I just signed up again for ITC at the 1080p download price of $34 a month. I was pleased to see some 3d videos for some of the girls so I started to download a few of those. Unfortunately for me, these files are larger than the standard files and within 10 MINUTES OF JOINING I hit my download limit for the hour, which was 10GB. In real 3d, one file can be 10GB... What's even worse is that I only actually downloaded 1 3D VIDEO before the thing shut me down. I could not even stream the videos and could not download images. That REALLY SUCKS! Checking the pricing matrix, the claim is that a 1080p file is 2.2gigs. That means that you can download files at just about the speed you can watch them. The only way to get unlimited downloads is to sign up for the unlimited 4K membership at $70 a month. So, rather than have an annual membership like I do at several other sites, I'm forced to sign up here once a year because they don't have annual memberships, and then I'm penalized because I didn't pay nearly what an annual membership would cost at other sites in order to the last year's worth of material. Very, very sleazy accounting here. Would I pay $120 for an annual membership? Probably but I asked and they don't have one. Instead, they want me to pay $70 for ONE MONTH so I can get more than about a months' worth of material. With all the top notch sites and excellent values out there, this is really bad accounting and marketing.
ITC Webmaster, your download metering limits are the most ridiculous thing I've ever seen on the Internet and I've seen a lot! I'm sure you have some great excuse for screwing me this way but it still screws me. Too bad. As I've said, I like your site, but I really hate this marketing strategy.
As much as I like this site, I am a little disappointed that there are no long term membership options. The price structure is set up for monthly only, so that means I have to join two or three times a year to "load up" and then quit. I would gladly pay the typical 3-months membership fee to have this site all year. Oh well.
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Beautiful models
High Quality, polished videos
In your face format
Many popular models and porn stars
Some interesting lesbian scenes
Terrific views....
Tons of content (Since 2001!)
Unique tiered payment structure
Cons:
Not much to say here:
Some of the videos can be a bit slow, but the webmasters warn you.
Older vids are not HD (of course...)
Bottom Line:
When I first saw this site, I thought it was about anal. Yep. NOT about anal. It's about taking the best porn stars and models in the industry and showcasing their bodies. And I mean ALL of their bodies...up close and personal.
There is not a single male in any set on the entire web site. It's all about the girls.
From what I can tell, there are over 1200 video sets here, each with between 3 and 6 10-20 minute videos. For the most part, each set starts out with a basic strip segment showing off the girl's usually amazing physique, then there is a close-up/spreading segment, then a fingering session, then a dildo/vibrator session and then one or more sessions that might include peeing, an anal dildo session, a speculum, or just a conversation between the model and the photography crew.
The models here are hot, well built, popular and professional. Lucy Lu is here, Saphira is here, Elsa Jean is here, heck even Melena G is here doing things you would never see her do on Met Art. Yum! If you are somebody who really enjoys amazing bodies, unobstructed views and in-your-face close-ups, this is a terrific site for you.
The webmasters provide a little narrative for each segment, explaining what the girl does and giving a check-mark of approval to those they think are really good. They even warn you if a segment is a little too slow. Nice touch.
Many models have two or more complete sets. To me, this confirms that the girls are treated well by the photography team and that they enjoy the shoots.
Many of the shoots are in local (to the girls, I guess) hotels, but some are in exotic locations.
Lighting, focus, formatting, sets, props, toys and overall photographic/videographic details are excellent.
Oh, there are a few pretty good lesbian scenes, also. The format of these sets is a little different in that the girls are basically showing themselves and each other off for the camera. They are into each other for the most part, but they are basically going look at this girls pussy. Isn't it awesome!..or something similar. Some of these sets are pretty awesome, but some that you want to be REALLY awesome, Like Little Caprice and Melissa Mendini, are a little..awkward. And a few are just a bunch of hot models stripping down for the camera. Eh. Still some great views, though.
