| All Activity |
A summary of all the feedback from this user. |
| Type |
Site - Score |
Feedback / Review |
Date |
Reply
26
|
Rodney Moore
(0)
|
Reply of
mbaya's Review
Nice review, as a result I signed up. In all honesty I had no idea Rodney Moore had done so much work, and is still doing it. It gives hope to fugly, well-hung men everywhere. LOL.
|
07-12-12 09:38am
|
Reply
27
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
|
Reply of
gaypornolover's Reply
Thanks for that. I agree, it's hard to find male focused BDSM.
|
07-10-12 12:20pm
|
Reply
28
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
|
Reply of
Gazette Risque's Reply
The quality does vary from year to year, but for the most part, even the new stuff was pretty bad.
|
07-10-12 12:19pm
|
Reply
29
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, when you click on those it takes you to a page with the video at the top, and underneath is the photoset. Her latest update didn't have a photoset with it though.
|
06-25-12 03:39pm
|
Review
30
|
Divine Bitches
(0)
94.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
This is part of the Kink.com network of sites, so you can generally expect pretty high quality from them. Their videos range (depending on ho wold they are) in size and quality, but most are HD videos, or near that quality for some of the oldest stuff. Most everything I downloaded was around 300mb or higher mark, 640x360 mp4s. You have a choice between low, med, and high quality video downloads. Streaming is pretty solid here as well. Even when I have several video pages opening up the streams all come in pretty quick (faster than videobox).
Probably the biggest selling point is the star power. People like Bobbi and Aiden Starr are the standard at Kink.com. I am always amazed at the range of talent these women have. Very talented, very attractive stars in all their videos. There really isn't such a thing as a "bad" video at their site.
When I joined they were offering two for one specials and I also got a membership at meninpain.com. |
| Cons: |
The search within the Divine Bitches website works fine, but if you click on a star's name to see everything he/she has done it takes you to a listing of all of their kink.com work. If you click on a video from this page even for something they shot for Divine Bitches, it takes you a pay-per-view page rather than the actual Divine Bitches site. So that's a little annoying. You can still type Aiden Starr into the search in Divine Bitches and pull up her DB videos only and download them.
Kink.com likes to link to their other sites a lot. There no real chance of actually ordering something by accident in the pay-per-view, but they really do like to hype their other sites. It was a little alarming to me the first time I joined a kink.com site and it made me a little paranoid that I might accidentally join another site. This is not the case, I assure you.
They throw a lot at you on the start page. It can be a little overwhelming at times. |
| Bottom Line: |
Kink.com is a group you can usually trust, and also a group that seems to be setting the standards for fetish videos such as these (BDSM, femdom, latex, etc.). I scored Divine Bitches a 94 because a) there is always room for improvement and b) they could do soemthing to make navigation a little easier, mainly indexing the videos by star within the individual site, rather than all of kink.com. If they did that I could easily see myself giving this site a 98 (I can't ever see a site going much higher than that).
As far as recommendation goes, I have been a member in other kink.com sites and I can say they all seem to be pretty good. This site was one I hadn't really looked at before, and frankly I think it is one of their better sites. You get a nice range of femdom BDSM here that covers a variety of subjects (cuckolding, BDSM,ball torture, teasing, masturbation instruction, so on and so forth), whereas some of their other sites are more specific or focused in terms of the niche. I think if you are interested in any of the kink.com sites and don't know which one to try, this might be the safest bet. |
|
06-25-12 11:08am
Replies (3)
|
Review
31
|
Cuckold Me Now
(0)
50.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
I rarely can't find anything positive to say about a site, but this site was really so bad it doesn't have any pros |
| Cons: |
Video quality is not quality at all. The average wmv file size at this site is around 20mb or less with many falling around 6mb. Even a large file I downloaded (83mb) was still in a 720x480 frame, was not HD, and it still looked like the picture was getting stretched when you maximized the video window. The smaller files are clearly designed for an old school site and to be played in a very small window (320x240).
The design of the site really looks outdated. I have talked in the past about sites that hearken back to the nineties. In this case, if I didn't know better, I would say the site was designed somewhere around 1979. It actually reminds me of an old Adam and Eve catalog from the 1970s. Basically a page which a bunch of thumbnails, no titles or descriptions for videos, and you don't even get any clue as to the size and quality until you open the page that has the video on it.
Absolutely no search capability or indexing whatsoever.
