Ah. OK. Natasha Schon is kind of a mixed bag for me, I've commented on MA many times and these shots of Elin/Aya are a good example. All 3 of the Schon MA sets are fairly dark, stylized and possibly highly altered images that attempt to shroud the model in mood and mystery. We have no idea what else Schon is altering in the name of artistic expression. I can appreciate the effort but prefer a little less alteration. The Hegre shots are mostly exactly the opposite and mostly just show the model in her true and unaltered form. Now, I also notice that Hegre has 35 galleries of this model dating back to 2013 (First set is called 18th Birthday so that says a lot....), so this model is younger and less experienced in the Hegre sets. The Schon sets are all dated 2017, so at this point the model has been working for 4 or 5 years. One huge change? The model's teeth. They are decidedly "European" in all if the Hegre sets including the ones published in 2017. (We have no idea when they were shot and every set could have been from the same 2-3 day shoot many years ago.) In the Schon shots, she's either gotten crowns or Schon has done a lot of editing. Either way, the difference is significant.
In the end, none of this matters. It is all in the eye of the beholder. I like this model's body on both sites. Please hold it against me. :-)
Thank you SO MUCH for taking my comments in the correct and positive light. In the end, we are all pretty committed to making TBP and PU a great place for people to find out what is good and what is bad. If PU isn't the CU of porn, I think it is at least safe to say you are the tomato meter. :-)
Thanks for the quick response. I know you guys have a LOT of site reviews to manage, but there really needs to be a better way to deal with this type of situation where a site changes its domain name, especially when the old domain name is still active. By not attaching an old domain to a new one, you are inadvertently aiding and abetting those really awful sites that change their name to evade bad reviews and deceive people into signing up for something again. At the same time, this process means that well established and highly rated sites that change their domain name for other reasons are treated like new sites with unknown reputations. Seems like the bad guys win here.
Hegre-Art.com actively links to this new hegre.com domain and the format and content hasn't changed at all. As a member for many years, I didn't even notice that the name had changed because all of my bookmarks still work. In TBP and PU The search for Hegre-Art returns a not-found or a message that says the site is no longer active. Totally not true. Even a search reference as simple as "This site is now X" would be helpful.
On the other hand, I have signed up for a couple of sites that have had no review only to find that it is the exact same crummy site that I had signed up for before where only the domain name had changed. This isn't common, but it does happen, especially among small niche sites.
So, unfortunately, the limitations of the TBP/PU system not being able to cross-reference site names are doing a disservice to your viewers. From my perspective, you are inadvertently helping these bad sites deceive people while hurting the really good, well established ones that change their name for other reasons. As the Consumer Reports of porn, I know you can come up with a better way.
I went ahead and created an updated review so that at least there is a PU score associated with the new domain name.
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Nearly 300,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002.
Cons:
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
Bottom Line:
Hegre.com, formerly Hegre-Art.com, is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicity, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...not an ounce of fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc.
(Although some sets called explicit really are pretty explicit.) The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, most of these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat. Peter Hegre and his staff are masters at showing the bests of the female form. There are a few pretty exclusive models here that are as amazing as any you will ever see elsewhere and some of the sets and behind the scene videos, like Ana S. standing nude near the Eiffel Tower, are simply unforgettable.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are close to 300,000 images in about 4500 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your closet with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while. It is every bit as good as Femjoy, Watch4Beauty or MPL studios and at its best may be better than Met-Art. ...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus!
Hegre.com, formerly Hegre-art.com is an excellent minimalist softcore site that has been around since 2002, publishing at least 1 new set every day since then. I previously wrote at least 1 review for it. Unfortunately, somebody at TBP completely wiped out the reviews for the old site name (even though the URL still works) so this site has no reviews. What's up with that?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Easily one of the top 5 softcore sites on the Internet.
Models are 18-25-ish, generally petite Europeans...all of them are fit.
Lots of popular European models plus a bunch of newbies and exclusive models.
Very nicely done sets and videos.
Mostly studio shoots with minimal props.
Navigation, search and voting (with "likes") are all pretty good.
Extra features of the site include orgasm videos, tantric massage and some "tutorials" that you have to see to appreciate.
Daily updates.
Images available in up to 10000k!
Over 268,000 images!
Sets dating back to 2002.
Cons:
The photography, which is about 80% of what goes on at the site, is often studio work shot in a plain, white studio. This is intended to show off the models, which are often amazing, but it can get a little monotonous sometimes.