Navigation is good, allowing you to see things chronologically or by model. You can also select by model age (??), nationality and shoot location.
The tiered payment structure is worth mentioning. You can get streaming only for $10 a month, I think. Then the pice goes up depending on how big you want your downloads to be, up to 4K for the latest videos. unlimited 1080p downloads is $39 a month, I think.
This site reminds me a little of ALSScan, except that site is much more lesbian oriented and the girls are more into each other than the camera. This site is more polished, more professional...and the overall package puts In The Crack among the top 10 sites for me.
If you haven't figured it out yet, I highly, highly recommend this site.
So all this time I've been thinking In the Crack was an ANAL site! I'm not really into that, so I stayed away. Wow was I wrong. The name of the site should really be In your Face because there are a lot of terrific, popular US and European models spreading lips and getting within a few inches of the camera. There is some anal, but the videos are broken up in a way that provides the view of your choice.
Yes, it is a video site, but generally there is one image set per video. Yes, the images could be larger. Yes, there are some odd download issues occasionally. But there is a TON of material here. Absolutely worth your $
The folks at Mr. Skin seem pretty busy these days. I signed up for their lifetime deal and have since been offered several others for $99. Today it was this Interactive GF site. Funny how I just asked PU folks about it yesterday....
Now....I just went straight to the site to see what the regular prices are and notice there is NO monthly option. There is a trial (one scene, $0.95), a 90 day sign-up ($59.95) and a 1 year sign-up ($119.40). If I didn't know any better (I don't), I might think these guys are cash strapped...either that, or they grossly overestimated the appeal of interactive material and invested too much into it.
Hi Amanda, Thanks for the reply. I honestly can't recall the name of the pay-to-play site. May have been life Selector. I remember a teaser that allowed you to get a few choices in and then hit you up for tokens or something so you could keep playing. Seemed rather expensive as I recall...the cost seemed roughly the same as a live chat model. Life Selector looks like it might have been it.
In the isn't that funny department, I think I had a copy of the CD called "Penthouse Interactive Photo Shoot, Volume 1", hosted by Bob Guccione and released in 1994. It was interactive in the same way as these sites (well, except it was a photo shoot, not sex), and at the end you were critiqued by the voice of Bob Guccione himself. It was interesting the first time, OK the next ten times and cheesy after that. So the concept is far from new.
In a more pragmatic sense, I think a lot of porn consumers may be editing their own videos anyway. I do. Who has time these days to watch a 30 minute porn video that has a 5 minute lead-up, 10 minutes of fellatio and a 5 minute hand job at the end. The way to make this concept work in my mind would be to provide a monthly subscription rate, then allow the subscriber to build and DOWNLOAD his/her video after creating it to suit his/her specific tastes. BAM! New concept!
Oh, I just noticed that these two sites ( InteractiveGirlfriend and Life Selector) must be owned by the same group because the videos are the same. Maybe they can use my idea above....
I look at this site and wonder if it is any better than a regular site. There used to be a similar "pay to play" site that is now gone, I think. Has anybody tried this one?
OK, I can appreciate that the genre may be a little different and that this may be a fetish, of sorts, but I wrote a review based on my observations, expectations, etc. I expected the scenes to be more engaging. Yes, the scenes are longer than 30 seconds, but that includes the long, long set-ups and the close-outs that are not action related. Yes, there are many different types of scenarios, but the idea that ALL of them are telling somebody how to masturbate, as in for the first time, is a little excessive. There are many, many similar scenes on dozens of sites that are more engaging and a few sites/porn stars do an absolutely spectacular job of dirty talking. Having a physically and visually disengaged girl telling me how to masturbate just doesn't do it for me. Far worse than a pity fuck, this is dozens of re-enactments of the 40 year old virgin with a leading female who isn't even remotely interested in the guy and often time belittles him. In the world of show and tell porn, this site is almost entirely just tell. I can appreciate the niche, but it does nothing for me.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
Looks like there are about 1500 videos
Videos date back to 2004
Good quality streaming videos
Many popular US porn stars here. Many!
