The last time I joined Hustler, this site was included in the network. Now I see it is still owned by LFP, but is part of a network that looks like it has a younger overall intended audience. It has been a long, long time since LFP material was top-notch, but I'm sure there is still some good stuff here.
If you put your email into the sign-up page and then back out at the credit card info page, you will eventually get a pretty good offer via email.
Well....lately I've been trying foreign clubs (russian and latin) and this one popped up on my radar. I noticed that they now have a payment option for ccbill, so apparently they are figuring out that we don't want to be billed directly. I will probably try them within the next month or so and will write a review when I do.
Call Epoch. It is in their best interest to assist you in getting access. If they can't assist in getting you access, tell them you have never had access, can't get anyone to respond from the site and request a refund. They will deny it initially but if you don't have access or a refund in 24 hours, call them back and keep calling. Be a squeeky wheel.
I just noticed that TBP is not doing business with this site, so they are a probably a pretty bad site in terms of support and business practices. Epoch is still your best bet. Use the fraud word if you have to but only after politely asking them for help.
And, as always, come to TBP and PU for reviews BEFORE you sign up to a site. They usually can tell you if a site is trouble.
This site is one of the many BDSM sites in the Fetish Network and joining this site gives you access to the other sites in the network. I wrote a review of FN back in Februrary of 2017 that is still valid. FN has some OK stuff, but they do really dumb things like make it hard to cancel (cancel page makes a discount offer but doesn't actually let you cancel. You have to contact them for that.) and sign you up to other sites without consent. I just joined BrutalPOV and, true to form, I was charged $1 for something else even though I unchecked all of the cross-checks. Turns out they automatically sign you up for a site called fetishclub.com, which is a bunch of old psuedo-fetish videos in various categories. I ended up writing support to cancel both subscrtiptions so I won't have to screw around with this later. I just don't understand why these people screw over their subscribers like this. If you join this site, watch for other sign-ups and cancel them right away.
Just so you know, I'm not complaining at all about the way the trial was described at TBP. I am complaining about the way it was abused by the site. TBP was told the trial included three partial videos. OK, the site lied. I was charged the upcharge upon the third CLICK on the site. I saw one girl, returned to main, clicked on another. BAM! No warning or explanation of any kind! I was on the site for less than 45 seconds before they hit my credit card for $39.95! That's what I consider inexcusable... Would you accept that kind of crap from Amazon? What about Met Art? Would you tolerate a live chat site that didn't delineate between free and pay links and arbitrarily charged your card for browsing? No? Of course you would not. No reputable web site of any kind would rip off a customer like that if they EVER cared about that customer enough to want to see them again. Well, they will never see ME again! OK, I'm done.
You set this PU site up so people could give their honest opinion about the sites visited. This is my honest opinion.
1-day intro is A FRAUD SCAM! FRAUD! FRAUD!
Only 1 video view allowed and viewing the 2nd video triggers an automatic $39.95 charge (which is more than the regular monthly charge)! NO WARNING OR REQUEST FOR APPROVAL!
Only 23 girls on the site as of 12/8/12
Each girl has 1 video except for doubles (3), so that is 20 videos, total!
$39 for that! Get real!
I saw right away that this site only has 20 or so videos, but they looked interesting, so I decided to give the 1-day membership a try. When the site did not like my username and asked me to change it, the cross-sales I had unchecked mysteriously became checked again. If I had not noticed it, I would have been charged $40 right then for a site I did not ask for and would not have even known about.
Once I got into the site, I started to download one video and was unable to right click and choose "download". As soon as I tried to EVEN LOOK AT a 2nd video, the page changed to an "UPGRADING ACCOUNT, please wait" page. I immediately paged back and tried another page. Same thing on the next page. Within 90 seconds, I got a call from my credit card company asking if I had authorized a $39.95 charge to Segway in Great Britain. Clearly, I did not! To ensure that they did not try to charge me again some other way, I had to cancel the card and get a new one issued.
There is absolutely nothing sleazier than baiting people with a 1-day intro pass and not telling them ON THE MAIN SIGNUP PAGE, what the limitations and expectations are. My experience with other sites in this network (SSC Group, LLC) has not been particularly good and I consider this baiting tactic just plain fraud!
