| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
151
|
Real Teen Latinas
(0)
|
|
07-02-09 11:23pm
Replies (1)
|
Reply
152
|
Nubiles.net
(0)
|
Reply of
Drooler's Comment
That's truly a shame. I was planning on going back to Nubiles soon. I am so sick of the masturbation/dildo stuff, in fact it's one of the reasons I stayed away from PU for a while: I feel so out of the loop. For some reason, watching a girl masturbate does nothing for me. I know this is not the norm, but what can I say? It bores the shit out of me.
|
07-02-09 11:11pm
|
Reply
153
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Sorry you were disappointed, Mes. I feel guilty because I gushed over the site in reply to a comment of yours here.
I agree with most of what you say, although I find myself enjoying some of the pictures here more than those at any other site I've joined thus far. Why that is I can't exactly say. There are things going on at a subconscious level that we aren't quite aware of and maybe don't understand. It could just be that I love the all-fours shots, and this site gives you every conceivable angle of that view, as if you are actually there behind the model.
That being said, yes, a site like this, which is 99 percent photo-driven, absolutely needs zipfiles. Especially when the photo sets contain numerous pictures from the exact same perspective. The man behind the site needs to do a LOT more editing of sets, and he needs to get more creative. The sets are repetitive, as you said, and could be cropped by seventy percent in a lot of cases. Furthermore, the pics are not named uniquely, and saving them becomes even more of a chore.
As far as navigation goes, yes, it needs a lot of work.
I am, by turns, very pleased and very displeased with my experiences here thus far. I was wowed at first, but that feeling has waned, except for the moments when something really resonates with me.
Sorry again.
|
01-23-09 12:31am
|
Reply
154
|
N/A
|
Reply of
surferman's Poll
Sex without context is just bumping uglies. Or, like a friend of mine used to say, two brillo pads fighting over a hot dog.
|
01-21-09 10:41pm
|
Reply
155
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Reply
Hi ace of aces,
Can't answer that I'm afraid, since I was never a member at One By Day.
|
01-20-09 01:42pm
|
Reply
156
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
Monahan's Reply
Hi Monahan,
Thanks for the trust vote, by the way. To answer your questions:
1. The site tends towards the real much more than silicone enhancement, although I do recall a few phonies in the mix. I can't stand fake breasts either. That being said, this is anything but an "all natural, girl-next-door" kind of site. The models are high-end all the way, are heavily made-up, and dressed to kill. Or undressed to kill.
2. Yes, the price is high, and yes, I do think it's worth the money, considering all the dough I've wasted on sites that have crappy content and no user-friendly features. which caused me to waste time as well as money. It all depends on your tastes. Normally, glamour and polish isn't my cup of tea, but I still enjoyed the site. There's a lot of hardcore here as well. I don't even look at that and yet I found the site worthwhile.
I wouldn't do the three months myself, because the site isn't huge.
3. No network, and I don't recall any bonus sites.
|
01-20-09 01:40pm
|
Reply
157
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Wittyguy's Poll
I voted yes. Like one famous photographer said (it was Hegre, I think), and I'm paraphrasing very loosely: admiring beautiful nude women lifts the spirit. I heartily agree, even when it fails to lift anything else.
|
01-18-09 08:37pm
|
Reply
158
|
LV Panty
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Messmer,
Go to the site and click the "join" link. On the bottom left is the webmaster's email address. I'd post it here but I don't know if that's allowed.
Like I told you before, my memory is shot and it's been over a year since I was a member, and I don't remember if the sets were zipped. I do know that I don't have any saved. My bet is you'll get a prompt response.
|
01-17-09 07:45pm
|
Reply
159
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Just had a look at LV Panty's preview. Looks like he is branching out a bit and featuring more modern, skimpy-type undies. My memory of the models was a bit fuzzy as well. They are indeed beautiful, but there are plenty of girl-next-door types we well.
|
01-16-09 09:54am
|
Reply
160
|
Nadine Jansen
(0)
|
Reply of
xyzzy's Review
Good review xyzzy, thanks. I've been tempted many times to join.
|
01-16-09 09:45am
|
Reply
161
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hi Mes,
A few things:
First, there are quite a few more models over the age of thirty at True Amateur Models than I originally thought. The guy behind the site doesn't seem to care about age. One model is in her fiftees. He doesn't care much about looks, either. I did notice some portrait style pics in older sets, but far and away his preference is landscape. As I said, the four full sets I took so far are landscape in their entirety: no portrait shots at all.
About LVPanty: I'm glad you're thinking of joining. It's been a while since I was there, but picture-wise it is second to none in the panty-genre, if you take in all factors such as fidelity to niche, pic size, and quality. **I don't recall if the sets at LVPanty are zipped**. You might want to contact the webmaster about that. I don't remember zips there, and I have none on file. My memory is shot, however. The video section is nothing to rave about either.
Also, bear in mind LVPanty is old-school. Full-sized, and predominantly full-backed, undies are the order of the day. There is not a fixation on cotton, which I know you don't like, but there is quite a bit; but even so there is nothing teeny-bopperish whatsoever. The variety of fabrics and styles is wide. The models are beautiful. It's not an amateur site. I believe you can see a few sample pics on the preview. I know you're cautious about which sites to join and I'd hate for you to think you blew your money.
A blend of LVPanty and True Amateur Models, with a vid section on par with Panty Amateur, would be a perfect site for me and I'd stay with it permanently!
|
01-16-09 09:36am
|
Reply
162
|
Asian Spreads
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Thanks, didn't know that.
|
01-15-09 10:14pm
|
Reply
163
|
True Amateur Models
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
No, mes, there are no zips.