Some of the videos are quite good
All videos are dated
Cons:
Videos are STREAMING ONLY
Videos are sold separately for $7.99-8.99 EACH.
Navigation is pretty basic
Navigation is frustratingly slow
Scenarios can be a little monotonous.
Some of the videos will make you laugh out loud.
Bottom Line:
Not sure what to say about this site....
I joined SexPOV and purchased this one as a $10 add on. Both sites are very similar. (I'll try to review SexPOV later.)
I joined because some of the videos looked amusing...and they are. Each video follows some kind of theme script and the range covers every scenario you can think of...everything from baby-sitter, to step-sister, to "jerk-off or my dad will fire you", to a hot alien female that needs your sperm to build a slave army. These are not your typical couple of lines from the girl scenes. They are long, long monologues that I'm surprised most of these girls could pull off (oh, wait, editing).
But I guess scripting like this is kind of typical for the porn stars that are here. Shyla Jennings, for example, has 6 sets. Lexi Bloom has 9 sets. Riley Reid has 14. What isn't typical is that there are no men. None...except a hand once in a while to help with lotion or something.
There are categories for the videos like Amazon, Asians, Babysitter, Boss, bratty girl, college girl, etc. There are some fetish videos too, like foot, bondage, a couple of lactation videos (as in breast pumps) and a bunch of humiliation videos...something for everybody, it seems.
Each video starts out pretty basic and usually innocent. Then the girl has a confession to make or something. She likes you. She found your porn stash. She saw you watching her. She noticed you have a hard-on. She thinks you have a really tiny dick. Whatever. She then usually takes her clothes off so you can jerk off to her. Sounds OK, right? But...
The majority of these scenes really aren't sexy enough to do much...for me anyway. They are cute, and a few of the girls are hot enough, but the simulated sex stuff can be weird and the girls aren't masturbating with you, they are just posing. Posing. Usually not on their backs or their stomachs or in any kind of open position. Just posing. And perhaps this is some kind of fitting joke on their part, but many of the girls only pose, or simulate, or whatever for about 30 seconds, then they are done because, I assume, they believe you are. Weird. Oh, and in a lot of scenes, for some odd reason, the girl will give a jerk-off hand gesture. Really? When, in any real-life situation ever, has a woman actually given you a jerk-off gesture besides in a Detroit strip club or a red light district in a foreign country? Never, that's when. (Yes, it's porn, not real life, but I've never seen a girl do this in a regular porn video without a dick in her hand, have you?) It just seems like an odd slur in a scenario where I'm supposed to be in the room...
The framing is just OK. There are some close-ups, but not nearly enough. Some scenes have no close ups at all. A few of the scenes are nearly clinical. I can't figure out if that is on purpose or if it is related to the talent level of the actress.
There are a few scenes that remind me of the old Twisty's or Danni's scenes where the girl teases the hell out you. These scenes are rarer than a nice tie at Burlington's but there are some if you look hard enough.
My acid test for any porno scene is simple. Turn off the sound. Watch the video. Did it get you off or seriously hard? Yes? It passes. No? It fails. Nearly all of these videos failed.
I mentioned before that I thought the site would be amusing. Well, after watching about 50 of these videos, it can be very amusing. Not necessarily exciting or stimulating, but amusing. Jana Jordan in a scene where she asks her step dad (me, right?) why she can't have a credit card is amusing. She's pretty good, but she is in her 30s, so the step dad scenario was a bit of a stretch.
The videography is generally pretty good. Lighting is good. But the sets look like they are all in somebody's apartment or maybe a house...nothing at all fancy. Many girls have multiple sets with different themes but in the same location and on the same day. Easy gig for them. One day model fee. No sex. Possible royalties from video sales. What's not to like?
