| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Comment
201
|
Busty Amateurss
(0)
|
|
09-10-08 01:44am
Replies (1)
|
Reply
202
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
Yes, but not a lot.
Melissa Joan Hart has a beautiful ass.
|
08-03-08 11:04pm
|
Reply
203
|
N/A
|
Reply of
nygiants03's Poll
I got tired of hardcore porn years ago, but I still try once in a while to rekindle the interest I had as a strapping young buck. I recently got a sub at VideoBox and downloaded a video featuring one of my dreamgirls, Alexis Love, being monotonously drilled for about ten minutes. It looked mechanical, visceral, purely physical. There was no spark, no passion, no eroticism at all. It was like watching an oil-rig. What's worse: it didn't look like it FELT GOOD. How can I explain that? it looked like an oil-rig. I didn't think to myself, wow, this dude is one lucky bastard! I was simply bored silly.
I could give myself blueballs watching porn twenty years ago. At my present age, and after a lot more actual experience in the field, there has to be some kind of mental relationship going on between characters in a story or performers in a film. It can't simply rely on the physical. There has to be some context, some backdrop, some REASON these two so and so's are bumping uglies. There has to be some desire for the other, not just a desire to get off. I guess for this reason I am much more into erotic literature at this point in my life than adult film or video. I'm currently reading Kate Chopin's "The Awakening" and there was more stimulation for me in one scene describing a single kiss than there was in watching an hour of VideoBox downloads.
That being said, I'm sure there's a lot of good porn out there that I've simply missed and/or can't seem to find. I'll keep looking.
PS: If by "porn" we mean looking at beautiful women naked, then I have never gotten sick of that. A bit bored at times, but never sick.
|
07-31-08 12:26am
|
Reply
204
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
Khan's Reply
Thanks, Khan, I'll do that. roseman, you're welcome.
|
07-30-08 01:19am
|
Reply
205
|
Wifey's World
(0)
|
Reply of
roseman's Review
Nice review, roseman. That last trust vote was mine. I don't know why it says anonymous. I could swear the 'vote anonymously" box was unchecked.
|
07-29-08 04:22pm
|
Reply
206
|
Panty Amateur
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Hi messmer,
I think I said "no download options", meaning you can only DL one way. That's my fault, bad wording there.
All videos (and there are over a thousand now) average about five minutes and are each downloadble in a single mpeg file. The quality is excellent and they have been moving into hi-def over the past few months. I can't even watch the new ones because my pc can't handle it and the replay is all choppy. Even the oldest vids are high quality and look great fullscreen on my 22" monitor, though I have to mention I'm not an afficianado in technical matters. This is the best panty-video site I know of. Bear in mind, this is a British site and the Brits tend to be old school (full-backs) when it comes to knickers, though the emphasis is not on cotton. Also very few thongs or boyshorts here. There is no graphic nudity though the girls do get into their birthday suits from time to time and bare breasts abound. There is some masturbation and lesbian content but the emphasis is heavily on solo tease.
|
07-18-08 02:51pm
|
Reply
207
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Ok, UK Upskirts links to both sites, to UK Upskirts if you hold the mouse over the UK part, and to Upskirts if you hold the mouse over the Upskirts part. Same thing with the Amateur Upskirts link.
Very strange. Or my computer is going crazy. Or I'm an idiot. Is this normal for links to function this way?
|
07-14-08 10:58pm
|
Reply
208
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Reply
Here's the link to the UK Up-skirts site
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ukupskirts/
|
07-14-08 10:45pm
|
Reply
209
|
Oh La La Glamour Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Review
Hi messmer,
I can't think of anything off the top of my head that would fit the bill.
UK Upskirts, as well as most of the sites from that company, has very high quality videos, but there is no nudity. Also the pics are smallish. Amateur Upskirts has plenty of nudity but is heavy on the cotton, which I know you don't like, and the last time I was there the vids were just not up to par quality-wise and the pics were tiny. Panties Pulled Down is not upskirt-focused but has lots of upskirt material and plenty of nudity, but while the Quicktime vids are top-notch quality-wise the content is masturbation-obssessed and hence boring to me. And the pics there are great but are just too small to get excited about. LV Panty has big, HQ pic sets which you might like, as they always end in nudity and are not fixated on cotton, but the vid section is less than mediocre, or at least it was the last time I checked.
Like you, I have a next to impossible time finding stuff that is completely up my alley. Good luck hunting!
