| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
176
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
Thanks for the heads up, messmer.
|
12-12-08 03:08pm
|
Reply
177
|
Mature Erotic
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Comment
I've been looking at this one too, so I'll be checking back to see if someone answers. The webmaster responded to someone else's comment hereabouts.
|
12-09-08 11:21pm
|
Reply
178
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
Reply of
badandy400's Reply
True, badandy, but allow me to explain why music ruins the experience of video for me, especially regarding solo models.
First, I am at an age where I don't look for this type of stuff solely to get off in a sexual way. For me, I enjoy the whole sensual experience of watching a beautiful woman strip and move and do various things, on video, and particularly if the vid is of decent quality. I've got good speakers and I like to keep the volume up a good ways. I want to hear the sound of high heels on a solid wood floor - something that you get in spades at a site like In The Crack. I want to hear the sound of the girl's clothing crinkling and rustling, the sound of her hands on it, the sound of female hands on nylon, the jingle of jewelry, the clicks and clacks and thuds and bumps of a warm human female in close quarters with ME. I like the ambient sounds in the room to a certain extent, though these should be kept to a minimum. Each sound generated by the girl, the floor, her clothes, her body, constitute another point of contact between her and me. If there is music, all these subtle points of contact are destroyed, or non-existent, and watching in silence doesn't help to generate a sense of union with the model, a sense of actually sharing the same and space.
It isn't just music that destroys the experience for me, but a chatty narrator is also a downer, in a serious way. The person behind the camera should be as anonymous as possible, a silent conduit between me and the girl.
Many sites seem to be doing silent videos now - silent as in no music and no talking - and I hope the trend catches on. In The Crack is by far the best for a one-on-one sensual encounter with a beautiful woman, with Panty Amateur a close second. I was hoping that DDF would give me much of the same, but thus far I am finding that at least half of the newest solo vids feature a music track, and the ones that don't seem to be deficient to some degree in sound quality, although that may be on my end. I must say I am a bit disappointed thus far, although the pic sets are top notch.
|
12-06-08 07:57pm
|
Reply
179
|
Aria Giovanni
(0)
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Reply
Aria's married to a guitarist? Cool, I'm a guitar...um...stylist, does that count?
Personally I'm glad she doesn't do hardcore.
I want to marry Aria.
|
12-05-08 04:54pm
|
Comment
180
|
DDF Busty
(0)
|
|
12-05-08 04:49pm
Replies (4)
|
Reply
181
|
N/A
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
messmer, you and I think alike, at least a good deal of the time.
I HATE toys. I hate the sight of them. The most erotic masturbation vid I ever saw was of a girl with the corner of a glass table. The runner up was a woman on the arm of a sofa.
That being said, I can be objective and realize that there might be something wrong with me, since the vast majority of guys like watching women with toys. It bores me to no end.
|
12-05-08 03:27pm
|
Reply
182
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
OK, littlejoe, I reviewed a bunch of vids.
Most of the girl/girl vids I saw feature what sound like American girls. A few of the solo models have accents. My favorite, Vanessa, sounds German, and she has nine or ten vids where she feasts on her own dirty undies as well as those from her "panty girlfriends", as well as masturbating feverishly with them. Unfortunately, while I think she's very hot - she reminds me of a woman I worked with once and on whom I had a terrible crush - her vids are just too whacky and hectic for me to enjoy. I prefer much more subtle stuff. BUT, if a woman "tasting herself" is your biggest fetish, you would probably like them, although her vids aren't of the best quality. The best quality vids are mostly solo/strip/tease/masturbation scenes.
I didn't mention it in my review, but there are some b/g vids as well.
From what I can see, the content at this site seems to come from several different sources.
|
12-01-08 11:18pm
|
Reply
183
|
Teens in Wet Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
littlejoe's Reply
Well, if that's your biggest fetish you are bound to find something to like at this site.
I can't look through what few videos I've kept from here since my kids are over at the moment, but may give a better answer later on...
I can't tell you if most of the girls are European. Many of them have accents, but the dialog is so silly, for the most part I usually turned the sound off. Not only that, most of what I downloaded were solo vids.
Will try to give a better answer later.
|
12-01-08 05:59pm
|
Reply
184
|
ATK Premium
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
I don't know, messmer, but I never noticed anything "darkish" or otherwise physically different about Toby's sets on ATK's various sites or in his work elsewhere. I did notice that his sets were extremely predictable and instantly recognizeable, at least with the older material, which comprises most of what I've seen since I'm not into the new style of softcore at all. Predictable as in: girl in doorway, expose one breast, expose other breast, lift skirt, turn around, get on floor, lift knees, open knees, turn on side, turn over...done. The models spent WAY too much time on the damn floor in most of Toby's vintage sets.