Be very, very careful if you decide to join this site or other sites in this network. Clearly, they are a hit-and-run operation that does not care if they rip you off or not. DO NOT USE the 1-DAY PASS as you will almost certainly be charged the highest possible monthly rate just for clicking on a link to see what you thought you had already signed up for!
Oh, BTW, just to be completely fair, in the unlikely event that the webmaster for this network sees my review. Take a look at my 100% trust rating and then respond if you wish with a justification for the insanely unethical charging tactics you have. I will gladly retract this review if you can justify your tactics.
In the meantime, I recommend to everyone to STAY AWAY FROM THIS SITE AND NETWORK!
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Attractive, fit and flexible models
Images and videos all the way back to 2000
About 65 models
5-30 sets per model
Exclusive content
All sets are dated
Probably 60+ HD video clips
Sets are nicely done (all studio)
CCBill generates a random username and password, (at sites request) but the site allows it to be saved.
Best site that I know of for the genre
Good honest site in a tiny niche
Minimal cross-selling
Cons:
In order:
Image size is 800x1200 MAX!!??
No image size options. What you click is what you get.
Navigation is truly awful!
No zip files of sets!!!??
File numbering is 001.jpg, 002.jpg (making file management diffcult)
Older vids are tiny
Older images are REALLY tiny (800x524)
Many of the models are only partially nude
Some are not nude at all
Updates maybe 2 times a week with partial sets.
Simply too expensive for quantity of material.
Bottom Line:
I tripped over a video from this site on Dailymotion.com and, after looking and leaving several times because of the high price, finally decided to see what was there. I was not really disappointed, but it was immediately apparent that this site is not run by any of the big players.
All of the girls are fit, which I suppose they have to be to be flexible like they are. Many are very attractive...some even beautiful The sets are all very similar, with the model starting out clothed in a dance outfit or something similar and then paring down to whatever their personal minimum is. Some of the sets start out with the girl nude. The sets are well done and the girls seem to interact well with the photographer. (suggestion: get a ladder! A full-body straight-down shot of some of these girls would be amazing!) Sets are generally between 25 and 50 images. These are all Eastern European girls, I think, and I have never seen any of them on any other site that I can recall. Kudos to the talent scouts for that.
This site does not have any sex, insertion, masturbation, etc. The models simply flex in incredible ways and give you a nice view. This webmaster has another site called perfectflex.com where there are toys and insertions. Personally, I'm more into the view, but I may and up over at the other site at some point. Clearly he's got models that are willing to pose nude. He needs to up the volume with those models here.
It looks as though there are a few "regular" models that have 20 or more sets. It looks as though this is the "stable" now, as the updates are dominated by these girls but I can't tell for sure because updates only come twice a week.
Now....on the down side...
That collection of 60 mnodels dates all the way back to 2000, so you can get some idea of the volume and frequency of updates.
The images on this site are much too small for today's monitors. I'm downloading 4k images from other sites, so 800x570 is really unacceptable. And as good as some of the older sets are, I'm going to have a hard time keeping images that only fill 1/5 of my screen and are grainy at full-screen. The webmaster really needs to go back and post the larger master images.
Navigation is pretty basic. Click a model, click a set, click an image, click "page back" to go back to set, click another image. No forward or backward, etc.
No zip files???? Come on, really? That makes no sense whatsoever...unless the server can't handle it...
Bottom line: I really like the type and quality of content, but the site really needs a lot of work to attract and keep subscribers in this 2-updates-a-day for $20 world. $39 to sign up? Somebody needs to take a marketing class to learn about elasticity in marking, not just modeling. I would be recommending the site like crazy if it were $19..but have a hard time telling anyone to check it out for $39.
So....my apologies to the webmaster...but if you are interested in this site, keep your money until the price comes down or they offer a mega-pass for all of the super-flexi sites for $39. After this month, that is probably the only thing that will get me back.
I have annual subs to last 3 above plus SexBabes, I think. Naughty America has too many "mature" porn stars for me, though. Wankz might have been the site I had a lot of trouble with initially but finally got it dialed in with my player. I'll have to go back and really look at the video quality again. You need to try SexBabesVR. I think there may be some samples on PornHub.