There have also been occasions lately where one or two models dominate the daily sets. Great if you like the model(s)...
Bottom Line:
Hegre-art.com is an excellent softcore photography site with some interesting and remarkable features. It differs from a lot of other sites in that Peter Hegre usually just wants to show you how amazing the female form can be. He does this very, very well! The girls are generally beautiful and the photography is often stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent.
This site is dominated by really well done single model photo shoots and softcore single-model videos. Most of the models are stunning and the photography is among the best anywhere. The models are probably mostly 20-25 with a few 18 year olds in the mix. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all ethnicities, often very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here) and generally very fit. (I just looked through the last few months of sets and can find not find a single model that doesn't look like she wakeboards or kite-surfs....translation...no fat on any of these models anywhere. Really. None!)
Models are usually completely nude throughout the set, but the shoots are conservative, meaning very few close-ups, spread eagles, etc. The majority of images are full body, natural pose shots. These models don't need a lot of props or pretense. Unlike a lot of other sites, these models don't have a bad side or angle. Still.....I do find myself wishing they would turn around if they are going to pose in a crab or bridge position like that....
There are beach/outdoor scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. Again, these are not romps, but more like showcases for the models and the photographer. It isn't ALSscan because it isn't supposed to be.
.....still, even without overt posing, close-ups, etc., there is often something here that will float your boat.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionally done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. There are sessions like this with men, too along with some other unusual sets or videos ending with a male-model orgasm.
There are, according to the site, over 268,000 images in 4332 galleries dating back as far as 2002! The images from that time-frame, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or print it out for an image that is over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want to line your room with life-sized images of amazing women just standing there in totally naked splendor. This site is your nirvana, then.
There are, on average, about 4 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for a place to appreciate the amazing female form for a while...just take the massage-orgasm videos as a bonus!
Yes, for most sites I only sign up for a month at a time, but I have annual subscriptions to a few. You are right about some sets not being that exciting, but I like the format because you can truly see what each model looks like without any stupid props, covered tattoos, airbrushing or clothing designed to hide things. Every single model is real and most are stunning. It isn't up in your face stuff very often and is mostly pretty soft core, but once a week or so there is a set that knocks my...um...socks off.
I just signed up again with a $75 annual subscription. This is one of 4 or 5 soft-core modeling sites that are always worth getting a long term subscription to.
The images are shot in very high resolution so when you blow them up, they are still sharp (unlike some sites that just take smaller pictures and increase their resolution). Many of the images are very sharp, but unfortunately, when you magnify blurry, you get VERY blurry. It all depends on the source image and the focus point that the photographer chooses.
My subscription was through newnudecash (who, as it turns out, is really CCBILL!). Once I logged in I was able to go to support and click on "How do I cancel a subscription". From there, a pop-up appeared with the link to the cancellation screen. I entered my username and password and got a message that said "your subscription has been cancelled. Welcome back in the future!" Kind of an odd process, but it worked. Before I cancelled, I went to ccbill and entered in my card number and email address and hegre-art was there. As soon as I cancelled (in the site) and refreshed the ccBill page, it showed cancelled. So it looks like you can cancel using either the ccBill page or within the website.
Good question. I had to go look to find out. It looks like all of the girls in the massage videos and still shots are already naked and oiled up by the time the shoot starts. A few models have sets called something like "before the massage" where they get oiled up. Most often, though, the "before" sets are images, from every angle, of the girl laying there. As I was just looking through the site, it dawned on me that the vast majority, like 90%, of shoots start out and end with the girls completely naked. It depends a little on the model, but very few of them have any clothes on at all. Ever. For example Little Caprice has 40 sets. She has a corset on in 2 sets, a pair of jean shorts in one set and panties or a bathing suit in 1 or two other sets. So maybe 35 out of 40 sets contain nothing but a completely naked Caprice. Melissa Mendini has 35 sets and she has a swimsuit or a shirt or something on, very briefly, in about 6 of those sets. 44 sets of the beautiful and now retired Marketa. Maybe 8 of those sets have any covering at all. Anna S, one of the nearly-exclusive models and one of the most beautiful models I have ever seen, has over 100 photo and video sets. She is completely naked in about 82 of them. I'm not sure but maybe the point the photographer is trying to make is that these girls are such fine examples of the female form that they don't need to hide anything. So....if you like sets where the girls strip, there are not many of those here. Sorry for the long answer.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
hegre-art.com is a spectacular erotic photography (softcore) site with some interesting and remarkable features. The girls are beautiful and the photography is always stunning. Most of the imagery is excellent, but the signature component to this site is probably the very well done erotic massage and tantra massage shoots and videos. Navigation is generally very good and the images come in a wide range of sizes up to 10,000k. The models are predominantly european, with a few well known US names mixed in. Oh, and the site is an excellent value for the money compared to other similar sites.