Over-all, however, I do agree that ATK lags behind some of the premier sites and are resting on their laurels technically and esthetically. I have always enjoyed my visits to their sites because of the sheer amount of content and the wide variety of photographers they use. But I do visit now far less than I did in the years past.
|
11-20-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
185
|
Only Cuties
(0)
|
Reply of
Cybertoad's Review
Great review, Cybertoad. But one question. You said 800 *pics" zipped, did you mean 800 "sets"? 800 pics seems pretty chintzy.
|
11-14-08 12:52pm
|
Reply
186
|
Old Spunkers
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Top-notch review, messmer.
In regard to the site's title: I would never even wind up at the welcome page of a site with a name like that. I ended up subscribing at one site, or network, more correctly, with a real dud of a name because of a rewiew here. It's called Monster Pimps. The network is very docile and tame and is mostly about softcore shots of cheerleaders, with a few mild HC sites. Monster Pimps sounds like the EXACT opposite of that. Old Spunkers makes me think of gray-haired retirees at a Pinocle table suddenly feeling an itch in the diapers.
**No dis-respect to aged persons intended.
|
11-14-08 12:47pm
|
Reply
187
|
Preggolicious
(0)
|
Reply of
BostonPJR's Review
Hi, Boston PJR. I know this is a bit late but I've only just found it.
And you're right, this model is gorgeous, and I'm only judging by the tour pages! My pc has issues with HD video, so if I decide to join it won't be until I've addressed that problem.
Thanks for the review.
|
11-13-08 12:58pm
|
Reply
188
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Reply
I just might join again soon, Mr Fountain.
I'm not generally a fan of tats or piercings, but I very clearly remember being impressed by many of the girls at SG. A good deal of them were so sexy I forgot about the tats and piercings.
Besides, in my experience, some of the girls who have that kind of SG fashion sense are flat-out sweethearts on the inside. And smart as all hell.
|
11-13-08 12:31am
|
Reply
189
|
Village Ladies
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Thanks for the reply, messmer.
I know you're a fan of mature women, as I am. As I said in my review, the premise of the site is good, and it's devoid of anything trashy, both of which are a plus. But if you're going to be a pictures-only site and steer clear of video, even in 2008, why not offer the best quality pictures you can? Why not offer zip-files? And why haul off a large percentage of the content to another site and charge extra for accessing it, when the content is not of premium quality to begin with? I'll admit, some of the newer pics are decent, but a lot of the older ones are smaller than 600x800. This move seems a bit stingy to me. Especially considering the 33.00 USD I paid for my month.
For a site like this, with small thumbs and no zips, not to mention generally slow-loading pages, it requires a good deal of patience and work to download each pic individually and hope to get some kind of genuine enjoyment out of the experience. Despite my low score, there are some very nice pictures here, as I said in my pros, but for 33 smackers I would rather not have to squint and hunt and click so much.
And like I said, seeing all those links to sets I can't access is sort of insulting, even though there's still a good deal of content I *can* get to. It's a bad idea, and without that the score might have been at least a 70. The spirited ladies themselves can be appreciated on their own merits, even though most of them are quite frankly not my cup of tea, and more or less transcend the whole scoring thing. The 63 is for Albert.
|
11-13-08 12:16am
|
Reply
190
|
Suicide Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
Mr Fountain's Comment
I agree, Mr Fountain. I was a member here a few years back and even then it was a good site, and virtually a steal for the 10.00 USD it cost me at that time. Been meaning to re-join.
|
11-11-08 03:04pm
|
Reply
191
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Reply
Hi Denner,
I'm glad my review helped in causing at least one person to join this site, and I'm even more glad that you are not regreting your choice.
As I said somewhere, I think this is the best panty-video site on the net, easily. A new vid every single day, and in hi-def. No music tracks, intimate settings, good camera work, good looking models, great undies. I am always watching and re-watching these videos.
I am not currently subscribed because the newest vids are of such high quality my pc can't play them. I get a choppy picture that halts and pauses and sometimes freezes up my machine. RATS!
Must upgrade video-card, or something.
I was really happy to see your comment, Denner.
|
11-07-08 05:15pm
|
Reply
192
|
Teen Stars Magazine
(0)
|
Reply of
Jeffrey99's Comment
Agreed. The vids are useless but the pictures are top-notch, and the girls are beautiful. A good pic archive.
|
11-05-08 09:32pm
|
Comment
193
|
G Queen
(0)
|
|
11-05-08 09:25pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
194
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff,
I went through my first folder and didn't find any. Bear in mind, I have hundreds of zips, so this might take a while. I know I only downloaded a few since I generally peruse the set before taking the zip and when I found one of those, by and large I opted not to DL.
