| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
51
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Reply
yadayada,
Re: the continual logging in. I find that if I tell my broswer to remember the info, it works fine, even with Internet Explorer. The log-in prompt still comes up when you navigate from one site to another in the network, but all the info is filled in, you just click submit.
|
04-27-10 04:26pm
|
Reply
52
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
I should mention that yadayada has a point about the picture quality, in regard to the dark areas. I know nothing about photography so I cannot explain this in technical terms. Maybe I shouldn't have said "excellent photography", though the vids are well-made and a great deal of the pictures are very nice indeed.
|
04-27-10 04:19pm
|
Review
53
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- 130 models currently, pic sets and vids for each varies widely. Some have as few as 8-10 sets, one model has over 200.
- Models are predominantly from Sao Paulo, Brazil: exotic, beautiful, and exclusive, though many are euro models seen on other sites.
- Site has several hundreds of high quality vids, with many (at least half if not more) at 1920x1080. Vid content ranges from mild solo strip to masturbation to b/g hc.
- Most (perhaps all, I haven't checked all 130 models) pic sets have accompanying RAR files, like a zipfile.
- NO music tracks, and hardly any talking in videos. Girls take whispered cues. Minimal male intrusion.
- Newest pics go as high as 1440x1900. RAR files often have bigger pics than seen in the browser.
- Webmaster was immediately responsive, extremely polite, and helpful. Like someone you've known for years. I was impressed.
- Regular and plentiful updates. This guy is BUSY.
- Blu-ray section, which I haven't gotten to yet. |
| Cons: |
- My biggest issue here is that the videos are accessed via text links. You have no idea at all what the content of the vid will be. No previews, no vidcaps, nada. All vids are viewable solely by downloading to hard-drive.
- No search functions.
- Browsing for pics to save as opposed to taking the RAR files is a chore. First, you have to click each pic individually in order to get the larger size, and when you get the larger size, it is named "fx". All of them, except for some newer ones.
- Some of the sets are huge, 15 pics per page, often extending to twenty or more pages. Without the RAR file, you are forced to do a lot of work clicking and re-naming.
- Pic sets could use some editing. Many pics are the same except for minute differences.
- Navigation can be confusing across the network.
- Many of the older pics have circular watermark in center. |
| Bottom Line: |
First of all, the TBP review here is in dire need of updating. It doesn't take the hi-def vids into account nor give any idea of the size of the network.
A join at St. Paul Girls gives you access to 4 other partner sites: g18spot, g18HDTV, girls18, and 18club. g18spot contains the Autoindex, a jump-station allowing easy access to all of the photo content. There are over 500,000 pics so far. g18HDTV contains the vid content, and there are 723 HD vids available. It is staggering to say the least to look at the list of text links. Some of these files are well over a gig. However, you are flying blind as far as content. You have no clue what the videos will be. So far I've seen mostly solo tease, heavy on masturbation but minimal toys, and one Boy/Girl hc scene. Bear in mind I've only taken about twenty vids so far. All you know when downloading is the name of the model.
Bottom line is simply this: this guy, named Greg, has a motherlode of excellent material on offer, but with only text links for the vids and no categories or search funtion, your feeling at coming at the material is a kind of hopeful hopelessness. Those with short term memory loss: good luck! Some organization, via categories, vid previews of some kind, and search function, would have earned this site a score in the high ninetees from this user.
The models are sometimes breathtaking and the photography is excellent, though there are quite a few blurry shots. The environment is warm, tropical, and WET. Water, water everywhere, gentleman, pools, showers, baths, what have you. I will also say that one of the masturbation vids I dl'd was among the best I've seen, with the model, the gorgeous Ariel, seeming to be shy about it but genuinely getting off.
I would highly recommend the site to those who enjoy exotic models, on the young side, and who enjoy soft photo content. Those video-lovers out there will have to bear in mind the mystery factor when it comes to text-link only video files.
The site has a daunting amount of material, but you will almost certainly experience a good deal of frustration when approaching it. |
|
04-27-10 01:47pm
Replies (3)
|
Reply
54
|
N/A
|
Reply of
turboshaft's Reply
Public toilet, at work many many moons ago. To a small pitcure of a female golfer I snipped from a newspaper. Wow, what a picture that was!
**this message was supposed to be a general reply, not specifically to turbo.
|
04-22-10 01:24pm
|
Reply
55
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Comment
One question, yadayada,
Can you give me an idea of what the vids are like? Most importantly-
Do they have a music track? If so, I would never sign up.
