Good to know. I never really have much to say about the pre-ticked cross-sell issue, but I can't deny it is taking advantage of customers, and the whole two-day cancellation issue is just salt in the wound, and another reason I don't trust trials.
The whole porn site industry does leave me jaded sometimes. A lot of things seem weighted against the customer, whether it's heavy-handed anti-piracy measures or trying to trick customers into spending money that they might not have.
I agree, I find the name borderline repulsive! It's like it's come from some random word generator where it pairs a type of animal with a bodily function.
Wow, hope you do manage to do a review. Your experience definitely sounds different to other reviewers, so I'd definitely like to read your expanded thoughts and always think it's important things like this are reflected in the site's overall score.
Wow, this is good to know, and definitely a site to cross off my hit-list too. I hate that feeling of joining up to a site, logging in for the first time and realising you've made a massive mistake.
Good to know - regional pricing is pretty annoying, particularly with examples like this. Presumably you complained in response to their reply? If so, what was their response?
Ah thank you for the clarification - there's so much content and I'd not discovered anything not downloadable, so apologies for the assumption. I'll edit my original comment in case people don't make it to the replies :)
Not sure there's much to say on top of the reviews already here, but here are a few of my thoughts from my membership:
This site is exceptional value for money with the PU discount and has an almost bewildering amount of content. Happy to see most content is downloadable (ie, everything I've encountered so far), and lots of options size-wise (I was concerned every video would be 1gb).
My only complaints are that despite selecting 'female only' I was still seeing shemales crop up in results. Also, too many of the sex scenes involve anal which I'm not a fan of.
Happy that there are lots of models and each seem to have a decent amount of updates, probably averaging around 3-5 for each model (most more, some less). I'm digging Riley Reid. Too many models have horrible, ugly tattoos though.
But yeah, definitely very impressed; by far the best-value site I've ever been a member of, and one I will definitely be rejoining.
I'm sure you can, but you'll probably need to speak to your bank first. If they thought it was suspect and declined the payment, you'll probably not be able to use it for the same transaction again :)
Oh OK. I wonder whether your bank is blocking the payment thinking your card has been compromised? That's happened to me before. I called and explained to the bank that the charge was legitimate. Hopefully you get access soon as it looks like a very good site.
I can see why a website would moderate comments, but I think reactive moderation would be better where the webmaster is notified of new comments published and can remove them if they're objectionable.
The strange thing is that looking at the reviews here, Evil Angel looks like a great website, so I can't believe they get much in the way of negative comments anyway.
One PU member said in their review if you don't write anything generic and flattering they won't approve it, while another has said they have written comments but none have appeared. I suspect they have comment moderation on (sensible...) but don't ever check the comments left (...not so good!)
Just so you know, FameGirls.net has just opened for business. It's only tiny at the moment, but with one video update and two photo updates every week it should grow quickly.
Virginia has now retired, and the original FG becomes an archive :(
Thanks for the very kind words, much appreciated. I've been a fan of FG for a long, long time. Have always loved Sandra, Ella and Virginia, and although it's a shame Sandra and Virginia have both retired, I think Katie is a superb replacement and definitely does the 'Fame Girls spirit' justice.
It's quite pricey now, but I think that's just because of the fees CCBill charges versus other processors.
I'll definitely have a read of your review. Having been a member of both sites, this one compares very favourably apart from obviously not having such a huge archive. The videos are a brilliant addition, though.
Glad to see another PU member who understands that girls don't necessarily have to do HC content to be extremely sexy.
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
Pros:
- Extremely high-quality photography and HD videos
- Already plenty of content despite it being a relatively new site
- Exclusive content and exclusive models
- Regular updates, all dated (3 galleries and at least 1 vid a week)
- All content is downloadable, with ZIPs available for galleries
- Two super, super-sexy models who are both very confident
- No ugly tattoos, fake breasts, lots of piercings etc
- Great quality photography and slickly-edited video
- Lots of variety in terms of shooting locations, gallery themes etc
- Nice, clean (if basic) navigation and previews of future updates
- Well-used comment and gallery/video rating system
- Ability to bookmark your favourite photos/sets
- Both models are outstanding teases without showing too much
- Billing by CCBill with reduced cost rebills
- Simple login with ability to choose own username/password
Cons:
Points marked with * don't bother me personally:
- Search system doesn’t seem to work
- Previews are a bit too vague, particularly for video updates
- Videos are a bit too arty-farty and can be slow-moving
- Daily bonus photos aren’t varied enough
- No interaction with/from the models (eg, blog)
- Currently only two models*
- Some might not be happy Katie/Ella aren’t totally nude*
- Pricey compared to some sites*
Bottom Line:
I nearly didn’t review this as I know a lot of people don’t ‘get’ non-nude sites, but for me a good tease site can definitely hold its own against even a lot of porn sites as for me the thrill of the chase, and the art of tease can be extremely sexy in my opinion.