Hey, not to draw this out much further, but does the MOVING in the VR videos at CzechVR bother you any? Some go forward and backwards, some tilt and some just go up and down. This is the only "top" site I can think of where the camera moves. (Lot's of lesser VR sites have camera shakes)
OK, I went back and looked at the VR vids I kept, which were the ones of girls I thought were reasonably attractive. None had the neon make-up. I did notice a very heavy and kind of unusual use of darker eye shadow though, which may be a signature item for the make-up artist that they use. The most recent one I have is #122. One of the 2 girls in that video has highly exaggerated smoky eyes.
(One thing I didn't mention before is how annoying it is when a VR girl plants a fake kiss on the camera. They do that a LOT here.)
In general, although a few of the girls are quite pretty, I do not think most of them exceed amateur quality and there is a certain roughness to some that defy explanation. (i..e bushy or very thin-line eyebrows, bad teeth, excessive bad tattoos, mediocre figures..) But I'm just an American asshole who likes Met Art and avoids the amateur sites, so my opinion is completely subjective. Clearly there are a lot of people who like this site....probably mostly Czechs! :-)
As for the poll you linked, it a voting poll based on number of votes, quantity, not necessarily quality. A similar type of poll consistently ranks the Olive Garden as the best Italian restaurant in my area. I would and have have ranked Wankz, Sexbabes and Badoink above this one.
Just for the heck of it, I'll give you three videos that I think are perhaps the reference standard when it comes to VR...at least they are my reference standard. They are well produced and make the absolute most of the girls in them.
1st: SexbabesVR - Romance in the Garden with Nancy A.
2nd: BadoinkVR - Patio Pussy pounding with an unnamed actress
3rd: WankzVR - Casting Couch with Leah Gotti
OK, that's it. I should be writing a review or something...... :-)
Well done review, thanks. It is interesting how different our perspectives are on this site as for me it is one of the lowest scorers among the 20+ VR sites I've joined so far. I totally agree that the video quality was good (it should be good) but I just didn't think the models/pornstars were attractive and the few popular ones had oddly done make-up. (I'm from the US, so eastern European make-up, especially bright colored eye shadow, is hard to watch for me.) Perhaps it has improved since I reviewed it or perhaps a little time will change my perspective, so I'll go back and watch some of the 48 VR vids that I kept from this site. Thanks!
Thanks! I try to be as detailed as possible and when I run into something that is far from the norm, good or bad, I like to elaborate. This one had some cool features, but compared to the leaders out there, the quality just wasn't there.
Your term conventionally attractive is perfect. Very few 18-24 year- olds are not attractive in some way. But very few look like Anjelica or Malena Morgan. Very hard to describe that without sounding like a complete ass.
You should get a set of Google cardboard glasses for your Android or iPhone, just to try it. There are a few sites that will send you a pair for free when you sign up. VR is very cool, but using a full-blown VR headset takes a little more effort than just sitting down at your desk or whatever.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
About 120 VR videos on CzechVR alone.
Site is part of a larger network.
A few Czech models you might recognize.
Fetish videos on sister site are interesting.
Decent navigation
Mostly young models
Site does a few things that are unique
OK quality videos
Cons:
Models are young but several are not necessarily fit or conventionally pretty
Lots of distractions
Models are not always enjoying themselves
Bottom Line:
I have been scoring these sites based on their VR-only content for the most part. I have also been comparing these VR sites to each other, not to non-VR sites, so my scoring is a little different. The assumption is that you are here looking for VR material.
Quick stats:
VR videos:
CzechVR: 120
CzechVR Fetish: 42
CzechVR Casting: 55
65%+ observational.
Unknown number of models (model page includes non-VR sets)
There is a VR update every 2-3 days.
Entirely Eastern European models that are mostly not well known elsewhere.
Downloads available for Smartphone, Gear and Oculus Rift
Most files are 60 FPS.
Resolutions and file sizes are good and listed.
Run times are listed and vary from 10-20 minutes.
Publish dates are listed.
Download times are OK
multiple downloads are OK
Videos are user scored thumbs up or down (highest score: 100% lowest score: 33%)
CzechVR is part of a larger group called Mentalpass. It includes two other VR sites CzechVR Casting and CzechVR Fetish and 6 non VR sites . In total there are about 200+ VR Videos here. That is a very large number for a VR site/network.
