| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
501
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Frequent to me means at least daily. Once a day would be daily. Multiple times a day? What would you call that?
|
05-21-15 09:04pm
|
Reply
502
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Poll
Wow. Porn destroys a lot of beautiful women but some are just amazing for a decade or more. This may also depend on the intensity of the activity. Some exceptional European photo models are still going strong after 10+ years, but they just do photos and solo videos. Personality has so much to do with it. Smart, interesting ones that control their careers can go the distance.
|
05-21-15 09:00pm
|
Reply
503
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Reply
Hey RustyJ, I think you hit the nail on the head with the feel in House of Taboo. It is glam bondage. There is a lot of make-up and nice fetish clothing but no real roughness at all. (Straight peeing should not be in this category these days.) But here's the deal. Even with light bondage, the model needs to be tied up well or tied firmly to something. Bondage is about trust, after all and faking bondage destroys the trust concept. When I look at the images here, many, many of them show a girl in handcuffs that aren't clasped or a girl tied in a way that she can clearly slip her hands or legs out of. And seeing a girl that is tied up suddenly slip free and masturbate SO defeats the purpose of the set. Yes, Kink.com is pretty brutal and the models are usually not glamorous, but there are other sites that strike a MUCH better balance between fake glam and "OMG she's tied down tight to that machine and has come so many times she's drooling uncontrollably" bondage. I'm not a huge Hustler fan, but the Hustler Taboo site does glam bondage pretty well. Check it out if you haven't already.
|
05-21-15 08:38pm
|
Reply
504
|
N/A
|
Reply of
LPee23's Poll
Watching American porn where the girls talk (as in, talk at YOU) in English is great, but many American models are...um...too enhanced. The volume of young, fresh, natural interesting European models is just amazing. One category you missed is Brazilian. Holy shit some of those women are unbelievable...even with the enhancements.
|
05-21-15 08:21pm
|
Reply
505
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Poll
I have three that I now buy annual subscriptions to...no brainer when they go on sale for, like, $89.00 a year (that's three months if buying monthly). Then I buy monthly subscriptions when I see something interesting, so I probably have 4-5 at a time.
|
05-21-15 08:14pm
|
Reply
506
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I have several home-built computers and keep them for 5+ years but do incremental upgrades between major overhauls. I bought the fastest AMD CPU made about 2 years ago and it is still up there, so I recently upgraded the motherboard (new chipset), memory and installed 2 SSD drives...one for the OS and one for cache. The thing boots up in 7 seconds and pegs the top of the Microsoft Experience index (for what that is worth) at 7.9 in every category. The biggest bang for the buck speed-wise these days is in Solid State drives. Just upgrade your drive. Seriously. Do it.
|
05-21-15 08:07pm
|
Reply
507
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
The problem with the 3D technology sites use today is that it is old tech, as in red-blue tech. I have not seen any decent polarized (modern TV) 3D porn yet. Making polarized 3D look real takes a LOT of processing power when rendering (creating) and a decent amount when displaying. I'm not sure the industry can afford it.
|
05-21-15 07:56pm
|
Reply
508
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
A lot of sites don't really separate video from photo updates, so it is really by the image or thumbnail. It also depends a lot on what I'm in the mood for. Some sites are predominantly video so I will browse until I find a model I like and then browse for more of her. Bottom line though, it is the thumbnail that decides if I click to watch the video. There has to be something really appealing in that thumbnail for me to click on it.
|
05-21-15 07:42pm
|
Reply
509
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
It's all about the package. There needs to be beauty, some softness and some firmness. ...and absolutely no hard steroid face. Huge muscles on a girl? Pass. Ballet dancer body? Yes, please. Flexibility turns me on, too. There are a couple of girls on Met Art that are athletic and flexible but not too muscular.
|
05-16-15 01:08pm
|
Comment
510
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
04-23-15 06:56pm
Replies (1)
|
Comment
511
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
04-21-15 06:57pm
Replies (2)
|
Comment
512
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
04-18-15 09:27pm
Replies (4)
|
Comment
513
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
|
03-22-15 09:56am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
514
|
DDF Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Comment
I am here looking now and the discounted price has gone up to $33.95. Not a cache issue. I let the PU folks know.
