm
Replies (3)
|