Edited: the site UK Upskirts links to IS NOT UK Upskirts....
https://www.pornusers.com/review/ukupskirts/
|
07-14-08 10:38pm
|
Comment
210
|
In The Crack
(0)
|
|
07-04-08 11:21pm
Replies (2)
|
Reply
211
|
Tawnee Stone
(0)
|
Reply of
silver's Review
I've been wanting to join Lightspeed World for some time, as I'm an avid pic collector and am mainly into softcore, with emphasis on soft; but 800x600 is just too small. The bigger your monitor gets, the higher res your screen gets, and consequently, 800x600 looks puny.
|
06-03-08 10:22pm
|
Reply
212
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Comment
Okay, this is strange. I went back to the site, clicked member's entrance, and got the member's page without a prompt. However, when I went to download a video, I got the prompt. Twice.
It's got to be some technical problem. No one who wanted to make money would do this stuff on purpose.
|
05-15-08 11:05pm
|
Reply
213
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
Thaeral's Comment
I just signed up and the same thing happened. Can't log in after paying my money. Sent off email. Will see what happens.
If I get no response, boy will there ever be hard feelings.
|
05-15-08 10:57pm
|
Reply
214
|
Brandi Belle
(0)
|
Reply of
jd1961's Comment
I tried the trial here and I've seen the preview vids, so I can say that it certainly looks as if this girl knows EXACTLY what she's doing, even though what she does will not cater to everyone's taste. She reminds me a little of Wifey from Wifey's World, not in her appearance, but in the way she does her thing. I'd gladly be putty in her hands. I'm about to take the plunge, I think. Thanks for the comment, jd1961.
|
05-15-08 10:19pm
|
Reply
215
|
Girls Out West
(0)
|
Reply of
messmer's Review
Good review. I might check it out in the future.
|
05-08-08 05:55pm
|
Reply
216
|
N/A
|
Reply of
mrcallen's Poll
Hell no. Couldn't.
|
05-05-08 04:34pm
|
Reply
217
|
Flower Panties
(0)
|
Reply of
ace of aces's Review
Thanks for the review, ace. I'm hard-wired to respond to the word "panties" like one of Pavlov's dogs, and I've been semi-tempted to try this place out. I'll probably ignore it for a good while now, before the word "panties" brings me salivating back...
WWW
**by the way, it's what's in the panties that counts, not the panties all by themselves. I don't huff them or wear them (OK, one time, when I was very drunk). Men in panties is a travesty! Nor do I hang around playgrounds in Highgate looking for Cross-eyed Mary! ;)
18+ please.
|
04-24-08 10:40pm
|
Reply
218
|
Gagging Whores
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
I retract what I said above. I sometimes forget that some women are actually into this kind of thing. As long as everyone's an adult and it's all consensual than my "sickening" comment doesn't apply. Thanks for the review, Lionheart, and apologies.
WWW
|
04-23-08 09:09pm
|
Reply
219
|
Sexxxy Celeste
(0)
|
Reply of
Denner's Comment
I know these are old comments, but I'm shopping around for a good NN site and saw this. I agree, Denner. It should be general practice just to avoid sites that won't give any stats as to the volume of material they have or the quality thereof, or specs for pics and vids. If they can't do that there is probably something they are hiding, like a lack of quantity and/or quality.
If you have high quantity, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have high quality, you'll use it as a selling point; if you have both, obviously you'll let us know.
|
04-22-08 07:51pm
|
Reply
220
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
ksauz's Comment
Sorry, I should have read the reviews first. Info is given there.
|
04-22-08 07:00pm
|
Reply
221
|
Teenrotica
(0)
|
Reply of
ksauz's Comment
Thanks for the comment, ksauz. What size are the pics, on average?
|
04-22-08 06:59pm
|
Reply
222
|
Gagging Whores
(0)
|
Reply of
Lionheart's Review
Sounds sickening to me. But each to his own.
|
04-22-08 06:55pm
|
Reply
223
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Poll
Vid (clean) on Youtube about the Ginger/Mary-Ann question:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8wrEqsTJCmg
|
04-21-08 07:07pm
|
Reply
224
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Poll
I'm guilty of assuming that most people here would know the Ginger or Mary Ann question, sorry for that. It's a pretty popular question among the male population here in the States, at least, and I remember it even from my high school days in the late seventies, early eightees.
Me, I'm totally into Mary Ann, and I could never understand why every male visitor to the island always went ga-ga over Ginger and treated Mary Ann like chopped liver. I mean, she was pretty, she was shapely, she had pig-tails, and always romped around in tight shorts. She was amazing. Ginger was fake and tacky and self-absorbed. Though I must say, she looked damn good in that same dress she had on for every episode.
Looking back, I think Ginger was a not-too-kind take off on Marilyn Monroe, what with the breathy voice and the air of seduction. And the ass, of course.
Anyone for Mrs. Howell? ;)
|
04-21-08 06:38pm
|
Reply
225
|
N/A
|
Reply of
WeeWillyWinky's Poll
I think I was drunk when I suggested this poll.
|
04-21-08 12:16am
|
|