And, are the videos mostly masturbation stuff? That seems to be the trend in solo vids, and I'm thoroughly tired of it.
|
04-15-10 04:49pm
|
Reply
56
|
Saint Paul Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
yadayada321's Comment
I was a member of the former Girls18 sites a while back and the deal was when you joined one site you got access to all of them, and this was quite a lot of models and tons of photos. They had no vids back then. It looks to me that a join here still gets you access to all the Girls18 sites and that video is now included. It also looks like the update schedule is humming along at good speed, since I get routine emails.
I will say two things: the models were almost all exceptionally cute and the pic sets were very good. A predominance of latin, and/or exotic models, most of them young looking to sometimes too-young looking.
The watermarks were instrusive and in EVERY picture, NOT JUST the samples! At least they were when I was a member, and these watermarks went right over the model in a circular fashion, as yadayada says. Their member forum was full of complaints about the watermarks, but the webmasters were adamant about them and were not about to budge.
If I read yadayada correctly, it looks like maybe this watermark is not present in newer pics.
I will probably join again soon.
|
04-11-10 09:41pm
|
Reply
57
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Comment
I agree, williamj. I'm amazed by many things at this site, the models as well as the high-end, luxurious sets. There's sometimes so much ornament, color, and detail that it's like Ridley Scott decided to direct some soft porn for a change of pace.
And I can't say too much about the silence factor: no music, ZERO blather from the cameraman, and precious little from the model.
Oh, and they seem to be holding the camera much steadier than a few years ago!
|
02-09-10 12:37pm
|
Reply
58
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
I don't have a Comcast connection, I have a cable connection. I never heard of Comcast before this thread.
|
02-09-10 12:29pm
|
Reply
59
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
williamj's Reply
You mean, I presume, that the DL came in at 2,200kb a second? Holy crap, that's more than three times as fast as my optimal speed, which is around 700k a sec. I thought I had a reasonably fast connection. Yikes.
Oh, and by the way, the downloads have been okay for me recently, ranging from 300 to 700k.
|
01-27-10 08:39pm
|
Reply
60
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Foolish me. I just noticed a disclaimer on the bottom of the page at this site, and I quote:
"All the models on the site are consenting, know they are being filmed, and it is all staged for entertainment purposes."
|
01-25-10 06:29pm
|
Reply
61
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
Ok, disabled it.
File coming in at around 600k with AVG disabled, without download manager (I've never used one), which is on the high end of what I typically get.
|
01-12-10 01:05pm
|
Reply
62
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I will try as you suggest, RB, and let you know how it went.
edit: OK, how do you disable AVG?
|
01-12-10 12:51pm
|
Comment
63
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
01-10-10 08:33pm
Replies (11)
|
Reply
64
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
I certainly didn't mean to be stepping on your toes either. Sorry if I came across as bothered or in any way upset with your comments.
And I do agree with you about the videos. More variety would be more than welcome and we should voice our opinions as we see fit.
Peace and goodwill to all!
|
01-10-10 08:28pm
|
Reply
65
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
My high rating for this site came from the outstanding beauty of the models and the high quality photo sets. I kept only a handful of videos, and more than likely I won't view them again. But then again, watching people fuck bores me to tears anyway.
That being said, I think Japanese porn in general has a higher level of eroticism than most other sources.
|
01-08-10 04:17pm
|
Reply
66
|
Voyeur Russian
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
I was a member here twice, I think, and enjoyed it both times. I ended up deleting the videos I took both times over worries whether the material was actually contrived or not. If it's real, it can't be legal, if it's legal, it can't be real, right? Or am I wrong? From my reading, I believe that candid public material is still legal, but material shot in a private setting - or a public place where privacy is expected - without the knowledge and consent of the subject, is not legal, nor should it be. The WC vids would most certainly be illegal if they were genuine, nor could I feel comfortable watching them even if it were legal to do so. If I could know for sure that it was all contrived and set-up I'd probably go back with a clearer conscience.
I've heard it many times that these kind of sites feature contrived videos, even though the site owners claim that they are real. However, I was a member at one of these voyeur sites and one vid which was set in an asian public bath-house had a small child in it, who was blurred. If this was contrived, why would there be a child present? There were also a few elderly people who I can't imagine would want to participate in such material. I emailed the webmaster at said site and he would only insist that the material was legal, but would not concede that it was contrived.
|
01-04-10 03:03pm
|
Reply
67
|
J Sex Network
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
I agree with a lot that you said, particularly in regard to the videos. However, I wonder if you looked into the Gravure photo section and archives? Most of the sets there are glamour/softcore, and of prime, top-notch quality. There is also a way-softcore section featuring bikinis and such, called "Buru Buru" if memory serves. The amateur section as well as the Urabon section are HC, although there are plenty of nice solo pics in the amateur sets. (I mention this in response to your list of cons, second one from the top)
I didn't pay much attention to the videos, after a brief infatuation with Maria Ozawa. And I agree there needs to be MUCH more variety in that category, especially since most people will be signing up for the videos.