OK, here's why I scored it a 72. It is a STREAMING ONLY site! WTF? Now it does stream in 3 speeds (medium high and mega..whatever that last thing is, it doesn't work on my computer), but you can't download anything. No vids, no pictures, nothing. If you want anything to keep, it will cost you...cost you $7 to $9 per video. Yeah. About that. No thanks. There are many other competitive sites that have as good as or better flirt scenes that I can download and keep.
Bottom Line? As far as "simulated sex" sites, this one seems pretty good, I guess. And there is a broad range of scenarios to choose from. But the complete lack of any downloading without paying extra per-download is the deal killer here. If you are into this type of site and you don't mind that you can't keep the videos, give it a shot. Unfortunately, I can't recommend it.
I recently rejoined Joymii and it now seems seems to be for 100% non-downloading mobile users. Navigation is big-button easy until you want to download, say, individual images. To do this, as far as I can tell, you go to the thumbnail images in a set, click on an image, SCALE IT TO THE SIZE YOU WANT on a sliding scale-bar, guessing you got the size you want, then right click to download that image. Yes, you can download a whole set via a zip file, but I no longer download whole sets. Oh, and in Chrome, once you open an image, there are no visible buttons to navigate back (they are there but hidden). I am a long time annual subscriber to Femjoy, but this site is just too messed up, navigation-wise. Oh, and if that isn't bad enough, when I went to complain on the contact page (using both Chrome and IE), the SUBMIT BUTTON DOESN'T WORK!! What a cluster!
Looks like I need to keep looking around. There is one bonus site that isn't bad called Ariel Rebel. Although I don't recall seeing the girl before, the solo site has Recent updates, decent vidos, etc.
I joined this site because the Girl they call Katie Fey is a personal favorite. Katie was Jenya at Met Art and was in Playboy as a Russian by the name of Yevgeniya Diordiychuk. I never expect much from these solo sites, but there was a lot of material here from between 2004 and 2008. I counted 300 sets!
Apparently, she is either retired or is no longer updating this site because the last sets were from 2008. Although she is smoking hot, she is not a porn model and most of the images were barely nude. The resolution of the images was 1000k or smaller.
There are some other sites that came with the deal, but they were of nobody I'd ever heard of, were very old (i.e. small and pooor quality) and most were not nude. I may have saved maybe one set from the other sites.
If you are "Katie Fay" collector, this site is worth it. If you hang around on the sign-up page long enough, you will get a "chat" pop-up and doing so will reduce the cost by $5.
Current Member for over 2 months (at the time of review).
Pros:
Excellent selection of models (350+)
Mostly 18-26 or so.
All shapes and sizes but mostly petite
Very large collection (650+ vids, 200k+ images)
Exclusive content
A few of the most popular European models
Older sets of spectacular popular models
Navigation is good
All galleries are dated
Generally very good photo quality
Newer sets use good file naming convention
Videos have been in 720p for several years
Newer sets up to about 5800x3500 pixels.
Lots of new models you've never seen before
Cons:
The site is often slow.
I had difficulty logging in a few times
All zips named small.zip,medium.zip,large.zip
(meaning zip files are not unique)
Videos are mostly from photo shoots
Good lighting/imagery, but not consitenly great
Color/white balance on some of the sets is off
Some of the sets are pretty short
Top rated model, though beautiful, is from 2005
Not that many new stand-out models
Lots of models you'll never see again
Oddball, quirky 3D sets
Bland color scheme
Bottom Line:
This is a very good site that anyone who is into solo or two-girl modeling should absolutely visit. It has tremendous variety of mostly eastern European girls that are perhaps a tad more natural than what you might see elsewhere.
That said, I find it very difficult to rate this site up there with the best of this class. I've been a member of this site off and on for about 8 years. When I first joined, the site was way up there with the best. It is still very good, but there is just a little something that makes it less appealing for me personally. The folks at MC-Nudes put together a very nice site and I know from my experiences with them that they are conscientious enough to read this, so I'll explain as carefully as I can.