Cons:
Couple of small things. First, it is too difficult to get to the larger images for each set and when they load, you cannot move through them because they each load to a separate page. The page-back navigation is a little clunky, too, as it usually does not immediately take you back to where you were before. Oh, and I was completely unable to get the site to work on Internet Explorer 9, although it works fine on Chrome. Something about cookies, I think. Not a hige deal as I use several browsers but it might be for others. Generally, if you can get into the previews, you can get into the site.
Bottom Line:
This site is dominated by really well done single model erotic photo shoots and softcore single-model videos, but most of the models are absolutely beautiful and the photography is among the best on the planet. The models are probably mostly 20-30 with a few really outstanding 18 year-olds. I think the point here is that this is NOT a teen or hard core site. It pays homage to the best of the female form. The models are all shapes, sizes, ethnicities and colors, but generally very shapely (probably some of the best breasts on the net here.) There is full nudity, but many models are conservitive, meaning they don't all do close-ups, spread eagles, etc. There are very few sex scenes and I can't recall a single toy or vibrator on the entire site. There are a lot of beach scenes and a handful of group shots where it appears a gang of girls was rounded up and shipped off someplace exotic for photo shoots. The result is more of a veuyers nude-beach fantasy than a photo shoot intended solely to get you off.
Perhaps another, much more esoteric way to put it is that this site is like a fine wine store. You can get a great buzz on fine wine, but part of the experience is appreciating the wine as you do. If you are just looking to get drunk quickly, go to the liquor store and buy some mad-dog. If you can appreciate this analogy, this site may be right for you. If not, skip it and go straigth to a hard-core site.
The signature item for the site is erotic massage, basically taking a beautiful girl, covering her with oil and giving her a professional massage, complete with happy ending. These are nicely and professionaly done, with no talking, no artificial moaning and no acting involved. Lookout, though, there are a few of these sessions with men.
Navigation is generally very good, with the option for thumbs, slides or something called journal, which takes all the images in a set and stacks them at roughly screen size.
There are, according to the site, over 200,000 images in 3300 galeries. The collection dates back as far as 2002. The images from that timeframe, although generally good quality and consistent with the theme of the web site, are small by today's standards at about 2000x1320 max.
The site seems to use mostly eastern european models with a few nearly exclusive resident models. Look up Anna S, an apparently French stunner, or Luba, a long-time regular.
If you are into large images, this site has some of the largest and best on the net, some as large as 7500x10000 pixels (That's close enough to see pores or over 11 feet tall at 72dpi!). Do you want a lifelsize image of Melissa Mendini standing against a white wall in nothing but high heels for the back of your closet door? (assuming you can print it.) Well, here's the place to get it and many, many more like that. The only problem is that you can't get to these large images via the thumbs. You have to go to slides, click through the slides, preview the image you are interested in and then choose the size. You can also go to the journal, wait for all the images to load, then scroll down and choose your size from there. There are, on average, about 6 sizes per image ranging from very small to larger-than-life. Older sets have almost-as-large-as-life images.
I would recommend this site to anyone who is tired of the teenybopper or hardcore porn sites and is just looking for some really beautiful women to look at for a while. I would also recommend this site to anyone who likes Met-Art, or Femjoy.
I have been a member of that network several times and cancelling is not as easy as it should be.
Although it is sometimes very difficult to find the biller site, this is the best way to see what you have signed up for and what is active. I regularly go to ccbill, epoch and segpay to make sure that what I cancelled has actually been cancelled and to see what is active. (Unfortunately, although Epoch takes Paypal, there is no easy way to track your Paypal paid accounts on the Epoch site yet without a subscription number.) I hate to say it but sometimes it is hard to keep track of what I have signed up for and what I've cancelled so this is the easiest way for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Lots of popular porn stars and models of all ages, shapes and sizes but a lot of D-cups and above. (i.e. curvy girls)
Perhaps one of the last "Glam-core" porn sites but with a lot of extra stuff like insertions.
