| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Should have done this long ago, but those initial problems were taken care of and I had no further difficulties with this site. WWW 5/26/11
|
05-26-11 02:18pm
|
Comment
27
|
Downblouse Loving
(0)
|
|
04-05-11 03:40am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
28
|
Karup's Older Women
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Some of us quirky fellows actually like the ho-hum, practical underwear!
|
01-20-11 06:09pm
|
Reply
29
|
Cum Blast City
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Comment
I thought it could be fun if done well. I joined this site because I am a big fan of the hand-job/CFNM niche. Unfortunately what I've seen so far is very disappointing. First, given six or seven minutes of a real, non-faked hand-job, the switch to the faked stuff is obvious because of terrible editing and terrible acting. It is not convincing at all, although if the participants tried a wee bit harder it could be a "blast".
Better to look for guys like Peter North who can do it for real (well, within reason!). There must be other males out there who could compete. ??
|
01-10-11 08:24pm
|
Reply
30
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Denner's Poll
The Late Selena and Jlo. Yes I like em on the bigger side!
|
01-04-11 08:33pm
|
Reply
31
|
Tiny Fetish Fun
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Comment
A lot of guys are into this. There are a lot of photoshopped pics of women squatting over stadiums and walking through cities, etc.
I don't have that fetish but I can understand it a little. I do like the idea of a strong, dominant woman in complete control, and I love the view from below of a beautiful woman towering over me. Methinks it might be some residue from infancy lurking in the psyche: The mama figure looming over the crib? That tied in with authority, appeasement, satisfaction, and obvious sexual attributes.
|
12-24-10 07:36pm
|
Reply
32
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
Where the fuck do they find these beefed up thugs? How the fuck can a man with an endowment like that brutalize a woman in such a way? These thugs are like animals. Is this the only way these poor girls can make a living? Fuck these gorillas and their sickening, psychotic energy. Disgusting.
|
11-18-10 07:20pm
|
Reply
33
|
Gapeland
(0)
|
Reply of
RustyJ's Comment
This shit is worrisome. What the fuck is going on in a man's mind who gets turned on watching shit like this?
|
11-18-10 07:13pm
|
Reply
34
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
Erm....you guys don't actually think that what we do is unusual, do ya?
|
11-05-10 10:41am
|
Reply
35
|
N/A
|
Reply of
PinkPanther's Poll
You need the password to log in to my side of the computer where the naughty stuff is. If I needed to have it repaired I'd tell the guy to click my son's user icon, which does not require a password.
If the repair guy goes deep and see the porn anyway, there is faint reason to think he'd bat an eye. Unless it was illegal stuff. I don't see the big problem.
Most tech guys probably have tons of porn.
|
11-05-10 10:40am
|
Reply
36
|
N/A
|
Reply of
graymane's Poll
I heard that thinking of Whoopie Goldberg helps. Actually, I have the opposite problem. It takes me a long time to climb that mountain, unless I'm all by myself, in which case it's sometimes a short hike.
|
09-28-10 09:09pm
|
Reply
37
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
OK now I'm a little miffed. I've come back to the site today and I still can't download the zips. Hmmm... This is silly. They've already got my 30 day sub. Why make it hard for me to get what I want? Silly.
|
09-16-10 04:55pm
|
Review
38
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Zipfiles for photo-sets
- Very faithful to the panty niche
- Mostly attractive, maturish-looking models in solo strip and faux-lesbian sets, office-girl and college-girl uniform.
- Decent amount of content, fast loading, good speeds.
- Sets are well edited and usually go from full-clothed to total nudity.
- Not too heavy on toys.
- Search utility offered, but is strange and I didn't use it.
- Model list.
- Seem to update pretty steadily.
- 2 options for vid download: WMV or Ipod. |
| Cons: |
- Daily limit for downloading zips. The first time I've encountered this. I didn't count but I did not download many before I was cut off. I am not aware of a limit for videos. I took quite a bit and was not cut off. Will update if this changes.
- Smallish pics for 2010: 803x1200.
- Videos are advertised as HD, when this is NOT the case. Vids ranged from 768x576 to 960x540, 1000 to 3000kb.
- Vids are limited in scope. Girl teases and talks to camera, winds up masturbating, tugging and playing with panties, same old same old. |
| Bottom Line: |
I have two scores for this site: my objective score is the one I posted. Subjectively, I would give this site a 95 for photo content alone, even though the vids are negligible.