The first thing I notice are the colors...or rather the lack of them. Everything is in tan or cream or some color of rice, wheat or straw. Everything. Even the sets are mostly in these nuetral colors with very low color saturation. I am pretty sure that this is because they think they might want to convert sets into 3D and the red-blue 3D doesn't work well if there are bright colors. But sadly, it is detracting from all the sets and the entire site. Go look at Met Art or Watch4Beauty and the colors on the site and in the sets leap off the page. MC-nudes? The colors stick to the page like this mornings oatmeal sticks to the bowl. If this reduced band of colors is to support 3D, I really think you should dump 3D. The site needs more POP.
OK, next. Years ago, MC-Nudes utilized mainstream models that were among the most beautiful on the planet. Marketa, Monika Vesela, Bambi, Zafira, Eufrat, etc. There are some fantastic sets here if you are into these mainstream models from 2004-2010 or so. They still have several models that have recently become very popular (like Nika and Dominika).
At the same time, they managed to find some ungodly beautiful models that you'd never seen before or since. This unknown but beautiful girl Simona is still their top rated model (from 2005 and with only 3 sets...)
More recently, I think they've gotten into using new and unknown models a little more. This is a great thing for those of us who like a lot of variety, but you have to go through a LOT of girls to find one or two true stars in this field. Nearly all of the MC-Nudes models have spectacular figures, but because of either the lighting, the make-up, the inconsistent eye contact with the camera or perhaps because they are new and don't seem to be having much fun, many of these girls just aren't as appealing as they could be. Some of the brighter or more popular models have figured out how to tease and play with the camera a little. But a really good photography team should be teaching them ALL how to be playful. It makes a huge difference.
Couple of peeves. The site is often very slow. I also could not get in a few times, getting an Apache server-type error message instead of the web site. I know that account management is tricky, but I have several subscripions (and several computers) and I have not had this kind of trouble before...pretty much ever.
Although the file management is better than it used to be, the zip files still need to be named and dated or coded in such a way to make them unique. Webmaster, if you do that once for each set, your thousands of customers won't have to do it at all.
Bottom line? Go check it out! If you like what you see in the samples, sign up! There is enough quality material to keep you busy and happy for quite a while. If you don't stay, check back every year or so. With daily updates, it will be worth your while.
I visited this site a couple of months ago on an intro offer from Met-Art. The site is very small and includes masturbation videos of many of the girls you see on Met-Art. These are a little more interesting than the videos found on Met-Art, but not much. If you like the girls on Met-Art and can't find them doing harder stuff on other sites, then this might be a good place to find them.
Watch out for network discount offer issues if you are already a subscriber
I've been a member of Met Art for many, many years and have an annual subscription. I rotate through the other MA network sites and typically have 3-5 subscriptions at a time. I sometimes get highly discounted offers. However, whenever I try to sign up to a discounted offer, the Met Art system recognizes the cookies on my browser and something goes wrong. Either the offer changes to a higher price or I get an error. The last time this happened was when I got an internal trial offer for MetArtX with a subsequent discounted monthly rate. I signed up within the MetArt network and got an error on the approval page. I knew I was going to sign up for longer, so I just went ahead and signed up for the monthly discounted rate using a different browser and email and billing method. Worked. 2 months later I realized I was being double billed for MetArtX as the original sign up that gave me an error had actually cleared. The problem then was that I did not know which account was attached to my single sign-on, so I reached out to MetArt help to see if they could resolve the issue and maybe make it right. That was nearly 3 weeks ago and all I have from them so far is a "We're working on it." I was just billed for one of the accounts again, so I cancelled both of them, one through the MetArt singl-sign-on and one through Epoch because the login credentials didn't work. Now....I really like this network and will probably be a subscriber until I'm dead, but not being able to take advantage of discount offers without signing up from a different browser with different credentials because you are already a subscriber to a site on the network is just rediculous. I just reviewed a couple of the MA sites and was about to re-review Met Art (for the 4th or 5th time), but I think I will wait until they respond to this issue so I can include it in the review.