One interesting thing they do here is what I'll call the missionary mimic. Basically, the girl lays down and the VR camera moves forward very close over her. She makes appropriate sounds and moves as though the viewer is mounting her. Then she gyrates up and down as though being fucked. The technique is sometimes used in those solo simulated sex sites and it is an interesting experience in a VR setting. The only issue is that the camera moves, which can be unsettling in VR. When done well I'm sure it can be very satisfying.
The other thing that they have here are VR fetish videos. This includes virtual face sitting, fisting, nylons, latex, peeing/pee-play and girls getting golden showers from the male participant. If you are into those things and you have VR equipment, this is a pretty good place to get it. I grabbed a couple of the face-sitting videos and was highly entertained. The rest are not my taste.
That said, as much as I would like to say this is a great site, it falls short in a couple of key areas.
First, the girls are all young and some are quite beautiful, but several are not conventionally attractive. Some are a little large and/or flat-chested for porn roles and some have a (politely) average look. Combine this with oddly done make-up, poor dental work and occasional hygiene issues and this makes a few of the videos difficult to watch. I was asking things like "Where did this girl get her neon eye shadow?..." Some girls also "pull faces" which didn't help. Now, to be fair, I'm a white American. What the fuck do I know about the tastes of people in other countries? Nothing.
This site also illustrates how prevalent tattoos are in eastern Europe. There are also some unusual piercings in places that I have not seen before. Again, these are all things that distract from the scenes. I should be enjoying the scene, not wondering what something tattooed on a girl says.
Only about a third of the videos are participatory. The rest are observing sex, have the girl masturbating or are lesbian scenes with no male participant. Somebody here doesn't get VR. I do not want to be watching, I want to be DOING!
The sets vary a lot in location, lighting and quality. There were a few scenes where the VR perspective (i.e. the camera) moved unexpectedly. In VR, this can be VERY disorienting. Many scenes have unexpected noises that make you want to pull off your VR gear to see what's happening in your room or who is at the door. Table and bed thuds, sirens outside, things dropping and noises that simply shouldn't be there. This was VERY distracting. Several sets also had distracting things within view. I found myself looking around far more often than I should have been.
To be fair, the majority of the models are pretty good looking and they seemed like they were enjoying themselves. But a few almost seemed to be in pain... When a girl looks to be in pain and never takes the guy all the way in, the scene can be unpleasant to watch. Culture, maybe...
Several of the girls spoke English, but a few spoke native (Czech?). I was guessing which line was "Do you want me to take my bra off?" and which was "I want you to fuck me!" Sometimes it was pleasant. Sometimes not.
Bottom line? Well....The fetish stuff is interesting and there are some pretty good videos here, but given the huge volume of VR videos here, the overall score is a little disappointing. You will have to sift through a lot to find the good ones. Those websites that list CzechVR among the top 10 porn VR sites clearly haven't looked lately. The site has some videos out on Pornhub if you want to sample them. After seeing some of the best VR the internet has to offer elsewhere, I have a hard time recommending this site for the general porn viewer. You decide
Good to hear from you. OK, I get that you want to review the niches within a site. Makes perfect sense. If you look at my VR site reviews on PU, I make it clear that I am reviewing just the VR portion but I often mention that there is a network and there is non-VR material. I even rate the VR sites "on a curve" rating them against each other instead of against mainstream non-VR sites that understandably have more content and more frequent updates. Looks like you guys are doing something similar.
I guess what is grey here is the definition of network. Lethalpass is a network that includes all sites for one price. POVD/Passion HD network is a group of individual sites that provide access to the entire network for an additional fee once you join one site. 21 Network bills itself as a network and lists all material but charges a fee to join each separate site. And Met Art is a network that generally keeps of their sites separate, chargins a separate fee for each one. I'm splitting hairs a little, but the first two networks are more inclusive. The Czech VR Fetish review does a good job of saying that you also have access to the other sites but maybe this is another thing that needs to be fleshed out in the site details column under the subject "network access includes:"
and/or "Network sites available for an additional fee:"
As for the lethalpass network, you really should review the main site, Czech VR. It compares fairly well to other, similar sites on your list.