|
03-22-15 09:37am
|
Reply
515
|
Femjoy
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Comment
I took them up on the Nubile-films and Joymii 2-for-1 offer. It was a great deal. I also saw a Femjoy $14.95 for a month offer but apparently it was only valid for a few days and I missed it. Make sure to sign up to their newsletters so you don't get left out of the deals!
|
01-17-15 06:13pm
|
Comment
516
|
Hegre Art
(0)
|
|
12-21-14 04:04pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
517
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Poll
A little rash or a slap mark is OK. Lots of pimples, razor burn or "other" can be kind of distracting. Many models go to great lengths to make sure their lower extremities look pristine, front and back. It does not take a lot of abuse to change a close-up view from Yum! to Yuck!
Oh, and I've seen a few great close-ups ruined by a FLY! A BIG FLY! WTF! Edit that out! :-)
|
12-06-14 04:44pm
|
Reply
518
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
I submitted this poll a while ago and would have updated if I had known they were going to use it again. Funny how things change in a year. I'm also at around 4 TBs.
|
11-16-14 02:47pm
|
Comment
519
|
Erotic Beauty
(0)
|
|
09-23-14 06:39pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
520
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
I'm with you on the anal thing. I can't think of her name, but there was a beautiful tall, athletic dark haired eastern European model that appeared on the scene a few years ago. First saw her on Met Art, I think. Then she popped up everywhere and soon had her then perfect boobs enlarged. Next time I saw her (not on Met Art, of course), she's doing anal. All I could think of is "awww". You can't unsee stuff like that.
|
09-13-14 10:43pm
|
Reply
521
|
N/A
|
Reply of
skippy's Poll
So...the reason I wrote the survey is to see what people think about seeing certain models EVERYWHERE and their thoughts on models that just don't seem to have the same, um, bounce that they once did. The girl named Malena/Maria seems to be everywhere these days. Caprice and Melissa Mendini are very, very popular models that, although beautiful and versatile, just seem, uh, a little over exposed. Malena Morgan is another very popular bombshell that I have seen in some sets lately where it just doesn't look like she's having any fun. I don't know if they are just crappy sets or what.
I just joined Twisty's for like the 10th time on a bargain sign up. There are a lot of great models there (including 35 sets of Malena, 31 sets of Caprice and 41 sets of Melissa Mendini), but also some older (30+) models and porn stars that I would prefer to think of from...kinder years.
Some models look great forever, some are one-shot wonders (pun intended) and a lot kind of evolve or devolve from the pressures of the business.
In the end, though, there are models we like no matter what, models we don't like very much and a whole lot of models that we will gladly look at until somebody more interesting comes a long.
|
09-13-14 10:24pm
|
Reply
522
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Drooler's Reply
Eufrat is a great example of somebody who has been modeling for a awhile but still has a great attitude and appearance. Lorena is another really lively one. There will always be great models that will look good well into their thirties or until they retire (Like Marketa Belonoha).
|
09-13-14 09:43pm
|
Reply
523
|
Twistys
(0)
|
Reply of
brotherlove's Reply
Yes, I had a chance to look through things in more detail and agree that it doesn't seem to be as good as it used to be. The advertising alone seems like it has doubled and I complained about that in 2012. It is funny that you mention score rigging as there are a lot of new , pretty average videos of pretty average girls rated 9.6 or higher, something I've never seen in any site. Now I know why. It is remarkable how many good sites have been destroyed by new owners that are just out to recoup their investment. This is probably one of them. Probably still worth it for $10 once every couple of years or so.
|
09-12-14 04:13am
|
Comment
524
|
Twistys
(0)
|
|
09-10-14 08:35pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
525
|
Watch 4 Beauty
(0)
|
|
09-10-14 07:33pm
Replies (0)
|