I have run out of room to keep complaining |
| Bottom Line: |
This site is probably the biggest ripoff I have ever personally encountered. I went for it basically because they also included a membership to Romanvideoarchives.com. That turned out be an even worse selling point.
Basically I think a lot of these videos actually do date back to the late seventies or eighties. At least they look like they do. The quality is sub-par, even by 1970s standards. There are times when you can tell they just put the camera there, hit record, and that's the only shot your going to see the whole time, even when the actors move out of frame. It really is pretty bad quality just at the most basic, point-and-shoot level.
This site doesn't seem to be updating, though they claim they are. If they are they are only updating with old videos from the archive, because I have yet to see anything that looks like it was even shot within the last five years. Even webcams have better video quality now than what they were using.
The bottom line here is that if you waste a single cent on this site you're getting burned. I am trying to post this ASAP in the hopes I can prevent some of you from making the same mistake I did. If you are looking for cuckold videos there are far better sites like Cuckoldcream that will cost you about the same amount. They have clearly designed this site for low bandwith users, and file size (and quality) designed for streaming or downloading through a 56k modem (remember those days). I guess if you're feeling nostalgic for a five or ten min video that has been broken down into 2min videos meant to be played in about a four inch window, then this is the site for you. Otherwise, I would avoid this site like the plague.
P.S. Don't let the "tour" or "start page" windows fool you. The page shown above (or for this site here) is not the actual "members" page. Once you click "members" it takes you to the page from the 1970s. |
|
06-25-12 10:33am
Replies (4)
|
Reply
32
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
My dlm only seems to have a problem on the home/update pages of ATK sites, where they post the most recent vids and pics. If I go to the model's individual page/gallery with all of her stuff, my dlm doesn't seem to have the problem. Since the home/update page changes everyday I can see where this may be a problem for dlms. Of course all of the bigger money sites are starting to rotate the addresses of their videos to prevent site raping. Another annoying thing I have been seeing is where you cannot continue browsing once you start downloading. Ferro Network does this.
|
06-21-12 11:47pm
|
Reply
33
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
|
Reply of
Capn's Reply
Yes, each video also comes with a photo gallery.
|
06-21-12 11:41pm
|
Reply
34
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Reply
I personally only run into this problem with the new videos off the front pages in ATK Hairy. That makes sense because each video is listed under a new day each time. From the model's actual gallery page, I don't have as much problem. Maybe it has something to do with the actual age of the model's page itself???
|
06-21-12 11:30am
|
Reply
35
|
ATK Galleria
(0)
|
Reply of
Claypaws's Review
Great review. I am a huge fan of anything ATK does. I also like the fact that they stole the Taekwondo organization's name. LOL. You are absolutely right about repeat modeling. Sativa Verde just did a live cam show for ATK Hairy and was talkingabout that very thing. She started as model working for anyone, fell in love with working for ATK, now she is shooting models herself for them. I also like the fact that girls that appear in Galleria may wind up in Hairy at some point, and vice versa.
Now they are offering a big deal where you can get access to all their sites for like a hundred a month. It's a steep price, but for me, it has always been a tough choice between all their sites.
|
06-21-12 11:27am
|
Reply
36
|
Fetish Network
(0)
|
Reply of
Ergo Proxy's Reply
I gave the score of 79 for that exact reason. I can appreciate that my cons may very well be your pros. I tried to keep my score at least within the range and focus of other reviewers. Personally, it might have been closer to a 69 for me, but like I said, how do you applaud a site for doing the minimum to be a good site. It functions, it's clunky, but it functions. LOL. At the same time, I reserve bad ratings for sites that truly screw us over. I don't think everyone will be screwed over by these guys, but I don't think everyone is going to be happy with their purchase either. Thanks for pointing this out though. At least some people are paying attention ;)
|
06-21-12 11:20am
|
Review
37
|
Ryanne Redd
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Let me preface this all by saying I am an absolute fan of RyAnne Redd. Arguably, why else would you join her site. So, let me give you the break down.
RyAnne is a super-hot redhead with a full bush of red pubes. She really is very unique in terms of her appearance and her particular niche. For those of you unfamiliar with her, she is a popular, and somewhat of a rare commodity, in the "hairy/hirsute" niche. She also has about the most perfect pair of breasts I have ever seen. So much so I called them "Breasts" and not "titties" or "ta-tas" like I normally would.