I have a wicked, unstoppable panty fetish, and I tend to like old school knickers: full-sized, full-back, cotton, nylon. This site is HEAVY on cotton, and HEAVY on white cotton. So Messmer, bear that in mind! Over the past couple years they have moved towards more modern, "sexy" panties, like thongs, g-strings, lacy things, satiny things. This is not so good for me but may be great for others. The farther back you go through the archives, the more into white cotton and granny-ish style undies you get.
For the bra-lover, who should exist in all of us to some extent, there are some lovely bras here, and some lovely things that go inside the bras, though there is also a near-toxic level of silicone. The Brits seem to be really, really into fake breasts.
I gave this site a low score because I don't want to mislead my PU friends, and I try to keep my personal kinks and preferences in check, realizing that most men cannot stand the kind of skivvies I like; realizing that most men hold them up as objects of contempt and ridicule.
That being said, kudos must be given to the photogs and the editors of these sets. They are very well presented and offer choice views of the precious undergarments in question. Shame on them for not moving into higher res photos, however. I don't need gigantic pics, but at least fill my screen here in 2010.
Those concerned about nudity: this is NOT a non-nude site. Nudity and graphic views of the generative organs are in most sets, though this is NOT Simonscans or In the Crack either.
Subjectively speaking: Panties Pulled Down is my favorite site for panty photo content. Objectively speaking, DO NOT spend your money here if the sight of white cotton panties turns you off. You will be sorely disappointed, and maybe even angry.
And do not come here for video content. It's hum-drum in that regard. |
|
09-16-10 04:16pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
39
|
Andi Pink
(0)
|
Reply of
RealMayer's Comment
One of the prettiest peaches on the net.
|
08-01-10 09:34pm
|
Reply
40
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Reply
It's gonna be a little while: gonna wait till my Panty Amateur sub runs out. Few weeks tops.
|
07-24-10 08:04pm
|
Comment
41
|
Panties Pulled Down
(0)
|
|
07-21-10 02:33pm
Replies (3)
|
Comment
42
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
|
06-29-10 09:22pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
43
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
graymane's Comment
I second this. I spoke with the webmaster (or one of them?) via email regarding the zipped photo sets and it was like talking to an old friend. Remarkable customer service and a great site as well!
|
06-23-10 05:57pm
|
Reply
44
|
Graphis
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
No, I haven't joined. I won't be joining any sites for the indefinite future, as my interest in sex and even self-pleasure as waned considerably over the past year.
|
06-18-10 03:51pm
|
Reply
45
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
While there is a good mix of fully clothed and fully nude, the photo-sets are frequently non-linear and feature the model in various modes of dress and undress. So no, you will not get the full strip from start to finish. Also bear in mind, the genitalia is blurred in most of the main photo sets, although the pubic hair is not.
In my opinion the JAV models are hands down the most beautiful in the world.
|
06-18-10 03:49pm
|
Reply
46
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
There's an option missing: "Most of the time".
|
06-11-10 03:57pm
|
Reply
47
|
Beshine
(0)
|
Reply of
Karasek's Review
Each to his own, but I wouldn't touch her with a ten-foot-pole.
|
05-25-10 02:53pm
|
Reply
48
|
N/A
|
Reply of
pornwatcher's Poll
There really should be an in-between option. I am an avid pic collector and must have nearly a million pics if not more. I seriously doubt if I've seen a large percentage of them a second time. I am also into video and do have tons of vids I haven't seen yet; BUT, I hope to eventually get around to it.
I want to add that sometimes it's a blessing to have a terrible memory. I just broke out an external HD which had been in mothballs for less than six months and some of those folders contained stuff I would have sworn I had never viewed or even downloaded.
Of course, it's also a curse because I have a TON of repeats, especially with photos.
|
05-19-10 10:09pm
|
Reply
49
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Reply
No, I didn't join for a year, but I have a feeling I'll be here for a while. Maybe I should have gone for that year option. And thanks for the trust vote!
|
04-28-10 08:30pm
|
Reply
50
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Reply
"you know that noise you hear when watching a recorded video it sounds like a machine is running even though there isn't one?"
I always figured that sound is either an air conditioner or the sound of the camera?? It doesn't bother me and to tell the truth I kind of like it.
|
04-27-10 04:29pm
|