When I get a chance, I'll write a user review for some of the VR sub-sites TBP is writing reviews on.
Oh, one last thing. HTC Vive owners know that they can use the high-def videos produced for Oculus Rift on their headsets, but people who are looking at these sites prior to deciding which VR headset to buy, or have a new Vive, might not. To be fair to those folks, you might want to change the "video format" listings to just say Oculus/Vive...possibly even if the site doesn't. I know some sites provide download links for both headsets, but the videos are the same. I can't recall if the Lethalpass sites just reference Oculus or not, but I have a Vive and all of the highest resolution videos from this network work on it. Just saying Oculus/Vive would also help make your review specs more consistent.
I appreciate the work you guys do and the great reviews you produce. Let me know if you ever need another reviewer on your team! :-)
I'm a little confused as to why this is listed as a separate site because it is included with a subscription to CheckVR, which I reviewed. CheckVR, Check VR Castig and Check VR Fetish is all part of the same one-price network. Not separate!
If they are considering or have already broken these sites out to be separate, then the scores should be somewhat lower. I reviewed Check VR and included these sites.
I'm a little confused as to why this is listed as a separate site because it is included with a subscription to CheckVR, which I reviewed. CheckVR, Check VR Castig and Check VR Fetish is all part of the same one-price network. Not separate!
I'm not sure I understand. You gave the site a 95 but didn't really explain why. Are you really saying this is one of the best porn sites on the Internet, which is what 95 means?
Also, what is daring about the sex? Is it in public? Is it in dangerous places? Looking at the images, I don't see anything particularly daring.
Well, I've pulled down a couple and some are 3d and some are not. No logic to which is which since a few new ones are not. I have not had a chance to actually watch any of them iun VR yet. Will update when I do.
That is probably because it is not a full-fledged site. It is just a landing page within the DDF site. It also does not appear on their list of sites within the DDF main site. Odd. Clearly still in development.
I just signed up and am looking around now, but DDF has several VR videos! When I search VR it comes back with 61 videos! I will be sure to include this in a review within the next month or so.
Unfortunately, it looks like these are VR but not 3D VR.
I just got a $9.99 email offer and decideed to take them up on it. Filled in the card info, UNCHECKED the two cross sales and clicked sign-up. Error and the card number went away. re-entered it, went to click sign up and noticed that the cross sales had been re-checked. THIS IS HOW THEY GET YOU FOLKS! The default for the page is checked. Anything resets, the boxes are checked again.
Hey RustyJ, I think you hit the nail on the head with the feel in House of Taboo. It is glam bondage. There is a lot of make-up and nice fetish clothing but no real roughness at all. (Straight peeing should not be in this category these days.) But here's the deal. Even with light bondage, the model needs to be tied up well or tied firmly to something. Bondage is about trust, after all and faking bondage destroys the trust concept. When I look at the images here, many, many of them show a girl in handcuffs that aren't clasped or a girl tied in a way that she can clearly slip her hands or legs out of. And seeing a girl that is tied up suddenly slip free and masturbate SO defeats the purpose of the set. Yes, Kink.com is pretty brutal and the models are usually not glamorous, but there are other sites that strike a MUCH better balance between fake glam and "OMG she's tied down tight to that machine and has come so many times she's drooling uncontrollably" bondage. I'm not a huge Hustler fan, but the Hustler Taboo site does glam bondage pretty well. Check it out if you haven't already.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Huge collection
Several niches
14 "sites" plus 2 pay sites
Models are generally attractive
Reasonable variety of girls
Lots of nice looking porn starlets
Sets go back to 2001!
Good navigation
Cons:
lots of overdone porn stars
Many, many enhanced body parts
Average model age is late 20's early 30's
Ads on every page
Image download options could be better
Had a fairly hard time with logins and customer support (they require a captcha for EVERYTHING)
The regular price is insanely expensive.
Bottom Line:
I've been around long enough to remember when DDF was owned by Dennis De Franco, a European photographer who shot for magazines and made Sandy famous. His work was simply spectacular. That was nearly 20 years ago. Since then, DDF has gone from his name, to DDF productions to DDF network. Dennis has either sold the site or no longer has very much to do with it. That's a shame because whoever runs things now is trying to be all things to all potential customers.