A quick bit of history first: Famegirls.net replaces Fame-Girls which is now an archive site. Previously there were three models; the famous Sandra, Virginia and Ella. Sandra retired, and recently Virginia also retired. Vlad, Ella’s photographer, decided to start a new site on his own, and introduced Katie, who is new to modelling.
The site is only a few months old, but already it has 36 galleries (5,000 pictures), and 19 videos, and with three galleries (averaging 100-150 photos) and at least one video every week, it’s growing fast.
Both Katie and Ella pose nude, with very little being left to the imagination apart from between the legs. They come very close to showing everything, though, particularly Ella. They are both supreme strip teases, though, and for me, little is sexier than a beautiful girl, slowly, sensually taking her clothes off and having fun as she does.
The galleries are set in number of locations; either in the studio, normally with a plain background and props, or often outside on a deserted road, beautiful meadow or idyllic river. Even on the outside shoots, the image quality and lighting is exceptional.
It’s a lot more sexual than the previous site in terms of poses, the style of photography, the detail and things like the Ella pouring milk over herself in one set, or Katie smothering herself in oil in another – it’s more than just glamour now.
Although sets are generally the same format, each gallery brings something new to the table. There’s always a strong narrative, the costumes vary from bikinis to dresses and everything in between, and both Ella and Katie seem to have a huge variety of poses so it somehow never gets repetitive.
Currently there are 35 galleries and around 4,500 images.
Images are 5760px on their longest side, and have a
translucent simple white logo in the corner. Each gallery is downloadable as a zip file. You can also choose to download the zip file with six different image dimensions from 640px on their longest side all the way up to their original size.
There are also 20 videos available. All are 1280x720, HD, MP4 and are around 5-10 minutes long. They’re beautifully shot, but generally a bit too arty-farty and slow-paced, although there are exceptions (eg, the latest Katie video where she’s in a sauna). At least one video is added every week.
Members can rate and comment on both videos and galleries. These seem like well-used features, and comments aren’t censored or even moderated from what I can tell.
Navigation-wise, you can view Ella’s sets, Katie’s sets, or videos. You can also add sets and photos to your favourites and view just those. There is also a search function, but I’m not sure it actually works – it would be nice if you could search for ‘lingerie’ or ‘bikini’ or some kind of tag, but every search term I tried didn’t return any results. The navigation is fairly simple but definitely fit for purpose.
Another little criticism is the daily bonus photo, which is not included in normal sets, ‘such as pictures from real life, artistic shots, or working moments’ – since I’ve been a member, every day it’s been a picture of Katie from the same shoot, albeit a different picture. It would be nice if these could be more mixed up so one day it might be (for example) Ella at the beach, then Katie on a shoot, then Ella shopping etc... at the moment it’s just like being slowly drip-fed a gallery day-by-day.
At the moment it is only Katie and Ella modelling. I know the webmaster is looking for another model, though. Both Katie and Ella compliment each other with both being extremely svelte, with incredible figures. Ella is blonde, while Katie is raven-haired. Neither have lots of piercings or any tattoos which is good to see. So far, there’s only been one video with the pair in, so fingers crossed for more.
My last criticism, possibly my biggest, is that there’s no interaction from the models in terms of behind the scenes footage or candid photos. I know a lot of people don’t care for this, but on a site like this I think it’s important. I don’t blame them for not getting involved with comments etc, but maybe Vlad (the photographer/webmaster) could consider a blog with more of a behind-the-scenes/off duty look at these gorgeous girls?
This is a great website with great photography and is incredibly sensual. The girls are both gorgeous, Ella is incredibly experienced and Katie is already confident and exciting in front of the camera. At the moment it is on the pricey side, but Vlad has a long history of being extremely reliable with updates, and content is continually being added and I definitely feel like I’ve got value for money compared to a lot of smaller amateur model sites.
Haha brilliant, thank you for such a great overview of this site. I'm still laughing at point 8 where you explain the clear, simple, clever cancellation process.
Sounds like the site has been just chucked together with little or no regard for users. The download limit also sounds particularly annoying, and the quality of content doesn't make it sound like all the other problems are even worth the hassle.
Urgh, hate that feeling of regret when you realise you've made a mistake joining a website. Hope you have time to review the site. Sorry that there's not more content for you to enjoy.
Has it always been like this? I seem to remember Foxes was one of the first sites I encountered when I got into porn many, many, MANY years ago - I don't recall ever joining it though, definitely not if it was a PPV site. Surely people must be insane to spent that much on four sets!
To be fair, the downloading content problem was only one of my complaints. I think my membership will be worthwhile as I like Francine and some of the pictures are great, but it's definitely not the kind of site I'd recommend, let alone join again.
I know, I just thought I'd give my initial thoughts here. I probably would have joined anyway as I really like Francine, but it doesn't stop me being disappointed, plus I like to at least give a site the benefit of the doubt.
Must admit I didn't read your review as it had expired, but I think mine will probably end up being fairly similar. She's a stunner, it's a shame the site is such a disappointment.
Protecting Minors We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