She is trying to fill a variety of fetishes. She does some jerkoff instruction, some cuckolding, and various other stuff. In a way it is similar to what some women like Mistress T are doing.
Video wuality is pretty good. You get a choice between HD flv, mp4, and "Ipod." |
| Cons: |
Strictly solo material so far. I have seen her in at least one POV blowjob video in the past, but there is nothing but solo material on the site and it would be nice to see her actually fuck someone else or whatever. She's hot, but there are only so many solo videos you can get away with before it starts to just me "lingerie of the week."
Low amount of video content. I'm not going to give you an actual count because this is a new site and it's not fair to her to condemn the site for not having a ton of material yet. That being said, though, it is a shame she couldn't at least get some of her previous videos on her new site. |
| Bottom Line: |
At the moment I have to say the jury is still out on this one. I gave the score of 85 simply because there are thing that make me think this site may be a lot bigger soon. They have links/buttons already in place to scroll through pages of videos and seem to be designing the site basically as you would expect any other soloists site to be. Can it be improved, sure. Better search capability, greater diversity in material, etc. The usual stuff.
The selling point here is that it is RyAnne Redd, and if you are a fan, you are probably an obsessed fan. It's worth a month's subscription just to snag those few extra videos of her.
I have an issue in that I am a huge fan, so I want to just shower her with accolades, but I also think that as a customer other people might want to know what they are paying for. If people don't subscribe, then the site will most likely fail. But telling people to subscribe to a site that has very little to offer right out of the gate isn't really fair to them. If you're a fan, a month's membership is a good way to show your appreciation and encourage her to do more, and I'll leave it at that. |
|
06-21-12 11:11am
Replies (5)
|
Review
38
|
Fetish Network
(0)
79.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
It's hard to come up with pros for this site. Is it a "pro" if they are simply performing the most basic duties of a website?
The site is stable. I have never had much trouble logging in or connecting to pages.
I have never found a dead link.
I find their font sizes to be legible without my glasses.
The appearance and layout is functional.
Yes, this is sarcasm, but I am really having a hard time finding a lot to put in this category for them. Here's some stuff about their videos.
You get a choice between "High" and "Low" quality mp4s, or you can stream. The high res stuff isn't bad. Some of it is even HD, but not much.
They do have a pretty impressive selection of categories: BDSM, spanking, femdom, smothering, fisting, smoking, nylon/lingerie, jerkoff instruction, lesbian, and mixed kink (see cons about this). |
| Cons: |
The one thing that annoys me the most is that there is no cross-listing or networking taking place here, and it is literally called the "Fetish Network." You have no real search capability, and if you do happen to find someone you think was really hot in something, there is no way to either find out who they are, or to easily find other videos with them on the site. In fact, the entire interface is definitely a 1990s design. Basically each "Site" under their network opens into a index of thumbnails for videos. The titles are fairly descriptive, but there is no way of knowing what will actually take place in the video. Arguably, this can make the videos more fun or exciting, but in dealing with subject matters such as this (BDSM generally) you kind of want to know what you're in for.
Aside from that, there is a distinct lack of variety. For as many videos as they have, they all just seem to be the same dozen or so, fat, middle-aged men, or whoever, doing the same stuff to girls. |
| Bottom Line: |
This is a site that could be awesome for you if you are really into seeing all sorts of women get spanked, caned, whipped, or titty twisted. That seems to be about 75% of the material. The models are a mixed bag of nuts, some are pretty and young, others are amateurish and/or fugly. The girls doing the jerkoff instruction are all pretty hot, and jerkoff instruction isn't exactly a really prevalent niche, so I thought it was going to be awesome having so many of these videos. Instead, they are all pretty lame, a few of the girls actually know who to do it, but most just kind of model their pantyhose and don't talk that much. So, you can see where something like this may be very tricky. Looking at clips or a thumbnail of videos like these make it seem like they are a lot higher quality than what you get with the entire product. It's kind of like getting duped into paying $15.00 to see Prometheus.
This site doesn't offer much to anyone who isn't really, really, really into spanking, caning and whipping. Beyond that subject matter, it is very shallow. There is a lot of bondage, but you don't get to see a lot of the actual binding. The girl or guy just appears bound. The machine sex is pretty cheap stuff, and they are still really into putting dildos on the end of pool cues. Even when there are hot models involved, the production values are still very low rent.