The site feels a lot like Twisty's or the long gone Danni's Hard Drive. The collection is huge but the girls are...let's just say many of them have moved a little too far down the porn star path to be really attractive. There are a LOT of enhancements, tons of porn moans and the percentage of anal is far above my threshold of tolerance. (Why so many beautiful or once beautiful girls subject themselves to anal is completely beyond me. And what is with all the gaping asses? If you are into anal and gaping asses, sign up now! You won't be disappointed!)
But I digress, let me tell you a bit more about the sites:
"1 by day" is one of the original sites that provides one video/photo set a day. You know many of these models, but it could be from years ago. Zafira (current), Peaches (last set in 2008) and Eufrat (2013) are among the most popular. Almost every set starts with the girl clothed, then a strip, then maybe a few straight nude shots, then come the fingers and toys. Lots and lots of toys. (If you like toys, then sign up now!) Many of the newer sets look truly new and are of girls I have not seen before. But the formula is generally the same with every set including (simulated moaning) masturbation or insertion. The oldest sets in 1 by day go back to 2001 and the old ones look almost exactly like the new ones except there are no anal shots and not as much insertion in the older sets. With 15 years of sets, you WILL get lost in here if you aren't careful. DDF Busty is a site full of...huge, huge boobs! These are mostly double-Fs at least. Some look pretty good but many are clearly not well done and a lot of the girls have the full figure to support that mass up front. This is more of a full porn site with sex, fisting, blow-jobs and boob sex, with the obvious feature up front. If you are into truly ginormous boobs, you will get your fill of them here. DDF Busty goes back to about 2005 with a set every two or three days for that entire time.
Hands on hard core is pretty much as it sounds. These sets go back to 2003 with SV videos and images in each older set. I can't quite tell when these went HD but I see some 720 as far back as 2005. This is the site that is...um...filled with anal and there is some double penetration and multi-way stuff as well.
Hot Legs and Feet is a fetish site for stockings, shoes and feet. Most of the sets are regular porn with the camera or video emphasizing the feet. Lots of shoe heel insertions... If you are into that stuff, the sets are not bad. The sets go all the way back to 2001 with a few sets a week for that entire time but there are a lot of duplicates to the other sites.
One other site I want to mention is House of Taboo. This is supposed to be a B&D and kink site but if you have ever seen any of the better commercial sites of that genre, you will be pretty disappointed here. Maybe 1 scene in 15 looks even remotely genuine. There are some pee scenes if you are into that, though.
There are several other much smaller sites including "only blowjobs", "Euro Girls on Girls", "Euro Teen Erotica"(6 sets with Anjelica here), "Hairy Twatter" and "Sex Video Casting" which is a collection of casting videos. There are also a handful of one-girl sites like Sandy and Cherry Jul.
So, the bottom line is that there is a LOT of stuff here and there are micro-sites that look like they fill most niches. The quality is decent, the models are mostly popular porn stars and the navigation is consistent and fairly intuitive. But the problem is that they try to fill so many niches that the site doesn't really excel at any of them. I'm not really into hairy twats, feet, peeing, fake bondage, watching blowjobs, fake orgasm moans, bolt-on F-cups, massive insertions, double penetration, anal or gaping. So the sites that feature those things are not something I want to pay for. Fortunately, there is a reasonable amount of good quality solo and straight material spanning a decade and a half. is it worth the $44 or so regular rate? Well, sorry, no. I waited and finally got an intro deal for $25. If you see it for $29.95, go ahead and try it.
If you are into a wide variety of different niches I mention above, sign up now. If you aren't into some of those things, look around for discounts and sign up when you find one. But if you are into any of these niches exclusively, you should probably sign up for one of the many other niche sites out there.
So I'm back. Go to the site through PU and the monthly price is now $38.95!!!! I open Chrome and go direct to the site and get a $29.95 option. I tried to purchase that repeatedly but the option will not load the Epoch pay site (the $99 annual option will, though.) (Yes, I cleared the cache, etc.) Tried Mozilla and it is $38.95. Three months in a row I've tried to join this site. Three months in a row I've gotten something that bothers me enough to pass. Off to Joymii, I guess!
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