Very high quality all-in-focus images
Mostly solo but some G/G and B/G
Good quality videos that include masturbation.
Several newer sets/videos that are full-on hardcore.
Several download sizes/formats for images and videos.
2+ updates a week.
Affiliated with the Met Art network
Great navigation (search on Model name, tags, etc.)
All sets dated.
Cons:
Number of images in a set is sometimes rather small.
Some of the porn-star models are rather mature...
Some older sets seem a little monotonous (same shoot sequence formula).
Some newer sets may be unreleased older sets.
Bottom Line:
If you don't know who Holly Randall is, she is a 2nd generation past nude model and current erotic photographer. She and her mother both shot for Playboy as well as several other magazines like Hustler. They practically invented that trademark large format everything is in focus image style that was/is common in those publications. She has shot for websites as well, like Twistys. She has won all kinds of awards for her photography and videography - awards she totally deserved.
I haven't been a member of Holly Randall since 2012, so I thought I would join to see what has changed and to collect the best of the 6 years of material that has accumulated since I was last here. I was not at all disappointed. The sets, models, make-up, lighting and image quality are all excellent, just like I remember.
The glam look is still there, too. I really like that done-up look and whoever is doing the doing-up here, um, knows what they are doing without over-doing it. Models you know, like Connie Carter and Candice Luca, look like a million bucks. Every pose is perfect. Nothing is out of place or overlooked.
Just take the best from Met-Art or Femjoy and turn up the glam a little bit. That's Holly Randall.
Couple of things I really like about this site.
In almost every set, there is nearly 100% eye contact. None of that voyeur, girl-in-the-woods or innocent looks into the distance crap. These women are all looking at you because they know exactly why you are looking at them. Nice power play.
There are a few close-ups in every set, but they are almost unnecessary because the sets flow naturally and already show everything. Some photographers on other sites (Met Art, for example) tend to add close-ups into sets as sort of an afterthought. On Holly Randall, the girl is making eye contact and striking many different poses with progressive levels of openness. Also, and this is huge, Holly knows how to use depth of field so EVERYTHING you want to see is in focus in almost every image, from her eyes to her high-heels and everything in between. None of that six shots focused on her face and one identical shot focused ONLY on her not-face nonsense. (I really don't like it when a photographer uses depth of field to tell you where to look.) Here you get the whole picture, all in focus and you get to look wherever you want in every image.
What's new since my last visit is the affiliation with Met Art, which has brought an updated and improved web site. Holly Randall is not on the Met Art pull-down sites menu, though....not sure why.
The site has been around since before 2009, but that is as far back as the sets go. Figure 15 sets a month for over 9 years, that's about 1600-1700 sets. Of course, the older ones are not in today's image resolution, but they still aren't bad. Around 2012, the site started to go a little harder. Many sets include an image or two with spreading, fingering, insertions and/or masturbation and the more recent sets almost always have them.
So....what's not to like? Well, there really isn't much. Some tiny things, really. Like although navigation is generally the same as it is on other Met Art sites, you can't set your preferences so images in a set show up in a new window. Big deal. Maybe a few of the porn-stars are a little past their prime (but Holly makes them look awesome). Not a deal killer. Occasionally, images are a little grainy or soft. Might be because they have ben resized? Not sure. Also not a deal killer. Ok, here's one. The sets are sometimes pretty small. Some are only 40 images or so. But when that happens, the images you get are usually very good. Most sets are at least 50 images and some are nearly 100. And lastly, there may be some photoshopping here and there, but I don't think it is obvious.
Ok, bottom line. If you like glam-style images of past and preset popular models and porn stars (like the images from Twisty's), then this is a site you really have to visit. Unlike Twisty's this site is easy to navigate and is managed by a highly reputable group. The only reason I am only giving it an 85 is because of the more mature models/pornstars that are not my taste.
It has taken me a couple of weeks to sift through all the material that has accumulated on this site since my last visit several years ago and I downloaded a lot, which says a lot.
I have been a member of this site a few times and just circled back around after 2 years or so. There is no preview and I can't tell if the site is generating new material or not. Funny that it is a Met Art site but isn't in the Met Art site list.....
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Wide variety of VR porn types
Very large collection for this genre
Generally very good quality
Huge mix of actresses/actors here
At least a few major porn stars
Excellent navigation, sort and search functions
New video every couple of days
Unique "position" icon on each video shows whether you should be standing, sitting up, laying back or flat on your back to watch the video. (Very nice feature!)