Update: The support folks responded and, after looking into the issue, sign-up timing and billing records, refunded all of the double billing and gave me access to the site of my choice for a couple of weeks for my troubles. They also recommended that I contact them before signing signing up with a discounted rate so that they could make sure it goes smoothly. They came through, as I expected. I'll comment again if there are any significant issues with adding sites under the single-sign-on process again.
OMG this is a pain in the ass. It has happened to me five or six times in the last year or so. I a couple of annuals and a couple of highly discounted monthly subscriptions (cheaper than annual), plus I rotate through most of their their sites once a year or so. Every time I sign up or cancel a site, my master account gets screwed up. For me, the problem is usually because they use different billers for different promotions. So two subscriptions are Epoch, two are rocketpay and one or two are ccbill. When they reset things, the different biller accounts don't synch up and logins fail. I had one account that continued to charge me for a couple of months before I realized that I wasn't actually cancelled like the site said. Of course, once I point all this out, they fix it within a day or two, but damn it is frustrating!
Has anyone ever heard of ECHST? I just signed up for an additional site in the network and was charged to join the site and ALSO charged to join Met-Art again, even though I'm already an annual member. Unlike EPOCH and CCBill, I did not get any conformation emails from ECHST. The only way I knew about it was the credit card charge. I sent a note to Met Art Support, who is usually very good about this type of thing, but have not yet heard back.
Hey, I was just reading this and wanted to mention that MPL Studios long ago resolved my issue and I am now a happy member there. I wrote a review of that site here on Porn Users.
I am an annual member on Met-Art and often join one or two of the other sites in their network or among their affiliates for a month or two. I've noticed that the prices will vary (i.e. $29 in most places, $19 in others) depending on where you look inside or outside of the network. Typically, though, The Porn Users site will have the best pricing other than the occasional $1-$5 teaser price for members of one site who never sign up for other sites. Personally, I think they should offer members long-term discounts to the other sites, especially the ones that don't update as often, but it is hard to blame them for not offering deep discounts given the perfection often found on their sites.
Yesterday the option changed again to "Thanks for using our public beta. Click here to set this as default" but there was no way to go back to the "classic format". Fortunately, there is a setting in "options" that allows you to set your default to "classic". This works, but my browser spends a lot of time switching from the now global-default new format to my personal setting classic format.
I would not mind the new format so much if it provided me with one-row per day (i.e. 4 sets) like the old one did, if it used the same naming conventions and if I could do the same things in the same number of clicks. (i.e. download a zip file) Both formats leave huge amounts of unused space on the sides. If the goal was to provide larger thumbnails, just take up some of that unused space.
So...after many years of having what I have always considered the highest standard for websites, literally a model for others to emulate, Met-Art is changing their website layout. When they first started floating a "beta" version of the new layout, I thought it was pretty awful and gave them my reasons why. Now, it looks like the old layout is just about to go away completely and we will be stuck with a site where the "live girls" portion, now taking up almost half of the main page, preventing me from clearly seeing what sets that I've already paid for are new. In my book, this greedy move falls just short of creating pop-ups or redirecting people at login to other offers. And the really sad thing is all they needed to do is adjust screen width slightly or establish a separate layout for mobile (which is probably part of why they made the change). I still click on the "classic site" option every chance I get because you get four models across and can see what is new, and once you get to a set you can actually see what you need to click to download a zip file rather than having to find some really tiny, cryptic camera icon. Clearly, I'm pretty annoyed about this and think they've taken a giant step backwards.
So....for those of you who subscribe to Met-Art, what do you think of the new web layout?
Current Member for over 1 year (at the time of review).
Pros:
Top rated softcore site
Some of the most beautiful models on the planet!