Interesting, me finding your comment here, since I gave you a passing thought almost as soon as I joined. Why? Because every single picture is in landscape format! All of 'em, at least the ones I've seen thus far, and that's four full sets with over a hundred pics each. I joined last night after seeing some dazzling pics at a TGP.
Latest pics are big, at 1500x1126, and they look great on my 22 inch monitor, even though they don't completely fill it.
BUT: **no zips**. My arm is still hurting from all the clicking I did last night. The models here run the gamut from dead plain to cute as hell. Most of them are average to nice looking young ladies you'd see anywhere: true amateurs. This site gives you a real sense of intimacy with the models, even though there are hardly any videos. I'm not a photography buff at all and I can't judge these pictures in a technical or artistic context, but they certainly are stimulating. I found myself being truly, physically turned-on, which hardly ever happens to me at an adult site anymore. I had all but given up hope! My pic collecting has for a long time been mostly a spirit-lifting hobby, without much lift anywhere else, if you get my drift.
Each to his own, they say, and this site won't be for everyone. I'm a panty-lingerie nut but there is hardly any of that here; and yet these pics still work for me, in the way that naughty pictures are supposed to work. ;)
Not many mature models, but there are a few. I will do a full review after a bit of time here. I am very happy I joined, though it is a lot of work without zips.
|
01-15-09 10:10pm
|
Reply
164
|
Asian Spreads
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Reply
Hi mbaya,
I always manually imput the U and P after sign-up, never cut and paste. I thought of the second possibility, being that with some sites there is a 30 minute to an hour delay in accessibility, but this wasn't mentioned anywhere on the sign-up page, or in the confirmation email.
I did get it sorted out via email (something about a problem with shared passwords and such), but it took a day and a half. They apologized and graciously extended my trial period. True, TBP doesn't mention the trial but it was offered on the join page, and I went for it. Maybe it's something new.
I wouldn't know about the DRM issue because I went in looking for pics and didn't bother with video, especially after seeing what a mess the site is. From what I can tell the vids are stream only. Maybe the trial limits you to streaming? I don't care because they all look like crap anyway.
I can't do a full review since I only took the trial, but I will say that for what this site offers, the regular sub price is highway robbery. The pictures are very small, averaging 512x768, and the material is dated. I saw a lot of this stuff on Newsgroups years ago. One could collect far better pictures on a semi-decent TGP.
The official TBP score is way too high, in my opinion.
|
01-15-09 09:15pm
|
Comment
165
|
Asian Spreads
(0)
|
|
01-13-09 12:05am
Replies (6)
|
Reply
166
|
Snot Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Comment
I've seen ads for this kind of stuff in Japanese TGPs. Nothing surprises me anymore. I visit a clips for sale site frequently and I've seen some strange stuff. Girls chewing gum and blowing bubbles, girls posing among balloons. I can understand a lot of the bodily function fetishes, since those deal with the naughty bits. But snot? None for me, thanks.
|
01-11-09 08:38pm
|
Reply
167
|
Jenny's Handjobs
(0)
|
Reply of
pissedatporn's Review
4-5 days? Holy crap. I'd be near insane. However, I've often had the thought that porn would be much improved if the male performers came to the performances only after a considerable downtime. It might be harder for them to go very long but the action would be more intense and more genuine, and the finish more of a spectacle, rather than the usual dribble, which you eloquently refer to.
As for handjob porn, this is surely the way to go. Handjob porn with a dribble at the end is useless. I am tempted to check this out - but your review is lacking in certain technical details. What is the quality of the vids? I mean size, bitrate. How many are there? How long are they? Are there various DL options?
|
01-08-09 07:50pm
|
Comment
168
|
Real Spankings Institute
(0)
|
|
01-04-09 10:19pm
Replies (0)
|
Reply
169
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Thanks Wittyguy, and Jeff. I've just signed up at KarupsPC and am liking it a lot so far.
|
12-30-08 03:22am
|
Reply
170
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
Reply of
TheRizzo's Reply
Thanks, TheRizzo, for the quick reply.
|
12-29-08 06:40pm
|
Comment
171
|
Karup's PC
(0)
|
|
12-29-08 05:39pm
Replies (7)
|
Reply
172
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
ummm...yeah...I guess that's what their called.
DOH!
|
12-23-08 12:17pm
|
Reply
173
|
N/A
|
Reply of
sitsat's Poll
I dislike all of the above, but bad boob-jobs are the worst, followed closely by big tats. I don't mind those little ones at the small of the back, hennas, I think they're called?
By the way, anyone know what to call those two little indents at the small of a girl's back? They are mostly noticeable with very fit, slender girls. A friend of mine said he couldn't stand them, but I think they're cute as hell.
Some guys have them too, but I prefer to pretend they don't.
|
12-22-08 08:25pm
|
Reply
174
|
N/A
|
Reply of
elonlybuster's Poll
My son came into my room late one night before I was able to close out a picture of a woman topless on my monitor. He said, "Whoahhhh!"
But a picture of a woman topless isn't porn by my reckonning, so I voted No-one.
Door-locks are a good thing.
|
12-19-08 04:33pm
|
Reply
175
|
Girls Planet
(0)
|
Reply of
RagingBuddhist's Reply
I asked admins to delete my review, and I deleted my comment here myself.
|
12-12-08 05:46pm
|
|