The site remembers what type of VR you have so you don't have to select from a list for each download. (Nice!)
A few of the upskirt/face sitting scenes will, ah, take your breath away.
Cons:
Many scenes don't really take advantage of VR
(i.e. some scenes are across the room)
Huge mix of actresses/actors here.
Girls are generally more mature.
Videos are not quite as polished
Bottom Line:
Disclaimer: My goal here is to compare VR sites and to explain particular VR things that a site does well or not so well. As always, my objective is to share my experience. If your experience is different, you are welcome to share yours too!
=======================
HoloGirlsVR is large for a VR site. But to be this large, it has perhaps made a few sacrifices in quality meaning you have to sift to find really good stuff that appeals to you.
HoloGirlsVR Stats:
105 Videos
74 models
Models appear to be popular US, Canadian and European porn stars.
Most girls are in more than 1 video
One new set every 3 or 4 days
Release dates are listed
Each set is rated on a 5 star scale
Frame rates are not listed
File sizes are not listed
I'll use an analogy the webmaster may not like, but it is what comes to mind. Men's Warehouse. Now there is some pretty schlocky stuff at Men's Warehouse, but if you are willing to sift through enough stuff, you will probably find something you like. Conversely, Men's Warehouse sells a LOT of stuff, so SOMEBODY must like what they are selling,even the schlocky stuff. So this site is the Men's Warehouse of VR porn. Something for everybody. If that's what the webmasters are going for, they are killing it!
One of the ways that the site tries to categorize things is by defining niches or collections. Nice job on that! There are several niches/collections that really lend themselves to the VR genre, and a few that don't. The face-sitting series is a great example of what VR porn can do. These girls stick their junk just beyond your tongue's reach above your face and I guarantee you will groan in approval when you experience a good example of it. However, one of the drawbacks of HD is that you might not really want to see some of these girls that close in good light. Keep looking, though, there will be a few that you like. It's OK to groan. Really. Slightly more tame is the upskirt category. This takes the porn upskirt genre to a higher level because you are laying prone under the girl involved as she stands directly over your head. Depending on the set, there is a broad range of views here from white panties (that get pulled aside) to complete nudity. This can be awesome if you find the right girl. Find her.
Other collections include the Mistress T collection, which is a whole dom series where YOU are the submissive (not my thing but, hey, some folks love it.) and the GFE (Girlfriend Experience, I think) collection, which is generally a younger girl talking to you, masturbating and occasionally fucking you. There's an only girls collection that let's you watch two or more (up to about 8, I think) girls getting each other or themselves off. There are also a lot of uncategorized videos in a range of activities. I recall foot fetish sets and stocking sets and a LOT of girls covered with tattoos. That's not necessarily a bad thing, but it is not something I'm used to. Sorry to bring this up, but something else I noticed was that several of the males in the sex videos were black. Seriously, Kudos to the site management for appealing to that potentially lucrative "blacked" porn market segment, but I'm a straight white guy who cannot get used to the idea of enjoying a VR segment with a hot girl when I look down and my junk is black. Again...men's warehouse. Something for everybody. Cool.
With the larger variety of videos comes a wider range of talent. I'm not sure how to define this other than some scenes are seriously over acted. A few of the girls seem to never shut up. I'm not sure if this is just the girls or if it is actually scripted this way. Again, different tastes....but less is usually better in this case.
The sets are generally nice, shot in homes or hotel rooms. The lighting is good but the masking for the VR is a little annoying when you notice it. They have blocked out anything that might distract you from the scene in front of you, which is more distracting than if they had left it.
File sizes are not listed but they are pretty big! Vive/Oculus files are a gig to 2 gigs each. Oddly, the high-res generic files are 2-4 gigs each. Download speeds are pretty slow.
File types:
Android 5.0+
Gear VR
Oculus (High and Low)
Iphone/Android pre 5.0
Generic H.264
Tech stuff
Update: I now have a dedicated VR computer with a very fast processor and video card. All o fthe Oculus/Vive files play fine.
...personally, although there are a few amazing sets on this site, I am a little disappointed. Why? Because many of the sets are watch others have sex sets rather than the fully immersive ME having sex sets. This completely defeats the opportunity available in VR.