The site is HUGE!
Spectacular imagery and sets
Dozens of outstanding photographers across Europe
4-6 updates PER DAY!
Excellent search capabilities
Excellent navigation and "window" management
Excellent range of photo and video resolution
Download speeds are consistently fast.
Customer service that ANY on-line company would be proud of.
Cons:
Only one thing in the CON category:
Too much cross-selling to the other sites in the network.
Bottom Line:
I noticed there were no current reviews of this site so I thought I would write an update to a review I wrote two years ago.
I've been a member of this site off and on for over a decade now and am a loyal, permanent customer. It is without a doubt one of the best softcore sites on the internet. The models are spectacular, the sets are great, the clothing, hair and make-up are usually perfect, the variety is great and the girls generally look like they are having a good time. Nothing cheap or poorly done anywhere, period.
Navigation is also very good and the way the site opens tabs for sets and individual images is the best I've seen. I've actually used this site as a reference to other webmasters with sites that have mediocre navigation.
There are several exclusive or nearly exclusive models on this site that words cannot describe. Many are well known European models but many are women you've never seen before but will want to see again and again. The girls are almost entirely all natural. The images you see on the main page and tour are perfectly representative of the images in the site as are the scores of the models (over 150 legitimate 9+ models).
To be clear here, this is a SOFTCORE site. If you enjoy looking at incredibly beautiful naked women positioned in ways that tastefully show off their assets, this is a great site for you. The site is mostly solo sets with a few two-girl sets and an occasional masturbation set. Sexy, but no sex. If you are looking for hardcore, insertions or kink of any kind, you will need to look elsewhere. Pretty much the only gaping here will be your mouth just before you say "Oh my fucking god this girl is beautiful"....and you will say that a lot!
There is really only one negative that I'm going to mention here and it is more of a customer service thing than a fault with the site. Met Art is part of a pretty big network which includes Sex Art, the Life Erotic, Errotica Archives, Erotic Beauty and a few others. Unlike many other networks, you have to join each of these sites separately. OK, I can appreciate that the individual owners want to maximize revenue. What I find a little annoying is that in Met-Art, when you look at a set of a model, a section sometimes appears at the bottom of the set that says something like "more of this model:' with a bunch of images that are links. Well, although there may be more of this model on Met-Art, the links are NOT WITHIN THE MET ART SITE. They are links to offers to join one of the other sites in the network where more images of this model exist. Since I first mentioned this a few years ago, I have seen a few other networks that do it but some of those are all inclusive networks with free access to the other sites. There is always a link on the top of each page that will get you to the models "profile card" within Met-Art (just click on the model's name), so after a while you will learn to ignore these links at the bottom.
Now, in-spite of that cross-selling tactic, the guys at Met-Art are gracious enough to discount the other sites once you join Met-Art, sometimes providing significant discounts, as low as $5-10 for a month for each site. To be fair, these sites have their own flavor and plenty of unique sets. And pretty much every site on the network is the same or nearly the same quality as Met-Art, although some of these other sites are considerably smaller.
Oh, and here's an interesting one. They have a cam site called MetCams.com. I do not partake in cam sites very often but browsing this one brings up several of the top models that are showcased on the Met-Art site. A few years ago I, um, came across Mila I., one of my all time favorite Met-art models, on the cam site and I could not resist. She did not disappoint, I was completely satisfied and I have a memory that (oddly, I admit) rivals a few from high-school. Clearly, the cam site is not soft-core....
I also want to say that the customer service for Met-Art and their network is simply outstanding. They are very responsive and have cleared up billing and other questions/issues immediately whenever I have had to contact them.
So...if you have not yet been to this site and want some seriously great softcore imagery and video to add to your collection, Met-Art is a MUST. I have an annual membership and have joined nearly every one of the other sites in the network for at least a month. This site and every other site on the network is totally, completely worth subscribing to.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.