Not all of the material is original, and stuff like the Rick Savage videos may have been around for awhile already. It is possible you have seen some of this stuff elsewhere. It is also possible that it is just so plain and generic that you think you've seen it elsewhere. They also tend to include duplicates of videos in the various sites.
I don't think a site should get any accolades for basically doing the bare minimum. Clearly someone updates the site, but no one seems to even try get organized. The videos are not enough to carry this site alone. They aren't horrible, but they aren't great either. Some customer consideration could go a long way into at least making the customer not feel as if they have just been scammed. But, unfortunately, once you shell out the money, you are immediately introduced to a site layout that screams "We got your money, what do we care?" |
|
06-21-12 10:45am
Replies (2)
|
Reply
39
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
Reply of
otoh's Reply
Their "nylon sites" are pretty interesting. Frankly, those were usually some of the better videos. Basically there was a site for just solo models in lingerie with a focus on pantyhose, then that with two girls, which usually ended up with some fairly hardcore strapon sex or other toys (it's not just muff diving), then there was one for boy/girl action, and then it sort of splits off into other categories. There is a site with trannys in pantyhose, a gay site with men in pantyhose, and a femdom site with the men in the pantyhose get pounded by chicks with strapons. So, I can't say for sure this is what you would be looking for, but as you can see, it is very much the "buckshot approach" to the subject of nylons. they really do seem to be covering just about every human configuration, save for maybe the nylon orgy.
|
06-21-12 10:09am
|
Reply
40
|
Young Legal Porn
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Comment
I could see that. Their "tour" still has a lot of amateurish-looking material. Of course, some people may prefer that anyway. You're right, though, the models are all super, super hot.
|
06-11-12 11:28pm
|
Reply
41
|
Tainster
(0)
|
Reply of
wildbillnj1975's Comment
Yes, this was major issue with this site. I wasn't a huge fan of the update methods either. basically you got a different angle of some mad sex party every day. These are some of the annoying aspects of Tainster.
|
06-11-12 11:26pm
|
Reply
42
|
Divine Breasts
(0)
|
Reply of
BubbaGump's Review
Download limits are always suspicious to me. On the one hand I can see where a solo artist may do this just to try to keep people around an extra month. I mean, c'mon, a girl's gotta make a living and you kind of expect it from the sex trade industry. But then there's those sites that just look low-rent and shady, and I think you have found a great example of this.
|
06-11-12 11:22pm
|
Reply
43
|
18 Only Girls
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
A most excellent review. Very thorough. I have thought about joining this site before, now I may go ahead and do it. Thanks.
|
06-11-12 11:16pm
|
Reply
44
|
N/A
|
Reply of
Khan's Poll
I love perving on the streets. LOL. This is the time of year when you can walk around with dark sunglasses on behind chicks in bikinis.
|
06-11-12 08:18am
|
Reply
45
|
Chaturbate
(0)
|
Reply of
pat362's Reply
Yeah, I know, it gets creepy sometimes.
|
06-11-12 12:07am
|
Reply
46
|
My Teen Oasis
(0)
|
Reply of
lk2fireone's Review
Yeah, I have gotten access to most of those sites through other sites like this, I think through DevilsFilms. Mainly the lack of search capability keeps it from working well. At any rate, I totally agree with your scoring.
|
06-10-12 02:44am
|
Review
47
|
Chaturbate
(0)
80.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for over 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
A few months since the last review and I would say there are actually a surprising number of models/shows here.
Some of the girls are actually extremely hot. Much more so than you expect for webcam stuff like this anyway.
You can actually see quite a bit without having to private. Basically stripping is free, anything beyond that is going to cost you.
The tipping/credits are noway near as expensive as other places.
You can broadcast yourself, private chat, etc. I could see where this might potentially grow as a sort of naked social network. |
| Cons: |
I have seen at least one person on there you will never convince me was over the age of fifteen. I'm not saying this so all you kiddie porn pervs can check it out. I'm saying this because this is one of those questionable elements on the internet where there may be too many people to ever police or monitor. I don't blame Chaturbate either, somebody gets an account and then someone else is doing the shows, it can be a little tricky to catch on. At any rate, just be warned that from time to time you may see someone on there who doesn't look legal. Some of these people are in foreign countries with different laws. Either way, I find many of the people on here to be of questionable standing. I personally would hate to think I am contributing to some sort of unregulated or illegal sex trade. |
| Bottom Line: |
I think this site has a lot of potential, but it's sort of the old Spiderman cliche about responsibility. Personally, I would like to see them make a greater effort to assure me, as someone who might actually spend money, that I am not contributing to something most of us would probably find immoral.