Overall, this is a great site to visit because of some of the unique sets you can find here, but I'm not sure how long it will be before I come bac
There are a couple of rather gory shoots on Burning Angel, which I honestly skipped right by as soon as I realized what they were, but Horror Porn takes this to a new level... I mentioned elsewhere that I think this is some extension of monster-sex animation that is popular in some circles. There is a site that specializes in selling tools to create 3d porn animation, but I can't find it at the moment. That site has lots of monster models to purchase and include in animations and from what I can tell, the site is moderately successful. So maybe this is just a mental evolution for the type of person that does that.
I have to wonder......anal sex is moderately popular among heterosexual millenials because they have such easy access to porn and consider it a normal sex thing (I think) because they see it there. I wonder what this kind of stuff will bring to sex in general? Hopefully nothing.
Nice review, thanks! I also like this site a lot but there is one thing that ensures I will only join once a year or so and only for a month: No discounted long term rates. When you pick a tier, the monthly price is the only option. There is no quarterly rate, no annual rate and no lifetime rate. Although I suppose I understand the webmaster logic behind this, it is flawed from both a revenue and a cash-flow perspective. Like you, I am a VOLUME consumer. I have 5 or 6 annual memberships at various rates equal to, what, about 50-70% off the monthly rate. I would not be a member of those sites for 12 months at the regular rate under any circumstances. Instead, there are a dozen or more sites that I join for a month every one to two years to catch up on. This site, rather than getting $100-130 from me for a recurring annual membership, gets $30-40 from me (or maybe $70 for unrestricted downloads, another PITA) for a single month of a monthly membership every year or two. An annual membership would be one transaction, one servicer transaction fee, one account set-up, and cash up-front rather than once a month for month or two most members probably stick around. So now that my review of this site, which was originally one of my highest, has expired, I will eventually join again for a month and write another review. I'm sure the site is just as good, but the philosophy of the site revenue model and the way they treat subscribers has soured things somewhat.
You should take a look at FTVgirls. I don't think there is an exact match to ITC anywhere, but FTVgirls is a similar video style with a little more outdoor stuff and some really good looking unknown models providing some serious close ups. The girls at FTV are almost all American (I think they shoot in Tucson or Phoenix, maybe). ALS is OK. ALSscan is mostly thinner girls and ALSAngels is generally bigger breasted, more popular models/stars, etc. Read my reviews to get an idea or just look at the previews. ALSscan is a Met-Art network site now while ALSAngels is not. Both are run by the same webmaster and both recycle a lot of material.
My reference to 10GB was in regards to the size of most 20-30 minute 3D video files from the most popular 3D sites. You can go look at my reviews for pretty much all of them.
BTW, I did go ahead and purchase the unlimited plan for $70 so I could download the files I want without being treated like a thief and then cancelled it. I think there is a fundamental problem with offering access to a site and then restricting how much a subscriber can actually download from it. Your use of the term "abusers" in your response is particularly insightful, reflecting your attitude toward "subscribers" very clearly. As I mentioned, I offered to pay $100-150 for an annual subscription, but you aren't interested in that, so I'll be back in a year or two and will again buy an unlimited subscription so I can catch up.
And there is one final point I wish to make here. When I subscribe to a site, I want to be able to watch the videos whenever and wherever I am without having to wait for anything to download or having a stream stutter or having it switch to a lower resolution because of traffic. Actually possessing the file means I can play it instantly, fast forward, skip huge sections or replay the section I like over and over, all on the player of my choice and regardless of where I am or whether or not I have an internet connection. So when I sign up for a site, the first thing I do is download a handful of videos so I have them and can watch them any time once they've downloaded. Except for your site. On your site, I downloaded part of a handful of videos before I hit my quota. The downloads stop so I don't get the files, but the portion download still applies to my quota. So on your site I was unable to apply the same download-and-watch methodology that I have applied to dozens of other sites. Why? Because downloading 5 videos is abusing the system? You really need to rethink this logic.
I just looked at my image collection over three years from ITC and it totals 41,770 images, which is probably about 70% of the sets available. Image sizes range from about 1000 x 1600 pixels for the older sets, to 1800x2400 or 3000 x 4500 for the most recent sets. I have videos and images in the same folders, so my computer is having a hard time figuring out how large that is, but it looks like it is about 36GB. So the 300GB level should allow you to download all of the images you want....just not within the first hour. :-)
Well, after looking at what was available, I downloaded the material I want and some of that was the picture sets since I last joined. Looking back at my history, I have about 42,000 images that were all downloaded in zip files. That's about 28 gigs of unzipped images and I would guess that this is about 80% of the images on the site.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