Otherwise, great review. My initial excitement over this site waned significantly over time, although I still believe the JAV models are the most beautiful creatures on the planet.
|
12-20-09 08:29pm
|
Review
68
|
18 Pussy Club
(0)
75.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
- Good-sized archive of attractive Euro models. I counted 262 models, some with several sets.
- All pic sets zipped.
- Pics of average to good quality, ranging from 821x1232 to 1067x1600.
- Fair amount of average-quality video, both hc and solo, with solo prevailing. All vids I dowloaded are 720x480.
- Member forum.
- Model list and various option for viewing it. |
| Cons: |
- Dead site. Last update 9/08.
- No search function.
- Ads for other sites on every page, with every click, slowing things down.
- Bonus feeds are the usual junk which only serve to remind you that you are not at a top-end site.
- It seems the majority of models do not have any vids. |
| Bottom Line: |
Yet another Euro-babe site which features some really cute girls in hum-drum, run-of-the-mill pic sets and vids. I was lured to the site via TGPs because I enjoy the cutesy, skinny-girl look, though I must say this gets boring pretty quickly here. The teeny-bopper factor is in full swing, with stuffed animals in a high percentage of sets and teeny-ish settings. A few of the solo vids featured the model playing with a stuffed animal on her bed throughout.
That being said, there is plenty of hc here, but nothing interesting and nothing to get excited about.
I wish the owners of dead sites would say as much on the welcome page. It is dishonest to claim that updates are coming soon when this is clearly not the case. I also wish that bonus feeds would disappear. They only reinforce the sense that you are not in Pornville's upper strata. Even more bizarre is the promise of *more* feed junk accruing with longer membership, which is insane being that a week here or less will be all that one requires to take everything on the site proper.
For young-looking, skinny models, in more or less teeny-style, you will be much better off at Nubiles, or YoungPorn. This is just anemic, characterless product for the most part. Not to impugn the models themselves, who have nothing to do with the site producers' laziness and lack of effort.
Unless you really have a penchant for cute, skinny euro-teenies in little cotton undies, don't bother. |
|
12-14-09 04:43pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
69
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Colm4's Poll
I was turned-on when I first saw lesbian sex in a porn flick, but it's so pervasive now it's merely cliche.
This probably applies to almost everything in porn nowadays.
|
12-04-09 07:33pm
|
Comment
70
|
Upskirt Collection
(0)
|
|
12-03-09 12:53pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
71
|
ATK Archives
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I've gotten similar offers a few times before by ATK, and I'm not sure if they were limited to the Archives site. I've been a member of all of their sites, and most of them several times, so maybe this is their way of paying back frequent flyers. Not that they don't pay you back in spades with the amount of content already.
|
12-03-09 12:12pm
|
Reply
72
|
Teen Flood
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Comment
I've been at TF twice, and both times I felt that I wasn't getting anywhere near maximum use of the site because of navigation issues. It IS a shame, because there is a ton of content and many, many lovely young ladies.
Also, the pics have this drab, washed-out look all the time. They need some color!
|
11-27-09 08:21pm
|
Reply
73
|
Seriously Big Tits
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Nope, just making some observations from the welcome page. I may join in the future, however.
|
11-25-09 08:30pm
|
Reply
74
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
Lest this thread suffer the Wrath of Khan, a question about Cosmid: I wonder why the site is not in the busty niche, and doesn't seem to sell itself as a busty site. I've seen many samples at TGP's and I have yet to see a model who wasn't stacked to the rafters.
|
11-22-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
75
|
Cosmid.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Back Door Angels! Martin Barre at his finest. He is one of the most under-rated guitarists ever, probably because he has always played in Ian's shadow, which looms pretty damn large.
Mark Knopfler (sp?) of Dire Straits remarked that Barre's playing with Tull was "Magical." That's a good nod.
Here's a great clip of Barre at his best, for those who think Tull was nothing without Ian:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mv1Vy6iCcfI
|
11-21-09 07:20pm
|
|