At the same time, you should all be adults and you should be able to navigate through the various shows available to see what you think is best. I certainly don't want to dissuade anyone from visiting or participating. |
|
06-10-12 02:36am
Replies (3)
|
Comment
48
|
Ferro Network
(0)
|
|
06-10-12 02:22am
Replies (3)
|
Review
49
|
Wank Pass
(0)
65.0
|
| Status: |
Current Member for less than 1 month (at the time of review).
|
| Pros: |
Fairly diverse collection of sites (see cons about this) with a few niches you don't usually get on other mass sites such as Bisex, Gay, various fetishes. |
| Cons: |
No search capability.
Video quality sucks. Hardly any HD material.
Each site in their collection is small, and even the few that have more than four pages of material are recycling some pretty common stuff.
Downloading is a pain because some of the sites are so old they still have their videos divided up into as many as twenty two 2-5mb files.
Download managers will work, but as soon as you start downloading files you can no longer continue browsing.
The interface is the worst part. You're basically looking at 1990s internet at this site. Some random screen caps and a very rough description is all you get for each file. When I say rough descriptions I'm talking about a screen cap of what might be an ass and something like "Two girls fuck a guy." No names, sometimes even no titles of the videos that I know came from specific movies. It's pretty awful. |
| Bottom Line: |
There is little good to say about this site, and frankly there's no improving it. The content may be original in some cases, but it's all pretty dated. This is basically a bargain basement porn site that should have died out with Y2K. |
|
06-10-12 02:07am
Replies (0)
|
Review
50
|
Next Door Nikki
(0)
85.0
|
| Status: |
Was a member approx. 3 months prior to this review.
|
| Pros: |
It's NDN, and at one point she was, and I would argue still is, one of the hottest women on the internet.
Tons of access to Nikki's life. Yes, I know it sounds cheesy, but just wait till you get to jack off to somebody whose blogs you have been reading for over a month.
Occasionally Nikki will go further than her usual softcore stff. It won't be triple "X" (XXX), but it does get into the single "X" region.
It's NDN. Have I mentioned this before?
Limited nudity. I personally find it incredibly sexy when I'm dying to see more.... and I don't.She's the kind of girl that makes you want to go and just pound one out fully clothed, let alone after she starts teasing.
Probably one of the most perfect bodies in creation.
You get to see some of her friends too, and they get a little more risque than Nikki. So you will get some full on masturbation, fully nude stripping on the site.
Live shows are great, and this is often where you get to see the most of Nikki. Lotsa nipple slips! |
| Cons: |
Very little beyond R-rated softcore stuff. If you want more than stripping, and never seeing her nipples, then move on.
A lot of the same stuff, just different costumes.
Her friends stuff is basically trying to get you to join their sites.
Very expensive.
Limited video qualities.
Some videos are just flat out pointless.
Download limits. They don't have enough videos to let people download them more than 5gb a day, and they're pretty big videos. |
| Bottom Line: |
It's Next Door Nikki for crying out loud. Either you have obsessed and poured over the internet looking for that one video where she actually fucks someone ore gets totally naked, or you could care less and have no idea who I am talking about.
NDN is an internet sensation primarily because she has never gone fully porn with her career. She is basically a stripper, and one who works in an area where pasties are required. Or, maybe she just likes keeping every guy hoping and dreaming. Either way, I find it very erotic and very exciting. She always brings you right to the edge of being pornographic, but then cuts you off. It can be kind of torturous, very teasing, but for some of us, that is often more stimulating than, as someone else put it here, the "gynecological closeups" of full frontals.
The problems with the site will be overlooked by most fans, because most people joining are niche fans of a specific star who is, in this case, known for being a bit of a cock-tease.
The main drawback is the price versus the amount of content. This is primarily the Phil-Flash materials, and not the entire cadre of NDN's work (there was an old site that is no longer in operation). With the download limit in place, you can still manage to download most of this site in a month.
Why an 85? Because it's NDN. She's will always be above an 80 in my book. She could get into the 90 region if she would figure out a way to feature more people who are willing to go at least XX, and at some point she is either going to have to fuck somebody on screen, or risk losing her career to age. |
|
05-20-12 01:57pm
Replies (1)
|
|