Until I rummage a few up, it might help if I tell you that these doubled sets - at least the ones I saw - ALL occurred in the old pages. I spent almost all my time in the regular amatuers section and athletic amateurs. I worked my way from oldest to newer since I prefer the style of the old sets (I'm an old-school undies fan). I don't recall any in exotics, and I never looked at outdoors, nor any hardcore.
Bear in mind, I wrote the initial comment in regard to this out of curiosity mainly and as a heads-up to you. It wasn't that big of a deal. As you can see by my review, basically your site is tops and I will be rejoining again in a few months to go through the newer stuff.
I will email with info when I can. Hopefully fairly soon.
|
10-29-08 10:07pm
|
Reply
195
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
Reply of
Karup's Reply
Hi Jeff,
Thanks for the quick reply. I will send you some of the set-names after I've located them, but I won't be able to send an URL because my sub has run out. **NOT fishing for any freebies here, either, nor would I accept any if offered. I'm weird about that sort of thing. Not that you would do that any way. I mention it just as an FYI.
|
10-28-08 01:45pm
|
Comment
196
|
Karup's Hometown Amateurs
(0)
|
|
10-28-08 10:23am
Replies (8)
|
Reply
197
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
Toadsith's Reply
Wow, Toadsith, you sure made an excellent case for your point of view. I would reply by saying first that I don't find a pregnant woman sexy necessarily: rather, I find a woman who is sexy already *even more* sexy when she is pregnant. Case in point: my little ex-wife. She was busty for such a slight little thing anyway (four foot eight inches, 85 lbs when I married her), and when she became pregnant...DAMN! It wasn't just the size, it was the texture, the density, the color of the areolae, everything. I was in hog heaven. The rest of her perfect little body became more exciting to me as well. Even her hair. Her skin and her face were more lustrous, rich, supple, smooth, choose your modifier. Sex was hot. And I mean literally hot.
My attraction to pregnant women has nothing to do with the "miracle of child birth" or anything like that. I'm not green, I'm not politically correct, and I detest the nuttier elements of the feminist movement as much as the next guy. That being said I don't find anything grotesque about reproduction or the physical changes women undergo when they are with child. Of course I speak from the male perspective, which is an easy one. I can sympathize as best I can, however, and I completely and without reservation support and commend any woman who refuses to become a mother, for whatever reason. I'm pretty much a libertarian and believe quite forcefully that a person holds sovereignty over their own body and that the demands of society, culture, and invisible deities can go fly a kite.
The beauty of the feminine form, for me, is about a particular concert of curves, contours, and convexities: the breasts, the hips, you know what I mean. In a pregnant woman, and by that I mean one who takes care of herself, those curves, contours, and convexities are accentuated in a dramatic and often breathtaking manner. The big belly, far from being a gravid lump of shapeless fat, is round and hard and smooth and sexy as hell. Once again, this is strictly from an onlooker's point of view and I don't mean for one second to underestimate the physical and emotional strain a pregnancy puts upon a woman.
Parasite may be a technically apt term as you use it, but as a father of two I can say that I am now as dependent on my children for my well-being as they are on me. If one of them died I would want to die too, and so the host/parasite relationship doesn't fly with me. Naturally it does apply to many a parent and child in this world, and our species as a whole would most certainly benefit greatly from a concerted effort to significantly reduce the number of childbirths worldwide.
Edited to add: I think this might call for a forum thread. I'm interested to hear what others think. I think I'll go start one.
|
10-17-08 10:33pm
|
Reply
198
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
The watermark is pretty big. I actually never heard of the site until a few weeks ago. Oh, and I should say, while Cel uses landscape more than the average site, on going through the pics I'd say he still uses it much less than half the time.
|
10-17-08 08:07pm
|
Reply
199
|
The Hand Job Site
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Thanks for the great review.
The HJ niche seems to be growing, which is odd given that most guys seem to regard a hand-job as something less than sex. To my mind, a good HJ is one of the damn nicest things a girl can do for a guy, and when you get a girl who knows how to do it, it can really be something.
Wifey from Wifey's World is the reigning queen of the HJ, in my opinion, and everyone else pales by comparison. I've been to several HJ sites and most of them are useless. Brandi Belle is pretty good, but she seems too detatched.
And, dang it, if there's a mouth or even a tongue involved, it ain't a handjob!
Anyway, just my .02$
|
10-17-08 04:42pm
|
Comment
200
|
XX Cel
(0)
|
|
10-10-08 04:52pm
Replies (1)
|
|
